Perceptions of Students in an Event Management Program of Annotation Systems and Their Influence on Student Learning

References

• Akyol, Z., Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). The impact of course duration on the development of a community of inquiry. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(3), 231–246. doi:10.1080/10494820902809147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, F., Nair, P. K., & Hussain, K. (2016). An assessment of students’ acceptance and usage of computer supported collaborative classrooms in hospitality and tourism schools. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 18, 51–60. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2016.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altinay, L., & Paraskevas, A. (2007). A computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) approach in teaching research methods. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 26(3), 623–644. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2006.05.005
   Google Scholar
• Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Berge, Z. L. (1997). Computer conferencing and the on-line classroom. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 3(1), 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Brush, A. J., Bargeron, D., Grudin, J., Borning, A., & Gupta, A. (2002). Supporting interaction outside of class: Anchored discussion vs. bulletin boards. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 425–434). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Capdeferro, N., & Romero, M. (2012). Are online learners frustrated with collaborative learning experiences? International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 26–44. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. N., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36(4), 462–494. doi:10.1177/0049124108314720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, M., & Tobias, S. (2016). Should instructors require discussion in online courses? Effects of online discussion on community of inquiry, learner time, satisfaction, and achievement. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 17(2), 123–140.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, S. W., & Liu, C. H. (2005). Learning effectiveness in a Web-based virtual learning environment: A learner control perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(1), 65–76. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00114.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, C., & Ackerman, D. (2015). Student reactions to classroom management technology: Learning styles and attitudes toward Moodle. Journal of Education for Business, 90(4), 217–223. doi:10.1080/08832323.2015.1019818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell University, Center for Teaching Innovation. (2016). Collaborative learning: Group work. Retrieved from https://www.cte.cornell.edu/teaching-ideas/engaging-students/collaborative-learning.html
   Google Scholar
• Correia, A., Fonseca, B., Paredes, H., Martins, P., & Morgado, L. (2016). Computer-simulated 3D virtual environments in collaborative learning and training: Meta-review, refinement, and roadmap. In Y. Sivan (Ed.), Handbook on 3D3C platforms: Applications and tools for three dimensional systems for community, creation and commerce (progress in IS), 403–440. Basel, Switzerland: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–339. doi:10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewiyanti, S., Brand-Gruwel, S., Jochems, W., & Broers, N. J. (2007). Students’ experience with collaborative learning in asynchronous computer-supported collaborative environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 496–514. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382–388. doi:10.2307/3150980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francescato, D., Porcelli, R., Mebane, M., Cuddetta, M., Klobas, J., & Renzi, P. (2006). Evaluation of the efficacy of collaborative learning in face-to-face and computer-supported university context. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 163–176. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking and computer conferencing: A model and tool to assess cognitive presence. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. doi:10.1080/08923640109527071
   Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C. (1995). Reflections of evolution and culture in children’s cognition. American Psychologist, 50(1), 24–37. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.1.24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, M., Xu, Y., & Yu, Y. (2004). An enhanced technology acceptance model for Web-based learning. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(4), 365–374.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2/3), 147–166.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., Killion, J., & Oomen, J. (2005). Student satisfaction in the virtual classroom. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 3(2), Article 6.
   Google Scholar
• Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, E. K. (2011). Online university students’ satisfaction and persistence: Examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1654–1664. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan.
   Google Scholar
• Karger, D., & Zyto, S. (2012, May). Successful classroom deployment of a social document annotation system. Retrieved from http://people.csail.mit.edu/karger/Papers/nb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., Oeberst, A., & Cress, U. (2015). Learning and collective knowledge construction with social media: A process-oriented perspective. Educational Psychologist, 50(2), 120–137. doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1036273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning (WCLTA 2011). Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486–490. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation-confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54, 506–516. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40, 191–204. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, I., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C. (2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use an online learning community. Computers & Education, 54, 600–610. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S. H., & Lan, Y.-J. (2015). Social constructivist approach to Web-based EFL learning: Collaboration, motivation, and perception on the use of Google docs. Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 171–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X. (2010). Empirical testing of a theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: An exploratory study of education wikis. Communication Education, 59(1), 52–69. doi:10.1080/03634520903431745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madland, C., & Richards, G. (2016). Enhancing student-student online interaction: Exploring the study buddy peer review activity. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 17(3), 157–175.
   Google Scholar
• Meeting Professionals International. (2012). Meeting and business event competency standards curriculum guide (MBECS). Retrieved from https://www.mpiweb.org/docs/default-source/Research-and-Reports/MBECS-Guide-APP-2-Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mejia, C., & Phelan, K. V. (2014). Academic referent group influences on hospitality students’ intentions to enroll in an online course. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 26(2), 65–74. doi:10.1080/10963758.2014.900378
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Panitz, T. (1996). A definition of collaborative vs. cooperative learning. Retrieved from http://colccti.colfinder.org/sites/default/files/a_definition_of_collaborative_vs_cooperative_learning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47(2), 222–244. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. doi:10.1002/jee.2004.93.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, A. Y. S., Yang, S. J. H., Hwang, W., & Zhang, J. (2010). A Web 2.0-based collaborative annotation system for enhancing knowledge sharing in collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 55, 752–766. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q. (2009). Design and evaluation of a collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1138–1146. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waugh, M. L., & Su, J. (2016). Student perceptions of a successful online collaborative learning community. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 14(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J. H., Hsia, T., Liao, Y., & Tennyson, R. D. (2008). What determinates student learning satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment? In Proceedings of the 12th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Leveraging ICT for resilient organizations and sustainable growth in the Asia Pacific region, Suzhou, China (p. 149). Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1210&context=pacis2008
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55, 155–164. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zyto, S., Karger, D. R., Ackerman, M. S., & Mahajan, S. (2012). Successful classroom deployment of a social document annotation system. In H. Chi and K. Höök (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1883–1892). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2208326.
   Google Scholar