Competitive Advantage in Nonprofit Grant Markets: Implications of Network Embeddedness and Status

REFERENCES

• Akerlof, G. 1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons': Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(3): 488–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashley, S., C. Bricker, G. Chikoto, C. Ferguson, and J. Johnson. 2008. Nonprofit Georgia: Geography. Nonprofit Studies Program Publication. Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University. https://aysps.gsu.edu/sites/default/files/documents/NonprofitGaGeography.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, S. and L. Faulk. 2010. “Nonprofit Competition in the Grants Marketplace.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 21(1): 43–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashley, S. and L. Faulk. 2014. “Financial Analysis for Measuring and Comparing Risk in Grantmaking Portfolios.” The Foundation Review 6(3): 60–68.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, S. and D. M. Van Slyke. 2012. “The Influence of Administrative Cost Ratios on State Government Grant Allocations to Nonprofits.” Public Administration Review 72(s1): 47–56.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Fundraising Professionals. 2009. 2009 State of Fundraising U.S. Fact Sheet. Arlington, VA: Association of Fundraising Professionals. www.afpnet.org/files/ContentDocuments/2009StateofFundraisingFactsheet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bielefeld, W. 1992. “Funding Uncertainty and Nonprofit Strategies in the 1980s.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 2(4): 381–402.
   Google Scholar
• Blackbaud, Inc. 2010. 2010 State of the Nonprofit Industry Survey: Global Comparison. Charleston, SC: Blackbaud, Inc. https://www.blackbaud.com/files/resources/downloads/2010%20SONI%20Global%20Comparison_US%20version.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bolduc, K., P. Buchanan, and J. Huang. 2004. Listening to Grantees: What Non-Profits Value in their Foundation Funders. Cambridge, MA: The Center for Effective Philanthropy.
   Google Scholar
• Bonacich, P. 2007. “Some Unique Properties of Eigenvector Centrality.” Social Networks 29(4): 555–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonacich, P. and P. Lloyd. 2004. “Calculating Status with Negative Relations.” Social Networks 26(4): 331–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., K. M. Carley, and D. Krackhardt. 2006. “On the Robustness of Centrality Measures under Conditions of Imperfect Data.” Social Networks 28(2): 124–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, W. 2011. “Financial Capacity and Sustainability of Ordinary Nonprofits.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 22(1): 37–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchheit, S. and L. M. Parsons. 2006. “An Experimental Investigation of Accounting Information's Influence on the Individual Giving Process.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 25(6): 666–686.
   Google Scholar
• Burger, R. and T. Owens. 2010. “Promoting Transparency in the NGO Sector: Examining the Availability and Reliability of Self-Reported Data.” World Development 38(9): 1263–1277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese, T. D. 2012. “The Accumulation of Nonprofit Profits: A Dynamic Analysis.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 41(2): 300–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese, T. D. and C. Grizzle. 2012. “Debt, Donors, and the Decision to Give.” Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting and Financial Management 24(2): 221.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, D. A. and K. J. Stater. 2009. “Revenue Diversification in Nonprofit Organizations: Does it Lead to Financial Stability?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19(4): 947–966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Effective Philanthropy. 2002. Indicators of Effectiveness Report: Understanding and Improving Foundation Performance. Report on the Foundation Performance Metrics Pilot Study. Cambridge, MA: Center for Effective Philanthropy.
   Google Scholar
• Church, B. K. and L. M. Parsons. 2008. “Performance Information and Charitable Giving: Experimental Evidence.” Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology and The University of Alabama. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228803033_Performance_Information
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. 2001. Influence: Science and Practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, B. L., S. T. Certo, R. D. Ireland, and C. R. Reutzel. 2011. “Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment.” Journal of Management 37(1): 39–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easley, D. and M. O'Hara. 1986. “Optimal Nonprofit Firms.” Pp. 85–93 in S. Rose-Ackerman ed., The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions: Studies in Structure and Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esparza, N. and S. H. Jeon. 2013. “Interlocking Boards of Trustees and Grant Acquisition among Homeless Service Organizations.” Public Performance & Management Review 36(4): 637–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulk, L. 2014. “Overcoming the Cause of Failure and the Role of Issue Salience: Toward a Comprehensive Theory for Nonprofit Activity and Competition in a Three-Sector Economy.” Nonprofit Policy Forum 5(2): 335–365.
   Google Scholar
• Faulk, L., A. J. Stewart, and J. F. Boyer. 2013. “Illuminating the Black Box: Testing the Two-Stage Competitive Process for Grants.” Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action (ARNOVA) annual association meeting, Hartford, CT, November 20–23, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Feigenbaum, S. 1987. “Competition and Performance in the Nonprofit Sector: The Case of US Medical Research Charities.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 35(3): 241–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, D. P. 1998. “Measuring the Unmeasurable: Empirical Studies of Nonprofit Organization Effectiveness from 1977 to 1997.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 27(2): 183–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, W. and G. Fine. 2007. “How Nonprofits Get Really Big.” Stanford Social Innovation Review 5(2): 46–55.
   Google Scholar
• Foundation Center. 2005. Key Facts on Georgia Foundations. Washington, DC: Foundation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Foundation Center. 2014. Key Facts on U.S. Foundations. Washington, DC: Foundation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. 1979. “Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification.” Social Networks 1(1978/79): 215–239.
   Google Scholar
• Frumkin, P. 2006. Strategic Giving: The Art and Science of Philanthropy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frumkin, P. 1998. “The Long Recoil from Regulation: Private Philanthropic Foundations and the Tax Reform Act of 1969.” American Review of Public Administration 28(3): 266–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frumkin, P. and M. T. Kim. 2001. “Strategic Positioning and the Financing of Nonprofit Organizations: Is Efficiency Rewarded in the Contributions Marketplace?” Public Administrative Review 61(3): 266–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz, J. 1985. Social Organization of an Urban Grants Economy: A Study of Business Philanthropy and Nonprofit Organizations. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz, J. 1997. “An Urban Grants Economy Revisited: Corporate Charitable Contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979–81, 1987–89.” Administrative Science Quarterly 42(3): 445–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz, J., W. Bielefeld, and M. Dowell. 2006. “Networks and Organizational Growth: A Study of Community Based Nonprofits.” Administrative Science Quarterly 51(3): 337–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz, J. and S. Wasserman. 1989. “Mimetic Processes within an Interorganizational Field: An Empirical Test.” Administrative Science Quarterly 34(3): 454–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrow, E. E. 2011. “Receipt of Government Revenue Among Nonprofit Human Service Organizations.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(3): 445–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrow, E. E. 2014. “Does Race Matter in Government Funding of Nonprofit Human Service Organizations? The Interaction of Neighborhood Poverty and Race.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24(2): 381–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giving USA. 2013. Giving USA 2013: The Annual Report on Philanthropy for the Year 2012. Chicago, IL: Giving USA Foundation and The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, T. P., C. L. Knock, and D. G. Neely. 2009. “The Role of Rating Agencies in the Market for Charitable Contributions: An Empirical Test.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 28(6): 469–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenlee, J. S. and K. L. Brown. 1999. “The Impact of Accounting Information on Contributions to Charitable Organizations.” Research in Accounting Regulation 13: 111–126.
   Google Scholar
• Greenlee, J. S. and H. Tuckman. 2007. “Financial health.” Pp. 315–335 in D. R. Young ed., Financing Nonprofits: Putting Theory into Practice. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, A. G. and D. Howard. 2009. “The Nonprofit Starvation Cycle.” Stanford Social Innovation Review 7(4): 49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Gronbjerg, K. A., L. Martell, and L. Paarlberg. 2000. “Philanthropic Funding of Human Services: Solving Ambiguity through the Two-Stage Competitive Process.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 29(suppl 1): 9–40.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, M. A. 2001. “Financial Vulnerability among Arts Organizations: A Test of the Tuckman-Chang Measures.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 30(2): 376–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hager, M. A., J. Galaskiewicz, and J. A. Larson. 2004. “Structural Embeddedness and the Liability of Newness among Nonprofit Organizations.” Public Management Review 6(2): 159–188.
   Google Scholar
• Hansmann, H. B. 1980. “The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise.” The Yale Law Journal 89(5): 835–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansmann, H. B. 1987. “Economic Theories of Nonprofit Organization.” Pp. 27–42 in W. Powell ed., The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D. and D. O. Renz. 1998. “Nonprofit Organizational Effectiveness: Contrasts between Especially Effective and Less Effective Organizations.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 9(1): 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D. and D. O. Renz. 2004. “Doing Things Right: Effectiveness in Local Nonprofit Organizations, a Panel Study.” Public Administration Review 64(6): 694–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D. and D. O. Renz. 2008. “Advancing Nonprofit Organizational Effectiveness Research and Theory: Nine Theses.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 18(4): 399–415.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, F. A. and N. P. Marudas. 2006. “Excessive, Optimal, and Insufficient Fundraising among the Nonprofit Times 100.” International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 11(2): 105–114.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, F. A. and N. P. Marudas. 2009. “The Combined Effect of Donation Price and Administrative Inefficiency on Donations to US Nonprofit Organizations.” Financial Accountability & Management 25(1): 33–53.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. and A. Roy. 2008. “Staging Exchange Partner Choices: When do Status and Reputation Matter?” Academy of Management Journal 51: 495–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing, Y. and B. Chen. 2012. “Is Competitive Contracting Really Competitive? Exploring Government–Nonprofit Collaboration in China.” International Public Management Journal 15(4): 405–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. M. 2016. “Necessary But Not Sufficient: The Impact of Community Input on Grantee Selection.” Administration & Society 48(1): 73–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun, K. N. and E. Shiau. 2012. “How are We Doing? A Multiple Constituency Approach to Civic Association Effectiveness.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 41(4): 632–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krashinsky, M. 1986. “Transaction Costs and a Theory of the Nonprofit Organization.” Pp. 114–132 in Susan Rose-Ackerman ed., The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions: Studies in Structure and Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krashinsky, M. 1997. “Stakeholder Theories of the Non-profit Sector: One Cut at the Economic Literature.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 8(2): 149–161.
   Google Scholar
• Lamothe, S. 2014. “How Competitive is ‘Competitive’ Procurement in the Social Services?” The American Review of Public Administration 45(5): 584–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latapy, M., C. Magnien, and N. Del Vecchio. 2008. “Basic Notions for the Analysis of Large Two-Mode Networks.” Social Networks 30(1): 31–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIndoe, H. 2008. “Repeat Players and New Entrants in the Chicago Grants Economy.” Working paper, Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• McGinnis, J. and S. Ashley. 2011. “The Family Difference? Exploring the Congruence in Grant Distribution Patterns between Family and Independent Foundations.” The Foundation Review 3(4): 74–81.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. and L. J. O'Toole. 2010. “Organizational Performance: Measurement Theory and an Application: Or, Common Source Bias, the Achilles Heel of Public Management Research.” American Political Science Association 2010 Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, September 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. C. and N. S. Majluf. 1984. “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms have Information that Investors Do Not Have.” Journal of Financial Economics 13(2): 187–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCCS. 2012a. Core 990 Data Files 2000–2005. Washington, DC: National Center for Charitable Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• NCCS. 2012b. NCCS-GuideStar National Nonprofit Research Database 990 Data Files 2000–2003. Washington, DC: National Center for Charitable Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Never, B. 2014. “Divergent Patterns of Nonprofit Financial Distress.” Nonprofit Policy Forum 5(1): 67–84.
   Google Scholar
• Nonprofit Research Collaborative. 2011. The Nonprofit Research Collaborative: Summer/Early Fall 2011. http://npresearch.org/summer-2011.html
   Google Scholar
• Nonprofit Research Collaborative. 2012. Nonprofit Fundraising Study: Covering Charitable Receipts at U.S. Nonprofit Organizations in 2011. http://npresearch.org/winter-2012.html
   Google Scholar
• Okten, C. and B. Weisbrod. 2000. “Determinants of Donations in Private Nonprofit Markets.” Journal of Public Economics 75(2): 255–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opsahl, T. 2009. “Structure and Evolution of Weighted Networks.” Ph.D. dissertation, School of Business and Management of Queen Mary College, University of London, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Opsahl, T. 2013. “Triadic Closure in Two-Mode Networks: Redefining the Global and Local Clustering Coefficients.” Social Networks 35(2): 159–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padrón, B., M. Nogales, and A. Traveset. 2011. “Alternative Approaches of Transforming Bimodal into Unimodal Mutualistic Networks: The Usefulness of Preserving Weighted Information.” Basic and Applied Ecology 12(8): 713–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, L. M. 2007. “The Impact of Financial Information and Voluntary Disclosures on Contributions to Not for Profit Organizations.” Behavioral Research in Accounting 19(1): 179–196.
   Google Scholar
• Pettijohn, S. L. 2013. The Nonprofit Sector in Brief: Public Charities, Giving and Volunteering, 2013. Washington, D.C: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Piazza, A. and F. Castellucci. 2014. “Status in Organization and Management Theory.” Journal of Management 40(1): 287–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podolny, J. 2005. Status Signal: A Sociological Study of Market Competition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Podolny, J. M. 1993. “A Status-Based Model of Market Competition.” American Journal of Sociology 98(4): 829–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podolny, J. M. 1994. “Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange.” Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 458–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posnett, J. and T. Sandler. 1989. “Demand for Charity Donations in Private Non-Profit Markets: The Case of the UK.” Journal of Public Economics 40(2): 187–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandfort, J. 2008. “Using Lessons from Public Affairs to Inform Strategic Philanthropy.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 37(3): 537–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauder, M., F. Lynn, and J. M. Podolny. 2012. “Status: Insights from Organizational Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 38: 267–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1943. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seaman, B., A. Wilsker, and D. R. Young. 2014. “Measuring Concentration and Competition in the U.S. Nonprofit Sector: Implications for Research and Public Policy.” Nonprofit Policy Forum 5(2): 231–259.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1955. “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 69(1): 99–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistical Consulting Group. 2014. Stata Data Analysis Examples: Truncated Regression. Los Angeles: UCLA Statistical Consulting Group. http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/dae/truncreg.htm
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, M. and C. B. Stevens. 1992. The Big Six: The Selling Out of America's Top Accounting Firms. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E. and A. Weiss. 1981. “Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information.” The American Economic Review 71(3): 393–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez, D. F. 2011. “Collaboration and Professionalization: The Contours of Public Sector Funding for Nonprofit Organizations.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(2): 307–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornoton, J. 2006. “Nonprofit Fund-Raising in Competitive Donor Markets.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 35: 204–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, J. 2010. “Explaining Unrestricted Giving by Charitable Foundations: A Transaction Cost Approach.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 28(1): 44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinkelman, D. 2004. “Using Non-Profit Organization-Level Financial Data to Infer Managers’ Fund-Raising Strategies.” Journal of Public Economics 88(9–10): 2181–2192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinkelman, D. and K. Mankaney. 2007. “When is Administrative Efficiency Associated with Charitable Donations?” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 36(1): 41–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussel, J. M. 2002. “Revisiting the Prediction of Financial Vulnerability.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 13(1): 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckman, H. P. and C. F. Chang. 1991. “A Methodology for Measuring the Financial Vulnerability of Charitable Nonprofit Organizations.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 20(4): 445–460.
   Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B. and R. Lancaster. 2004. “Embeddedness and Price Formation in the Corporate Law Market. American Sociological Review 69(3): 319–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. and B. S. Coffey. 1992. “Board Composition and Corporate Philanthropy.” Journal of Business Ethics 11(10): 771–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisbrod, B. and N. Dominguez. 1986. “Demand for Collective Goods in Private Nonprofit Markets: Can Fundraising Expenditures Help Overcome Free-Rider Behavior.” Journal of Public Economics 30(1): 83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werbel, J. D. and S. M. Carter. 2002. “The CEO's Influence on Corporate Foundation Giving.” Journal of Business Ethics 40(1): 47–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, J., S. Boenigk, and M. Jegers. 2014. “Seven Trade-Offs in Measuring Nonprofit Performance and Effectiveness.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 25(6): 1648–1670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, J., M. Jegers, and L. Faulk. 2014. “The Antecedents of Reputational Effectiveness.” Public Performance & Management Review.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. 1979. “Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations.” Journal of Law and Economics 22(2): 233–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. 2000. Introductory Economics: A Modern Approach. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
   Google Scholar