How Does A Seminal Article in Public Administration Diffuse and Influence the Field? Bibliometric Methods and the Case of Hood's “A Public Management For All Seasons?”

REFERENCES

• Alford, J., and O. Hughes. 2008. “Public Value Pragmatism as the Next Phase of Public Management.” The American Review of Public Administration 38(2):130–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., and M. Esteve. 2015. “Still like Ships That Pass in the Night? The Relationship between Public Administration and Management Studies.” International Public Management Journal 18(1):31–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., and S. Van de Walle. 2013. “New Public Management and Citizens’ Perceptions of Local Service Efficiency, Responsiveness, Equity and Effectiveness.” Public Management Review 15(5):762–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonsen, M., and T. B. Jørgensen. 1997. “The ‘Publicness’ of Public Organizations.” Public Administration 75(2):337–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aucoin, P. 1995. The New Public Management: Canada in Comparative Perspective. Montreal, Canada: Institute for Research on Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, P., C. Gabrielatos., and T. McEnery. 2013. “Sketching Muslims: A Corpus Driven Analysis of Representations around the Word ‘Muslim’ in the British Press 1998–2009.” Applied Linguistics 34(3):255–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belter, C. W. 2015. “Bibliometric Indicators: Opportunities and Limits.” Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA 103(4):219–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M. 2012. “Probabilistic Topic Models.” Communications of the ACM 55(4):77–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borins, S. 2000. “Loose Cannons and Rule Breakers, or Enterprising Leaders? Some Evidence about Innovative Public Managers.” Public Administration Review 60(6):498–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., and L. Waltman. 2011. “The Detection of “Hot Regions” in the Geography of Science—a Visualization Approach by Using Density Maps.” Journal of Informetrics 5(4):547–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyack, K. W., and R. Klavans. 2014. “Creation of a Highly Detailed, Dynamic, Global Model and Map of Science.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65(4):670–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyack, K. W., and R. Klavans. 2010. “Co‐Citation Analysis, Bibliographic Coupling, and Direct Citation: Which Citation Approach Represents the Research Front Most Accurately?” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(12):2389–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. 1998. “Bureaucratic Theory Meets Reality: Public Choice and Service Contracting in US Local Government.” Public Administration Review 58(6):474–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., C. Farrell., J. Law., M. Powell., and R. M. Walker. 2003. Evaluating Public Management Reforms: Principles and Practice. Buckingham, UK: The Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bratt, S., J. Hemsley., J. Qin., and M. Costa. 2017. “Big Data, Big Metadata and Quantitative Study of Science: A Workflow Model for Big Scientometrics.” Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 54(1):36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, H. S., and J. Gao. 2013. “Can the Same Key Open Different Locks? Administrative Values Underlying Performance Measurement in China.” Public Administration 91(2):366–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra, Y. 2018. “Mapping the Evolution of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research (1990-2013): A Scientometric Analysis.” PLos ONE 13(1):e0190228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra, Y. 2016. “A Rhetoric-Orientation View of Social Entrepreneurship.” Social Enterprise Journal 12(2):161–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra, Y., L. C. Jiang, and C. J. Wang. 2016. “Mining Social Entrepreneurship Strategies Using Topic Modeling.” PLoS ONE 11(3):e0151342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.,. F. Ibekwe-SanJuan, and J. Hou. 2010. “The Structure and Dynamics of Cocitation Clusters: A Multiple-Perspective Cocitation Analysis.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(7):1386–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. 2018. “Eugene Garfield’s Scholarly Impact: A Scientometric Review.” Scientometrics 114(2):489–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough, J. R., J. Gollings., T. V. Loach., and T. S. Evans. 2015. “Transitive Reduction of Citation Networks.” Journal of Complex Networks 3(2):189–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobo, M. J., A. G. López‐Herrera, E. Herrera‐Viedma, and F. Herrera. 2011. “Science Mapping Software Tools: Review, Analysis, and Cooperative Study among Tools.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62(7):1382–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, D., and S. Van de Walle. 2018. “A Bibliometrics Approach to Understanding Conceptual Breadth, Depth and Development: The Case of New Public Management.” Political Studies Review 16(2):113–124. DOI: doi:10.1177/1478929916644869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferlie, E., L. Ashburner., L. Fitzgerald., and A. Pettigrew. 1996. The New Public Management in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, M. P., C. F. Pinto., and F. R. Serra. 2014. “The Transaction Costs Theory in International Business Research: A Bibliometric Study over Three Decades.” Scientometrics 98(3):1899–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. 2004. “Historiographic Mapping of Knowledge Domains Literature.” Journal of Information Science 30(2):119–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. 1979. “Is Citation Analysis A Legitimate Evaluation Tool?” Scientometrics 1(4):359–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. 2009. “From the Science of Science to Scientometrics: Visualizing the History of Science with HistCite Software.” Journal of Informetrics 3(3):173–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, E., A. I. Pudovkin., and V. S. Istomin. 2003. “Why Do We Need Algorithmic Historiography?” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54(5):400–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatenby, M., C. Rees., C. Truss., K. Alfes., and E. Soane. 2015. “Managing Change, or Changing Managers? the Role of Middle Managers in UK Public Service Reform.” Public Management Review 17(8):1124–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrish, E. 2016. “The Impact of Performance Management on Performance in Public Organizations: A Meta-Analysis.” Public Administration Review 76(1):48–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorry, P., and P. Ragouet. 2016. “Sleeping Beauty” and Her Restless Sleep: Charles Dotter and the Birth of Interventional Radiology.” Scientometrics 107(2):773–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulrajani, N., and K. Moloney. 2012. “Globalizing Public Administration: Today’s Research and Tomorrow’s Agenda.” Public Administration Review 72(1):78–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, G. A. 2000. Privatization: An International Review of Performance. Boulder, CO: Westview Pr.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration 69(1):3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 1995. “Emerging Issues in Public Administration.” Public Administration 73(1):165–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 1998. “Individualized Contracts for Top Public Servants: Copying Business, Path-Dependent Political Re‐Engineering—or Trobriand Cricket?” Governance 11(4):443–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., and G. Peters. 2004. “The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14(3):267–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha, R., A. A. Jbara., V. Qazvinian, and D. R. Radev. 2017. “NLP-Driven Citation Analysis for Scientometrics.” Natural Language Engineering 23(01):93–130.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, T. B., and B. Bozeman. 2007. “Public Values an Inventory.” Administration & Society 39(3):354–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J. S., and B. R. Martin. 1997. “What Is Research Collaboration?” Research Policy 26(1):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., and A. Nerghes. 2017. “Co-Word Maps and Topic Modeling: A Comparison Using Small and Medium-Sized Corpora (N< 1,000).” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68(4):1024–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucio‐Arias, D., and L. Leydesdorff. 2008. “Main-Path Analysis and Path-Dependent Transitions in Histcite™-Based Historiograms.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(12):1948–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maor, M. 1999. “The Paradox of Managerialism.” Public Administration Review 59(1):5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascarenhas, R. C. 1993. “Building an Enterprise Culture in the Public Sector: Reform of the Public Sector in Australia, Britain, and New Zealand.” Public Administration Review 53(4):319–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCain, K. W. 1990. “Mapping Authors in Intellectual Space: A Technical Overview.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41(6):433–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. 2006. “Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It.” Public Administration Review 66(s1):33–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. O. N. A. L. D. P. 2006. “Ambiguity in Policy Lessons: The Agencification Experience.” Public Administration 84(4):1029–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni, C., C. R. Sugimoto., and A. Robbin. 2017. “Examining the Evaluation of the Field of Public Administration through a Bibliometric Analysis of Public Administration Review.” Public Administration Review 77(4):496–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niskanen, W. A. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. New Brunswick, Canada: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, S., S. K. Pandey., and L. Miller. 2017. “Measures of Innovativeness in Public Organizations: Using Natural Language Processing Techniques in Computer-Aided Textual Analysis.” International Public Management Journal 20(1):78–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasadeos, Y., J. Phelps., and B. H. Kim. 1998. “Disciplinary Impact of Advertising Scholars: Temporal Comparisons of Influential Authors, Works and Research Networks.” Journal of Advertising 27(4):53–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillay, S. 2008. “A Cultural Ecology of New Public Management.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 74(3):373–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2004. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. 1990. “Doing Business in the Temple? Managers and Quality Assurance in the Public Services.” Public Administration 68(4):435–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, D. J. D. 1965. “Networks of Scientific Papers.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 149(3683):510–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groos, O. L. E. V., and A. L. A. N. Pritchard. 1969. “Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics.” Journal of Documentation 25(4):344–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos-Rodríguez, A. R., and J. Ruíz-Navarro. 2004. “Changes in the Intellectual Structure of Strategic Management Research: A Bibliometric Study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000.” Strategic Management Journal 25(10):981–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org. [Accessed on 10 September 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Small, H. 1973. “Co‐Citation in the Scientific Literature: A New Measure of the Relationship between Two Documents.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24(4):265–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streib, G., B. J. Slotkin., and M. Rivera. 2001. “Public Administration Research from a Practitioner Perspective.” Public Administration Review 61(5):515–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tague-Sutcliffe, J. 1992. “An Introduction to Informetrics.” Information Processing & Management 28(1):1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teicher, J., Q. Alam., and B. Van Gramberg. 2006. “Managing Trust and Relationships in PPPs: Some Australian Experiences.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 72(1):85–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry, L. D. 1998. “Administrative Leadership, Neo-Managerialism, and the Public Management Movement.” Public Administration Review 58(3):194–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usdiken, B., and Y. Pasadeos. 1995. “Organizational Analysis in North America and Europe: A Comparison of Co-Citation Networks.” Organization Studies 16(3):503–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eck, N. J., and L. Waltman. 2014a. “Visualizing Bibliometric Networks.” Pp. 285–320 in Measuring Scholarly Impact: Methods and Practice, edited by Ding, Y., R. Rousseau and D. Wolfram. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eck, N. J., and L. Waltman. 2014. “CitNetExplorer: A New Software Tool for Analyzing and Visualizing Citation Networks.” Journal of Informetrics 8(4):802–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eck, N. J., and L. Waltman. 2010. “Software Survey: VOSviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping.” Scientometrics 84(2):523–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eck, N. J., L. Waltman., E. C. Noyons., and R. K. Buter. 2010. “Automatic Term Identification for Bibliometric Mapping.” Scientometrics 82(3):581–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eck, N. J., L. Waltman., A. F. J. Van Raan., R. J. M. Klautz., and W. C. Peul. 2013. “Citation Analysis May Severely Underestimate the Impact of Clinical Research as Compared to Basic Research.” PLoS ONE 8(4):e62395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eck, N. J., and L. Waltman. 2017. “Citation-Based Clustering of Publications Using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer.” Scientometrics 111(2):1053–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoest, K., G. Bouckaert., and B. G. Peters. 2007. “Janus-Faced Reorganization: Specialization and Coordination in Four OECD Countries in the Period 1980—2005.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 73(3):325–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, R. 2014. “What Happened to the Public Organization? a Bibliometric Analysis of Public Administration and Organization Studies.” The American Review of Public Administration 44(4):383–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volberda, H. W., F. A. J. Van Den Bosch., and O. R. Mihalache. 2014. “Advancing Management Innovation: Synthesizing Processes, Levels of Analysis, and Change Agents.” Organization Studies 35(9):1245–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, K. 1995. Public Services and Market Mechanisms. London, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Waltman, L., and N. J. Van Eck. 2012. “A New Methodology for Constructing a Publication‐Level Classification System of Science.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63(12):2378–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltman, L., N. J. Van Eck., and E. C. M. Noyons. 2010. “A Unified Approach to Mapping and Clustering of Bibliometric Networks.” Journal of Informetrics 4(4):629–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, B., E. Horlings., M. van der Zouwen., and P. van den Besselaar. 2017. “Mapping Science through Bibliometric Triangulation: An Experimental Approach Applied to Water Research.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68(3):724–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F., R. Li., L. Huang., H. Miao., and X. Li. 2017. “Theme Evolution Analysis of Electrochemical Energy Storage Research Based on CitNetExplorer.” Scientometrics 110(1):113–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesilkagit, K., and J. De Vries. 2004. “Reform Styles of Political and Administrative Elites in Majoritarian and Consensus Democracies: Public Management Reforms in New Zealand and The Netherlands.” Public Administration 82(4):951–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuccala, A. 2006. “Modeling the Invisible College.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(2):152–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zupic, I., and T. Čater. 2015. “Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization.” Organizational Research Methods 18(3):429–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar

• Based on internal citation score in the citation network; following Van Eck and Waltman’s (2014b) citation network methodology.
   Google Scholar
• Barberis, P. 1998. “The New Public Management and a New Accountability.” Public Administration 76(3):451–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. 1998. “What Right Do Public Managers Have to Lead?” Public Administration Review 58(3):209–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., R. A. Rhodes., and P. Weller. 2003. “Traditions of Governance: Interpreting the Changing Role of the Public Sector.” Public Administration 81(1):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. 2007. “Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services.” Public Administration Review 67(5):846–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowornwathana, B. 2000. “Governance rReform in Thailand: Questionable Assumptions, Uncertain Outcomes.” Governance 13(3):393–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brereton, M., and T. Temple. 1999. “The New Public Service Ethos: An Ethical Environment for Governance.” Public Administration 77(3):455–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, N., and P. Greer. 1993. “Evaluating Agencies: Next Steps and Performance Indicators.” Public Administration 71(3):407–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. B. 2005. “The Politics of Administrative Reforms in Asia: Paradigms and Legacies, Paths and Diversities.” Governance 18(2):257–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. B. 1996. “Efficiency as the Rhetoric: Public-Sector Reform in Hong Kong Explained.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 62(1):31–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. B. 1997. “Understanding Public-Sector Reforms: Global Trends and Diverse Agendas.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 63(4):435–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Lwogreid. 1998. “Administrative Reform Policy: The Case of Norway.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 64(3):457–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Araújo, J. F. F. E. 2001. “Improving Public Service Delivery: The Crossroads between NPM aand Traditional Bureaucracy.” Public Administration 79(4):915–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleon, L. 1998. “Accountability in a ‘Reinvented’ Government.” Public Administration 76(3):539–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diefenbach, T. 2009. “New Public Management in Public Sector Organizations: The Dark Sides of Managerialistic ‘Enlightenment.” Public Administration 87(4):892–909.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, S., and J. Wallis. 2010. “Two Myths of Convergence in Public Management Reform.” Public Administration 88(4):1099–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore, A. 1994. “The New Job of the Federal Executive.” Public Administration Review 54(4):317–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. J. 1999. “Social Capital Theory and Administrative Reform: Maintaining Ethical Probity in Public Service.” Public Administration Review 59(1):63–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, R. C., B. M. Feldman, and C. P. Scavo. 2000. “Reinventing Government: City Manager Attitudes and Actions.” Public Administration Review 60(6):535–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klages, H., and E. Loffler. 1998. “New Public Management in Germany: The Implementation Process of the New Steering Model.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 64(1):41–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S. 2010. “New Public Management for the ‘Classical Continental European Administration’: Modernization at the Local Level in Germany, France and Italy.” Public Administration 88(4):1116–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, N. 2001. “The Legacy of the New Public Management in Developing Countries.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 67(2):297–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., and L. J. O’Toole. Jr. 2009. “The Proverbs of New Public Management: Lessons from an Evidence-Based Research Agenda.” The American Review of Public Administration 39(1):4–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro Galera, A., and M. Rodríguez Bolívar. 2007. “The Contribution of International Accounting Standards to Implementing NPM iin Developing and Developed Countries.” Public Administration and Development 27(5):413–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., and L. Brown. 2011. “Innovation, Public Policy and Public Services Delivery in the UK: The Word that Would be King?” Public Administration 89(4):1335–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, S. J., and D. H. Rosenbloom. 2002. “Nonmission-bBased Values in Results-Oriented Public Management: The Case of Freedom of Information.” Public Administration Review 62(6):643–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. 1996. “Antistatist Reforms and New Administrative Directions: Public Administration in the United Kingdom.” Public Administration Review 56(1):81–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritz, A. 2009. “Public Service Motivation and Organizational Performance in Swiss Federal Government.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 75(1):53–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., and A. Navarro Galera. 2007. “Could Fair Value Accounting be Useful, under NPM Models, for Users of Financial Information?” International Review of Administrative Sciences 73(3):473–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samaratunge, R., Q. Alam, and J. Teicher. 2008. “The New Public Management Reforms in Asia: A Comparison of South and Southeast Asian Countries.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 74(1):25–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson, I. 2001. “Performance Management, Evaluation and Learning in ‘Modern’ Local Government.” Public Administration 79(2):297–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. 2006. “Metagovernance: The Changing Role of Politicians in Processes of Democratic Governance.” The American Review of Public Administration 36(1):98–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, B. 1995. “Administrative Accountability in the ‘Westminster’ Democracies: Towards a New Conceptual Framework.” Governance 8(4):505–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, L. 2004. “Trajectories in Public Administration Reforms in European Continental Countries.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 63(3):99–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trottier, T., M. Van Wart, and X. Wang. 2008. “Examining the Nature and Significance of Leadership in Government Organizations.” Public Administration Review 68(2):319–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., G. De Graaf., and K. Lasthuizen. 2008. “What’s Valued Most? Similarities and Differences between the Organizational Values of the Public and Private Sector.” Public Administration 86(2):465–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., and D. Barbieri. 2009. “Investigating the ‘NPM-ness’ of Agencies in Italy and Flanders: The Effect of Place, Age and Task.” Public Management Review 11(3):345–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wistow, G., M. Knapp., B. Hardy., and C. Allen. 1992. “From Providing to Enabling: Local Authorities and the Mixed Economy of Social Care.” Public Administration 70(1):25–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollmann, H. 2001. “Germany’s Trajectory of Public Sector Modernisation: Continuities and Discontinuities.” Policy & Politics 29(2):151–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar