Analysis of impact damage of Fritillaria ussuriensis Maxim using a free drop experimental study

References

• Ding, C.; Guo, S.; Sun, H.; Ma, W.; Zhou, B.; Wang, Z. Research Progress of Medicinal Plant Fritillaria ussuriensis Maxim. Guiding J. Traditional Chinese Med. Pharm. 2018, 24, 73–75. DOI: 10.13862/j.cnki.cn43-1446/r.2018.03.024.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H.; Jiang, Y.; Li, P. Chemistry, Bioactivity and Geographical Diversity of Steroidal Alkaloids from the Liliaceae Family. Nat Prod. Rep. 2006, 23, 735–736. DOI: 10.1039/B609306J.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, M.; Yang, M.; Peng, L.; Zhang, M.; Feng, L. Rapid Discrimination of Fritillary Herbs by a Photochemical Colorimetric Sensor Array. Chinese J. Analytical Chem. 2021, 49, 424–426. DOI: 10.19756/j.issn.0253-3820.201662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.; Mushtaq, S. A. Implications of the Digital Economy on Merger Control in Pakistan and China: Policy Implications for Pakistan. J. Politics Law. 2021, 15(1), 40. DOI: 10.5539/jpl.v15n1p40.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, J.; Zhao, W.; Tian, S.; Zhang, Q.; Song, J.; Li, Y.; Han, X. Simulation Test of Soil Covered Parts of Fritillaria ussuriensis Maxim Based on EDEM. J. Agric. Mechanization Res. 2023, 45(10), 24–31. DOI: 10.13427/j.cnki.njyi.2023.10.026.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, L.; Man, D.; Miao, Z.; Li, S.; Wu, H. Design and Finite Element Analysis of 4OPB-1201Fritillaria ussuriensis Maxim Harvester Excavation Device. For. Machinery Woodworking Eouipment. 2020, 48(11), 18–23. DOI: 10.13279/j.cnki.fmwe.2020.0127.
   Google Scholar
• Song, J.; Qiu, S.; Wang, X. Design and Test on 4B-1200 Type Bulbus Fritillariae Ussuriensis Medicinal Material Harvester. Trans. CSAE. 2015, 31(8), 34–41. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.08.006.
   Google Scholar
• Song, J.; Liu, L.; Wang, M.; Zhang, J. Improved Design and Test of 4B-1200 Type Bulbus Fritillariae Ussuriensis Medicinal Materials Harvester. Trans. CSAE. 2017, 33(1), 45–51. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.01.006.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, G.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, X.; Chen, G.; Jin, B. Effect of Drum Structure on Particle Mixing Behavior Based on DEM Method. Particuol. 2023, 74, 74–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2022.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S.; Wu, L.; Wei, X.; Man, D.; Miao, Z. Experimental Study and Finite Element Analysis on Bulb Collision Damage of Fritillaria ussuriensis Maxim. J. Agric. Mechanization Res. 2021, 10(1), 126–130. DOI: 10.13427/j.cnki.njyi.2021.10.024.
   Google Scholar
• Vursavus, K.; Ozguven, F. Determining the Effects of Vibration Parameters and Packaging Method on Mechanical Damage in Golden Delicious Apples. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2004, 28, 311–320.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, J.; Liu, J.; Chen, Q.; Saritporn, V. Detecting Subtle Bruises on Fruits with Hyperspectral Imaging. Trans. CSAM. 2008, 39, 106–109.
   Google Scholar
• Baranowski, P.; Mazurek, W.; Witkowska-Walczak, B.; Sławiński, C. Detection of Early Apple Bruises Using Pulsed-Phase Thermography. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2009, 53(3), 91–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babarinsa, F.; Ige, M. Strength Parameters of Packaged Roma Tomatoes at Break Point Under Compressive Loading. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2012, 3, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi, E.; Ghassemzadeh, H. R.; Sadeghi, M.; Moghaddam, M.; Neshat, S. Z. The Effect of Impact and Fruit Properties on the Bruising of Peach. J. Food Eng. 2010, 97(1), 110–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.09.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maness, N. O.; Brusewitz, G. H.; McCullum, T. G. Impact Bruise Resistance Comparison Among Peach Cultivars. Hort. Sci. 1992, 27(9), 1008–1011. DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.27.9.1008.
