Characterization of ground-based atmospheric pollution and meteorology sampling stations during the Lake Michigan Ozone Study 2017

References

• Abdioskouei, M., Z. Adelman, J. Al-Saadi, T. Bertram, G. Carmichael, M. Christiansen, P. Cleary, A. C. Czarnetzki, A. Dickens, M. Fuoco, et al. 2019. Lake Michigan Ozone Study (2017) preliminary finding report. Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO). https://www.ladco.org/technical/projects/lmos-2017/.
   Google Scholar
• Abdi-Oskouei, M., G. Carmichael, M. Christiansen, G. Ferrada, B. Roozitalab, N. Sobhani, K. Wade, A. Czarnetzki, R. B. Pierce, T. Wagner, et al. 2020. Sensitivity of meteorological skill to selection of WRF-Chem physical parameterizations and impact on ozone prediction during the Lake Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS). J. Geophys. Res. 2008:e2019JD031971. doi:10.1029/2019JD031971.
   Google Scholar
• Abeleira, A., I. B. Pollack, B. Sive, Y. Zhou, E. V. Fischer, and D. K. Farmer. 2017. Source characterization of volatile organic compounds in the Colorado Northern front range metropolitan area during spring and summer 2015. J. Geophys. Res. 122:3595–613. doi:10.1002/2016JD026227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, S. G., S. S. Weygandt, J. M. Brown, M. Hu, C. R. Alexander, T. G. Smirnova, J. B. Olson, E. P. James, D. C. Dowell, G. A. Grell, et al. 2016. A North American hourly assimilation and model forecast cycle: The rapid refresh. Mon. Weather Rev. 144 (4):1669–94. doi:10.1175/MWR-D-15-0242.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowne, N., and D. Shearer. 1991. Summary of LMOS 1991 field measurements program, Des Plaines, IL. Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, B., P. Karamchandani, R. Sykes, D. Henn, and E. Knipping. 2015. Reactive puff model SCICHEM: Model enhancements and performance studies. Atmos. Environ. 117:242–58. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, P. A., N. Fuhrman, L. Schulz, J. Schafer, J. Fillingham, H. Bootsma, J. McQueen, Y. Tang, T. Langel, S. McKeen, et al. 2015. Ozone distributions over southern Lake Michigan: Comparisons between ferry-based observations, shoreline-based DOAS observations and model forecasts. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15 (9):5109–22. doi:10.5194/acp-15-5109-2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, S. A., I. C. Faloona, D. H. Lenschow, A. Karion, and C. Sweeney. 2014. A low-cost system for measuring horizontal winds from single-engine aircraft. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 31 (6):1312–20. doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00143.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Gouw, J. A., J. B. Gilman, S. W. Kim, B. M. Lerner, G. Isaacman-vanwertz, B. C. McDonald, C. Warneke, W. C. Kuster, B. L. Lefer, S. M. Griffith, et al. 2017. Chemistry of volatile organic compounds in the Los Angeles basin: Nighttime removal of alkenes and determination of emission ratios. J. Geophys. Res. 122 (11):843–811,861. doi:10.1002/2017JD027459.
   Google Scholar
• de Gouw, J. A., C. Warneke, D. D. Parrish, J. S. Holloway, M. Trainer, and F. C. Fehsenfeld. 2003. Emission sources and ocean uptake of acetonitrile (CH3CN) in the atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 108. doi:10.1029/2002je001978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dye, T. S., P. T. Roberts, and M. E. Korc. 1995. Observations of transport processes for ozone and ozone precursors during the 1991 Lake-Michigan ozone study. J. App. Meteorol. 34 (8):1877–89.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, T., E. A. Betterton, P. E. Robert Jacko, and J. Hillery. 2011. Lake Michigan air quality: The 1994-2003 LADCO aircraft project (LAP). Atmos. Environ. 45 (18):3192–202. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D. L., C. P. Loughner, M. Tzortziou, J. W. Stehr, K. E. Pickering, L. T. Marufu, and R. R. Dickerson. 2014. Higher surface ozone concentrations over the Chesapeake Bay than over the adjacent land: Observations and models from the DISCOVER-AQ and CBODAQ campaigns. Atmos. Environ. 84:9–19. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, S. R., and J. C. Chang. 1995. Relations between meteorology and ozone in the Lake-Michigan region. J. Appl. Meteorol. 34 (3):670–78.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, D. R., J. Narayan, C. Schiller, H. Niki, P. B. Shepson, D. M. L. Sills, P. A. Taylor, W. J. Moroz, J. W. Drummond, N. Reid, et al. 1999. Observational evidence for the impact of the lake breeze circulation on ozone concentrations in Southern Ontario. Atmos. Environ. 33 (2):323–35. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00199-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, J., A. Cede, E. Spinei, G. Mount, M. Tzortziou, and N. Abuhassan. 2009. NO2 column amounts from ground-based Pandora and MFDOAS spectrometers using the direct-sun DOAS technique: Intercomparisons and application to OMI validation. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 114 (D13):1–20. doi:10.1029/2009jd011848.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, D. D., M. B. Christiansen, A. Milani, M. P. Vermeuel, G. A. Novak, H. D. Alwe, A. F. Dickens, R. B. Pierce, D. B. Millet, T. H. Bertram, et al. 2021. PM2.5 chemistry, organosulfates, and secondary organic aerosol during the 2017 Lake Michigan Ozone Study. Atmos. Environ. 244:13. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isakov, V., T. M. Barzyk, E. R. Smith, S. Arunachalam, B. Naess, and A. Venkatram. 2017. A web-based screening tool for near-port air quality assessments. Environ. Modell. Software 98:21–34. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. M., T. Trieu, M. Azzi, and S. Chamberlain. 1993. Results from Airtrak 2000 systems, Lake Michigan Ozone Study 1991 field program, Des Plaines, IL. Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium, 238.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. R., E. R. Jayaratne, J. Lau, V. Thomas, A. M. Juwono, B. Kitchen, and L. Morawska. 2013. Remote measurement of diesel locomotive emission factors and particle size distributions. Atmos. Environ. 81:148–57. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd, L. M., J. A. Al-Saadi, S. J. Janz, M. G. Kowalewski, R. Bradley Pierce, J. J. Szykman, L. C. Valin, R. Swap, A. Cede, M. Mueller, et al. 2019. Evaluating the impact of spatial resolution on tropospheric NO2 column comparisons within urban areas using high-resolution airborne data. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 12 (11):6091–111. doi:10.5194/amt-2019-161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khlystov, A., C. Stanier, and S. N. Pandis. 2004. An algorithm for combining electrical mobility and aerodynamic size distributions data when measuring ambient aerosol special issue of aerosol science and technology on findings from the fine particulate matter supersites program. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 38 (sup1):229–38. doi:10.1080/02786820390229543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinman, L. I. 2005. A comparative study of ozone production in five U.S. metropolitan areas. J. Geophys. Res. 110 (D2):D02301–D02301. doi:10.1029/2004JD005096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. H., P. K. Hopke, and J. R. Turner. 2006. Source identification of airborne PM2.5 at the St. Louis-Midwest supersite. J. Geophys. Res. 111 (C11003):111. doi:10.1029/2005JD006329.
   Google Scholar
• Lennartson, G. J., and M. D. Schwartz. 2002. The lake breeze-ground-level ozone connection in eastern Wisconsin: A climatological perspective. Int. J. Climatol. 22 (11):1347–64. doi:10.1002/joc.802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LMOS Team. 2018. LMOS – Lake Michigan Ozone Study 2017. https://www-air.larc.nasa.gov/missions/lmos/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, W. A. 1972. The climatology and prediction of the Chicago lake breeze. J. Appl. Meteorol. 11 (8):1259–70. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26176965.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, W. A., and H. S. Cole. 1976. Photochemical oxidant transport: Mesoscale lake breeze and synoptic-scale aspects. J. Appl. Meteorol. 15 (7):733–43.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, W. A., and L. E. Olsson. 1973. Detailed mesometeorological studies of air pollution dispersion in the Chicago lake breeze. Mon. Weather Rev. 101 (5):387–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, W. A., C. J. Tremback, and R. A. Pielke. 1995. Applications of the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS) to provide input to photochemical grid models for the Lake Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS). J. Appl. Meteorol. 34 (8):1762–86.
   Google Scholar
• Millet, D. B., H. D. Alwe, X. Chen, M. J. Deventer, T. J. Griffis, R. Holzinger, S. B. Bertman, P. S. Rickly, P. S. Stevens, T. Léonardis, et al. 2018. Bidirectional ecosystem-atmosphere fluxes of volatile organic compounds across the mass spectrum: How many matter? ACS Earth Space Chem. 2 (8):764–77. doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, G., R. Duvall, S. Brown, and S. Bai. 2014. EPA Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) 5.0 fundamentals and user guide. U.S. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Paatero, P., and P. K. Hopke. 2003. Discarding or downweighting high-noise variables in factor analytic models. Anal. Chim. Acta 490 (1–2):277–89. doi:10.1016/S0003-2670(02)01643-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekney, N. J., C. I. Davidson, L. Zhou, and P. K. Hopke. 2006. Application of PSCF and CPF to PMF-modeled sources of PM2.5 in Pittsburgh. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 40:952–61. doi:10.1080/02786820500543324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, B., R. Kaleel, A. Dickens, T. H. Bertram, C. Stanier, and D. M. Kenski, 2016. White paper: Lake Michigan Ozone Study 2017 (LMOS 2017). http://ladco.org/reports/ozone/post08/Great_Lakes_Ozone_Study_White_Paper_Draft_v6.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Reff, A., S. I. Eberly, and P. V. Bhave. 2007. Receptor modeling of ambient particulate matter data using positive matrix factorization: Review of existing methods. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 57 (2):146–54. doi:10.1080/10473289.2007.10465319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, P., P. Roth, C. Blanchard, M. Korc, and F. Lurmann. 1995. Characteristics of VOC-limited and NOx limited areas within the Lake Michigan air quality region. Des Plaines, IL: Lake Michigan air directors consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Rolph, G., A. Stein, and B. Stunder. 2017. Real-time environmental applications and display system: Ready. Environ. Modell. Software 95:210–28. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauffler, S. M., E. L. Atlas, D. R. Blake, F. Flocke, R. A. Lueb, J. M. Lee-Taylor, V. Stroud, and W. Travnicek. 1999. Distributions of brominated organic compounds in the troposphere and lower stratosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 104 (D17):21513–35. doi:10.1029/1999JD900197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sillman, S. 1995. The use of NOy, H2O2, and HNO3 as indicators for ozone-NOx-hydrocarbon sensitivity in urban locations. J. Geophys. Res. 100:14175–88. doi:10.1029/94jd02953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, M. G., A. Venkatram, D. K. Heist, S. G. Perry, W. B. Petersen, and V. Isakov. 2013. RLINE: A line source dispersion model for near-surface releases. Atmos. Environ. 77:748–56. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanier, C. O., R. B. Pierce, M. Abdioskouei, Z. E. Adelman, J. Al-Saadi, H. D. Alwe, T. H. Bertram, G. R. Carmichael, M. B. Christiansen, P. A. Cleary, et al. 2021. “Overview of the Lake Michigan Ozone Study 2017.” Working paper, University of Iowa. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.
   Google Scholar
• Stauffer, R. M., A. M. Thompson, D. K. Martins, R. D. Clark, D. L. Goldberg, C. P. Loughner, R. Delgado, R. R. Dickerson, J. W. Stehr, and M. A. Tzortziou. 2015. Bay breeze influence on surface ozone at Edgewood, MD during July 2011. J. Atmos. Chem. 72 (3–4):335–53. doi:10.1007/s10874-012-9241-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, A. F., R. R. Draxler, G. D. Rolph, B. J. B. Stunder, M. D. Cohen, and F. Ngan. 2015. NOAA’s HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96 (12):2059–77. doi:10.1175/bams-d-14-00110.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. T., T. Berkoff, G. Gronoff, T. Knepp, M. Pippin, D. Allen, L. Twigg, R. Swap, M. Tzortziou, A. M. Thompson, et al. 2018. The ozone water–land environmental transition study: An innovative strategy for understanding Chesapeake Bay pollution events. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 100 (2):291–306. doi:10.1175/bams-d-18-0025.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornhill, D. A., A. E. Williams, T. B. Onasch, E. Wood, S. C. Herndon, C. E. Kolb, W. B. Knighton, M. Zavala, L. T. Molina, and L. C. Marr. 2010. Application of positive matrix factorization to on-road measurements for source apportionment of diesel- and gasoline-powered vehicle emissions in Mexico City. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10 (8):3629–44. doi:10.5194/acp-10-3629-2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatram, A., and T. W. Horst. 2006. Approximating dispersion from a finite line source. Atmos. Environ. 40 (13):2401–08. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeuel, M. P., G. A. Novak, H. D. Alwe, D. D. Hughes, R. Kaleel, A. F. Dickens, D. Kenski, A. Czarnetzki, E. A. Stone, C. O. Stanier, et al. 2019. Sensitivity of ozone production to NOs and VOC Along the Lake Michigan coastline. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 124 (20):10989–1006. doi:10.1029/2019JD030842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victory, L. 2018. New pre-owned metra locomotives contribute to pollution; CEO says new locomotives too expensive. CBS 2 Chicago. https://chicago.cbslocal.com/2018/12/06/metra-locomotive-pollution/.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, T. J., A. C. Czarnetzki, M. Christiansen, R. B. Pierce, C. O. Stanier, and E. W. Eloranta. 2021. “Observations of the development and vertical structure of Lake Michigan lake breezes.” Working paper, University of Wisconsin-Madison. J. Atmos. Sci.
   Google Scholar
• Warneke, C., S. A. McKeen, J. A. de Gouw, P. D. Goldan, W. C. Kuster, J. S. Holloway, E. J. Williams, B. M. Lerner, D. D. Parrish, M. Trainer, et al. 2007. Determination of urban volatile organic compound emission ratios and comparison with an emissions database. J. Geophys. Res. 112. doi:10.1029/2006jd007930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, B., Y. Liu, M. Shao, S. H. Lu, and D. G. Streets. 2010. Biomass burning contributions to ambient VOCs species at a receptor site in the Pearl River Delta (PRD), China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 (12):4577–82. doi:10.1021/es1003389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., E. Kim, P. Hopke, C. Stanier, and S. Pandis. 2005. Mining airborne particulate size distribution data by positive matrix factorization. J. Geophys. Res. 110. doi:10.1029/2004JD004707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., E. Kim, P. K. Hopke, C. Stanier, and S. N. Pandis. 2004. Advanced factor analysis on Pittsburgh particle size-distribution data special issue of aerosol science and technology on findings from the fine particulate matter supersites program. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 38 (sup1):118–32. doi:10.1080/02786820390229589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar