Organizational context and budget orientations: a computational text analysis

References

• Anastasopoulos, L. Jason and Andrew B. Whitford. 2019. “Machine Learning for Public Administration Research, with Application to Organizational Reputation.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 29(3):491–510. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muy060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, Rhys. 2009. “Organizational Task Environments and Performance: An Empirical Analysis.” International Public Management Journal 12(1):1–23. doi: 10.1080/10967490802646813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, Rhys, George A. Boyne, M. Jae Moon, and Richard M. Walker. 2010. “Assessing Organizational Performance: Exploring Differences between Internal and External Measures.” International Public Management Journal 13(2):105–29. doi: 10.1080/10967491003766533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, Robert N. 1965. Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Boston, MA: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, Robert N. 1988. The Management Control Function. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barberá, Pablo. 2015. “Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data.” Political Analysis 23(1):76–91. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpu011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, Christopher. 2008. “Piling on: Multilevel Government and the Fiscal CommonPool.” American Journal of Political Science 52(4):802–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00344.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei, David M., and, and John D. Lafferty. 2006. “Dynamic Topic Models.” Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning. New York, NY: ACM; pp. 13–120. doi: 10.1145/1143844.1143859.
   Google Scholar
• Blei, David M., and John D. Lafferty. 2007. “A Correlated Topic Model of Science.” The Annals of Applied Statistics 1(1):17–35. doi: 10.1214/07-AOAS114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, Robert, and Solomon Messing. 2015. “Quantifying Social Media’s Political Space: Estimating Ideology from Publicly Revealed Preferences on Facebook.” American Political Science Review 109(1):62–78. doi: 10.1017/S0003055414000525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdeaux, Carolyn. 2005. “A Question of Genesis: An Analysis of the Determinants of Public Authorities.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(3):441–62. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mui020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, George A. 1992. “Local Government Structure and Performance: Lessons from America.” Public Administration 70(3):333–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1992.tb00942.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, George A. 2003. “Sources of Public Service Improvement: A Critical Review and Research Agenda.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13(3):367–24. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mug027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cann, Damon M. 2018. “The Structure of Municipal Political Ideology.” State and Local Government Review 50(1):37–41. doi: 10.1177/0160323X18781456.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, Jered B., and Richard C. Feiock. 1999. “Metropolitan Government and Economic Development.” Urban Affairs Review 34(3):476–88. doi: 10.1177/10780879922184031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, Deborah A., and Terri Johnson. 2010. “Examining Small Town Revenues: To What Extent Are They Diversified?” Public Administration Review 70(2):223–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02129.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collobert, Ronan, Jason Weston, Léon Bottou, Michael Karlen, Koray Kavukcuoglu, and Pavel Kuksa. 2011. “Natural Language Processing (Almost) from Scratch.” Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (Aug):2493–537.
   Google Scholar
• Cusack, Thomas R. 1999. “Partisan Politics and Fiscal Policy.” Comparative Political Studies 32(4):464–86. doi: 10.1177/0010414099032004003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daley, Dennis M. 1985. “Control, Management, and Planning: A State-Level Replication of the Friedman Study of Budget Practices.” International Journal of Public Administration 7(3):291–304. doi: 10.1080/01900698508524492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Benedictis-Kessner, Justin, and Christopher Warshaw. 2016. “Mayoral Partisanship and Municipal Fiscal Policy.” The Journal of Politics 78(4):1124–38. doi: 10.1086/686308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslatte, Aaron, Tyler A. Scott, and David P. Carter. 2019. “Specialized Governance and Regional Land-Use Outcomes: A Spatial Analysis of Florida Community Development Districts.” Land Use Policy 83(1):227–39. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.029.
   Google Scholar
• Dess, Gregory G., and Donald W. Beard. 1984. “Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments.” Administrative Science Quarterly 29(1):52–73. doi: 10.2307/2393080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, Richard C. 2013. “The Institutional Collective Action Framework.” Policy Studies Journal 41(3):397–425. doi: 10.1111/psj.12023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, Lewis C. 1975. “Control, Management, and Planning: An Empirical Examination.” Public Administration Review 35(6):625–8. doi: 10.2307/974282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Derek, and James P. Cross. 2017. “Exploring the Political Agenda of the European Parliament Using a Dynamic Topic Modeling Approach.” Political Analysis 25 (1):77–94. doi: 10.1017/pan.2016.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer, Robert A., Tima T. Moldogaziev, and Tyler A. Scott. 2018. “Polycentric Governance and the Impact of Special Districts on Fiscal Common Pools.” International Journal of the Commons 12(2):xx–136. doi: 10.18352/ijc.839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan, Lars Tummers, and Sanjay K. Pandey. 2017. “Promoting State-of-the-Art Methods in Public Management Research.” International Public Management Journal 20(1):7–13. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2016.1169066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmer, Justin. 2010. “A Bayesian Hierarchical Topic Model for Political Texts: Measuring Expressed Agendas in Senate Press Releases.” Political Analysis 18 (1):1–35. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpp034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmer, Justin, and Brandon M. Stewart. 2013. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis 21(3):267–97. doi: 10.1093/pan/mps028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Yulan, Chenghua Lin, Wei Gao, and Kam-Fai Wong. 2013. “Dynamic Joint Sentiment-Topic Model.” ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 5(1):6. doi: 10.1145/2542182.2542188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildreth, W. Bartley. 1993. “State and Local Governments as Borrowers: Strategic Choices and the Capital Market.” Public Administration Review 53(1):41–9. doi: 10.2307/977275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildreth, W. Bartley, and Gerald J. Miller 2002. “Debt and Local Economy: Problems in Benchmarking Local Government Debt Affordability.” Public Budgeting & Finance 22(4):99–113. .
   Google Scholar
• Hinton, Geoffrey E., and Ruslan R. Salakhutdinov. 2009. “Replicated Softmax: An Undirected Topic Model.” Pp. 1607–14 in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22 (NIPS 2009). San Diego, CA: Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS).
   Google Scholar
• Hollibaugh, Gary E. 2019. “The Use of Text as Data Methods in Public Administration: A Review and an Application to Agency Priorities.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 29(3):474–90. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muy045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, Meagan M. 2003. “Punctuations and Agendas: A New Look at Local Government Budget Expenditures.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 22(3):345–60. doi: 10.1002/pam.10136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettl, Donald F. 2016. “Making Data Speak: Lessons for Using Numbers for Solving Public Policy Puzzles.” Governance 29(4):573–9. doi: 10.1111/gove.12211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, Chih-Chin, and Ming-Chi Tsai. 2004. “An empirical performance comparison of machine learning methods for spam e-mail categorization.” Hybrid Intelligent Systems, 2004. HIS’04. Fourth International Conference. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE; pp. 44–8.
   Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael, Kenneth Benoit, and John Garry. 2003. “Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data.” American Political Science Review 97(2):311–31. doi: 10.1017/S0003055403000698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavertu, Stéphane. 2016. “We All Need Help: “Big Data” and the Mismeasure of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 76(6):864–72. doi: 10.1111/puar.12436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, Will, Kenneth Benoit, Slava Mikhaylov, and Michael Laver. 2011. “Scaling Policy Preferences from Coded Political Texts.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 36(1):123–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-9162.2010.00006.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallum, Andrew Kachites. 2002. “Mallet: A Machine Learning for Language Toolkit.” http://mallet.cs.umass.edu.
   Google Scholar
• McGinnis, Michael Dean. 1999. Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., and L. J. O’Toole. 2013. “Subjective Organizational Performance and Measurement Error: Common Source Bias and Spurious Relationships.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23(2):429–56. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mus057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mergel, Ines, R. Karl Rethemeyer, and Kimberley Isett. 2016. “Big Data in Public Affairs.” Public Administration Review 76(6):928–37. doi: 10.1111/puar.12625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikesell, John L. 1976. “Property Market Dynamics, Local Economies, and Tax Delinquency.” State and Local Government Review 8(2):41–5.
   Google Scholar
• Mikesell, John L. 2013. “Property Tax Stability: A Tax System Model of Base and Revenue Dynamics through the Great Recession and Beyond.” Public Finance Management 13(4):310–34.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, David, and Kurt Thurmaier. 2011. “Toward a Theory of Budgeting for Collaboration.” Pp. 2–4 in Public Management Research Conference, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Moldogaziev, Tima T., Tyler A. Scott, and Robert A. Greer. 2019. “Organizational Dissolutions in the Public Sector: An Empirical Analysis of Municipal Utility Water Districts.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 29(4):535–55. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muy081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moldogaziev, Tima T., and William G. Resh. 2016. “A Systems Theory Approach to Innovation Implementation: Why Organizational Location Matters.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26(4):677–92. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muv047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe, Burt L., Michael P. Colaresi, and Kevin M. Quinn. 2008. “Fightin’words: Lexical Feature Selection and Evaluation for Identifying the Content of Political Conflict.” Political Analysis 16(4):372–403. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpn018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, Rebecca. 1994. “Computerized Content Analysis in Management Research: A Demonstration of Advantages & Limitations.” Journal of Management 20(4):903–31. doi: 10.1016/0149-2063(94)90035-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, Lawrence J., Jr., and Kenneth J. Meier. 2011. Public Management: Organizations, Governance, and Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, Lawrence J., Jr., and Kenneth J. Meier. 2015. “Public Management, Context, and Performance: In Quest of a More General Theory.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(1):237–56. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muu011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, Sheela, Sanjay K. Pandey, and Larry Miller. 2017. “Measuring Innovativeness of Public Organizations: Using Natural Language Processing Techniques in Computer-Aided Textual Analysis.” International Public Management Journal 20(1):78–107. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2016.1143424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popping, Roel. 2012. “Qualitative Decisions in Quantitative Text Analysis Research.” Sociological Methodology 42(1):88–90.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Margaret E., Brandon M. Stewart, Dustin Tingley, Christopher Lucas, Jetson Leder-Luis, Shana Kushner Gadarian, Bethany Albertson, and David G. Rand. 2014. “Structural Topic Models for Open-Ended Survey Responses.” American Journal of Political Science 58(4):1064–82. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, Irene. 2015. “Past and Future Budget Classics: A Research Agenda.” Public Administration Review 75(1):25–1082. doi: 10.1111/puar.12289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schick, Allen. 1966. “The Road to PPB: The Stages of Budget Reform.” Public Administration Review 26(4):243–58. doi: 10.2307/973296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straussman, Jeffrey D. 1979. “A Typology of Budgetary Environments: Notes on the Prospects for Reform.” Administration & Society 11(2):216–26. doi: 10.1177/009539977901100205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tausanovitch, Chris, and Christopher Warshaw. 2013. “Measuring Constituent Policy Preferences in Congress, State Legislatures, and Cities.” The Journal of Politics 75(2):330–42. doi: 10.1017/S0022381613000042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibshirani, Robert, Michael Saunders, Saharon Rosset, Ji Zhu, and Keith Knight. 2005. “Sparsity and Smoothness via the Fused Lasso.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 67(1):91–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Chong, David Blei, and David Heckerman. 2012. “Continuous Time Dynamic Topic Models.” Retrieved https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3298
   Google Scholar
• Wiedemann, Gregor. 2013. “Opening up to Big Data: Computer-Assisted Analysis of Textual Data in Social Sciences.” Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 2013:332–57.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbur, W. John, and Karl Sirotkin. 1992. “The Automatic Identification of Stop Words.” Journal of Information Science 18(1):45–55. doi: 10.1177/016555159201800106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, Aaron B. 1964. The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston, MA: Little and Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, Charles F. 1993. Crossing the Next Meridian: Land, Water, and the Future of the West. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willoughby, Katherine. 2016. The State of the State Addresses: Governors in the Hot Seat. Lexington, KY: The Council of State Governments.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Lori, and Stuart Soroka. 2012. “Affective News: The Automated Coding of Sentiment in Political Texts.” Political Communication 29(2):205–31. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2012.671234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Cun-Hui, and Jian Huang. 2008. “The Sparsity and Bias of the Lasso Selection in High-Dimensional Linear Regression.” The Annals of Statistics 36(4):1567–94. doi: 10.1214/07-AOS520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar