The air quality forecast rote: Recent changes and future challenges

References

• Antonopoulos, S., P. Bourgouin, J. Montpetit, and G. Croteau. 2012. Forecasting O3, PM2.5 and NO2 hourly spot concentrations using an updatable MOS methodology. In Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application XXI, ed. D.G Steyn and S.T. Rao, 309–314. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Appel, K.W., C. Chemel, S.J. Roselle, X.V. Francis, R.-M. Hu, R.S. Sokhi, S.T. Rao, and S. Galmarini. 2012. Examination of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model performance over the North American and European domains. Atmos. Environ. 53:142–155. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron, R.H. 1980. Forecasting high level oxidant concentrations in the Los Angeles basin. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 20:1227–1228.doi:10.1080/00022470.1980.10465174
   Google Scholar
• Black, T.L. 1994. The new NMC mesoscale Eta model: Description and forecast examples. Weather Forecast. 9:265–278. doi:10.1175/1520-0434(1994)009<0265:TNNMEM>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocquet, M., H. Elbern, H. Eskes, M. Hirtl, R. Žabkar, G.R. Carmichael, J. Flemming, A. Inness, M. Pagowski, J.L. Pérez Camaño, and P.E. Saide. 2015. Data assimilation in atmospheric chemistry models: Current status and future prospects for coupled chemistry meteorology models. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 14:32233–32323.doi:10.5194/acpd-14-32233-2014
   Google Scholar
• Burrows, W.R., M. Benjamin, S. Beauchamp, E.R. Lord, D. McCollor, and B. Thomson. 1995. CART decision-tree statistical analysis and prediction of summer season maximum surface ozone for the Vancouver, Montreal and Atlantic regions of Canada. J. Appl. Meteorol. 34:1848–1862. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<1848:CDTSAA>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Butler, T. J., F. M. Vermeylen, M. Rury, G.E. Likens, B. Lee, G. E. Bowker, and L. McCluney. 2011. Response of ozone and nitrate to stationary source NOx emission reductions in the eastern USA. Atmos. Environ. 45:1084–1094. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.11.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun, D., and K. L. Schere. 2006. Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Appl. Mech. Rev. 59:51–77. doi:10.1115/1.2128636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascio, W. E., A. Davis, and S. L. Stone. 2013. The Green Heart Initiative: Using air quality information to reduce adverse health effects in patients with heart and vascular disease. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 28:401–404. doi:10.1097/JCN.0b013e318295d1ae
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang, M. T., Y. Zhang, and D. Kang. 2011. Application of WRF/Chem-MADRID for real-time air quality forecasting over the Southeastern United States. Atmos. Environ. 45:6241–6250. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.06.071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobourn, W. G. 2007. Accuracy and reliability of an automated air quality forecast system for ozone in seven Kentucky metropolitan areas. Atmos. Environ. 41:5863–5875. doi:10.1016/2007.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobourn, W. G., L. Dolcine, M. French, and M. C. Hubbard. 2000. A comparison of nonlinear regression and neural network models for ground-level ozone forecasting. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 50:1999–2009. doi:10.1080/10473289.2000.10464228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobourn, W.G., and M. C. Hubbard. 1999. An enhanced ozone forecasting model using air mass trajectory analysis. Atmos. Environ. 33:4663–4674. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00240-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comrie, A.C. 1997. Comparing neural networks and regression models for ozone forecasting. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 47:653–663. doi:10.1080/10473289.1997.10463925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, O. R., R. S. Gao, D. Tarasick, T. Leblanc, and C. Sweeney. 2012. Long-term ozone trends at rural ozone monitoring sites across the United States, 1990–2010. J. Geophys. Res. 117(D22):D22307. doi:10.1029/2012JD018261
   Google Scholar
• Delle Monache, L., J. Wilczak, S. McKeen, G. Grell, M. Pagowski, S. Peckham, R. Stull, J. McHenry, and J. McQueen. 2008. A Kalman-filter bias correction method applied to deterministic, ensemble averaged and probabilistic forecasts of surface ozone. Tellus B 60:238–249. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0889.2007.00332.x
