Priming in Behavioral Public Administration: Methodological and Practical Considerations for Research and Scholarship

REFERENCES

• Anderson, Derrick M., and Justin M. Stritch. 2016. “Goal Clarity, Task Significance, and Performance: Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26(2):211–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Derrick M., and Barry C. Edwards. 2015. “Unfulfilled Promise: Laboratory Experiments in Public Management Research.” Public Management Review 17(10): 1518–1542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, Simon C., and Morten Hjortskov. 2015. “Cognitive Biases in Performance Evaluations.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26(4):647–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baekgaard, Martin, et al. 2015. “Conducting Experiments in Public Management Research: A Practical Guide.” International Public Management Journal 18(2):323–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, John A. 2006. “What Have We Been Priming All These Years? On the Development, Mechanisms, and Ecology of Nonconscious Social Behavior.” European Journal of Social Psychology 36(2):147–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, John A. 2016. “Awareness of the Prime Versus Awareness of its Influence: implications for the real-world scope of unconscious higher mental processes.” Current Opinion in Psychology 12:49–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, John A., Mark Chen, and Lara Burrows. 1996. “Automaticity of Social Behavior: Direct Effects of Trait Construct and Stereotype Activation on Action.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(2):230–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrows, Samuel, et al. 2016. “Relative Performance Information and Perceptions of Public Service Quality: Evidence from American School Districts.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26(3):571–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belle, Nicola., and Paola Cantarelli. 2017. “Randomized Experiments and Reality of Public and Nonprofit Organizations: Understanding and Bridging the Gap.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 1–18. doi:10.1177/0734371X17697246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besharov, Marya L., and Wendy K. Smith. 2014. “Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 39(3):364–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, Jens., Rebecca Morton, and Soren Serritzlew. 2015. “Experiments in Public Management Research.” International Public Management Journal 18(2):151–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwman, Robin., and Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen. 2016. “Experimental Public Administration from 1992 to 2014: A Systematic Literature Review and Ways Forward.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 29(2):110–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, Barry., and Patrick Scott 1992. “Laboratory Experiments in Public Policy and Management.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2(3):293–313.
   Google Scholar
• Button, Katherine S., et al. 2013. “Power Failure: Why Small Sample Size Undermines the Reliability of Neuroscience.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 14(5):365–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesario, Joseph. 2014. “Priming, Replication, and the Hardest Science.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 9(1):40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartrand, Tanya L., and John A. Bargh. 1996. “Automatic Activation of Impression Formation and Memorization Goals: Nonconscious Goal Priming Reproduces Effects of Explicit Task Instructions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(3):464–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, Robert K., and Bradley E. Wright. 2018. “Public Service Motivation and Ethical Behavior: Evidence From Three Experiments.” Journal of Behavioral Public Administration 1(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Jacob. 1969. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 1st ed. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Allan M., and Elizabeth F. Loftus. 1975. “A Spreading-Activation Theory of Semantic Processing.” Psychological Review 82(6):407–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, Karen S., and Toshio Yamagishi. 2008. “A Defense of Deception on Scientific Grounds.” Social Psychology Quarterly 71(3):215–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyen, Stephan, et al. 2012. “Behavioral Priming: It's All in the Mind, But Whose Mind?.” PloS One 7(1):e29081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, Nicholas., and Thomas Gilovich. 2005. “When Effortful Thinking Influences Judgmental Anchoring: Differential Effects of Forewarning and Incentives on Self‐Generated and Externally Provided Anchors.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 18(3):199–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, Karl. 2012. “Ten Ironic Rules for Non-Statistical Reviewers.” Neuroimage 61(4):1300–1310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, Wendi L., Shira Gabriel, and Angela Y. Lee. 1999. "“I” Value Freedom, But “We” Value Relationships: Self-Construal Priming Mirrors Cultural Differences in Judgment.” Psychological Science 10(4): 321–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, Andrew., and John Carlin. 2014. “Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (sign) and Type M (magnitude) Errors.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 9(6):641–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodrick, Elizabeth., and Trish Reay. 2011. “Constellations of Institutional Logics: Changes in the Professional Work of Pharmacists.” Work and Occupations 38(3):372–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, Royston., and Christopher R. Hinings. 1993. “Understanding Strategic Change: The Contribution of Archetypes.” Academy of Management Journal 36(5):1052–1081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan, et al. 2017. “Behavioral Public Administration: Combining Insights from Public Administration and Psychology.” Public Administration Review 77(1):45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjortskov, Morten. 2017. “Priming and Context Effects in Citizen Satisfaction Surveys.” Public Administration 95(4):912–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, Kosuke., Dustin Tingley, and Teppei Yamamoto. 2013. “Experimental Designs for Identifying Causal Mechanisms.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 176(1):5–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, Kosuke., et al. 2011. “Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies.” American Political Science Review 105(4):765–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, Oliver., and Gregg G. Van Ryzin. 2016. “Motivated Reasoning About Public Performance: An Experimental Study of How Citizens Judge the Affordable Care Act.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 27(1):197–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Candace. and Reut Livne‐Tarandach 2008. “Designing a Frame: Rhetorical Strategies of Architects.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 29(8):1075–1099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachelmeier, Stephen J. and Ronald R. King. 2002. “Using Laboratory Experiments to Evaluate Accounting Policy Issues.” Accounting Horizons 16(3):219–232.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, Steve. 2005. “Public Management Needs Help!” Academy of Management Journal 48(6):967–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelman, Steve. 2007. “Public Administration and Organization Studies.” The Academy of Management Annals 1(1):225–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatzky, Roberta L., and J. David Creswell. 2014. “An Intersensory Interaction Account of Priming effects - and Their Absence.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 9(1):49–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, Jon A., and Stanley Presser. 2010. “Question and Questionnaire Design.” Pp. 263–314 in Handbook of Survey Research, edited by P. V. Marsden and J. D. Wright, 2nd ed. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Loersch, Chris., and B. Keith Payne 2011. “The Situated Inference Model: An Integrative Account of the Effects of Primes on Perception, Behavior, and Motivation.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 6(3):234–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, Jeffrey., William Ocasio, and Candace Jones. 2012. “Vocabularies and Vocabulary Structure: A New Approach Linking Categories, Practices, and Institutions.” Academy of Management Annals 6(1):41–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loken, Eric., and Andrew Gelman. 2017. “Measurement Error and the Replication Crisis.” Science 355(6325):584–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margetts, Helen Z. 2011. “Experiments for Public Management Research.” Public Management Review 13(2):189–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marriott, Lisa. 2014. “Using Student Subjects in Experimental Research: A Challenge to the Practice of Using Students as a Proxy for Taxpayers.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 17(5):503–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvel, John D. 2015. “Public Opinion and Public Sector Performance: Are Individuals’ Beliefs About Performance Evidence-Based Or the Product of Anti–Public Sector Bias?” International Public Management Journal 18(2):209–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvel, John D. 2016. “Unconscious Bias in Citizens’ Evaluations of Public Sector Performance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26(1):143–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, Scott E., Ken Kelley, and Joseph R. Rausch. 2008. “Sample Size Planning for Statistical Power and Accuracy in Parameter Estimation.” Annual Review of Psychology 59:537–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeague, Lynn., et al. 2015. “Using Implicit Measures to Explore Children’s Intergroup Attitudes: Methodological and Practical Considerations for Researchers.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18(1):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, Keith. 2012. “Searching for Causality in the Wrong Places.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 15(1):15–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, Rebecca B., and Kenneth C. Williams. 2010. Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulligan, Neil W. 2012. “Differentiating Between Conceptual Implicit and Explicit Memory: A Crossed Double Dissociation Between Category-Exemplar Production and Category-Cued Recall.” Psychological Science 23(4):404–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussweiler, Thomas., Fritz Strack, and Tim Pfeiffer. 2000. “Overcoming the Inevitable Anchoring Effect: Considering the Opposite Compensates for Selective Accessibility.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26(9):1142–1150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussweiler, Thomas., and Fritz Strack. 1999. “Hypothesis-Consistent Testing and Semantic Priming in the Anchoring Paradigm: A Selective Accessibility Model.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35(2):136–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuberg, Steven L., et al. 2004. “From Evolved Motives to Everyday Mentation: Evolution, Goals and Cognition.” Pp. 133–152 in Social Motivation: Conscious and Unconscious Processes, edited by J. P. Forgas and K. Williams. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, Ben R., and David R. Shanks. 2014. “Prime Numbers: Anchoring and its Implications for Theories of Behavior Priming.” Social Cognition 32(Supplement):88–108.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Poul A., and Martin Baekgaard. 2013. “Performance Information, Blame Avoidance, and Politicians’ Attitudes to Spending and Reform: Evidence from an Experiment.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(2):545–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, Brian A., Carlee B. Hawkins, and Rebecca S. Frazier. 2011. “Implicit Social Cognition: From Measures to Mechanisms.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15(4):152–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocasio, William., Jeffrey Loewenstein, and Amit Nigam. 2015. “How Streams of Communication Reproduce and Change Institutional Logics: The Role of Categories.” Academy of Management Review 40(1):28–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papies, Esther K., et al. 2014. "Using Health Primes to Reduce Unhealthy Snack Purchases among Overweight Consumers in a Grocery Store." International Journal of Obesity 38(4): 597–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, Mogens J. 2015. “Activating the Forces of Public Service Motivation: Evidence from a Low‐Intensity Randomized Survey Experiment.” Public Administration Review 75(5):734–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, James L. 2012. “How Can We Improve Our Science to Generate More Usable Knowledge for Public Professionals?” Public Administration Review 72(4):479–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, Deborah A. and Dale T. Miller. 1992. “When Small Effects Are Impressive.” Psychological Bulletin 112(1):160–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisberg, Daniel., and Sheri Snavely. 2010. Cognition: Exploring the Science of the Mind. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Salancik, Jeffrey R. 1974. “Inference of One's Attitude From Behavior Recalled Under Linguistically Manipulated Cognitive Sets.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 10(5):415–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salancik, Gerald R., and Jeffrey Pfeffer 1978. “A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design.” Administrative Science Quarterly 23(2):224–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, Dietram A. 2000. “Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Political Communication.” Mass Communication & Society 3(2–3):297–316.
   Google Scholar
• Sell, Jane. 2008. “Introduction to Deception Debate.” Social Psychology Quarterly 71(3):213–214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, William R., Thomas D. Cook, and Donald T. Campbell 2002. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Shanks, David R., et al. 2013. “Priming Intelligent Behavior: An Elusive Phenomenon.” PloS One 8(4):e56515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, Steven J., et al. 2003. “Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Cigarette Smoking: The Effects of Context and Motivation.” Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 22(1):13–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, Herbert A. 1947a. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Herbert A. 1947b. “A Comment on the Science of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 7(3):200–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, Joseph P., Robyn A. LeBoeuf, and Leif D. Nelson. 2010. “The Effect of Accuracy Motivation on Anchoring and Adjustment: Do People Adjust From Provided Anchors?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99(6):917–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelcher, Chris., and Steven R. Smith. 2015. “Theorizing Hybridity: Institutional Logics, Complex Organizations, and Actor Identities: The Case of Nonprofits.” Public Administration 93(2):433–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, Neil H., Margaret Lay, and Lindsey K. de Lopez. 2017. “Normal Enough? Tools to Aid in Decision-Making.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20(2):167–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strack, Fritz., and Thomas Mussweiler. 1997. “Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73(3):437–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, Patricia H., and William Ocasio. 2008. “Institutional Logics.” Pp 99–129 in R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, and K. Sahlin, eds., The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalis. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, Patricia H., William Ocasio, and Michael Lounsbury. 2012. The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tulving, Endel., and Michael J. Watkins. 1975. “Structure of Memory Traces.” Psychological Review 82(4):261–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, Amos., and Daniel Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185(4157):1124–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, Steven., and Gregg G. Van Ryzin. 2011. “The Order of Questions in a Survey on Citizen Satisfaction with Public Services: Lessons From a Split‐Ballot Experiment.” Public Administration 89(4):1436–1450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vohs, Kathleen D., Nicole L. Mead, and Miranda R. Goode. 2006. “The Psychological Consequences of Money.” Science 314(5802):1154–1156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, Richard M., et al. 2018. “Analyzing the Complexity of Performance Information Use: Experiments with Stakeholders to Disaggregate Dimensions of Performance, Data Sources, and Data Types.” Public Administration Review 78. doi:10.1111/puar.12920
   Google Scholar
• Watson, David., Lee Anna Clark, and Auke Tellegen. 1988. “Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(6):1063–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingarten, Evan., et al. 2016. “From Primed Concepts to Action: A Meta-Analysis of the Behavioral Effects of Incidentally Presented words.” Psychological Bulletin 142(5):472–497.
   Google Scholar