Barriers for Crowd’s Impact in Crowdsourced Policymaking: Civic Data Overload and Filter Hierarchy

REFERENCES

• Aitamurto, T. 2012. Crowdsourcing for Democracy: New Era in Policy-Making. Helsinki, Finland: Publications of the Committee for the Future, Parliament of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Aitamurto, T. 2016. “Collective Intelligence in Law Reforms: When the Logic of the Crowds and the Logic of Policymaking Collide.” Pp. 1780–2789. Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, January 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Aitamurto, T., and K. Chen. 2017. “The Value of Crowdsourcing in Public Policymaking: Epistemic, Democratic and Economic Value.” The Theory and Practice of Legislation 5(1):55–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitamurto, T., and J. Saldivar. 2017. “Motivating Participation in Crowdsourced Policymaking: The Interplay of Epistemic and Interactive Aspects. Motivating Participation in Crowdsourced Policymaking: The Interplay of Epistemic and Interactive Aspects.” Proceedings of the Acm on Human-Computer Interaction 1(2):1–22. Article 18.
   Google Scholar
• Aitamurto, T., and H. Landemore. 2015. “Five Design Principles for Crowdsourced Policymaking: Assessing the Case of Crowdsourced off-Road Traffic Law in Finland.” Journal of Social Media for Organizations 2(1):1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Aitamurto, T., and H. Landemore. 2016. “Crowdsourced Deliberation: The Case of the Law on off-Road Traffic in Finland.” Policy & Internet 8(2):174–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitamurto, T., H. Landemore, and J. Saldivar Galli. 2017. “Unmasking the Crowd: Participants’ Motivation Factors, Expectations, and Profile in a Crowdsourced Law Reform.” Information, Communication & Society 20(8):1239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1228993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekkers, V. J., and V. Homburg, eds. 2005. The Information Ecology of e-Government: e-Government as Institutional and Technological Innovation in Public Administration. Vol. 9. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Besley, T., and M. Ghatak. 2003. “Incentives, Choice, and Accountability in the Provision of Public Services.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 19(2):235–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, T., and R. Burgess. 2001. “Political Agency, Government Responsiveness and the Role of the Media.” European Economic Review 45 (4–6):629–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. 2013. Crowdsourcing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charalabidis, Y., A. Triantafillou, V. Karkaletsis, and E. Louki. 2012. “Public Policy Formulation Through Non-Moderated Crowdsourcing in Social Media.” Pp. 156–69. Paper presented at International Conference on Electronic Participation.
   Google Scholar
• Chun, S. A., S. Shulman, R. Sandoval, and E. Hovy. 2010. “Government 2.0: Making Connections between Citizens, Data and Government.” Information Polity 15(1):1.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. 2010. Why Voice Matters. London, UK: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Distelhorst, G., and Y. Hou. 2017. “Constituency Service under Nondemocratic Rule: evidence from China.” The Journal of Politics 79(3):1024–1040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. 2001. Social Policy, Public Policy: From Problem to Practice. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Estellés-Arolas, E., and F. González-Ladrón-de-Guevara. 2012. “Towards an Integrated Crowdsourcing Definition.” Journal of Information Science 38(2):189–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. 2011. When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Font, J., S. P. del Amo, and G. Smith. 2016. “Tracing the Impact of Proposals from Participatory Processes: methodological Challenges and Substantive Lessons.” Journal of Public Deliberation 12(1):3.
   Google Scholar
• Font, J., G. Smith, C. Galais, and P. Alarcón. 2017. “Cherry‐Picking Participation: Explaining the Fate of Proposals from Participatory Processes.” European Journal of Political Research 57:615–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S. 1994. “Direct Democracy: Politico-Economic Lessons from Swiss Experience.” American Economics Review 84(2):338–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. 2006. “Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance.” Public Administration Review 66(s1):66–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. 2015. “Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future.” Public Administration Review 75(4):513–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A., and E. O. Wright. 2001. “Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance.” Politics and Society 29(1):5–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J. 2004. “Towards Participatory Governance: Assessing the Transformative Possibilities.” Pp. 25–41 in Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation, edited by S. Hickey and G. Mohan, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Goel, A., A. Krishnaswamy, S. Sakshuwong, and T. Aitamurto. 2015. “Knapsack Voting.” Collective Intelligence 2015, Santa Clara, May 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, J. 2008. Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business. New York: Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., M. Ramesh, and A. Perl. 1995. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles & Policy Subsystems. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., Y. Charalabidis, and A. Zuiderwijk. 2012. “Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government.” Information Systems Management 29(4):258–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., and H. Van Der Voort. 2016. “Adaptive Governance: Towards a Stable, Accountable and Responsive Government.” Government Information Quarterly 33(1):1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeppesen, L. B., and K. R. Lakhani. 2010. “Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search.” Organization Science 21(5):1016–1033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. 2015. “Moderator Variables.” http://davidakenny.net/cm/moderation.htm
   Google Scholar
• Konisky, D. M., and T. C. Beierle. 2001. “Innovations in Public Participation and Environmental Decision Making: Examples from the Great Lakes Region.” Society and Natural Resources 14(9):815–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuklinski, J. H., and J. E. Stanga. 1979. “Political Participation and Government Responsiveness: The Behavior of California Superior Courts.” American Political Science Review 73(4):1090–1099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landemore, H. 2015. “Inclusive Constitution-Making: The Icelandic Experiment.” Journal of Political Philosophy 23(2):166–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landemore, H. 2017. “Inclusive Constitution Making and Religious Rights: Lessons from the Icelandic Experiment.” The Journal of Politics 79(3):762–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D., A. Goel, T. Aitamurto, and H. Landemore. 2014. “Crowdsourcing for Participatory Democracies: Efficient Elicitation of Social Choice Functions.” Paper presented at The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (HCOMP 2014), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Macintosh, A. 2004. “Using Information and Communication Technologies to Enhance Citizen Engagement in the Policy Process.” Promise and Problems of E-Democracy 19:142.
   Google Scholar
• Macnamara, J. 2016. Organizational Listening: The Missing Essential in Public Communication. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mergel, I., R. K. Rethemeyer, and K. Isett. 2016. “Big Data in Public Affairs.” Public Administration Review 76(6):928–937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels, A., and L. De Graaf. 2010. “Examining Citizen Participation: Local Participatory Policy Making and Democracy.” Local Government Studies 36(4):477–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelimarkka, M., B. Nonnecke, S. Krishnan, T. Aitamurto, D. Catterson, C. Crittenden, … J. Patel. 2014. “Comparing Three Online Civic Engagement Platforms Using the “Spectrum of Public Participation framework.”” Pp. 25–6. Proceedings of the Oxford Internet, Policy, and Politics Conference (IPP).
   Google Scholar
• Noveck, B. S. 2009. Wiki Government: how Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noveck, B. S. 2015. Smart Citizens, Smarter State: The Technologies of Expertise and the Future of Governing. Harvard, UK: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, S., S. K. Pandey, and L. Miller. 2017. “Measuring Innovativeness of Public Organizations: Using Natural Language Processing Techniques in Computer-Aided Textual Analysis.” International Public Management Journal 20(1):78–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. 2012. “APSA Presidential Address: Participatory Democracy Revisited.” Perspectives on Politics 10(1):7–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G. 1999. American Public Policy: Promise and Performance. Chappaqua, NY: Chatham House/Seven Rivers.
   Google Scholar
• Pirog, M. A. 2014. “Data Will Drive Innovation in Public Policy and Management Research in the Next Decade.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 33(2):537–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, B., D. Strömberg, and Y. Wu. 2017. “Why Does China Allow Freer Social Media? Protests versus Surveillance and Propaganda.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(1):117–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. 1962. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
   Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P., and A. Goldhammer. 2008. Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Vol. 7. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Short, J. C., J. C. Broberg, C. C. Cogliser, and K. C. Brigham. 2010. “Construct Validation Using Computer-Aided Text Analysis (CATA): an Illustration Using Entrepreneurial Orientation.” Organizational Research Methods 13(2):320–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. 2009. Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Surowiecki, J. 2005. The Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. C., and G. Streib. 2003. “The New Face of Government: citizen‐Initiated Contacts in the Era of E‐Government.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13(1):83–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., and K. Callahan. 2005. “Assessing Citizen Involvement Efforts by Local Governments.” Public Performance & Management Review 29(2):191–216.
   Google Scholar
• Yanovitzky, I. 2002. “Effects of News Coverage on Policy Attention and Actions: A Closer Look into the Media-Policy Connection.” Communication Research 29(4):422–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar