Particulate matter emissions of different brands of mentholated cigarettes

References

• Ahijevych, K., and B.E. Garrett. 2004. Menthol pharmacology and its potential impact on cigarette smoking behavior. Nicotine Tobacco Res. 6 (Suppl. 1):17–28. doi:10.1080/14622200310001649469.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, C., G. Connolly, and M. Jarvis. 1999. Tobacco additives: Cigarette engineering and nicotine addiction. http://ash.org.uk/information-and-resources/tobacco-industry-information-and-resources/tobacco-additives-cigarette-engineering-and-nicotine-addiction (accessed December 05, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• BMEL. 2017. Tabakzusatzstoffe. Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft. https://service.bmel.de/tabakerzeugnisse/index2.php?site_key=153 (accessed November 29, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Breuer, D., R. Kühn, M. Weigl, U. Eickmann, T. Weiß, and H. Blome. 2012. Passivrauchen am Arbeitsplatz: DGUV-UVT-Report 1/2011. Berlin 2012. DGUV/IFA.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkman, M.C., J.C. Chuang, S.M. Gordon, H. Kim, R.R. Kroeger, G.M. Polzin, and P.A. Richter. 2012. Exposure to and deposition of fine and ultrafine particles in smokers of menthol and nonmenthol cigarettes. Inhal. Toxicol. 24 (5):255–69. doi:10.3109/08958378.2012.667218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J.S., T. Gordon, O. Price, and B. Asgharian. 2013. Thoracic and respirable particle definitions for human health risk assessment. Particle and Fibre Toxicology 10 (12). doi:10.1186/1743-8977-10-12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brunekreef, B., and B. Forsberg. 2005. Epidemiological evidence of effects of coarse airborne particles on health. Eur. Respir. J. 26 (2):309–18. doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00001805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buddrus, J., and B. Schmidt. 2015. Grundlagen der Organischen Chemie, 5th ed. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter GmbH& Co. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Burkart, J., G. Steiner, G. Reischl, H. Moshammer, M. Neuberger, and R. Hitzenberger. 2010. Characterizing the performance of two optical particle counters (Grimm OPC1.108 and OPC1.109) under urban aerosol conditions. J. Aerosol Sci. 41 (10):953–62. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.07.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celebucki, C.C., G.F. Wayne, G.N. Connolly, J.F. Pankow, and E.I. Chang. 2005. Characterization of measured menthol in 48 U.S. cigarette sub-brands. Nicotine Tobacco Res. 7 (4):523–31. doi:10.1080/14622200500186270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CITEPA (Centre Interprofessionnel Technique d’Etudes de la Pollution Atmosphérique). 2017. Particulate matter. https://www.citepa.org/en/air-and-climate/pollutants-and-ghg/particulate-matter (accessed November 25, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, G.N., G.D. Wayne, D. Lymperis, and M.C. Doherty. 2000. How cigarette additives are used to mask environmental tobacco smoke. Tobacco Control 9 (3):283–91. doi:10.1136/tc.9.3.283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Marco, C., A.A. Ruprecht, P. Pozzi, E. Munarini, A.C. Ogliari, R. Mazza, and R. Boffi. 2015. Particulate matters from diesel heavy duty trucks exhaust versus cigarettes emissions: A new educational antismoking instrument. Multidiscip. Respir. Med. 11:2. doi:10.1186/s40248-016-0042-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djulancic, N., V. Radojicic, and M. Srbinoska. 2013. The effect of cigarette moisture on formation of particulate phase of the mainstream tobacco smoke. In Proceedings of the 24th International Scientific Expert Conference of Agriculture and Food Industry, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, September 25–28, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2017. What is PM and how does it get into the air? U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/particulate-matter-pm-basics#PM (accessed December 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Gaworski, C.L., M.M. Dozier, J. M. Gerhart, N. Rajendran, L.H. Brennecke, C. Aranyi, and J.D. Heck. 1997. 13-Week inhalation toxicity study of menthol cigarette smoke. Food Chem. Toxicol. 35 (7):683–92. doi:10.1016/S0278-6915(97)00033-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A., A.V. Hofen-Hohloch, J. Schulze, and D.A. Groneberg. 2015. Tobacco smoke particles and indoor air quality (ToPIQ-II) - a modified study protocol and first results. J. Occup. Med. Toxicol. 10:5. doi:10.1186/s12995-015-0047-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. 2017. Environment and natural resources—Particulate matter. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/air-pollution/pollutants/common-contaminants/particulate-matter.html (accessed November 25, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• GrimmAerosol Technik Gmbh & Co. Kg Ainring. 2010. Portable laser aerosolspectrometer and dust monitor model 1.108/1.109 (Manual). http://wmo-gaw-wcc-aerosol-physics.org/files/OPC-Grimm-model–1.108-and-1.109.pdf (accessed Dec 06, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• GrimmAerosol Technik Gmbh & co. Kg ainring. 2012. GRIMM Software für Optical Particle Counter Tragbares Aerosolspektrometer 1.108/1.109. http://wiki.grimm-aerosol.de/images/c/c6/M_d_labview_software_rev_2p1.pdf (accessed December 6, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, H., and D.J. Eatough. 2009. Aerosol measurement: The use of optical light scattering for the determination of particulate size distribution, and particulate mass, including the semi-volatile fraction. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 59 (1):101–7. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.59.1.101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerin, M.R., C.E. Higgins, and R.A. Jenkins. 1987. Measuring environmental emissions from tobacco combustion: Sidestream cigarette smoke literature review. Atmos. Environ. 21 (2):291–97. doi:10.1016/0004-6981(87)90004-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S.K., and S.P. Elumalai. 2017. Size-segregated particulate matter and its association with respiratory deposition doses among outdoor exercisers in Dhanbad City, India. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 67 (10):1137–45. doi:10.1080/10962247.2017.1344159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, I., E. Symanski, and T.H. Stock. 2017. Feasibility of using low-cost portable particle monitors for measurement of fine and coarse particulate matter in urban ambient air. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 67 (3):330–40. doi:10.1080/10962247.2016.1241195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haustein, K.O., and D.A. Groneberg. 2008. Tabakabhängigkeit—Gesundheitliche Schäden durch das Rauchen. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A.C., and D. Simmons. 2011. Menthol cigarette smoking and nicotine dependence. Tobacco Induced Diseases 9 (Suppl. 1):S5. doi:10.1186/1617-9625-9-S1-S5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ISO. 2016. Review of human smoking behaviour and recommendations for a new ISO standard for the machine smoking of cigarettes. International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso: std:iso:tr:17219:ed-1:v1:en (accessed February 2, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R.A., R.H. Ilgner, B.A. Tomkins, and D.W. Peters. 2004. Development and application of protocols for the determination of response of real-time particle monitors to common indoor aerosols. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 54 (2):229–41. doi:10.1080/10473289.2004.10470892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juranic, B., Z. Rakosec, J. Jakab, S. Miksic, S. Vuletic, M. Ivandic, and I. Blazevic. 2017. Prevalence, habits and personal attitudes towards smoking among health care professionals. J. Occup. Med. Toxicol. 12:20. doi:10.1186/s12995-017-0166-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahnert, S., U. Nair, U. Mons, and M. Potschke-Langer. 2012. Effects of menthol as an additive in tobacco products and the need for regulation. Bundesgesund. Gesundheitsforsch. Gesundheitsschutz 55 (3):409–15. doi:10.1007/s00103-011-1425-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, U., C. Prugger, and J. Heidrich. 2016. Passivrauchen. Public Health Forum 24 (2):84–87. doi:10.1515/pubhef-2016-0027.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, C.H., and J.C. Derrick. 1960. Measurement of the particle size distribution and concentration of cigarette smoke by the “conifuge.” J. Colloid Sci. 15:340–56. doi:10.1016/0095-8522(60)90037-4.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K.H., E. Kabir, and S. Kabir. 2015. A review on the human health impact of airborne particulate matter. Environ. Int. 74:136–43. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreslake, J.M., G.F. Wayne, H.R. Alpert, H.K. Koh, and G. N. Connolly. 2008. Tobacco industry control of menthol in cigarettes and targeting of adolescents and young adults. Am. J. Public Health 98 (9):1685–92. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2007.125542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landesanstalt für Umwelt Messungen und Naturschutz Baden-Württemberg. 2016. Wirkungen auf den Menschen. http://www4.lubw.baden-wuerttemberg.de/servlet/is/18796 (accessed March 25, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, D., B. Cadman, and A.C. Hoffman. 2011. Sensory properties of menthol and smoking topography. Tobacco Induced Diseases 9 (Suppl. 1):S3. doi:10.1186/1617-9625-9-S1-S3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, Y.O., and S.A. Glantz. 2011. Menthol: Putting the pieces together. Tobacco Control 20 (Suppl. 2):ii1–7. doi:10.1136/tc.2011.043604.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li, X., B. Lin, H. Zhang, F. Xie, N. Ta, L. Tian, H. Liu, and Z. Xi. 2016. Cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of sidestream cigarette smoke particulate matter of different particle sizes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 23 (3):2588–94. doi:10.1007/s11356-015-5483-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., K.G. Mcadam, and T.A. Perfetti. 2011. Some recent topics in cigarette smoke science. Organic Chem. 2011 (44):349–59.
   Google Scholar
• Marian, C., R.J. O’Connor, M.V. Djordjevic, V.W. Rees, D.K. Hatsukami, and P. G. Shields. 2009. Reconciling human smoking behavior and machine smoking patterns: Implications for understanding smoking behavior and the impact on laboratory studies. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 18 (12):3305–20. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, C., N. Warren, P. Biggs, and J. McAughey. 2009. Real-time measurement of inhaled and exhaled cigarette smoke: Implications for dose. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 151 (1):12018. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/151/1/012018.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, X., Y. Ma, R. Chen, Z. Zhou, B. Chen, and H. Kan. 2013. Size-fractionated particle number concentrations and daily mortality in a Chinese city. Environ. Health Perspectives 121 (10):1174–78. doi:10.1289/ehp.1206398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, D., J. Schulze, H. Ackermann, D. Klingelhoefer, S. Uibel, and D. A. Groneberg. 2012. Particulate matter (PM) 2.5 levels in ETS emissions of a Marlboro Red cigarette in comparison to the 3R4F reference cigarette under open- and closed-door condition. J. Occup. Med. Toxicol. 7 (1):14. doi:10.1186/1745-6673-7-14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mueller, D., S. Uibel, M. Braun, D. Klingelhoefer, M. Takemura, and D. A. Groneberg. 2011. Tobacco smoke particles and indoor air quality (ToPIQ)—The protocol of a new study. J. Occup. Med. Toxicol. 6:35. doi:10.1186/1745-6673-6-35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazaroff, W.W., and N.E. Klepeis. 2003. Environmental tobacco smoke particles. In Indoor environment: Airborne particles and settled dust, ed. L. Morawska and T. Salthammer, 245–74. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, D., T. Raupach, K. Radon, and S. Andreas. 2008. Passivrauchen als Gesundheitsrisiko. Pneumologe 5 (6):386–92. doi:10.1007/s10405-008-0254-4.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, C.A. 3rd. 2000. Epidemiology of fine particulate air pollution and human health: Biologic mechanisms and who’s at risk? Environ. Health Perspect. 108 (Suppl. 4):713–23. doi:10.2307/3454408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protano, C., M.S. Cattaruzza, J.F. Osborn, and M. Vitali. 2014. Indoor particulate matter and secondhand smoke: Simulation of an exposure scenario. Ann. Ig. Med. Prev. Comun. 26 (2):186–89. doi:10.7416/ai.2014.1975.
   Google Scholar
• Roemer, E., H. Schramke, H. Weiler, A. Buettner, S. Kausche, S. Weber, A. Berges, M. Stueber, M. Muench, E. Trelles-Sticken, et al. 2012. Mainstream smoke chemistry and in vitro and in vivo toxicity of the reference cigarettes 3R4F and 2R4F. Beitr. Tab. Int. Contrib. Tobacco Res. 2012 (25):316–35.
   Google Scholar
• Rustemeier, K., R. Stabbert, H.J. Haussmann, E. Roemer, and E.L. Carmines. 2002. Evaluation of the potential effects of ingredients added to cigarettes. Part 2: Chemical composition of mainstream smoke. Food Chem. Toxicol. 40 (1):93–104. doi:10.1016/S0278-6915(01)00085-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahu, S.K., M. Tiwari, R.C. Bhangare, and G. G. 2013. Particle size distribution of mainstream and exhaled cigarette smoke and predictive deposition in human respiratory tract. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2013 (13):324–32.
   Google Scholar
• Schimpf, F. 2015. Smoke pump for medical research. Schimpf Ing. http://www.schimpf-ing.no/index_e.html#projects (accessed December 3, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2016. U.S. Food and Drug Administration preliminary scientific evaluation of the possible public health effects of menthol versus nonmenthol cigarettes. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/UCM361598.pdf (accessed February 3, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• UBA—Umweltbundesamt. 2008. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 2008 (51):1370–78. accessed December 6, 2017). Gesundheitliche Bedeutung von Feinstaub in der Innenraumluft. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/pdfs/feinstaub_2008.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ueno, Y., and L.K. Peters. 1986. Size and generation rate of sidestream cigarette smoke particles. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 5 (4):469–76. doi:10.1080/02786828608959110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Kentucky. 2017. Kentucky tobacco research & development center. University of Kentucky. https://ctrp.uky.edu/resources/pdf/webdocs/3R4F%20Preliminary%20Analysis.pdf(accesssed December 5, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• U.S.Public Health Service. 2014. The health consequences of smoking—50 Years of progress: A Report of the Surgeon General—Executive summary. https://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/50-years-of-progress/exec-summary.pdf (assesed December 1, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Wasel, J., M. Boll, M. Schulze, D. Mueller, M. Bundschuh, D.A. Groneberg, and A. Gerber. 2015. Brand cigarillos: Low price but high particulate matter levels—Is their favorable taxation in the European Union justified? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 12 (8):9141–53. doi:10.3390/ijerph120809141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertz, M.S., T. Kyriss, S. Paranjape, and S.A. Glantz. 2011. The toxic effects of cigarette additives. Philip Morris’ project mix reconsidered: An analysis of documents released through litigation. PLoS Med. 8 (12):e1001145. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2017. Tobacco fact sheet. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs339/en (accessed March 15, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, R.J. 2015. How menthol alters tobacco-smoking behavior: A biological perspective. Yale J. Biol. Med. 88 (3):279–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright, C. 2015. Standardized methods for the regulation of cigarette-smoke constituents. Trends Anal. Chem. 2015 (66):118–27. doi:10.1016/j.trac.2014.11.011.
   Google Scholar