Furthering a partnership: Air quality modeling and improving public health

References

• Appel, K. W., S. L. Napelenok, K. M. Foley, H. O. T. Pye, C. Hogrefe, D. J. Luecken, J. O. Bash, S. J. Roselle, J. E. Pleim, H. Foroutan, et al. 2017. Description and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.1. Geosci. Model Dev. 10 (4):1703–32. doi:10.5194/gmd-10-1703-2017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, J. 2007. Will the circle be unbroken: A history of the U.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standards. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 57 (6):652–97. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.57.6.652.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berrocal, V. J., Y. Guan, A. Muyskens, H. Wang, B. J. Reich, J. A. Mulholland, and H. H. Chang. 2020. A comparison of statistical and machine learning methods for creating national daily maps of ambient PM2.5 concentration. Atmos. Environ. 222:117130. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedoussi, I. C., S. D. Eastham, E. Monier, and S. R. H. Barrett. 2020. Premature mortality related to United States cross-state air pollution. Nature 578 (7794):261–65. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-1983-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, R., T. Fox, M. Fuentes, A. Gilliland, S. Hanna, C. Hogrefe, S. John Irwin, T. Rao, R. Scheffe, K. Schere, et al. 2010. A framework for evaluating regional-scale numerical photochemical modeling systems. Environ. Fluid Mech. 10 (4):471–89. doi:10.1007/s10652-009-9163-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di, Q., I. Kloog, P. Koutrakis, A. Lyapustin, Y. Wang, and J. Schwartz. 2016. Assessing PM2.5 exposures with high spatiotemporal resolution across the Continental United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 (9):4712–21. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b06121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di, Q., Y. Wang, A. Zanobetti, Y. Wang, P. Koutrakis, C. Choirat, F. Dominici, and J. D. Schwartz. 2017. Air pollution and mortality in the medicare population. New Engl. J. Med. 376 (26):2513–22. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1702747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diao, M., T. Holloway, S. Choi, S. M. O’Neill, M. Z. Al-Hamdan, A. V. Donkelaar, R. V. Martin, X. Jin, A. M. Fiore, D. K. Henze, et al. 2019. Methods, availability, and applications of PM2.5 exposure estimates derived from ground measurements, satellite, and atmospheric models. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 69 (12):1391–414. doi:10.1080/10962247.2019.1668498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fann, N., H. Roman, C. Fulcher, M. Gentile, B. Hubbell, K. Wesson, and J. Levy. 2011. Maximizing health benefits and minimizing inequality: Incorporating local-scale data in the design and evaluation of air quality policies. Risk Anal. 31 (6):908–22. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01629.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friberg, M. D., X. Zhai, H. A. Holmes, H. H. Chang, M. J. Strickland, S. E. Sarnat, P. E. Tolbert, A. G. Russell, and J. A. Mulholland. 2016. Method for fusing observational data and chemical transport model simulations to estimate spatiotemporally resolved ambient air pollution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 (7):3695–705. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b05134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Effects Institute. 2019. State of global air 2019, www.stateofglobalair.org.
   Google Scholar
• Heo, S., and M. L. Bell. 2019. The influence of green space on the short-term effects of particulate matter on hospitalization in the U.S. for 2000-2013. Environ. Res. 174:61–68. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2019.04.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, R., C. E. Xinxin Zhai, M. D. Ivey, X. H. Friberg, Y. Liu, Q. Di, J. Schwartz, J. A. Mulholland, and A. G. Russell. 2018. Air pollutant exposure field modeling using air quality model-data fusion methods and comparison with satellite AOD-derived fields: Application over North Carolina, USA. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 11 (1):11–22. doi:10.1007/s11869-017-0511-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerrett, M., A. Arain, P. Kanaroglou, B. Beckerman, D. Potoglou, T. Sahsuvaroglu, J. Morrison, and C. Giovis. 2005. A review and evaluation of intraurban air pollution exposure models. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 15 (2):185–204. doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, X., A. M. Fiore, K. Civerolo, B. Jianzhao, Y. Liu, A. van Donkelaar, R. V. Martin, M. Al-Hamdan, Y. Zhang, T. Z. Insaf, et al. 2019. Comparison of multiple PM 2.5 exposure products for estimating health benefits of emission controls over New York State, USA. Environ. Res. Lett. 14 (8):084023. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab2dcb.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, D., K. M. Foley, R. Mathur, S. J. Roselle, K. E. Pickering, and D. J. Allen. 2019. Simulating lightning NO production in CMAQv5.2: Performance evaluations. Geosci. Model Dev. 12 (10):4409–24. doi:10.5194/gmd-12-4409-2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. T., C. J. Jang, B. Timin, B. Gantt, A. Reff, Y. Zhu, S. Long, and A. Hanna. 2019a. A system for developing and projecting PM2.5 spatial fields to correspond to just meeting national ambient air quality standards. Atmos. Environ. X 2:100019. doi:10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly, J. T., S. N. Koplitz, K. R. Baker, A. L. Holder, O. T. Havala, B. N. Pye, J. O. Murphy, B. H. Bash, N. C. Henderson, H. S. Possiel, et al. 2019b. Assessing PM2.5 model performance for the conterminous U.S. with comparison to model performance statistics from 2007-2015. Atmos. Environ. 214:116872. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurent, O., J. Hu, L. Li, M. Cockburn, L. Escobedo, M. J. Kleeman, and J. Wu. 2014. Sources and contents of air pollution affecting term low birth weight in Los Angeles County, California, 2001–2008. Environ. Res. 134:488–95. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2014.05.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurent, O., H. Jianlin, L. Lianfa, M. J. Kleeman, S. M. Bartell, M. Cockburn, L. Escobedo, and W. Jun. 2016. A statewide nested case-control study of preterm birth and air pollution by source and composition: California, 2001–2008. Environ. Health Perspect. 124 (9):1479–86. doi:10.1289/ehp.1510133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, B. C., J. A. de Gouw, J. B. Gilman, S. H. Jathar, C. D. Ali Akherati, J. L. Cappa, J. Jimenez, P. L. Lee-Taylor, S. A. Hayes, Y. McKeen, et al. 2018. Volatile chemical products emerging as largest petrochemical source of urban organic emissions. Science 359 (6377):760. doi:10.1126/science.aaq0524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuinn, L. A., C. Ward-Caviness, L. M. Neas, A. Schneider, Q. Di, A. Chudnovsky, J. Schwartz, P. Koutrakis, A. G. Russell, V. Garcia, et al. 2017. Fine particulate matter and cardiovascular disease: Comparison of assessment methods for long-term exposure. Environ. Res. 159:16–23. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostro, B., J. Hu, D. Goldberg, P. Reynolds, A. Hertz, L. Bernstein, and M. J. Kleeman. 2015. Associations of mortality with long-term exposures to fine and ultrafine particles, species and sources: Results from the California Teachers Study Cohort. Environ. Health Perspect. 123 (6):549–56. doi:10.1289/ehp.1408565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özkaynak, H., L. K. Baxter, K. L. Dionisio, and J. Burke. 2013. Air pollution exposure prediction approaches used in air pollution epidemiology studies. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 23 (6):566–72. doi:10.1038/jes.2013.15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, S. D., P. M. Roth, and J. H. Seinfeld. 1973. Mathematical modeling of photochemical air pollution—I: Formulation of the model. Atmos. Environ. (1967) 7 (11):1033–61. doi:10.1016/0004-6981(73)90214-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffe, R. D., S. B. Madeleine Strum, J. T. Phillips, A. Eyth, S. Fudge, M. Morris, T. Palma, and R. Cook. 2016. Hybrid modeling approach to estimate exposures of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) for the National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA). Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 (22):12356–64. doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b04752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA 2018a. Technical support document EPA’s 2014 National Air Toxics Assessment. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. EPA. Research Triangle Park, NC. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-09/documents/2014_nata_technical_support_document.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA 2018b. Risk and exposure assessment for the review of the primary national ambient air quality standard for sulfur oxides. EPA-452/R-18-003. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Health and Environmental Impacts Division U.S. EPA. Research Triangle Park, NC. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-05/documents/primary_so2_naaqs_-_final_rea_-_may_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA. 2019. Integrated Science Assessment (ISA) for particulate matter (final report). EPA/600/R-19/188. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/isa/recordisplay.cfm?deid=347534
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA 2020a. Integrated Science Assessment (ISA) for Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants (Final Report). EPA/600/R-20/012. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/isa/recordisplay.cfm?deid=348522
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA 2020b. Policy assessment for the review of the ozone national ambient air quality standards. EPA-452/R-20-001. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Health and Environmental Impacts Division U.S. EPA. Research Triangle Park, NC. https://www.epa.gov/naaqs/particulate-matter-pm-standards-policy-assessments-current-review-0
   Google Scholar
• van Donkelaar, A., R. V. Martin, L. Chi, and R. T. Burnett. 2019. Regional estimates of chemical composition of fine particulate matter using a combined geoscience-statistical method with information from satellites, models, and monitors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53 (5):2595–611. doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b06392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedal, S., M. J. Campen, J. D. McDonald, T. V. Larson, P. D. Sampson, L. Sheppard, C. D. Simpson, and A. A. Szpiro. 2013. “National Particle Component Toxicity (NPACT) initiative report on cardiovascular effects.” Res Rep Health Eff Inst (178):5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, S. A., T. Z. Insaf, E. S. Hall, T. O. Talbot, and A. K. Huff. 2016. Assessing the impact of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) on respiratory-cardiovascular chronic diseases in the New York City Metropolitan area using hierarchical bayesian model estimates. Environ. Res. 151:399–409. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2016.07.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesson, K., N. Fann, M. Morris, T. Fox, and B. Hubbell. 2010. A multi-pollutant, risk-based approach to air quality management: Case study for Detroit. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 1 (4):296–304. doi:10.5094/APR.2010.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar