Implementation and application of sub-grid-scale plume treatment in the latest version of EPA’s third-generation air quality model, CMAQ 5.01

References

• Baker, K. 2005. Regulatory modeling system performance in the Upper Midwest for 3 annual simulations at 36 km (PM_2.5) and 3 summer seasons at 12 km (8-hr ozone). Paper presented at the 4th Annual CMAS Models-3 Users’ Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, September 26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Briant, R., and C. Seigneur. 2013. Multi-scale modeling of roadway air quality impacts: Development and evaluation of a Plume-in-Grid model. Atmos. Environ. 68: 162–73. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun, D., and K.L. Schere, 2006. Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Appl. Mech. Rev. 59: 51–77. doi:10.1115/1.2128636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doraiswamy, P., C. Hogrefe, W. Hao, K. Civerolo, J.-Y. Ku, and G. Sistla. 2010. A retrospective comparison of model-based forecasted PM2.5 concentrations with measurements. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 60: 1293–308. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.60.11.1293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ENVIRON. 2013. Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx) version 6.0 user’s guide. ENVIRON International Corporation, Novato, CA. http://www.camx.com/Files/CamxUsersGuide_v6-00.pdf (accessed August 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Electric Power Research Institute. 1999. SCICHEM: A new generation plume-in-grid model. EPRI report TR-113097. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA. http://www.epri.com/abstracts/Pages/ProductAbstract.aspx?ProductId=TR-113097 (accessed August 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Electric Power Research Institute. 2001. Further development and evaluation of Models-3/CMAQ-APT. EPRI report 1005161. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA. http://www.epri.com/abstracts/Pages/ProductAbstract.aspx?ProductId=000000000001005161 (accessed August 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Gillani, N.V., J.F. Meagher, R.J. Valente, R.E. Imhoff, R.L. Tanner, and M. Luria. 1998. Relative production of ozone and nitrates in urban and rural power plant plumes 1. Composite results based on data from 10 field measurement days, J. Geophys. Res. 103: 22593–615. doi:10.1029/98JD00966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godowitch, J. 2004. Simulations of aerosols and photochemical species with the CMAQ plume-in-grid modeling system. Paper presented at the 3rd Annual Models-3 User’s CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hogrefe, C., S.T. Rao, P. Kasibhatla, W. Hao, G. Sistla, R. Mathur, and J. McHenry. 2001. Evaluating the performance of regional-scale photochemical modeling systems: Part II—Ozone predictions. Atmos. Environ. 35: 4175–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibusuki, T., and K. Takeuchi. 1987. Sulfur dioxide oxidation by oxygen catalyzed by mixtures of manganese(II) and iron(III) in aqueous solutions at environmental reaction conditions. Atmos. Environ. 21: 1555–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamchandani, P., A. Koo, and C. Seigneur. 1998. Reduced gas-phase kinetic mechanism for atmospheric plume chemistry, Environ. Sci. Technol. 32: 1709–20. doi:10.1021/es970707u
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamchandani, P., and C. Seigneur. 1999. Simulation of sulfate and nitrate chemistry in power plant plumes, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 49: 175–181. doi: 10.1080/10473289.1999.10463885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamchandani, P., L. Santos, I. Sykes, Y. Zhang, C. Tonne, and C. Seigneur. 2000. Development and evaluation of a state-of-the-science reactive plume model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34: 870–80. doi:10.1021/es990611v
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamchandani, P., C. Seigneur, K. Vijayaraghavan, and S.-Y. Wu. 2002. Development and application of a state-of-the-science plume-in-grid model. J. Geophys. Res. 107:4403. doi:10.1029/2002JD002123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamchandani, P., K. Vijayaraghavan, S.-Y. Chen, C. Seigneur, and E.S. Edgerton. 2006. Plume-in-grid modeling for particulate matter. Atmos. Environ. 40: 7280–97. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamchandani, P., K. Lohman, and C. Seigneur. 2009. Using a sub-grid scale modeling approach to simulate the transport and fate of toxic air pollutants. Environ. Fluid Mech. 9: 59–71. doi:10.1007/s10652-008-9097-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamchandani, P., K. Vijayaraghavan, S.-Y. Chen, R. Balmori-Bronson, and E.M. Knipping. 2010. Development and application of a parallelized version of the advanced modeling system for transport, emissions, reactions and deposition of atmospheric matter (AMSTERDAM): 1. Model performance evaluation and impacts of plume–in–grid treatment. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 1: 260–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamchandani, P., K. Vijayaraghavan, and G. Yarwood. 2011. Sub-grid scale plume modeling. Atmosphere 2: 389–406. doi:10.3390/atmos2030389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamchandani, P., Y. Zhang, and S.-Y. Chen. 2012. Development and initial application of a sub-grid scale plume treatment in a state-of-the-art online multi-scale air quality and weather prediction Model. Atmos. Environ. 63: 125–34. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsakissok, I., and V. Mallet. 2010a. Subgrid-scale treatment for major point sources in an Eulerian model: A sensitivity study on the European Tracer Experiment (ETEX) and Chernobyl cases. J. Geophys. Res. 115: D03303. doi:10.1029/2009JD012734
   Google Scholar
• Korsakissok, I., and V. Mallet. 2010b. Development and application of a reactive plume-in-grid model: evaluation over Greater Paris. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10: 8917–31. doi:10.5194/acp-10-8917-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, N., and A.G. Russell. 1996. Development of a computationally efficient, reactive subgrid-scale plume model and the impact in the northeastern United States using increasing levels of chemical detail. J. Geophys. Res. 101: 16737–44. doi:10.1029/96JD01372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X.-H., Y. Zhang, K.M. Olsen, W.-X. Wang, B.A. Do, and G.M. Bridgers. 2010. Responses of future air quality to emission controls over North Carolina, Part I: Model evaluation for current-year simulations. Atmos. Environ. 44: 2443–56. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L.R., and T.W. Good. 1991. Catalyzed oxidation of sulfur dioxide in solution: The iron–manganese synergism. Atmos. Environ. Part A General Topics 25: 2395–99. doi:10.1016/0960-1686(91)90113-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odman, M.T. and C.L. Ingram. 1996. Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP): Source Code Documentation and Validation. MCNC Report ENV-96TR002-v1.0, MCNC, RTP, NC. http://people.ce.gatech.edu/odman/maqsip.pdf (accessed August 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Otte, T.L., and J.E. Pleim. 2010. The Meteorology–Chemistry Interface Processor (MCIP) for the CMAQ modeling system: Updates through MCIPv3.4.1. Geosci. Model Dev. 3: 243–56. doi:10.5194/gmd-3-243-2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reff, A., P.V. Bhave, H. Simon, T.G. Pace, G.A. Pouliot, J.D. Mobley, and M. Houyoux. 2009. Emissions inventory of PM2.5 trace elements across the United States, Environ. Sci. Technol. 43: 5790–96. doi:10.1021/es802930x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, L.W., J.A. Anderson, D.L. Blumenthal, A.A. Brandt, J.A. McDonald, N. Waters, E.S. Macias, and P.S. Bhardwaja. 1981. The chemistry, aerosol physics, and optical properties of a western coal-fired power plant plume, Atmos. Environ. 15: 2111–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissman, J., S. Arunachalam, M. Woody, J.J. West, T. BenDor, and F.S. Binkowski. 2013. A plume-in-grid approach to characterize air quality impacts of aircraft emissions at the Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 13: 1089–132. doi:10.5194/acpd-13-1089-2013
   Google Scholar
• Seigneur, C., T.W. Tesche, P.M. Roth, and M.-K. Liu. 1983. On the treatment of point source emissions in urban air quality modeling. Atmos. Environ. 17: 1655–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sillman, S., J.A. Logan, and S.C. Wofsy. 1990. A regional scale model for ozone in the United States with subgrid representation of urban and power plant plumes. J. Geophys. Res. 95: 5731–48. doi:10.1029/JD095iD05p05731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, D.Q., and D.L. Mauzerall. 2006. Spatial variability of summertime tropospheric ozone over the continental United States: Implications of an evaluation of the CMAQ model. Atmos. Environ. 40: 3041–56. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.11.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2007. Guidance on the use of models and other analyses for demonstrating attainment of air quality goals for ozone, PM2.5, and regional haze. Final report, EPA-454/B-07-002, April. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation/Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/scram001/guidance/guide/final-03-pm-rh-guidance.pdf (accessed August 2013)).
   Google Scholar
• Vijayaraghavan, K., P. Karamchandani, and C. Seigneur. 2006. Plume-in-grid modeling of summer air pollution in Central California. Atmos. Environ. 40: 5097–109. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayaraghavan, K., P. Karamchandani, C. Seigneur, R. Balmori, and S.-Y. Chen. 2008. Plume-in-grid modeling of atmospheric mercury. J. Geophys. Res. 113: D24305. doi:10.1029/2008JD010580
   Google Scholar
• Vijayaraghavan, K., Y. Zhang, C. Seigneur, P. Karamchandani, and H.E. Snell. 2009. Export of reactive nitrogen from coal-fired power plants in the U.S.: Estimates from a plume-in-grid modeling study. J. Geophys. Res. 114: D04308. doi:10.1029/2008JD010432
   Google Scholar
• Whitten, G.Z., G. Heo, Y. Kimura, E. McDonald-Buller, D.T. Allen, W.P.L. Carter, and G. Yarwood. 2010. A new condensed toluene mechanism for Carbon Bond: CB05-TU. Atmos. Environ. 44: 5346–55. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yano, A., F. Garcia-Menendez, Y. Hu, M.T. Odman, D.S. McRae, and G.L. Achtemeier. 2010. Modeling biomass burnings by coupling a sub-grid scale plume model with adaptive grid CMAQ. Paper presented at the 9th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 11–13.
   Google Scholar