References
- Air Sciences. 2020. Fire emission inventories for regional haze planning: methods and results. Air Sciences, Inc., Portland, Oregon. April. http://wrapair2.org/pdf/fswg_rhp_fire-ei_final_report_20200519_FINAL.PDF
- Aksoyoglu, S., G. Ciarelli, I. El-Haddad, U. Baltensperger, and A. S. H. Prévôt. 2017. Secondary inorganic aerosols in Europe: Sources and the significant influence of biogenic VOC emissions, especially on ammonium nitrate. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17 (12):7757–73. doi:10.5194/acp-17-7757-2017.
- Bey, I., D. Jacob, R. Yantosca, J. Logan, B. Field, A. Fiore, Q. Li, H. Liu, L. Mickley, and M. Schultz. 2001, October 16. Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: model description and evaluation. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 106 (D19):23073–95. doi:10.1029/2001JD000807.
- Bowden, J., K. Talgo, and Z. Adelman. 2016. Western-State Air Quality Modeling Study (WAQS) – Weather Research Forecast 2014 Meteorological Model Application/Evaluation. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill – Institute for the Environment. January 1. http://views.cira.colostate.edu/wiki/Attachments/Modeling/WAQS_2014_WRF_MPE_January2016.pdf
- Brewer, P., G. Tonnesen, R. Morris, T. Moore, U. Nopmongcol, and D. Miller. 2019. Air pollutant source characterization using the revised regional haze tracking metric and a photochemical grid model and implications for regional haze planning. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 69 (3):373–90. doi:10.1080/10962247.2018.1537985.
- Center for the New Energy Economy. 2019. Analysis of EGU emissions for regional haze planning and ozone transport contribution, project report for WESTAR-WRAP, Final Report June 14, http://www.wrapair2.org/EGU.aspx
- Gantt, B., M. Beaver, B. Timin, and P. Lorang. 2018. Recommended metric for tracking visibility progress in the Regional Haze Rule. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 68 (5):438–45. doi:10.1080/10962247.2018.1424058.
- Hand, J. L., B. A. Schichtel, W. C. Malm, and N. H. Frank. 2013. Spatial and temporal trends in PM2.5 organic and elemental carbon across the United States. Adv. Meteor. ID:367674. doi:10.1155/2013/367674.
- Hand, J. L., W. H. White, K. A. Gebhart, N. P. Hyslop, T. E. Gill, and B. A. Schichtel. 2016. Earlier onset of the spring dust season in the southwestern United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43 (8):4001–09. doi:10.1002/2016GL068519.
- Koo, B., G. Wilson, R. Morris, A. Dunker, and G. Yarwood. 2009. Comparison of source apportionment and sensitivity analysis in a particulate air quality model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43 (17):6669–75. doi:10.1021/es9008129.
- Morris, R., G. Tonnesen, P. Brewer, and T. Moore. 2022. Assessment of progress toward regional haze rule visibility goals using United States anthropogenic emissions rate of progress, submitted to J. Air & Waste Manage.
- Pepe, N., G. Pirovano, A. Balzarini, A. Toppetti, G. M. Riva, F. Amato, and G. Lonati. 2019. Enhanced CAMx source apportionment analysis at an urban receptor in Milan based on source categories and emission regions. Atmos. Environ. X 2:100020. doi:10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100020.
- Pitchford, M., W. Malm, B. Schichtel, N. Kumar, D. Lowenthal, and J. Hand. 2007. Revised algorithm for estimating light extinction from IMPROVE particle speciation data. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 57 (11):1326–36. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.57.11.1326.
- Prenni, A. J., D. E. Day, A. Evanoski-Cole, B. C. Sive, A. Hecobian, Y. Zhou, and B. A. Schichtel. 2016. Oil and gas impacts on air quality in federal lands in the Bakken region: An overview of the Bakken air quality study and first results. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16 (3):1401–16. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1401-2016.
- Ramboll. 2018. Representativeness analysis of candidate modeling years for the Western U.S. http://www.wrapair2.org/pdf/WESTAR_RTOWG_Representativeness_final.pdf
- Ramboll. 2020a. User’s guide comprehensive air quality model with extensions, Version 7.1. https://camx-wp.azurewebsites.net/Files/CAMxUsersGuide_v7.10.pdf
- Ramboll. 2020b. Mobile source emissions inventory development for implementation in WRAP regional haze modeling. https://views.cira.colostate.edu/docs/wrap/mseipp/WRAP_MSEI_Summary_Memo_13Mar2020.pdf
- Rodriguez, M. A., M. G. Barna, and T. Moore. 2009. Regional impacts of oil and gas development on ozone formation in the Western United States. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 59 (9):1111–18. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.59.9.1111.
- Skamarock, W. C., J. B. Klemp, J. Dudhia, D. O. Gill, D. M. Barker, M. G. Duda, X.-Y. Huang, W. Wang, and J. G. Powers, 2008: A description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3. NCAR Technical Note 475. https://opensky.ucar.edu/islandora/object/technotes:500
- Solomon, P., D. Crumpler, J. Flanagan, R. Jayanty, E. Rickman, and C. McDade. 2014. U.S. National PM 2.5 chemical speciation monitoring networks—CSN and IMPROVE: Description of networks. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 64 (12):1410–38. doi:10.1080/10962247.2014.956904.
- Thompson, T. M., D. Shepherd, A. Stacy, M. G. Barna, and B. A. Schichtel. 2017. Modeling to evaluate contribution of oil and gas emissions to air pollution. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 67 (4):445–61. doi:10.1080/10962247.2016.1251508.
- U.S. EPA. 1999. Regional Haze Regulations, Final Rule. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 40 CFR Part 51. Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 126/Thursday. Accessed July 1, 1999, pp. 35714–74. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1999-07-01/pdf/99-13941.pdf
- U.S. EPA. 2017. Protection of Visibility Amendments to Requirements for State Plans, Final Rule. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 40 CFR Parts 51 and 52. Federal Register/Vol. 82, No. 6/Tuesday, Accessed January 10, 2017, pp. 3078–129. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2017-01-10/pdf/2017-00268.pdf
- U.S. EPA. 2018. Technical Support Document (TSD): Preparation of emissions inventories for the Version 7.1 2014 emissions modeling platform for the national air toxics assessment. https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-modeling/2014-version-71-technical-support-document-tsd
- U.S. EPA. 2019. Technical Support Document for EPA’s Updated 2028 Regional Haze Modeling. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC, September 19. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-10/documents/updated_2028_regional_haze_modeling-tsd-2019_0.pdf
- U.S. EPA. 2021. Technical Support Document (TSD): Preparation of emissions inventories for the 2016v1 North American emissions modeling platform. https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-modeling/2016-version-1-technical-support-document
- WRAP. 2019. Western regional modeling and analysis platform – Initial 2014 platform development and shake-out. https://views.cira.colostate.edu/iwdw/docs/waqs_2014v1_shakeout_study.aspx
- WRAP. 2020a. Weighted Emissions Potential (WEP) and Area of Influence (AOI) Analyses, https://views.cira.colostate.edu/docs/iwdw/platformdocs/WRAP_2014/Run_Spec_WRAP_2014_Task6-2_WEP-AOI-SA_v5.pdf
- WRAP. 2020b. Dynamic evaluation – 2002 CAMx simulation and analysis, run specification sheet. Western regional air partnership and Ramboll. February 24. https://views.cira.colostate.edu/docs/iwdw/platformdocs/WRAP_2014/Run_Spec_WRAP_2014_Task3_Dynamic-Evaluation_v1.pdf
- WRAP. 2020c. WRAP/WAQS 2014v2 modeling platform description and western region performance evaluation. http://views.cira.colostate.edu/iwdw/docs/WRAP_WAQS_2014v2_MPE.aspx
- WRAP. 2020d. High-Level and low-level source apportionment modeling using the Repbase2 and 2028otba2 Emission Scenarios. https://views.cira.colostate.edu/docs/iwdw/platformdocs/WRAP_2014/SourceApportionmentSpecifications_WRAP_RepBase2_and_2028OTBa2_High-LevelPMandO3_and_Low-Level_PM_andOptionalO3_Sept29_2020.pdf
- WRAP. 2021a. Future Fire Sensitivity Simulations. https://views.cira.colostate.edu/docs/iwdw/platformdocs/WRAP_2014/Run_Spec_WRAP_Future_Fire_Sensitivities_August4_2021_final.pdf
- WRAP. 2021b. WRAP technical support system for regional haze planning: emissions methods, results, and references, https://views.cira.colostate.edu/tssv2/Docs/WRAP_TSS_emissions_reference_final_20210930.pdf
- WRAP. 2021c. WRAP technical support system for regional haze planning: modeling methods, results, and references, https://views.cira.colostate.edu/tssv2/Docs/WRAP_TSS_modeling_reference_final_20210930.pdf