1,081
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Paper

Integrating site-specific dispersion modeling into life cycle assessment, with a focus on inhalation risks in chemical production

ORCID Icon &
Pages 1224-1238 | Received 03 Apr 2018, Accepted 27 Jun 2018, Published online: 01 Oct 2018

References

  • Afshar, A. A. 2014. Chemical profile: Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate. Accessed March 23, 2018. http://www.chemplan.biz/(X(1)S(r05csalpuogmwlo1c3mrhj4g))/chemplan_demo/sample_reports/MDI_Profile13.pdf.
  • American Chemistry Council. 2011. Cradle-to-gate life cycle inventory of nine plastic resins and four polyurethane precursors. Washington, DC: American Chemistry Council.
  • American Chemistry Council. 2015. What are diisocyanates? Accessed March 21, 2018. http://dii.americanchemistry.com/Diisocyanates-Explained/What-Are-Diisocyanates.
  • American Chemistry Council. 2016. American chemistry: The cornerstone of our economy. Accessed March 21, 2018. https://www.americanchemistry.com/Jobs/EconomicStatistics/American-Chemistry-The-Cornerstone-of-our-Economy.pdf.
  • Bare, J. 2011. TRACI 2.0: The tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 13 (5):687–696. doi:10.1007/s10098-010-0338-9.
  • Biryol, D., C. I. Nicolas, J. Wambaugh, K. Phillips, and K. Isaacs. 2017. High-throughput dietary exposure predictions for chemical migrants from food contact substances for use in chemical prioritization. Environ. Int. 108:185–194. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2017.08.004.
  • Bonnell, M. A., A. Zidek, A. Griffiths, and D. Gutzman. 2018. Fate and exposure modeling in regulatory chemical evaluation: New directions from retrospection. Environ. Sci.: Process. Impacts 20 (1):20–31. doi:10.1039/C7EM00510E.
  • Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2016. Gross-Domestic-Product-(GDP)-by-industry data. Accessed March 21, 2018. http://www.bea.gov/industry/gdpbyind_data.htm.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2012. The different types of health assessments. Accessed March 21, 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/types_health_assessments.htm.
  • Environmental Systems Research Institute. 2015. ArcGIS desktop 10.2.. Redlands, CA.
  • Harder, R., H. Holmquist, S. Molander, M. Svanstrom, and G. M. Peters. 2015. Review of environmental assessment case studies blending elements of risk assessment and life cycle assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (22):13083–13093. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b03302.
  • Hellweg, S., E. Demou, R. Bruzzi, A. Meijer, R. K. Rosenbaum, M. A. J. Huijbregts, and T. E. McKone. 2009. Integrating human indoor air pollutant exposure within life cycle impact assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43 (6):1670–1679. doi:10.1021/es8018176.
  • Humbert, S., R. Manneh, S. Shaked, C. Wannaz, A. Horvath, L. Deschenes, O. Jolliet, and M. Margni. 2009. Assessing regional intake fractions in North America. Sci. Total Environ. 407 (17):4812–4820. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.05.024.
  • Isaacs, K. K., W. G. Glen, P. Egeghy, M. R. Goldsmith, L. Smith, D. Vallero, R. Brooks, C. M. Grulke, and H. Ozkaynak. 2014. SHEDS-HT: An integrated probabilistic exposure model for prioritizing exposures to chemicals with near-field and dietary sources. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (21):12750–12759. doi:10.1021/es502513w.
  • Morello‐Frosch, R., A. T. J. Woodruff, D. A. Axelrad, and J. C. Caldwell. 2000. Air toxics and health risks in California: The public health implications of outdoor concentrations. Risk Anal. 20 (2):273–292. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.202026.
  • Moriguchi, Y., and A. Terazono. 2000. A simplified model for spatially differentiated impact assessment of air emissions. Int J. Life Cycle Assess. 5 (5):281. doi:10.1007/bf02977580.
  • Neumann, C. M., D. L. Forman, and J. E. Rothlein. 1998. Hazard screening of chemical releases and environmental equity analysis of populations proximate to toxic release inventory facilities in Oregon. Environ. Health Perspect. 106 (4):217–226.
  • Olsen, S. I., F. M. Christensen, M. Hauschild, F. Pedersen, H. F. Larsen, and J. Tørsløv. 2001. Life cycle impact assessment and risk assessment of chemicals — A methodological comparison. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 21 (4):385–404. doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00075-0.
  • Potting, J., M. Hauschild, and H. Wenzel. 1999. “Less is better” and “only above threshold”: Two incompatible paradigms for human toxicity in life cycle assessment? Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 4 (1):16–24. doi:10.1007/bf02979391.
  • Rosenbaum, R. K., A. Meijer, E. Demou, S. Hellweg, O. Jolliet, N. L. Lam, M. Margni, and T. E. McKone. 2015. Indoor air pollutant exposure for life cycle assessment: Regional health impact factors for households. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (21):12823–12831. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b00890.
  • Rosenbaum, R. K., M. J. Huijbregts, A. Henderson, M. Margni, T. McKone, D. Meent, M. Hauschild, S. Shaked, D. Li, L. Gold, and O. Jolliet. 2011. USEtox human exposure and toxicity factors for comparative assessment of toxic emissions in life cycle analysis: Sensitivity to key chemical properties. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 16 (8):710–727. doi:10.1007/s11367-011-0316-4.
  • Rosenbaum, R. K., T. Bachmann, L. Gold, M. J. Huijbregts, O. Jolliet, R. Juraske, A. Koehler, H. Larsen, M. MacLeod, M. Margni, T. McKone, J. Payet, M. Schuhmacher, D. Meent, and M. Hauschild. 2008. USEtox—The UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: Recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 13 (7):532–546. doi:10.1007/s11367-008-0038-4.
  • Sleeswijk, A. 2011. Regional LCA in a global perspective. A basis for spatially differentiated environmental life cycle assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 16 (2):106–112. doi:10.1007/s11367-010-0247-5.
  • Sonnemann, G., F. Castells, and M. Schuhmacher. 2004. Integrated life-cycle and risk assessment for industrial processes. USA: Lewis Publishers.
  • Spadaro, J. V., and A. Rabl. 1999. Estimates of real damage from air pollution: Site dependence and simple impact indices for LCA. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 4 (4):229. doi:10.1007/bf02979503.
  • Stanford Research Institute. 2011. Directory of chemical producers: United States of America. Menlo Park, CA: Chemical Information Services, Stanford Research Institute.
  • Tam, B. N., and C. M. Neumann. 2004. A human health assessment of hazardous air pollutants in Portland, OR. J. Environ. Manage. 73 (2):131–145. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.06.012.
  • Thinkstep. 2014. GaBi LCA databases. Accessed March 21, 2018. http://www.gabi-software.com/databases/gabi-databases/.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1989. Risk assessment guidance for superfund. In Human health evaluation manual (Part A). , ed.. Vol. I. Washington, D.C: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. .
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1996. Technology transfer network: 1996 national-scale air toxics assessment - Unit Risk Estimate (URE). Accessed March 21, 2018. https://archive.epa.gov/airtoxics/nata/web/html/gloadd.html.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1999a. Estimate of stack heights and exit gas velocities for TRI facilities in OPPT’s risk-screening environmental indicators model, June 1999. Accessed May 5, 2018. https://www.epa.gov/rsei/estimate-stack-heights-and-exit-gas-velocities-tri-facilities-oppts-risk-screening.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1999b. Residual risk - report to congress. In Office of air quality planning and standards, ed. 27711. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2015a. Assessing and managing chemicals under TSCA: Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate (MDI) and related compounds. Accessed March 21, 2018. https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/methylene-diphenyl-diisocyanate-mdi-and-related.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2015b. Technical support document EPA’s 2011. National-scale Air Toxic Assessment. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2016. Modifications to the 112(b)1 hazardous air pollutants. Accessed March 21, 2018. https://www3.epa.gov/airtoxics/pollutants/atwsmod.html.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2017. Download Human Exposure Model (HEM). Accessed December 10, 2017. https://www.epa.gov/fera/download-human-exposure-model-hem.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2018a. Human exposure modeling - overview. Accessed March 21, 2018. https://www.epa.gov/fera/human-exposure-modeling-overview.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2018b. Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) program. Accessed March 21, 2018. https://www.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Human health risk assessment protocol. In Office of solid waste and emergency response, ed. Washington, D.C: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  • United States Census Bureau. 2015. Census blocks. Accessed March 21, 2018. https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/webatlas/blocks.html.
  • United States Congress. 1990. 42 U.S.C. chapter 85-air pollution prevention and control, section 7412. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • United States Congress. 2016. H.R.2576 - Frank R. Lautenberg chemical safety for the 21st century act, ed. Washington, D.C: House - Energy and Commerce.
  • United States Government Accountability Office. 2013. Chemical regulation: Observations on the toxic substances control act and EPA implementation. In United states government accountability office, ed.. 20548. Washington, DC: U.S. Governmental Accountability Office.
  • Walser, T., R. Juraske, E. Demou, and S. Hellweg. 2014. Indoor exposure to toluene from printed matter matters: Complementary views from life cycle assessment and risk assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (1):689–697. doi:10.1021/es403804z.
  • Wambaugh, J. F., A. Wang, K. L. Dionisio, A. Frame, P. Egeghy, R. Judson, and R. W. Setzer. 2014. High throughput heuristics for prioritizing human exposure to environmental chemicals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (21):12760–12767. doi:10.1021/es503583j.
  • Wambaugh, J. F., R. W. Setzer, D. M. Reif, S. Gangwal, J. Mitchell-Blackwood, J. A. Arnot, O. Joliet, A. Frame, J. Rabinowitz, T. B. Knudsen, R. S. Judson, P. Egeghy, D. Vallero, and E. A. Cohen Hubal. 2013. High-throughput models for exposure-based chemical prioritization in the expocast project. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (15):8479–8488. doi:10.1021/es400482g.
  • Wegener Sleeswijk, A., and R. Heijungs. 2010. GLOBOX: A spatially differentiated global fate, intake and effect model for toxicity assessment in LCA. Sci. Total Environ. 408 (14):2817–2832. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.02.044.
  • Weidema, B., C. Bauer, R. Hischier, and C. Mutel. 2013. The ecoinvent database: Overview and methodology, Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. Accessed March 21, 2018. https://www.ecoinvent.org/files/dataqualityguideline_ecoinvent_3_20130506.pdf.
  • Yurika, N., J. I. Levy, G. A. Norris, W. Andrew, H. Patrick, and J. D. Spengler. 2002. Integrating Risk assessment and life cycle assessment: A case study of insulation. Risk Anal. 22 (5):1003–1017. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00266.
  • Zelm, R., M. J. Huijbregts, and D. Meent. 2009. USES-LCA 2.0—A global nested multi-media fate, exposure, and effects model. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 14 (3):282–284. doi:10.1007/s11367-009-0066-8.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.