Quantitative Methods in Public Administration: Their Use and Development Through Time

REFERENCES

• Agranoff, R. and M. McGuire. 2001. “Big Questions in Public Network Management Research.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11(3): 295–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozzetto, D. A. 1994. “Quantitative Research in Public Administration: A Need to Address Some Serious Methodological Problems.” Administration & Society 26(3): 337–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. and V. L. P. Clark. 2007. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, J. and K. J. Meier. 2000. “Public Administration Research and Practice: A Methodological Manifesto.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(1): 157–199.
   Google Scholar
• Groeneveld, S. M., A. J. Steijn, and P. Van der Parre. 2009. “Joining the Dutch Civil Service: Influencing Motives in a Changing Economic Context.” Public Management Review 11(2): 173–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haverland, M. and D. Yanow. 2012. “A Hitchhiker's Guide to the Public Administration Research Universe: Surviving Conversations on Methodologies and Methods.” Public Administration Review 72(3): 401–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, D. and S. M. Delevan. 1990. “Public Administration Research: An Assessment of Journal Publications.” Public Administration Review 50(6): 674–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, D. J. and S. M. Delevan. 1994. “A Comparative Assessment of Public Administration Journal Publications.” Administration & Society 26(2): 252–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, O. and S. van Thiel. 2011. “Structural Devolution and Agencification.” Pp. 209–222 in T. Christensen and P. Laegreid eds., Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. 2000. “Public Administration at the Millennium: The State of the Field.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(1): 7–34.
   Google Scholar
• King, G., R. O. Keohane, and S. Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lan, Z. and Z. Anders. 2000. “A Paradigmatic View of Contemporary Public Administration Research: An Empirical Test.” Administration & Society 32(2): 138–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, G., J. Benoit-Bryan, and T. P. Johnson. 2012. “Survey Research in Public Administration: Assessing Mainstream Journals with a Total Survey Error Framework.” Public Administration Review 72(1): 87–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. L. 2005. Social Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• O'Toole, L. J. 2000. “Research on Policy Implementation: Assessment and Prospects.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(2): 263–288.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L. 2012. “How Can We Improve Our Science to Generate More Usable Knowledge for Public Professionals?” Public Administration Review 72: 479–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L. and A. Hondeghem. 2008. Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L. and K. L. Kraemer. 1986. “Research Methodology in the Public Administration Review, 1975–1984.” Public Administration Review 46(3): 235–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, D. W. and S. Fernandez. 2009. “The State of Public Management Research: An Analysis of Scope and Methodology.” International Public Management Journal 12(4): 399–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. 2004. “Theoretical Overview.” Pp. 319–341 in C. Pollitt and C. Talbot eds., Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. 2006. “Academic Advice to Practitioners: What is its Nature, Place and Value Within Academia?” Public Money and Management 26(4): 257–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. 2013. “Balance and Imbalance in the Study of Public Sector Organizations.” Paper presented at EGPA conference, Edinburgh, UK, September 11–13, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raadschelders, J. 2011. Public Administration: The Interdisciplinary Study of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. 1995. “The State of Public Administration: A Professional History, 1970–1995.” Public Administration 73: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. 2010. Public Administration: Traditions of Inquiry and Philosophies of Knowledge. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scandura, T. A. and E. A. Williams. 2000. “Research Methodology in Management: Current Practices, Trends, and Implications for Future Research.” Academy of Management Journal 43(6): 1248–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stallings, R. A. and J. M. Ferris. 1988. “Public Administration Research: Work in PAR, 1940–1984.” Public Administration Review 48(1): 580–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone-Romero, E. F., A. E. Weaver, and J. L. Glenar. 1995. “Trends in Research Design and Data Analytic Strategies in Organizational Research.” Journal of Management 21(1): 141–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. G. 2011. “Explaining the Willingness of Public Professionals to Implement New Policies: A Policy Alienation Framework.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 77(3): 555–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenabeele, W. 2008. “Development of a Public Service Motivation Measurement Scale: Corroborating and Extending Perry's Measurement Instrument.” International Public Management Journal 11(1): 143–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoest, K., S. Van Thiel, G. Bouckaert, and P. Laegreid. (Eds.). 2012. Government Agencies: Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Vijverberg, W. P. M. 1997. “The Quantitative Methods Component in Social Sciences Curricula in View of Journal Content.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 16(4): 621–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E. and A. M. Grant. 2010. “Unanswered Questions about Public Service Motivation: Designing Research to Address Key Issues of Emergence and Effects.” Public Administration Review 70(5): 691–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E., L. J. Manigault, and T. R. Black. 2004. “Quantitative Research Measurement in Public Administration: An Assessment of Journal Publications.” Administration & Society 35(6): 747–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar