Improving artificial neural network model predictions of daily average PM₁₀ concentrations by applying principle component analysis and implementing seasonal models

References

• Aneja, V.P., A. Agarwal, P.A. Roelle, S.B. Phillips, Q. Tong, N. Watkins, and R. Yablonsky. 2001. Measurements and analysis of criteria pollutants in New Delhi, India. Environ. Int. 27:35–42. doi:10.1016/S0160-4120(01)00051-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antanasijevic, D.Z., V.V. Pocajt, D.S. Povrenovic, M.D. Ristic, and A.A. Peric-Grujic. 2013. PM10 emission forecasting using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm input variable optimization. Sci. Total Environ. 443:511–519. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, R.T., J. Brook, T. Dann, C. Delocla, O. Philips, S. Cakmak, R. Vincent, M.S. Goldberg, and D. Krewski. 2000. Association between particulate- and gas-phase components of urban air pollution and daily mortality in eight Canadian cities. Inhal. Toxicol. 12:15–39. doi:10.1080/089583700750019495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., R. Shi, S. Shu, and W. Gao. 2013. Ensemble and enhanced PM10 concentration forecast model based on stepwise regression and wavelet analysis. Atmos. Environ. 74:346–359. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DMSP. 2010. Düzce Municipality Strategic Plan for 2010–2014 [in Turkish]. Düzce, Turkey: Düzce Municipality.
   Google Scholar
• FANN. 2014. Fast Artificial Neural Network library. http://leenissen.dk/fann/wp (accessed July 14, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Gennaro, G., L. Trizio, A. Gilio, J. Pey, N. Pérez, M. Cusack, A. Alastuey, and X. Querol. 2013. Neural network model for the prediction of PM10 daily concentrations in two sites in the Western Mediterranean. Sci. Total Environ. 463–464:875–883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, R.M., A.R. Deacont, and M.R. Jones. 1997. Sources and processes affecting concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 particulate matter in Birmingham (U.K.). Atmos. Environ. 31:4103–4117. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00296-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, R.C., and G.M. Hidy. 1979. Multivariate analysis of particulate sulfate and other air quality variables by principal components—Part I. Annual data from Los Angeles and New York. Atmos. Environ. 13:1581–1596. doi:10.1016/0004-6981(79)90068-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornik, K., M. Stinchcombe, and H. White. 1989. Multilayer feed forward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw. 2:359–366. doi:10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilten, N., and A.T. Selici. 2008. Investigating the impacts of some meteorological parameters on air pollution in Balikesir, Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess. 140:267–277. doi:10.1007/s10661-007-9865-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, I.T. 1986. Principal Component Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kampa, M., and E. Castanas. 2008. Human health effects of air pollution. Environ. Pollut. 151:362–367. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaw, J.F.C., B.S. Lim, L.E.N. Lim. 1995. Optimal design of neural networks using the Taguchi method. Neurocomputing 7:225–245. doi:10.1016/0925-2312(94)00013-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.S., and B.J. Yum. 2004. Robust design of multilayer feed-forward neural networks: An experimental approach. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 17:249–263. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2003.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köne, A.C., and T. Büke. 2012. A comparison for Turkish provinces’ performance of urban air pollution. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16:1300–1310. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurt, A., and A.B. Oktay. 2010. Forecasting air pollutant indicator levels with geographic models 3 days in advance using neural networks. Expert Syst. Appl. 37:7986–7992. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.05.093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H.C. 2002. The statistical characters of PM10 concentration in Taiwan area. Atmos. Environ. 36:491–502. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00245-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madic, M.J., and M.R. Radovanovic. 2011. Optimal selection of ANN training and architectural parameters using Taguchi method: A case study. FME Trans. 39:79–86.
   Google Scholar
• Mok, K.M., and K.I. Hoi. 2005. Effects of meteorological conditions on PM10 concentrations–a study in Macau. Environ. Monit. Assess. 102:201–223. doi:10.1007/s10661-005-6022-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nejadkoorki, F., and S. Baroutian. 2012. Forecasting extreme PM10 concentrations using artificial neural networks. Int. J. Environ. Res. 6:277–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen, S. 2007. Large scale reinforcement learning using Q-SARSA(λ) and cascading neural networks. MSc thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Ordieres, J.B., E.P. Vergara, R.S. Capuz, and R.E. Salazar. 2005. Neural network prediction model for fine particulate matter (PM2.5) on the US–Mexico border in El Paso (Texas) and Ciudad Juárez (Chihuahua). Environ. Model. Softw. 20:547–559. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez, P., and J. Reyes. 2002 Prediction of maximum of 24-h average of PM10 concentrations 30-h in advance in Santiago, Chile. Atmos. Environ. 36:4555–4561. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00419-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Ccoyllo, O.R., and F.M. Andrade. 2002. The influence of meteorological conditions on the behavior of pollutants concentrations in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Environ. Pollut. 116:257–263. doi:10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00129-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saufie, A.Z., A.S. Yahaya, N.A. Ramli, N. Rosaida, and H.A. Hamid. 2013. Future daily PM10 concentrations prediction by combining regression models and feedforward backpropagation models with principle component analysis (PCA). Atmos. Environ. 77:621–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfetsos, A., and D. Vlachogiannis. 2010. A new methodology development for the regulatory forecasting of PM10: Application in the Greater Athens Area, Greece. Atmos. Environ. 44:3159–3172. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statheropoulos, M., N. Vassiliadis, and A. Pappa. 1998. Principal component and canonical correlation analysis for examining air pollution and meteorological data. Atmos. Environ. 32:1087–1095. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00377-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurston, G.D., K. Ito, and R. Lall. 2011. A source apportionment of U.S. fine particulate matter air pollution. Atmos. Environ. 45:3924–3936. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TURKSTAT. 2014. Online Web service of Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT). http://www.turkstat.gov.tr (accessed August 6, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Vahlsing C., and K.R. Smith. 2012. Global review of national ambient air quality standards for PM10 and SO2 (24 h). Air Qual. Atmos. Health 5:393–399. doi:10.1007/s11869-010-0131-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar