584
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Non-destructive prediction of hazelnut and hazelnut kernel deformation energy using machine learning techniques

, , , &
Pages 326-340 | Received 03 Dec 2023, Accepted 08 Feb 2024, Published online: 03 Mar 2024

References

  • Uzundumlu, A. S.; Kurtoğlu, S.; Şerefoğlu, C. The Role of Turkey in the World Hazelnut Production and Exporting. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2022, 34, 117–127. DOI: 10.9755/ejfa.2022.v34.i2.2810.
  • Selvi, K. C.; Yesiloğlu, E.; Sauk, H. Engineering Properties of Two Hazelnuts Varieties and Its Kernel Relation to Harvest and Threshing. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2020, 32, 528–539. DOI: 10.14674/IJFS-1666.
  • FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Natıons, Crops And Livestock Product. 2021. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (accessed on December 23 2022).
  • Türkten, H.; Yıldırım, Ç.; Boz, İ. Factors Influencing the Adoption of Pressurized Irrigation Systems in Hazelnut Production and Its Effect on the Water Footprint in the Çarşamba District of Samsun. Erwerbs-Obstbau. 2022, 65(4), 775–783. DOI: 10.1007/s10341-022-00754-y.
  • Mohsenin, N. N. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials; Gordon and Breach Press: New York, NY, USA, 1986, p. 742. DOI: 10.1002/food.19870310724.
  • Kabas, O. Cracking Simulation of Hazelnut Shell Using Finite Element Method. Mitteilungen Klosterneubg. 2020, 70, 148–156.
  • Sitkei, G. Mechanics of Agricultural Materials; Budapest: Akademiai Kiado, 1986; p. 485.
  • Sunmonu, M. O.; Iyanda, M. O.; Odewole, M. M.; Moshood, A. N. Determination of Some Mechanical Properties of Almond Seed Related to Design of Food Processing Machines. Niger. J. Technol. Dev. 2015, 12(1), 22–26. DOI: 10.4314/njtd.v12i1.5.
  • Drees, A. M.; Ibrahim, M. M.; Aboegela, M. A. Design, Construction and Performance Evaluation of an Almond Kernel Extraction Machine. Agric. Eng. Int. CIGR J. 2017, 19, 133–144.
  • Aydın, C. PH—Postharvest Technology. Biosyst. Eng. 2002, 82(3), 297–303. DOI: 10.1006/bioe.2002.006.
  • Alasalvar, C.; Shahidi, F.; Cadwallader, K. R. Comparison of Natural and Roasted Turkish Tombul Hazelnut (Corylus Avellana L.) Volatiles and Flavor by DHA/GC/MS and Descriptive Sensory Analysis. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2003, 51, 5067–5072. DOI: 10.1021/jf0300846.
  • Demir, A. D.; Cronin, K. The Thermal Kinetics of Texture Change and the Analysis of Texture Variability for Raw and Roasted Hazelnuts. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 39, 371–383. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.00796.x.
  • Kibar, H.; Öztürk, T. The Effect of Moisture Content on the Physico-Mechanical Properties of Some Hazelnut Varieties. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2009, 45, 14–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspr.2008.06.005.
  • Ercisli, S.; Ozturk, I.; Kara, M.; Kalkan, F.; Seker, H.; Duyar, O.; Erturk, Y. Physical Properties of Hazelnuts. Int. Agrophysics. 2011, 25, 115–121.
  • Maleki, G.; Milani, J.; Motamedzadegan, A. Some Physical Properties of Azarbayejani Hazelnut and Its Kernel. Int. J. Food Eng. 2013, 9, 135–140. DOI: 10.1515/ijfe-2012-0162.
  • Ghirardello, D.; Contessa, C.; Valentini, N.; Zeppa, G.; Rolle, L.; Gerbi, V.; Botta, R. Effect of Storage Conditions on Chemical and Physical Characteristics of Hazelnut (Corylus Avellana L.). Postharvest. Biol. Technol. 2013, 81, 37–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.02.014.
  • Delprete, C.; Sesana, R. Mechanical Characterization of Kernel and Shell of Hazelnuts: Proposal of an Experimental Procedure. J. Food Eng. 2014, 124, 28–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.09.027.
  • Chengmao, C.; Si, S.; Ran, D.; Bing, L.; Shuo, W. Experimental study on mechanical characteristics of nut rupturing under impact loading. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2017, 10, 53–60. DOI: 10.3965/j.ijabe.20171001.2331.
  • Firouzi, S. Physical, Mechanical and Nutritional Properties of Hazelnut (A Case Study: Cultivars of North of Iran). J. Agric. Eng. 2016, 39, 93–112. DOI: 10.22055/agen.2016.12277.
  • Guiné, R. P.; Almeida, C. F.; Correia, P. M. Influence of Packaging and Storage on Some Properties of Hazelnuts. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2015, 9(1), 11–19. DOI: 10.1007/s11694-014-9206-3.
  • Giacosa, S.; Belviso, S.; Bertolino, M.; Dal Bello, B.; Gerbi, V.; Ghirardello, D.; Giordano, M.; Zeppa, G.; Rolle, L. Hazelnut Kernels (Corylus Avellana L.) Mechanical and Acoustic Properties Determination: Comparison of Test Speed, Compression or Shear Axis, Roasting, and Storage Condition Effect. J. Food Eng. 2016, 173, 59–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.10.037.
  • Bohnhoff, D. R.; Lawson, K. S.; Fischbach, J. A. Physical Properties of Upper Midwest USA-Grown Hybrid Hazelnuts. Trans. ASABE. 2019, 62(5), 1087–1102. DOI: 10.13031/trans.13378.
  • Aremu, A. K.; Ojo-Ariyo, A. M.; Oyefeso, B. O. Selected Mechanical Properties of Bambara Groundnut Seeds Under Compressive Loading. LAUTECH J. Eng. Technol. 2022, 16, 70–77.
  • USDA. Official Grain Standards of the United States. US Department of Agricultural Consumer and Marketing Service, Grain Division, Revised; USDA: Washington, DC, USA, 1970.
  • Dhanaraj, R. K.; Rajkumar, K.; Hariharan, U. Enterprise IoT Modelling: Supervised, Unsupervised, and Reinforcement Learning. In Business Intelligence for Enterprise Internet of Things; Haldorai, A., Ramu, A. Khan, S. Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; Vol. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing, pp. 55–79. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-44407-5_3
  • Eberly, L. E. Multiple linear regression. Methods Mol. Biol. 2007, 404, 165–187. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-59745-530-5_9.
  • Uyanık, G. K.; Güler, N. A Study on Multiple Linear Regression Analysis. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013, 106, 234–240. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.027.
  • Andrews, D. F. A Robust Method for Multiple Linear Regression. Technometrics. 1974, 16(4), 523–531. DOI: 10.2307/1267603.
  • Vapnik, V. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, 2nd ed.; Springer Science+Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  • Ahmad, A. S.; Hassan, M. Y.; Abdullah, M. P.; Rahman, H. A.; Hussin, F.; Abdullah, H.; Saidur, R. A Review on Applications of ANN and SVM for Building Electrical Energy Consumption Forecasting. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2014, 33, 102–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.069.
  • Smola, A. J.; Schölkopf, B. A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat. Comput. 2004, 14(3), 199–222. DOI: 10.1023/B%3ASTCO.0000035301.49549.88.
  • Chang, C. C.; Lin, C. J. Training V-Support Vector Regression: Theory and Algorithms. Neural Comput. 2002, 14, 1959–1977. DOI: 10.1162/089976602760128081.
  • Üstün, B.; Melssen, W. J.; Buydens, L. M. Facilitating the Application of Support Vector Regression by Using a Universal Pearson VII Function Based Kernel. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2006, 81(1), 29–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2005.09.003.
  • Jain, A. K.; Mao, J.; Mohiuddin, K. M. Artificial neural networks: A tutorial. Computer. 1996, 29(3), 31–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/2.485891.
  • Ghorbani, H.; Wood, D. A.; Choubineh, A.; Mohamadian, N.; Tatar, A.; Farhangian, H.; Nikooey, A. Performance comparison of bubble point pressure from oil PVT data: Several neurocomputing techniques compared. Experimental And Computational Multiphase Flow. 2020, 2(4), 225–246. DOI: 10.1007/s42757-019-0047-5.
  • Mohamadian, N.; Ghorbani, H.; Wood, D. A.; Mehrad, M.; Davoodi, S.; Rashidi, S.; Soleimanian, A.; Shahvand, A. K. A Geomechanical Approach to Casing Collapse Prediction in Oil and Gas Wells Aided by Machine Learning. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2021, 196, 107811. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107811.
  • Zou, J.; Han, Y.; So, S. S. Overview of Artificial Neural Networks. Methods Mol. Biol. 2009, 458, 15–23. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60327-101-1_2.
  • Ertuğrul, Ö. F. A Novel Type of Activation Function in Artificial Neural Networks: Trained Activation Function. Neural. Netw. 2018, 99, 148–157. DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2018.01.007.
  • Herzog, S.; Tetzlaff, C.; Wörgötter, F. Evolving artificial neural networks with feedback. Neural. Netw. 2020, 123, 153–162. DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.12.004.
  • Kiran, A.; Shirisha, N. K-Anonymization Approach for Privacy Preservation Using Data Perturbation Techniques in Data Mining. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 64, 578–584. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.117.
  • Kayakus, M.; Tutcu, B.; Terzioglu, M.; Talaş, H.; Ünal Uyar, G. F. ROA and ROE Forecasting in Iron and Steel Industry Using Machine Learning Techniques for Sustainable Profitability. Sustainability. 2023, 15(9), 7389. DOI: 10.3390/su15097389.
  • Kayakuş, M.; Erdoğan, D.; Terzioğlu, M. Predicting the Share of Tourism Revenues in Total Exports. Alphanumeric J. 2023, 11(1), 17–30. DOI: 10.17093/alphanumeric.1212189.
  • Ozer, D. J. Correlation and the Coefficient of Determination. Psychol. Bull. 1985, 97, 307. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.307.
  • Renaud, O.; Victoria-Feser, M. P. A Robust Coefficient of Determination for Regression. J. Stat. Plan. Inference. 2010, 140(7), 1852–1862. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2010.01.008.
  • Tuchler, M.; Singer, A. C.; Koetter, R. Minimum mean squared error equalization using a priori information. EEE Trans. Signal Process. 2002, 50(3), 673–683. DOI: 10.1109/78.984761.
  • Colak, M.; Yesilbudak, M.; Bayindir, R. Daily Photovoltaic Power Prediction Enhanced by Hybrid GWO-MLP, ALO-MLP and WOA-MLP Models Using Meteorological Information. Energies. 2020, 13(4), 901. DOI: 10.3390/en13040901.