   Google Scholar
• Dickerson, R. R., G.J. Huffman, W.T. Luke, L.J. Nunnermacker, K.E. Pickering, et al. 1987. Thunderstorms: An important mechanism in the transport of air pollutants. Science 235:460–464. doi:10.1126/science.235.4787.460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djalalova, I., L. Delle Monache, and J. Wilczak. 2015. PM2.5 analog forecast and Kalman filter post-processing for the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model. Atmos. Environ. 108:76–87. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djalalova, I., J. Wilczak, S. McKeen, G. Grell, S. Peckham, M. Pagowski, L. Delle Monache, et al. 2010. Ensemble and bias-correction techniques for air quality model forecasts of surface O3 and PM2.5 during the TEXAQS-II experiment of 2006. Atmos. Environ. 44:455–467. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doraiswamy, P., C. Hogrefe, W. Hao, K. Civerolo, J.-Y. Ku, and G. Sistla. 2010. A retrospective comparison of model-based forecasted PM2.5 concentrations with measurements. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 60:1293–1308. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.60.11.1293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doswell, C.A., III. 2004. Weather forecasting by humans—Heuristics and decision making. Weather Forecast. 19:1115–1126. doi:10.1175/WAF-821.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draxler, R. R., and G. D. Hess. 1998. An overview of the HYSPLIT_4 modeling system of trajectories, dispersion, and deposition. Aust. Meteor. Mag. 47:295–308.
   Google Scholar
• Draxler, R. R., and G. D. Rolph. 2015. HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory). Model access via NOAA ARL READY Web site. NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD. http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php (accessed October 27, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Eder, B., D. Kang, R. Mathur, J. Pleim, S. Yu, T. Otte, et al. 2009. A performance evaluation of the National Air Quality Forecast Capability for the summer of 2007. Atmos. Environ. 43:2312–2320. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, B., D. Kang, R. Mathur, S. Yu, and K. Schere. 2006. An operational evaluation of the Eta-CMAQ air quality forecast model. Atmos. Environ. 40:4894–4905. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbern, H., and H. Schmidt. 2001. Ozone episode analysis by four dimensional variational chemistry data assimilation. J. Geophys. Res. 106:3569–3590. doi:10.1029/2000JD900448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• e-WALL: The Electronic Map Wall Product, copyright 2004–2016. 2015. eWall: The Electronic Wall Map. Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. http://mp1.met.psu.edu/~fxg1/ewall.html (accessed October 27, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Garner, G. G., and A. M. Thompson. 2012. The value of air quality forecasting in the mid-Atlantic region. Weather Climate Soc. 4:69–79. doi:10.1175/WCAS-D-10-05010.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaza, R. S. 1998. Mesoscale meteorology and high ozone in the northeast United States. J. Appl. Meteorol. 37:961–977. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1998)037<0961:MMAHOI>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Gilliland, A. B., et al. 2008. Dynamic evaluation of regional air quality models: Assessing changes in O3 stemming from changes in emissions and meteorology. Atmos. Environ. 42:5110–5123. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godowitch, J. M., A. B. Gilliland, R. R. Draxler, and S. T. Rao. 2008a. Modeling assessment of point source NOx emission reductions on ozone air quality in the eastern United States. Atmos. Environ. 42:87–100. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godowitch, J. M., C. Hogrefe, and S. T. Rao. 2008b. Diagnostic analyses of a regional air quality model: Changes in modeled processes affecting ozone and chemical-transport indicators from NOx point source emission reductions. J. Geophys. Res. 113(D19):D19303. doi:10.1029/2007JD009537
   Google Scholar
• Godowitch, J.M., Pouliot, G. A., and S. T. Rao. 2010. Assessing multi-year changes in modeled and observed urban NOx concentrations from a dynamic model evaluation perspective. Atmos. Environ. 44:2894–2901. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grell, G., and A. Baklanov. 2011. Integrated modeling for forecasting weather and air quality: A call for fully coupled approaches. Atmos. Environ. 45:6845–6851. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grell, G. A., S. E. Peckham, R. Schmitz, S. A. McKeen, G. Frost, W. C. Skamarock, and B. Eder. 2005. Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model. Atmos. Environ. 39:6957–6975. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamill, T. M., K. Gilbert, and M. Peroutka. 2015. Statistical post-processing in NOAA: Key changes necessary to make the national blend of models and reforecasting successful. http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/people/tom.hamill/WhitePaperImplementationofReforecastsandNationalBlend.pdf (accessed November 2, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, S. R., Z. Lu, H. C. Frey, N. Wheeler, J. Vukovich, S. Arunachalam, M. Fernau, and D. A. Hansen. 2001. Uncertainties in predicted ozone concentrations due to input uncertainties for the UAM-V photochemical grid model applied to the July 1995 OTAG domain. Atmos. Environ. 35:891–903. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00367-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, H., J. W. Stehr, J. C. Hains, D. J. Krask, B. G. Doddridge, K. Y. Vinnikov, T. P. Canty, et al. 2013. Trends in emissions and concentrations of air pollutants in the lower troposphere in the Baltimore/Washington airshed from 1997 to 2011. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13:7859–7874. doi:10.5194/acp-13-7859-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X.-M., P. M. Klein, M. Xue, F. Zhang, D. C. Doughty, R. Forkel, E. Joseph, and J. D. Fuentes. 2013. Impact of the vertical mixing induced by low-level jets on boundary layer ozone concentration. Atmos. Environ. 70:123–130. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.12.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, U., R. Bianconi, E. Solazzo, I. Kioutsioukis, A. Badia, A. Balzarini, R. Baró, et al. 2015. Evaluation of operational online-coupled regional air quality models over Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII phase 2. Part I: Ozone. Atmos. Environ. 115:404–420. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janjic, Z.I. 2003. A nonhydrostatic model based on a new approach. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 82:271–285. doi:10.1007/s00703-001-0587-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, D., R. Mathur, R., S. T. Rao, and S. Yu. 2008. Bias adjustment techniques for improving ozone air quality forecasts. J. Geophys. Res. 113(D23): D23308. doi: 10.1029/2008JD010151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, W. H. 1971. Computer prediction of precipitation probability in the United States. J. Appl. Meteorol. 10:903–915. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1971)010<0903:CPOPPI>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Kukkonen, J., T. Olsson, D. M. Schultz, A. Baklanov, Thomas Klein, A. I. Miranda, A. Monteiro, et al. 2012. A review of operational, regional-scale, chemical weather forecasting models in Europe. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12:1–87. doi:10.5194/acp-12-1-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, P., et al. 2012. Incremental development of air quality forecasting system with offline/online capability: Coupling CMAQ to NCEP national mesoscale model. In Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application XXI ed. D.G Steyn and S.T. Rao, 187–192. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Loughner, C. P., D. J. Allen, K. E. Pickering, D.-L. Zhang, Y.-X. Shou, and R. R. Dickerson. 2011. Impact of fair-weather cumulus clouds and the Chesapeake Bay breeze on pollutant transport and transformation. Atmos. Environ. 45:4060–4072. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughner, C. P., et al. 2014. Impact of bay-breeze circulations on surface air quality and boundary layer export. J. Appl. Meteorol. 53:1697–1713. doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0323.1
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Z., D. G. Streets, B. de Foy, L. N. Lamsal, B. N. Duncan, and J. Xing. 2015. Emissions of nitrogen oxides from US urban areas: Estimation from Ozone Monitoring Instrument retrievals for 2005–2014. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15:14961–15003. doi:10.5194/acpd-15-14961-2015
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, E. A., and T. A. Niziol. 1997. BUFKIT: A software application toolkit for predicting lake-effect snow. Preprints, 13th Intl. Conf. on Interactive Information and Processing Systems for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hydrology. Long Beach, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 388–391.
   Google Scholar
• McCollister, G., and K. Wilson. 1975. Linear stochastic models for forecasting daily maxima and hourly concentrations of air pollutants. Atmos. Environ. 9:417–423. doi:10.1016/0004-6981(75)90127-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHenry, J. N., W. F. Ryan, N.L. Seaman, C.J. Coats Jr., J. Pudykiewicz, S. Arunachalam, J.M. Vukovich, et al. 2004. A real-time Eulerian photochemical model forecast system: Overview and initial ozone forecast performance in the northeast US corridor. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 85:525–548. doi:10.1175/BAMS-85-4-525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHenry, J. N., N. Seaman, C. Coats, A. Lario-Gibbs, J. Vukovich, N. Wheeler, and E. Hayes. 1999. Real-time nested mesoscale forecasts of lower tropospheric ozone using a highly optimized coupled model numerical prediction system. In Symposium on Interdisciplinary Issues in Atmospheric Chemistry, 125–128.
   Google Scholar
• McKeen, S., G. Grell, S. Peckham, J. Wilczak, I. Djalalova, E.-Y. Hsie, et al. 2009. An evaluation of real-time air quality forecasts and their urban emissions over eastern Texas during the summer of 2006 Second Texas Air Quality Study field study. J. Geophys. Res. 114(D7): D00F11. doi: 10.1029/2008JD011697.
   Google Scholar
• McKeen, S., J. Wilczak, G. Grell, I. Djalalova, S. Peckham, E.-Y. Hsie, W. Gong, et al. 2005. Assessment of an ensemble of seven real-time ozone forecasts over eastern North America during the summer of 2004. J.Geophys. Res. 110(D21):D21307. doi: 10.1029/2005JD005858.
   Google Scholar
• Meir, T., P. M. Orton, J. Pullen, T. Holt, W. T. Thompson, and M. F. Arend. 2013. Forecasting the New York City urban heat island and sea breeze during extreme heat events. Weather Forecast. 28:1460–1477. doi:10.1175/WAF-D-13-00012.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Environmental Prediction. 2015. National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), Environmental Modeling Center, Washington, DC. NCEP operational air quality forecast change log. http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/aq/AQChangelog.html ( accessed October 27, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Neal, L. S., P. Agnew, S. Moseley, C. Ordóñez, N. H. Savage, and M. Tilbee. 2014. Application of a statistical post-processing technique to a gridded, operational, air quality forecast. Atmos. Environ. 98:385–393. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeyer, L. E. 1960. Forecasting air pollution potential. Mon. Weather Rev. 88:88–96. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1960)088<0088:FAPP>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Nunalee, C.G., and S. Basu. 2014. Mesoscale modeling of coastal low-level jets: Implications for offshore wind resource estimation. Wind Energy 17:1199–1216. doi:10.1002/we.v17.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otte, T. L., and J. E. Pleim. 2010. The Meteorology-Chemistry Interface Processor (MCIP) for the CMAQ modeling system: Updates through MCIPv3. 4.1. Geosci. Model Dev. 3:243–256. doi:10.5194/gmd-3-243-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otte, T. L., G. Pouliot, J. E. Pleim, J. O. Young, K. L. Schere, D. C. Wong, P. S. Lee, et al. 2005. Linking the Eta model with the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system to build a national air quality forecasting system. Weather Forecast. 20:367–384. doi:10.1175/WAF855.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagnotti, V. 1987. A meso-meteorological feature associated with high ozone concentrations in the northeastern United States. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 37:720–722. doi:10.1080/08940630.1987.10466258
   Google Scholar
• Pan, L., D. Q. Tong, P. Lee, H. Kim, and T. Chai. 2014. Assessment of NOx and O3 forecasting performances in the U.S. National Air Quality Forecasting Capability before and after the 2012 major emissions updates. Atmos. Environ. 95:610–619. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pielke, R. A., and M. Uliasz. 1998. Use of meteorological models as input to regional and mesoscale air quality models—Limitations and strengths. Atmos. Environ. 32:1455–1466. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00140-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, P. A., H. E. Fuelberg, and K. K. Droegemeier. 1999. High-resolution modeling of the Cape Canaveral area land-water circulations and associated features. Mon. Weather Rev. 127:1808–1821. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<1808:HRMOTC>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robeson, S. M., and D. G. Steyn. 1989. A conditional probability density function for forecasting ozone air quality data. Atmos. Environ. 23:689–692. doi:10.1016/0004-6981(89)90016-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E., G. DiMego, T. Black, M. Ek, B. Ferrier, G. Gayno, Z. Janjic, et al. 2009. The NCEP North American mesoscale modeling system: Recent changes and future plans. In Preprints, 23rd Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/19th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction. Omaha, NE, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 2A.4., 1–5 June, 2009. http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/154114.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Suárez, J. C., O. A.Mayora-Ibarra, J. Torres-Jiménez, and L. G. Ruiz-Suárez. 1995. Short-term ozone forecasting by artificial neural networks, Adv. Eng. Softw. 23:143–149. doi:10.1016/0965-9978(95)00076-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, A., and R. Dennis. 2000. NARSTO critical review of photochemical models and modeling. Atmos. Environ. 34:2283–2324. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00468-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, W. F. 1995. Forecasting ozone episodes in the Baltimore metropolitan area. Atmos. Environ. 29:2387–2398. doi:10.1016/1352-2310(94)00302-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, W. F. 2011. July 2011 episode summary. Department of Meteorology, Pennsylvania State University. http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~wfr1/July-2011-episode-summary.pdf (accessed October 27, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, W. F., B. Doddridge, R. R. Dickerson, R. M. Morales, K. A. Hallock, P. T. Roberts, K. L. Civerolo, et al. 1998. Pollutant transport during a regional O3 episode in the Mid-Atlantic States. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 48:786–797. doi:10.1080/10473289.1998.10463737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, W.F., C. A. Piety, and E. D. Luebehusen. 2000. Air quality forecasts in the mid-Atlantic region: Current practice and benchmark skill. Weather Forecast. 15:46–60. doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015<0046:AQFITM>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, J.T. 1986. Severe thunderstorm forecasting: A historical perspective. Weather Forecast. 1:164–189. doi:10.1175/1520-0434(1986)001<0164:STFAHP>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Schepanski, K., et al. 2014. The sensitivity of nocturnal low-level jets and near-surface winds over the Sahel to model resolution, initial conditions and boundary-layer set-up. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 141:1442–1456. doi: 10.1002/qj.2453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman, N. L. 2000. Meteorological modeling for air-quality assessments. Atmos. Environ. 34:2231–2259. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00466-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman, N. L., and S. A. Michelson. 2000. Mesoscale meteorological structure of a high-ozone episode during the 1995 NARSTO-Northeast study. J. Appl. Meteorol. 39:384–398. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<0384:MMSOAH>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Stauffer, R. M., and A. M. Thompson. 2013. Bay breeze climatology at two sites along the Chesapeake Bay from 1986–2010: Implications for surface ozone. J. Atmos. Chem. 70:1–18. doi:10.1007/s10874-013-9260-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauffer, R. M., A. M. Thompson, D. K. Martins, R. D. Clark, D. L. Goldberg, C. P. Loughner, R. Delgado, R. R. Dickerson, J. W. Stehr, and M. A. Tzortziou. 2012. Bay breeze influence on surface ozone at Edgewood, MD during July 2011. J. Atmos. Chem. 69:1–19. doi:10.1007/s10874-012-9241-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, Y., P. Lee, M. Tsidulko, H. Huang, J. T. McQueen, G. J. DiMego, L. K. Emmons, R. B. Pierce, A. M. Thompson, H. Lin, et al. 2008. The impact of chemical lateral boundary conditions on CMAQ predictions of tropospheric ozone over the continental United States. Environ. Fluid Mech. 9:43–58. doi: 10.1007/s10652-008-9092-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. 2014. The Canadian Air Quality Health Index. In Air Quality Management, ed. E. Taylor and A. McMillan, 351–363. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Triangle Air Awareness. 2015. Triangle Air Awareness Web site. http://www.triangleairawareness.org (accessed October 28, 2915).
   Google Scholar
• University Center for Atmospheric Research. 2015. Image Archive. http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/imagearchive (accessed October 27, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environment Protection Agency. 2003. Guidelines for Developing an Air Quality (Ozone and PM2.5) Forecasting Program. EPA-456/R-03-002. http://www3.epa.gov/airnow/aq_forecasting_guidance-1016.pdf (accessed December 19, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environment Protection Agency. 2010. Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard for nitrogen dioxide. Fed. Regist. 75:6473–6537. http://www3.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/standards/nox/fr/20100209.pdf (accessed December 19, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environment Protection Agency. 2015a. National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone. Fed. Regist. 80: 65292–65468.https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-10-26/pdf/2015-26594.pdf (accessed December 19, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environment Protection Agency. 2015b. AirNow Program, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.airnow.gov (accessed October 26, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Vautard, R., M. D. Moran, E. Solazzo, R. C. Gilliam, V. Matthias, R. Bianconi, C. Chemel, et al. 2012. Evaluation of the meteorological forcing used for the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) air quality simulations. Atmos. Environ. 53:15–37. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vira, J., and M. Sofiev. 2012. Comparing air quality forecast and a reanalysis: Improvements due to chemical data assimilation and better NWP forcing. In Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXI, ed. D.G Steyn and S.T. Rao, 403–406. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weisman, R. A. 1990. An observational study of warm season southern Appalachian lee troughs. Part I: Boundary layer circulation. Mon. Weather Rev. 118:950–963. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<0950:AOSOWS>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, X.-J., L. Balluz, and A. Mokdad. 2009. Association between media alerts of air quality index and change of outdoor activity among adult asthma in six states, BRFSS, 2005. J. Community Health 34:40–46. doi:10.1007/s10900-008-9126-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilczak, J., S. McKeen, I. Djalalova, G. Grell, S. Peckham, W. Gong, V. Bouchet, et al. 2006. Bias-corrected ensemble and probabilistic forecasts of surface ozone over eastern North America during the summer of 2004. J.Geophys. Res. 111(D23):D23528. doi:10.1029/2006JD007598
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, L. J., and M. Vallée. 2003. The Canadian updateable model output statistics (UMOS) system: Validation against perfect prog. Weather Forecast. 18:288–302. doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2003)018<0288:TCUMOS>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, G.T., and P.J. Lioy. 1978. An empirical model for forecasting maximum daily ozone levels in the northeastern United States. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 28:1034–1038. doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2003)018<0288:TCUMOS>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., R. Mathur, K.Schere, D. Kang, J. Pleim, and T. L. Otte. 2007. A detailed evaluation of the Eta-CMAQ forecast model performance for O3, its related precursors, and meteorological parameters during the 2004 ICARTT study. J. Geophys. Res. 112(D12): D12514. doi: 10.1029/2006JD007715.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, S., R. Mathur, K.Schere, D. Kang, J. Pleim, Young, J., et al. 2008. Evaluation of realtime PM2.5 forecasts and process analysis for PM2.5 formation over the eastern United States using the Eta-CMAQ forecast model during the 2004 ICARTT study. J. Geophys. Res. 113(D6): D06204. doi: 10.1029/2007JD009226.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D.-L., S. Zhang, and S. J. Weaver. 2006. Low-level jets over the Mid-Atlantic states: Warm-season climatology and a case study. J. Appl. Meteorol. 45:194–209. doi:10.1175/JAM2313.1
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. 2008. Online-coupled meteorology and chemistry models: History, current status, and outlook. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8:2895–2932. doi:10.5194/acp-8-2895-2008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., M. Bocquet, V. Mallet, C. Seigneur, and A. Baklanov. 2012a. Real-time air quality forecasting, Part I: History, techniques, and current status. Atmos. Environ. 60:632–655. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., M. Bocquet, V. Mallet, C. Seigneur, and A. Baklanov. 2012b. Real-time air quality forecasting, Part II: State of the science, current research needs, and future prospects. Atmos. Environ. 60:656–676. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar