Comparative study of egg quality parameters of different breeds of peacock

References

• Kabir, A.; Hawkeswood, T. J. Captive Breeding and Rehabilitation of Peafowls (Aves: Phasianidae) in Bangladesh. Calodema. 2021, 890, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Praveen, J.; Jayapal, R.; Pittie, A. Updates to the Checklists of Birds of India, and the South Asian Region—2019. Indian Birds. 2019, 15(1), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, S. A.; Didier, A.; Khan, M. A. Avifauna on the Ceramics of Ketch-Makran, Balochistan, Pakistan. Pakistan Heritage. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Yenilmez, F. Peafowl Production. Turk. J. Agric. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 8(4), 945–948. DOI: 10.24925/turjaf.v8i4.945-948.3198.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. http://www.redlist.org. ( 2008, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Rajashekara, S.; Ananda, N.; Amulya, S.; Bhagyashree, M.; Khanam, N.; Prathibha, Y.; Venkatesha, M. G. Conservation Status of the Indian Peafowl Pavo cristatus (Aves: Galliformes: Phasianidae) in Bangalore University Campus, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. Indian For. 2019, 145(10), 992–997.
   Google Scholar
• Anwar, M.; Mahmood, A.; Rais, M.; Hussain, I.; Ashraf, N.; Khalil, S. Population Density and Habitat Preference of Indian Peafowl (Pavo cristatus) in Deva Vatala National Park, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. Pakistan J. Zool. 2015, 47(5).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuhara, R.; Agarie, J.; Furugen, M.; Seki, H. Nesting Habitats of Free-Ranging Indian Peafowl, Pavo cristatus, Revealed by Sniffer Dogs in Okinawa, Japan. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2022, 249, 105605. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Obaidi, F. A.; Al-Shadeedi, S. M. Effect of Age and Seasons on Egg Production and Egg Morphology of Peafowl Reared Outdoor in Baghdad. Biochem. Cell. Arch. 2020, 20(1), 791–795.
   Google Scholar
• Anitha, S.; Lalitha, K.; Chandrasekaran, V. Peacock Repellant Technique for Crop Protection in the Agricultural Land. Mach. Intell. Smart Sys. Springer, Singapore. 2021, 691–697.
   Google Scholar
• Fu-Min, Y.; Xiao-Xia, X.; Min, Y.; Kai-Xia, Q.; Xue-Yan, W. Comparison of Quality and Nutritional Components of Eggs from Blue Peafowl and Hen. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2014 Apr 25; 2 4, 141–147. DOI:10.12691/jfnr-2-4-2.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. L.; Zheng, J. X.; Ning, Z. H.; Qu, L. J.; Xu, G. Y.; Yang, N. Laying Performance and Egg Quality of Blue-Shelled Layers as Affected by Different Housing Systems. Poultr. Sci. 2009, 88(7), 1485–1492. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2008-00417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, H.; Takaya, M.; Nishimura, K.; Goto, T. Breed and Feed Affect Amino Acid Contents of Egg Yolk and Eggshell Color in Chickens. Poultr. Sci. 2020, 99(1), 172–178. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pez557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontecka, H.; Woznicka, J.; Witiewicz, K.; Nowaczewsi, S. Laying, Egg and Hatchability Characteristics in Ostrich (Struthio camelus) at Different Age. Folia Biologica. 2011, 59(3–4), 163–167. DOI: 10.3409/fb59_3-4.163-167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzniacka, J.; Bernacki, Z.; Adamski, M. Effect of the Date of Egg-Laying on the Biological Value of Eggs and Reproductive Traits in Pheasants (Phasianus colchicus L.). Folia Biologica. 2005, 53(4), 73–78. DOI: 10.3409/173491605775789281.
   Google Scholar
• Castilla, A. M.; Herrel, A.; Van Dongen, S.; Furio, N.; Negro, J. J. Determinants of Egg Shell Strength in Endangered Raptors. J. Exp. Zool. A: Ecol. Integr. Physiol. 2009, 311(4), 303–311. DOI: 10.1002/jez.532.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, V.; Malhi, M.; Soomro, S. A.; Qureshi, T. A.; Sanjrani, M. N.; Malhi, K. D. Gender Differences in Some Haematological and Blood Biochemical Parameters in Wild Indian Peafowl (Pavo cristatus) of Thar Desert, Pakistan. Pakistan J. Zool. 2017, 49(4), 1477–1481. DOI: 10.17582/journal.pjz/2017.49.4.1477.1481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batkowska, J.; Brodacki, A.; Knaga, S. Quality of Laying Hen Eggs During Storage Depending on Egg Weight and Type of Cage System (Conventional vs. Furnished Cages). Ann. Anim. Sci. 2014, 14(3), 707–719. DOI: 10.2478/aoas-2014-0021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samour, J.; Naldo, J.; Rahman, H.; Sakkir, M. Hematologic and Plasma Biochemical Reference Values in Indian Peafowl (Pavo cristatus). J. Avian Med. Surg. 2010, 24(2), 99–106. DOI: 10.1647/2008-019.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, M. S.; Howlider, M. A. R.; Kabir, F.; Alam, J. Comparative Assessment of Fertility and Hatchability of Barred Plymouth Rock, White Leghorn, Rhode Island Red and White Rock Hens. Int. J. Poult Sci. 2002, 1(4), 85–90. DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2002.85.90.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, H.; Arshad, A.; Ali, I.; Arshad, M.; Ahmed, M. S.; Alam, M.; Swati, Z. A. Evaluation of Genetic Diversity in Peafowl Color Mutants. Sci. Int. 2013, 25(1).
   Google Scholar
• Ashraf, S.; Javid, A.; Ashraf, M.; Akram, M.; Malik, S.; Altaf, M. Influence of Egg Weight on Egg Quality Parameters and Growth Traits in Ring Necked Pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) in Captivity. J. Anim Plant Sci. 2016, 26(2), 331–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmar, S. N. S.; Thaur, M. S.; Tomar, S. S.; Pillai, P. V. A. Evaluation of Egg Quality Traits in Indigenous Kadaknath Breed of Poultry. Livestock Res. Rural Dev. 2006, 18(9).
   Google Scholar
• Monira, K. N.; Salahuddin, M.; Miah, G. Effect of Breed and Holding Period on Egg Quality Characteristics of Chicken. Int. J. Poultry Sci. 2003, 2(4), 261–263. DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2003.261.263.
   Google Scholar
• Menezes, P. C.; Cavalcanti, V. F. T.; Lima, E. R.; Revencio Neto, J. Aspectos produtivos e econômicos de poedeiras comerciais submetidas a diferentes densidades de alojamento. Rev. Bras. de Zootec. 2009, 38(11), 2224–2229. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-35982009001100023.
   Google Scholar
• Dudusola, I. O. Comparative Evaluation of Internal and External Qualities of Eggs from Quail and Guinea Fowl. Int. Res. J. Plant Sci. 2010, 1(5), 112–115.
   Google Scholar
• Champati, A.; Samal, L.; Behura, N. C.; Pati, P. K.; Muduli, S.; Popalghat, H. K. Laying Performance and Egg Quality Traits of Hansli X CSML Birds Under Different Rearing Systems. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 2020, 8(4), 37–39.
   Google Scholar
• Kirikci, K.; Gunlu, A.; Cetin, O.; Garip, M. Effect of Hen Weight on Egg Production and Some Egg Quality Characteristics in the Partridge (Alectoris graeca). Poult. Sci. 2007, 86(7), 1380–1383. DOI: 10.1093/ps/86.7.1380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeogun, I. O.; Amole, F. O. Some Quality Parameters of Exotic Chicken Eggs Under Different Storage Conditions. Bull. Anim. Health Prod. Afr. 2004, 52, 43–47.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva Pires, P. G.; Bavaresco, C.; Prato, B. S.; Wirth, M. L.; de Oliveira Moraes, P. The Relationship Between Egg Quality and Hen Housing Systems-A Systematic Review. Livestock Sci. 2021, 250, 104597. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malfatti, L. H.; Zampar, A.; Galvão, A. C.; da Silva Robazza, W.; Boiago, M. M. Evaluating and Predicting Egg Quality Indicators Through Principal Component Analysis and Artificial Neural Networks. LWT. 2021, 148, 111720. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, X.; Dong, J.; Peng, Y.; Tang, X. Comparative Study of Albumen pH and Whole Egg pH for the Evaluation of Egg Freshness. Spectrosc. Lett. 2017, 50(9), 463–469. DOI: 10.1080/00387010.2017.1360357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alig, B. N.; Malheiros, R. D.; Anderson, K. E. Evaluation of Physical Egg Quality Parameters of Commercial Brown Laying Hens Housed in Five Production Systems. Animals. 2023, 13(4), 716. DOI: 10.3390/ani13040716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoddard, M. C.; Yong, E. H.; Akkaynak, D.; Sheard, C.; Tobias, J. A.; Mahadevan, L. Avian Egg Shape: Form, Function, and Evolution. Science. 2017, 356(6344), 1249–1254. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaj1945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbeger, J.; Pytlak, K.; Łukaszewicz, E.; Kowalczyk, A. Variation in Bird Eggs—Does Female Factor, Season, and Laying Order Impact the Egg Size, Pigmentation, and Eggshell Thickness of the Eggs of Capercaillie? Animals. 2021, 11(12), 3454. DOI: 10.3390/ani11123454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaliduzzaman, A.; Konagaya, K.; Suzuki, T.; Kashimori, A.; Kondo, N.; Ogawa, Y. A Nondestructive Eggshell Thickness Measurement Technique Using Terahertz Waves. Sci. Rep. 2021, 10(1), 1052. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-57774-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman, A.; Rafi, U.; Yasmeen, R.; Fayyaz, M. Effects of Nutritional Supplement E-Sel on the Egg Production, Fertility, and Hatchability of Indian Peafowl. J. Wildl. Biodiver. 2022, 6(X).
   Google Scholar