   Google Scholar
• González-Merino, R.; Hidalgo-Fernández, R. E.; Rodero, J.; Sola-Guirado, R. R.; Sánchez-López, E. Postharvest Geometric Characterization of Table Olive Bruising from 3D Digitalization. Agron. 2022, 12, 27–32. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12112732.
   Google Scholar
• Sola-Guirado, R. R.; Bayano-Tejero, S.; Aragon-Rodriguez, F.; Pena, A.; Blanco-Roldan, G. Bruising Pattern of Table Olives (‘Manzanilla’ and ‘Hojiblanca’ Cultivars) Caused by Hand-Held Machine Harvesting Methods. Biosyst. Eng. 2022, 215, 188–202. DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2022.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuwana, Y.; Duprat, F. Prediction of Apple Bruising Based on the Instantaneous Impact Shear Stress and Energy Absorbed. Int. Agrophys. 1998, 12, 133–140.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zeebroeck, M.; Van Linden, V.; Darius, P.; De Ketelaere, B.; Ramon, H.; Tijskens, E. The Effect of Fruit Properties on the Bruise Susceptibility of Tomatoes. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2007, 45(2), 168–175. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.12.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi, E. Bruise Susceptibilities of Kiwifruit as Affected by Impact and Fruit Properties. Res. Agric. Eng. 2012, 58(3), 107–113. DOI: 10.17221/57/2011-RAE.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, H.; Du, W.; Yang, J.; Wang, W.; Wu, Z.; Yang, Z. Bruise Measurement of Fresh Market Apples Caused by Repeated Impacts Using a Pendulum Method. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2022, 195, 112–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2022.112143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahbazi, F. Impact Damage to Chickpea Seeds as Affected by Moisture Content and Impact Velocity. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2011, 27, 771–775. DOI: 10.13031/2013.39557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kursat Celik, H. Determination of Bruise Susceptibility of Pears (Ankara Variety) to Impact Load by Means of FEM-Based Explicit Dynamics Simulation. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2017, 128, 83–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Jiménez, F.; Castro-García, S.; Blanco-Roldán, G. L.; Ferguson, L.; Rosa, U. A.; Gil-Ribes, J. A. Table Olive Cultivar Susceptibility to Impact Bruising. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2013, 86, 100–106. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.06.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, B.; Zhang, F.; Liu, Y.; Yin, H.; Zou, J.; Ou-Yang, A. Quantitative Study on Impact Damage of Yellow Peach Based on Hyperspectral Image Information Combined with Spectral Information. J. Mol. Struct. 2023, 1272, 34176. DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.134176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiwong, S.; Saengrayap, R.; Rattanakaran, J.; Chaithanarueang, A.; Arwatchananukul, S.; Aunsri, N.; Tontiwattanakul, K.; Jitkokkruad, K.; Kitazawa, H.; Trongsatitkul, T. Natural Rubber Latex Cushioning Packaging to Reduce Vibration Damage in Guava During Simulated Transportation. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2023, 199, 112273. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2023.112273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Fu, H.; Yang, Z. Improved Prediction of Litchi Impact Characteristics with an Energy Dissipation Model. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2021, 176, 111508. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2021.111508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vipasdamrongkul, P.; Chocharat, S.; Srimunwing, P.; Arwatchananukul, S.; Chaiwong, S.; Saengrayap, R.; Aunsri, N. Guava Bruise Area Calculation Using Color and Grayscale Image Segmentation. InCit. 2022, 29–34. DOI: 10.1109/InCIT56086.2022.10067362.
   Google Scholar
• Htike, T.; Saengrayap, R.; Kitazawa, H.; Chaiwong, S. Fractal Image Analysis and Bruise Damage Evaluation of Impact Damage in Guava. Information Process. Agric. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.inpa.2023.02.004.
   Google Scholar
• Satitmunnaithum, J.; Kitazawa, H.; Arofatullah, N. A.; Widiastuti, A.; Kharisma, A. D.; Yamane, K.; Tanabata, S.; Sato, T. Microbial Population Size and Strawberry Fruit Firmness After Drop Shock-Induced Mechanical Damage. Postharvest. Biol. Technol. 2022, 192, 112008. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2022.112008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, S.; Deng, W.; Liu, F. Impact Velocity and Bruising Analysis of Potato Tubers Under Pendulum Impact Test. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agr. Amb. 2023, 27(7). DOI: 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v27n7p559-566.
   Google Scholar
• Shao, Z.; Wang, H.; Dong, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Li, J.; Zhao, L. Early Bruises Detection Method of Apple Surface Based on Near Infrared Camera Imaging Technology and Image Threshold Segmentation Method. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2021, 52(S1), 134–139. DOI: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2021.S0.017.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, F.; Ishikawa, Y.; Kitazawa, H.; Satake, T. Impact Damage to Apple Fruits in Commercial Corrugated Fiberboard Box Packaging Evaluated by the Pressure-Sensitive Film Technique. J. Food Agric Environ. 2010, 8, 218–222.
   Google Scholar
• Saracoglu, T.; Ucer, N.; Ozarslan, C. Engineering Properties and Susceptibility to Bruising Damage of Table Olive Fruit. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2011, 13, 801–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W.; Zhang, S.; Fu, H.; Lua, H.; Yang, Z. Evaluation of Litchi Impact Damage Degree and Damage Susceptibility. Comput. Electron. Agr. 2020, 173, 405–409. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caserta, A. J.; Navarro, H. A.; Cabezas-G´omez, L. Damping Coefficient and Contact Duration Relations for Continuous Nonlinear Spring-Dashpot Contact Model in DEM. Powder Technol. 2016, 13, 566–590. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.07.032.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, W.; Wang, C.; Xie, S. Test Research on the Impact Peak Force and Damage Depth of Potato. INMATEH-Agric. Eng. 2020, 61(2), 105–114. DOI: 10.35633/inmateh-61-12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, S.; Wang, C.; Deng, W. Model for the Prediction of Potato Impact Damage Depth. Int. J. Food. Prop. 2018, 21(1), 2517–2526. DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2018.1534124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F.; Wei, X.; Han, Y.; Zhao, M. Impact Mechanical Characteristics and Damage Analysis of Watermelon. J. Sichuan Agric. Univ. 2016, 34, 185–189. DOI: 10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2016.02.010.
   Google Scholar
• Kursat Celik, H.; Hayri Ustun, H.; Erkan, M.; Rennie, A. E. W.; Akinci, I. Effects of Bruising of ‘Pink Lady’ Apple Under Impact Loading in Drop Test on Firmness, Colour and Gas Exchange of Fruit During Long Term Storage. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2021, 179, 111561. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2021.111561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komarnicki, P.; Stopa, R.; Szyjewicz, D.; Kuta, Ł.; Klimza, T. Influence of Contact Surface Type on the Mechanical Damages of Apples Under Impact Loads. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2017, 10, 1479–1494. DOI: 10.1007/s11947-017-1918-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J.; He, L.; Karkee, M.; Zhang, Q. Effect of Catching Surface and Tilt Angle on Bruise Damage of Sweet Cherry Due to Mechanical Impact. Comput. Electron. Agr. 2016, 121, 282–289. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2016.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öztekn, Y. B.; Güngör, B. Determining Impact Bruising Thresholds of Peaches Using Electronic Fruit. Sci. Hortic-Amsterdam. 2019, 262(3), 109046. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.109046.
   Google Scholar
• Stopa, R.; Szyjewicz, D.; Komarnicki, P.; Kuta, Ł. Determining the Resistance to Mechanical Damage of Apples Under Impact Loads. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2018, 146, 79–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, P.; Ji, H.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Ren, C. Quantitative Evaluation of Impact Damage to Apples Using NIR Hyperspectral Imaging. Int. J. Food. Prop. 2021, 24(1), 457–470. DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2021.1900240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W.; Lu, H.; Zhang, S.; Yang, Z. Damage Caused by Multiple Impacts of Litchi Fruits During Vibration Harvesting. Comput. Electron. Agr. 2019, 162, 732–738. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.04.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, L.; Wang, Z. Dropping Impact Mechanical Characteristics of Apple. Trans. CSAE. 2007, 23(2), 254–257.
   Google Scholar