Street-Level Bureaucrats as Individual Policymakers: The Relationship between Attitudes and Coping Behavior toward Vulnerable Children and Youth

REFERENCES

• Akerloff, G. A. and R. E. Kranton. 2005. “Identity and the Economics of Organizations.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(1): 9–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baviskar, S. and S. C. Winter. 2009. “The Effects of Casework on Vulnerable Children and Youth.” Paper presented at the XXI World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Santiago, Chile, July 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, F., S. C. Winter, M. H. Stigaard, A. C. Henriksen, and N. Friisberg. 2008. Statslig og Kommunal Beskæftigelsesindsats: Implementering af “Flere i arbejde” før Strukturreformen (State and Municipal Employment Efforts: The Implementation of the “Putting More People into Work” Reform before The Local Government Consolidation Act). Copenhagen: SFI–Danish National Centre for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, H. S., C. J. Hill, and J. Riccio. 2003. “Linking Program Implementation and Effectiveness: Lessons from a Pooled Sample of Welfare-to-Work Experiments.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 22(4): 551–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. 2003. “Sources of Public Service Improvement: A Critical Review and Research Agenda.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13(3): 367–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannick, M. T., D. Chan, J. M. Conway, C. E. Lance, and P. E. Spector. 2010. “What is Method Variance and How Can We Cope with it? A Panel Discussion.” Organizational Research Methods 13: 407–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. and S. Gates. 1997. Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., D. Wastell, S. White, C. Hall, S. Peckover, K. Thompson, A. Pithouse, and D. Davey. 2010. “Performing ‘Initial Assessment': Identifying the Latent Conditions for Error at the Front-Door of Local Authority Children's Services.” British Journal of Social Work 40: 352–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. 1997. “Inside the Welfare Contract: Discretion and Accountability in State Welfare Administration.” Social Service Review 71(1): 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. 2011. “Policy Work: Street-Level Organizations under New Managerialism.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(supplement 2): i253–i277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. 2012. “Reflections on Street-Level Bureaucracy: Past, Present, and Future.” Public Administration Review 72(6): 940–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmines, E. G. and R. A. Zeller. 1979. Reliability and Validity Assessment (Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 07–017). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cearley, S. 2004. “The Power of Supervision in Child Welfare Services.” Child and Youth Care Forum 33(5): 313–327.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, D. 2008. “So Why Ask Me?—Are Self-Report Data Really that Bad?” Pp. 309–36 in C. E. Lance and R. J. Vandenberg (eds.), Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends: Received Doctrine, Verity, and Fable in the Organizational and Social Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, E. and T. Egelund. 2002. Børnesager (Child Cases). SFI report no. 0210. Copenhagen: SFI–Danish National Centre for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Christoffersen, M. C., A.-D. Hestbæk, A. Lindemann, and V. L. Nielsen. 2005. Nye Regler for Udsatte Børn og Unge: Evaluering af Ændringerne i Serviceloven 2001 (New Rules for Vulnerable Children and Youth: Evaluation of Changes in the 2001Social Service Law). Copenhagen: SFI–Danish National Centre for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Christoffersen, M. N. 2002. Social Støtte til Børn: En Undersøgelse af Børn, der Modtog Forebyggende Hjælp iht. Serviceloven for Første gang i 1998 (Social Assistance to Children: An Investigation of Children Who Received Preventive Assistance under the Act on Social Services for the First Time in 1998). SFI Working Paper 9: 2002. Copenhagen: SFI–Danish National Center for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, J. M. and C. E. Lance. 2010. “What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research.” Journal of Business & Psychology 25: 325–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, T. G. and S. L. Manring. 1977. “The Relationship between Worker Alienation and Work-Related Behavior.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 10(2): 167–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal, R. S. 2005. “A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Counterproductive Work Behavior.” Journal of Applied Psychology 90: 1241–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPietro, R. B. and A. Pizam. 2008. “Employee Alienation in the Quick Service Restaurant Industry.” Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research 32(1): 22–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohan, D., L. Schmidt, and S. Henderson. 2005. “From Enabling to Bootstrapping: Welfare Workers’ Views of Substance Abuse and Welfare Reform.” Contemporary Drug Problems 32: 429–55.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1967. Inside Bureaucracy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. and S. Chaiken. 1993. The Pyschology of Attitudes. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Egelund, T. 1996. “Bureaucracy or Professionalism? The Work Tools of Child Protection Services.” Scandinavian Journal of Social Work 5: 165–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egelund, T. 2002. Metodeanvendelse i Kommunernes Forebyggende Arbejde med Børn og Unge. 2. Delrapport i Evaluering af den Forebyggende Indsats over for Børn og Unge (The Application of Methods in Municipalities’ Preventive Efforts for Children and Youth, Second Subreport in Evaluation of Preventive Interventions for Children and Youth). Working paper 03:2002. Copenhagen: SFI–Danish National Centre for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Egelund, T. and S. A. Thomsen. 2002. En Vignetundersøgelse om Socialforvaltningernes Vurderinger i Børnesager (A Vignette-Based Study of Municipalities’ Assessments in Child Cases). Copenhagen: SFI–Danish National Centre for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F. 1982. “Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions.” Pp. 18–35 in W. Williams et al. ed., Studying Implementation: Methodological and Administrative Issues. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Favero, N. and J. B. Bullock. 2015. “How (Not) to Solve the Problem: An Evaluation of Scholarly Responses to Common Source Bias.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(1): 285–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favero, N., K. J. Meier, and L. J. O'Toole Jr. 2014. “Goals, Trust, Participation, and Feedback: Linking Internal Management with Performance Outcomes.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26(2): 327–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fixsen, D. L., S. F. Naoom, K. A. Blasé, R. M. Friedman, and F. Wallace. 2005. Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, P. B. and W. K. Hoy. 1978. “Isolation and Alienation in Educational Organizations.” Educational Administration Quarterly 14(1): 80–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frese, M. and D. Zapf. 1994. Methodological Issues in the Study of Work Stress: Objective vs. Subjective Measurement of Work Stress and the Question of Longitudinal Studies. Oxford, UK: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gaasholt, Ø. and L. Togeby. 1995. I syv Sind: Danskernes Holdninger til Flygtninge og Indvandrere (In Two Minds: The Attitudes of Danes toward Refugees and Immigrants). Aarhus: Politica.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N., N. Parton, and M. Skivenes ed. 2011. Child Protection Systems: International Trends and Orientations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, S., N. Burns, N. Hutton, F. McNeill, and C. Tata. 2009. “Street-Level Bureaucracy, Interprofessional Relations, and Coping Mechanisms: A Study of Criminal Justice Social Workers in the Sentencing Process.” Law and Policy 31(4): 405–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handler, J. F. 1986. The Conditions of Discretion. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. 2000. “Organizational Forms as Moral Practices: The Case of Welfare Departments.” Social Service Review 74(3): 329–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinesen, E., S. C. Winter, I. R. Bøge, and Leif Husted. 2004. Kommunernes Integrationsindsats og Integrationssucces (The Integration Efforts and the Integration Success of Municipalities). Copenhagen: AKF Forlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Hestbæk, A.-D. 2011. “Denmark: A Child Welfare System under Reframing.” Pp. 131–53 in N. Gilbert, ed., Child Protection Systems: International Trends and Orientations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hestbæk, A.-D., A. Lindemann, V. L. Nielsen, and M. N. Christoffersen. 2006. Nye Regler–Nye Praksis: Ændringerne i Servicelovens Børneregler 2001: Afslutningsrapport (New Regulations–New Practices: 2001 Changes to the Child-Related Regulations in the Social Service Act: Final Report). Odense: Agency for Social Service.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C. J. 2006. “Casework Job Design and Client Outcomes in Welfare-to-Work Offices.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(2): 263–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosticka, C. J. 1979. “We Don't Care about What Happened, We Only Care about What Is Going to Happen: Lawyer–Client Negotiations of Reality.” Social Problems 26(5): 599–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., M. Hill, and A. Buffat eds. 2015. Understanding Street-level Bureaucracy. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M. and R. Jensen. 2015. “Common Method Bias in Public Management Studies.” International Public Management Journal 18(1): 3–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, T. P., S. C. Winter, J. Manniche, and P. D. Ørberg. 1991. Indsatsen for Langtidsledige–en Undersøgelse af Administration og Effekt af Arbejds: Og Uddannelsestilbud (Assisting Long-Term Unemployed People–Examining the Implementation and Effect of the Danish Employment Training Program). Copenhagen: AKF Forlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Kadushin, A. 1992. Supervision in Social Work, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keiser, L. R. 2010. “Understanding Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Decision Making: Determining Eligibility in the Social Security Disability Program.” Public Administration Review 70(2): 247–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keiser, L. R. and J. Soss. 1998. “With Good Cause: Bureaucratic Discretion and the Politics of Child Support Enforcement.” American Journal of Political Science 42(4): 1133–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Léveillé, S. and C. Chamberland. 2010. “Toward a General Model for Child Welfare and Protection Services: A Meta-Evaluation of International Experiences Regarding the Adoption of the Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families (FACNF).” Children and Youth Services Review 32: 929–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, A. C. 2002. Reform in the Making: The Implementation of Social Policy in Prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindemann, A. and V. L. Nielsen. 2006. “Gør Valg af Ledelsesværktøjer og Ledelsesstil en Forskel?” (Does a Choice of Leadership Tools and Leadership Style Make a Difference?) Nordisk Administrativt Tidsskrift 87(4): 242–69.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1981. “The Welfare State as Workplace.” Public Welfare 39(3): 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Loyens, K. 2015. “Law Enforcement and Policy Alienation: Coping by Labor Inspectors and Federal Police Officers.” Pp. 99–114 in P. Hupe M. Hill and A. Buffat eds., Understanding Street-Level Bureaucracy. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• May, P. J. and S. C. Winter. 2009. “Politicians, Managers, and Street-Level Bureaucrats: Influence on Policy Implementation.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19(3): 453–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S. and M. Musheno. 2003. Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. and L. J. O'Toole, Jr. 2007. “Modeling Public Management: Empirical Analysis of the Management-Performance Nexus.” Public Management Review 9: 503–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. and L. J. O'Toole, Jr. 2013. “Subjective Organizational Performance and Measurement Error: Common Source Bias and Spurious Relationships.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23: 429–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, M. K., B. Glaser, and K. MacDonald. 1998. “On the Front Lines of Welfare Delivery: Are Workers Implementing Policy Reforms?” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17(1): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, M. K. and V. L. Nielsen. 2012. “Street-Level Bureaucrats and Policy Implementation.” Pp. 305–18 in B. G. Peters and J. Pierre eds., The Sage Handbook of Public Administration. London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, M. K. and S. Vorsanger. 2003. “Street-Level Bureaucrats and the Implementation of Public Policy.” Pp. 245–56 in B. G. Peters and J. Pierre eds., Handbook of Public Administration. London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. J. and A. B. Whitford. 2007. “The Principal's Moral Hazard: Constraints on the Use of Incentives in Hierarchy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17(2): 213–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, T. M. 1984. “The New Economics of Organization.” American Journal of Political Science 28(4): 739–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, V. L. 2006. “Are Street-Level Bureaucrats Compelled or Enticed to Cope?” Public Administration 84(4): 861–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, V. L. and T. Pallesen. 2009. “Procesregulering af Indsatsen overfor Udsatte Børn og Unge” (Process Regulation of Work towards Vulnerable Children and Youth).” Politica 41(2): 199–214.
   Google Scholar
• Ones, D., C. Viswesvaran, and A. Reiss. 1996. “Role of Social Desirability in Personality Testing for Personnel Selection: The Red Herring.” Journal of Applied Psychology 81: 660–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallesen, T. 2006. “The Impact of Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Discretion: The Case of Out-of-Home Placement of Children and Youngsters in Danish Localities.” Paper presented at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, USA, August 31–September 3.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, M. J. 2013. “Public Service Motivation and Attraction to Public versus Private Sector Employment: Academic Field of Study as Moderator?” International Public Management Journal 16(3): 357–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, M. J. 2015. Capitalizing on the Forces within Us: Public Employee Motivation and Commitment at Work. Ph.D. dissertation, submitted to Department of Political Science, Aarhus University.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff. 2003. “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88: 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendergast, C. 2007. “The Motivation and Bias of Bureaucrats.” American Economic Review 97(1): 180–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendergast, C. 2008. “Intrinsic Motivation and Incentives.” American Economic Review 98(2): 201–05.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prottas, J. M. 1979. People-Processing. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M., M. K. Meyers, I. Lurie, and J. S. Han. 2004. “The Implementation of Welfare Reform Policy: The Role of Public Managers in Front-Line Practices.” Public Administration Review 64(4): 438–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosdahl, A. and U. Hvidman. 2011. “Personaleledelse af lærere” (Human Resource Management of Teachers), Pp. 105–14 in S. C. Andersen and S. C. Winter eds., Ledelse, Læring og Trivsel i Folkeskolerne (Management, Learning and Well-being in Danish Public Schools). Copenhagen: SFI–Danish National Centre for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sandfort, J. R. 2000. “Moving Beyond Discretion and Outcomes: Examining Public Management from the Front Lines of the Welfare System.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10: 729–76.
   Google Scholar
• Sandfort, J. R., A. Kalil, and J. A. Gottschalk. 1999. “The Mirror Has Two Faces: Welfare Clients and Front-Line Workers View Policy Reforms.” Journal of Poverty 3(3): 71–91.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. L. and H. Ingram. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” American Political Science Review 87(2): 334–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz, J. T., J. Twombly, and B. Headrick. 1991. “Street-Level Political Controls over Federal Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review 85(3): 829–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkansky, I. 1995. “Coping Strategies of Engagement and Avoidance: The Case of Jerusalem.” Policy & Politics 23(2): 91–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. 1995. “Supervision and Consultation.” Pp. 2373–79 in R. L. Edwards and J. G. Hopps eds., Encyclopedia of Social Work, 19th ed. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. D. and S. E. Donovan. 2003. “Child Welfare Practice in Organizational and Institutional Context.” Social Service Review 77(4): 541–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. R. and M. Lipsky. 1995. Nonprofits for Hire: The Welfare State in the Age of Contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soss, J., R. C. Fording, and S. F. Schram. 2011a. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soss, J., R. C. Fording, and S. F. Schram. 2011b. “The Organization of Discipline: From Performance Management to Perversity and Punishment.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(supplement 2): i203–i232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, P. E. 2006. “Method Variance in Organizational Research.” Organizational Research Methods 9: 221–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, C. N. 1981. “Attitudinal Tendencies among Officials.” Pp. 83–101 in Charles T. Goodsell ed., The Public Encounter: Where State and Citizen Meet. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, I. and J. Kelly. 2006. “Professionals, Discretion and Public Sector Reform in the UK: Re-visiting Lipsky.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 19(7): 629–42.
   Google Scholar
• Togeby, L. 1997. Fremmedhed og Fremmedhad i Danmark: Teorier til Forklaring af Etnocentrisme (Foreignhood and Xenophobia in Denmark: Theories Explaining Etnocentrism). Copenhagen: Columbus.
   Google Scholar
• Togeby, L. 2000. “Som man Råber i Skoven” (If One Makes Rude Remarks).” Politica 32: 191–205.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M. and C. R. Gareis. 2004. “Principals’ Sense of Efficacy: Assessing a Promising Construct.” Journal of Educational Administration 42(5): 573–85.
   Google Scholar
• Tummers, L., V. Bekkers, and B. Steijn. 2012. “Explaining the Willingness of Public Professionals to Implement Public Policies: Content, Context, and Personality Characteristics.” Public Administration 90(3): 716–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. L. G., V. Bekkers, E. Vink, and M. Musheno. 2015. “Coping during Public Service Delivery: A Conceptualization and Systematic Review of the Literature.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(4): 1099–1126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkup, M. 1997. “Policy Dysfunction in Humanitarian Organizations: The Role of Coping Strategies, Institutions, and Organizational Culture.” Journal of Refugee Studies 10(1): 37–60.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins-Hayes, C. 2009a. The New Welfare Bureaucrats: Entanglements of Race, Class and Policy Reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins-Hayes, C. 2009b. “Race-ing the Bootstrap Climb: Black and Latino Bureaucrats in Post-Reform Welfare Offices.” Social Problems 56(2): 285–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherall, C. D. and K. S. Markwardt. 2010. Caseworker Behavior and Clients’ Employability. Copenhagen: SFI–The Danish National Centre for Social Research Working Paper Series 2010:04.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherley, R. A. 1979. Reforming Special Education: Policy Implementation from State Level to Street Level. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherley, R. A. and M. Lipsky. 1977. “Street-Level Bureaucrats and Institutional Innovation: Implementing Special Education Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 47: 171–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J. and S. E. Anderson. 1994. “An Alternative Approach to Method Effects Using Latent-Variable Models: Applications in Organizational Behavior Research.” Journal of Applied Psychology 79: 323–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S. C. 1986. “Studying Implementation of Top-Down Policy from the Bottom Up: Implementation of Danish Youth Employment Policy.” Pp. 109–38 in R. C. Rist ed., Finding Work. Cross National Perspectives on Employment and Training. New York, NY: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S. C. 2002. “Explaining Street-Level Bureaucratic Behavior in Social and Regulatory Policies.” Paper presented at the 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, August 29–September 1.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S. C. 2003. “Political Control, Street-Level Bureaucrats and Information Asymmetry in Regulatory and Social Policies.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, DC, November 6–8, 2003, Danish National Institute of Social Research, Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S. C. 2005. “Effects of Casework: The Relation between Implementation and Social Effects in Danish Integration Policy.” Paper presented at the 2005 Research Conference of the Association for Public Policy and Management, Washington, DC, November 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S. C., P. T. Dinesen, and P. J. May. 2008. “Implementation Regimes and Street-Level Bureaucrats: Employment Service Delivery in Denmark.” SFI Working Paper Series 2008: 12. Copenhagen: SFI–Danish National Centre for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S. C. and P. J. May. 2001. “Motivation for Compliance with Environmental Regulation.” Journal of Policy Analysis & Management 20(4): 675–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S. C. and P. J. May. 2015. “Street-Level Bureaucrats and Regulatory Deterrence.” Pp. 133–152 in M. Hill A. Buffat and P. Hupe eds., Understanding Street-Level Bureaucracy. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S. C., V. L. Nielsen, and P. J. May. 2011. “Coercion at the Frontlines in Regulatory and Social Policies: The Role of Power and Social Construction of Target Populations.” Paper presented at the Public Management Research Conference, Syracuse, NY, June 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S. C., M. J. Pedersen, V. L. Nielsen, and S. C. Andersen. 2016. “Pygmalion Effects on Followers’ Followers.” Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association at San Juan, Puerto Rico, January 7–9, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S. C., M. H. Skou, and F. Beer. 2008. “Effective Management for National or Local Policy Objectives? Implementing Welfare Sanction Policy in Denmark.” SFI Working Paper Series 2008: 14. Copenhagen: SFI–Danish National Centre for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Worsham, J. and J. Gatrell. 2005. “Multiple Principals, Multiple Signals: A Signaling Approach to Principal-Agent Relations.” The Policy Studies Journal 3(3): 363–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamnill, S. and G. N. McLean. 2001. “Theories Supporting Transfer of Training.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 12(2): 195–208.
   Google Scholar