432
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Symposium on Public Management in China: Reform, Innovation, and Governance

Fiscal slack or environmental pressures: which matters more for technological innovation assimilation? A configurational approach

Pages 380-404 | Received 13 Feb 2018, Accepted 02 Jul 2019, Published online: 07 Aug 2019

References

  • Andersen, S. C., and M. L. Jakobsen. 2018. “Political Pressure, Conformity Pressure, and Performance Information as Drivers of Public Sector Innovation Adoption.” International Public Management Journal 21 (2):213–42. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2018.1425227.
  • Andrews, R. 2009. “Organizational Task Environments and Performance: An Empirical Analysis.” International Public Management Journal 12 (1):1–23. doi: 10.1080/10967490802646813.
  • Andrews, R., M. J. Beynon, and A. F. McDermott. 2016. “Organizational Capability in the Public Sector: A Configurational Approach.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26 (2):239–58. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muv005.
  • Andrews, R., M. J. Beynon, and A. F. McDermott. 2019. “Configurations of New Public Management Reforms and the Efficiency, Effectiveness and Equity of Public Healthcare Systems: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Public Management Review 21 (8):1236–60. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1561927.
  • Bala, V., and S. Goyal. 1998. “Learning from Neighbors.” Review of Economic Studies 65 (3):595–621. doi: 10.1111/1467-937X.00059.
  • Berry, F. S., and W. D. Berry. 1990. “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis.” American Political Science Review 84 (2):395–415. doi: 10.2307/1963526.
  • Berry, F. S., and W. D. Berry. 2007. “Innovations and Diffusions Models in Policy Research.” Pp. 307–63 in Theories of the Policy Process, 3rd ed., edited by P. A. Sabatier and C. M. Weible. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Bernier, L., T. Hafsi, and C. Deschamps. 2015. “Environmental Determinants of Public Sector Innovation: A Study of Innovation Awards in Canada.” Public Management Review 17 (6):834–56. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.867066.
  • Borins, S. 2000. “Loose Cannons and Rule Breakers, or Enterprising Leaders? Some Evidence about Innovative Public Managers.” Public Administration Review 60 (6):498–507. doi: 10.1111/0033-3352.00113.
  • Boyne, G. A. 2002. “Public and Private Management: What’s the Difference?” Journal of Management Studies 39 (1):97–129. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00284.
  • Boyne, G. A., J. S. Gould-Williams, J. Law, and R. M. Walker. 2005. “Explaining the Adoption of Innovation: An Empirical Analysis of Management Reform.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 23 (3):419–35. doi: 10.1068/c40m.
  • Cai, H., and D. Treisman. 2006. “Did Government Decentralization Cause China’s Economic Miracle?” World Politics 58 (4):505–35. doi: 10.1353/wp.2007.0005.
  • Chatterjee, D., R. Grewal, and V. Sambamurthy. 2002. “Shaping up for E-Commerce: Institutional Enablers of the Organizational Assimilation of Web Technologies.” MIS Quarterly 26 (2):65–89. doi: 10.2307/4132321.
  • Cyert, R., and J. March. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Damanpour, F. 1987. “The Adoption of Technological Administrative and Ancillary Innovations Impacts of Organizational Factors.” Journal of Management 13 (4):675–88. doi: 10.1177/014920638701300408.
  • Damanpour, F., and M. Schneider. 2006. “Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations Effects of Environment Organization and Top Managers.” British Journal of Management 17 (3):215–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00498.x.
  • Daniel, F., F. T. Lohrke, C. J. Fornaciari, and R. A. Turner. 2004. “Slack Resources and Firm Performance: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Business Research 57 (6):565–74. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00439-3.
  • Dawson, G. S., J. S. Denford, and K. C. Desouza. 2016. “Governing Innovation in US State Government: An Ecosystem Perspective.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 25 (4):299–318. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2016.08.003.
  • DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2):147–60. doi: 10.2307/2095101.
  • Fernandez, S., and L. R. Wise. 2010. “An Exploration of Why Public Organizations Ingest Innovations.” Public Administration 88 (4):979–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01857.x.
  • Fichman, R. G., and C. F. Kemerer. 1999. “The Illusory Diffusion of Innovation: An Examination of Assimilation Gap.” Information Systems Research 10 (3):255–75. doi: 10.1287/isre.10.3.255.
  • Fiss, P. C. 2007. “A Set-Theoretic Approach to Organizational Configurations.” Academy of Management Review 32 (4):1180–98. doi: 10.5465/amr.2007.26586092.
  • Fiss, P. C. 2011. “Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research.” Academy of Management Journal 54 (2):393–420. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.60263120.
  • Frambach, R. T., P. C. Fiss, and P. T. M. Ingenbleek. 2016. “How Important Is Customer Orientation for Firm Performance? a Fuzzy Set Analysis of Orientations, Strategies, and Environments.” Journal of Business Research 69 (4):1428–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.120.
  • Gallivan, M. J. 2001. “Organizational Adoption and Assimilation of Complex Technological Innovations: Development and Application of a New Framework.” ACM SIGMIS Database 32 (3):51–85. doi: 10.1145/506724.506729.
  • Greckhamer, T. 2011. “Cross-Cultural Differences in Compensation Level and Inequality across Occupations: A Set-Theoretic Analysis.” Organization Studies 32 (1):85–115. doi: 10.1177/0170840610380806.
  • Greckhamer, T. 2016. “CEO Compensation in Relation to Worker Compensation across Countries: The Configurational Impact of Country-Level Institutions.” Strategic Management Journal 37 (4):793–815. doi: 10.1002/smj.2370.
  • Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., and M. K. Feeney. 2017. “Developing and Testing an Integrative Framework for Open Government Adoption in Local Governments.” Public Administration Review 77 (4):579–90. doi: 10.1111/puar.12689.
  • Hansen, M. B. 2011. “Antecedents of Organizational Innovation: The Diffusion of New Public Management into Danish Local Government.” Public Administration 89 (2):285–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01855.x.
  • Hansen, M. B., and I. Nørup. 2017. “Leading the Implementation of ICT Innovations.” Public Administration Review 77 (6):851–60. doi: 10.1111/puar.12807.
  • Heilmann, S. 2008. “From Local Experiments to National Policy: The Origins of China’s Distinctive Policy Process.” The China Journal 59:1–30. doi: 10.1086/tcj.59.20066378.
  • Hendrick, R. 2006. “The Role of Slack in Local Government Finances.” Public Budgeting Finance 26 (1):14–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5850.2006.00837.x.
  • Ingrams, A., A. Manoharan, L. Schmidthuber, and M. Holzer. 2018. “Stages and Determinants of E-Government Development: A Twelve-Year Longitudinal Study of Global Cities.” International Public Management Journal 1–39. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2018.1467987.
  • Johansson, V. 2012. “Negotiating Bureaucrats.” Public Administration 90 (4):1032–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02025.x.
  • Jun, K. N., and C. Weare. 2011. “Institutional Motivations in the Adoption of Innovations: The Case of E-Government.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (3):495–519. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muq020.
  • Korac, S., I. Saliterer, and R. M. Walker. 2017. “Analysing the Environmental Antecedents of Innovation Adoption among Politicians and Public Managers.” Public Management Review 19 (4):566–87. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1200119.
  • Kwon, M., F. S. Berry, and R. C. Feiock. 2009. “Understanding the Adoption and Timing of Economic Development Strategies in US Cities: Using Innovation and Institutional Analysis.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (4):967–88. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mun026.
  • Landry, P. E. 2008. Decentralized Authoritarianism in China: The Communist Party’s Control of Local Elites in the Post-Mao Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lee, C., K. J. Chang, and F. S. Berry. 2011. “Testing the Development and Diffusion of E-Government and E-Democracy: A Global Perspective.” Public Administration Review 71 (3):444–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02228.x.
  • Lieberson, S. 1969. “Measuring Population Diversity.” American Sociological Review 34 (6):850–62. doi: 10.2307/2095977.
  • Ma, L. 2013. “The Diffusion of Government Microblogging: Evidence from Chinese Municipal Police Bureaus.” Public Management Review 15 (2):288–309. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2012.691010.
  • Ma, L. 2014. “Diffusion and Assimilation of Government Microblogging: Evidence from Chinese Cities.” Public Management Review 16 (2):274–95. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2012.725763.
  • Ma, L. 2017. “Political Ideology, Social Capital, and Government Innovativeness: Evidence from the US States.” Public Management Review 19 (2):114–33. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1177108.
  • Marlowe, J. 2005. “Fiscal Slack and Counter-Cyclical Expenditure Stabilization: A First Look at the Local Level.” Public Budgeting Finance 25 (3):48–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5850.2005.00367.x.
  • Mei, C., and Z. Liu. 2014. “Experiment-Based Policy Making or Conscious Policy Design? The Case of Urban Housing Reform in China.” Policy Sciences 47 (3):321–37. doi: 10.1007/s11077-013-9185-y.
  • Meijer, A. J. 2014. “From Hero-Innovators to Distributed Heroism: An in-Depth Analysis of the Role of Individuals in Public Sector Innovation.” Public Management Review 16 (2):199–216. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.806575.
  • Meseguer, C. 2005. “Policy Learning, Policy Diffusion, and the Making of a New Order.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598 (1):67–82. doi: 10.1177/0002716204272372.
  • Mergel, I. 2018. “Open Innovation in the Public Sector: Drivers and Barriers for the Adoption of Challenge.gov.” Public Management Review 20 (5):726–45. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1320044.
  • Meyer, A. D., A. S. Tsui., and C. R. Hinings. 1993. “Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis.” Academy of Management Journal 36 (6):1175–95. doi: 10.2307/256809.
  • Moon, M. J., and D. F. Norris. 2005. “Does Managerial Orientation Matter? The Adoption of Reinventing Government and E-Government at the Municipal Level.” Information Systems Journal 15 (1):43–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00185.x.
  • Moulick, A. G., and L. L. Taylor. 2017. “Fiscal Slack, Budget Shocks, and Performance in Public Organizations: Evidence from Public Schools.” Public Management Review 19 (7):990–1005. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1243813.
  • National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC). 2016. Statistical Yearbook of China. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
  • Nasi, G., F. Frosini, and D. Cristofoli. 2011. “Online Service Provision: Are Municipalities Really Innovative? The Case of Larger Municipalities in Italy.” Public Administration 89 (3):821–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01865.x.
  • Oliveira, G. H. M., and E. W. Welch. 2013. “Social Media Use in Local Government: Linkage of Technology, Task, and Organizational Context.” Government Information Quarterly 30 (4):397–405. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.019.
  • O’Toole, L. J., Jr, and K. J. Meier. 2010. “In Defense of Bureaucracy: Public Managerial Capacity, Slack and the Dampening of Environmental Shocks.” Public Management Review 12 (3):341–61. doi: 10.1080/14719030903286599.
  • Pei, M. X. 2012. “Is CCP Rule Fragile or Resilient?” Journal of Democracy 23 (1):27–41. doi: 10.1353/jod.2012.0008.
  • Ragin, C. C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Ragin, C. C. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago University.
  • Ragin, C. C. 2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ragin, C. C., and P. C. Fiss. 2008. “Net Effects Analysis versus Configurational Analysis: An Empirical Demonstration.” Pp. 190–212 in Redesining Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Set and Beyond, edited by C. C. Ragin, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ricard, Lykke Margot, Erik Hans Klijn, Jenny M. Lewis, and Tamyko Ysa. 2017. “Assessing Public Leadership Styles for Innovation: A Comparison of Copenhagen, Rotterdam and Barcelona.” Public Management Review 19 (2):134–56. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1148192.
  • Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: The Free Press.
  • Salge, T. O. 2011. “A Behavioral Model of Innovative Search: Evidence from Public Hospital Services.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (1):181–210. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muq017.
  • Schneider, C. Q., and C. Wagemann. 2012. Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Scott, W. R. 2003. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education International.
  • Shipan, C. R., and C. Volden. 2008. “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4):840–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x.
  • Simmons, R., and C. Brennan. 2017. “User Voice and Complaints as Drivers of Innovation in Public Services.” Public Management Review 19 (8):1085–104. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1257061.
  • Sørensen, E. 2017. “Political Innovations: Innovations in Political Institutions, Processes and Outputs.” Public Management Review 19 (1):1–19. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1200661.
  • Stock, R. M., B. Six, and N. A. Zacharias. 2013. “Linking Multiple Layers of Innovation-Oriented Corporate Culture, Product Program Innovativeness, and Business Performance: A Contingency Approach.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 41 (3):283–99. doi: 10.1007/s11747-012-0306-5.
  • Tan, J., and M. W. Peng. 2003. “Organizational Slack and Firm Performance during Economic Transitions: Two Studies from an Emerging Economy.” Strategic Management Journal 24 (13):1249–63. doi: 10.1002/smj.351.
  • Thomann, E. 2015. “Is Output Performance All about the Resources? A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Street-Level Bureaucrats in Switzerland.” Public Administration 93 (1):177–94. doi: 10.1111/padm.12130.
  • Tolbert, C. J., K. Mossberger, and R. McNeal. 2008. “Institutions, Policy Innovation, and E-Government in the American States.” Public Administration Review 68 (3):549–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00890.x.
  • Tsui, K. Y., and Y. Wang. 2004. “Between Separate Stoves and a Single Menu: Fiscal Decentralization in China.” The China Quarterly 177:71–90. doi: 10.1017/S0305741004000050.
  • United Nations. 2014. E-government Survey 2014: E-government for the Future we Want. New York, NY: United Nations.
  • Verschuere, B., E. Beddeleem, and D. Verlet. 2014. “Determinants of Innovative Behaviour in Flemish Nonprofit Organizations: An Empirical Research.” Public Management Review 16 (2):173–98. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2012.757347.
  • Volden, C. 2006. “States as Policy Laboratories: Emulating Success in the Children’s Health Insurance Program.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2):294–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00185.x.
  • Voss, G. B., D. Sirdeshmukh, and Z. G. Voss. 2008. “The Effects of Slack Resource and Environmental Threat on Product Exploration and Exploitation.” Academy of Management Journal 51 (1):147–64. doi: 10.5465/amj.2008.30767373.
  • Walker, R. M. 2006. “Innovation Type and Diffusion: An Empirical Analysis of Local Government.” Public Administration 84 (2):311–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00004.x.
  • Walker, R. M. 2008. “An Empirical Evaluation of Innovation Types and Organizational and Environmental Characteristics: Towards a Configuration Framework.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4):591–615. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum026.
  • Walker, R. M. 2014. “Internal and External Antecedents of Process Innovation: A Review and Extension.” Public Management Review 16 (1):21–44. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.771698.
  • Walker, R. M., C. N. Avellaneda, and F. S. Berry. 2011. “Exploring the Diffusion of Innovation among High and Low Innovative Localities.” Public Management Review 13 (1):95–125. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2010.501616.
  • Walker, R. M., F. S. Berry, and C. N. Avellaneda. 2015. “Limits on Innovativeness in Local Government: Examining Capacity, Complexity, and Dynamism in Organizational Task Environments.” Public Administration 93 (3):663–83. doi: 10.1111/padm.12159.
  • Wang, W. 2016. “Exploring the Determinants of Network Effectiveness: The Case of Neighborhood Governance Networks in Beijing.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26 (2):375–88. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muv017.
  • Wang, W. 2017. “The Effects of Political and Fiscal Incentives on Local Government Behavior: An Analysis of Fiscal Slack in China.” International Public Management Journal 20 (2):294–315. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2016.1160014.
  • Wernerfelt, B. 1984. “A Resource-Based View of the Firm.” Strategic Management Journal 5 (2):171–80. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250050207.
  • West, D. M. 2008. State Federal Electronic Government in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • Wu, J., L. Ma, and Y. Yang. 2013. “Innovation in the Chinese Public Sector: Typology and Distribution.” Public Administration 91 (2):347–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02010.x.
  • Xu, C. 2011. “The Fundamental Institutions of China’s Reform and Development.” Journal of Economic Literature 19 (1):1076–151. doi: 10.1257/jel.49.4.1076.
  • Zhang, Y., and X. Zhu. 2018. “Multiple Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion in China.” Public Management Review 21 (4):495–514. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1497695.
  • Zhao, Q. 2012. “The Regional Disparities in Chinese Provincial Government Innovation.” Innovation 14 (4):595–604. doi: 10.5172/impp.2012.14.4.595.
  • Zhu, X. 2014. “Mandate versus Championship: Vertical Government Intervention and Diffusion of Innovation in Public Services in Authoritarian China.” Public Management Review 16 (1):117–39. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.798028.
  • Zhu, X., and Y. Zhang. 2016. “Political Mobility and Dynamic Diffusion of Innovation: The Spread of Municipal Pro-Business Administrative Reform in China.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26 (3):535–51. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muv025.
  • Zhu, X., and Y. Zhang. 2019. “Diffusion of Marketization Innovation with Administrative Centralization in a Multilevel System: Evidence from China.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 29 (1):133–50. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muy034.
  • Zhu, X., and H. Zhao. 2018. “Experimentalist Governance with Interactive Central–Local Relations: Making New Pension Policies in China.” Policy Studies Journal. doi: 10.1111/psj.12254.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.