Whom do we learn from? The impact of global networks and political regime types on e-government development

References

• Ahn, Michael J. 2011. “Adoption of E-Communication Applications in U.S. Municipalities: The Role of Political Environment, Bureaucratic Structure, and the Nature of Applications.” The American Review of Public Administration 41(4):428–52. doi: 10.1177/0275074010377654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, Mohammad Afshar, Md Rakibul Hoque, and Khorshed Alam. 2018. “An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between E-Government Development and the Digital Economy: The Case of Asian Countries.” Journal of Knowledge Management 22(5):1176–200. doi: 10.1108/JKM-10-2017-0477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altshuler, Alan, and Robert D. Behn. 1997. Innovations in American Government. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, Gwen. 2014. “Policy Learning and Science Policy Innovation Adoption by Street-Level Bureaucrats.” Journal of Public Policy 34(3):389–414. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X14000154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, Gwen. 2015. “Street-Level Policy Entrepreneurship.” Public Management Review 17(3):307–27. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.806577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, Tobias, Sandra van Thiel, Gerhard Hammerschmid, and Reto Steiner. 2017. “Administrative Tradition and Management Reforms: A Comparison of Agency Chief Executive Accountability in Four Continental Rechtsstaat Countries.” Public Management Review 19(6):765–84. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1210205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balla, Steven J. 2001. “Interstate Professional Associations and the Diffusion of Policy Innovations.” American Politics Research 29(3):221–45. doi: 10.1177/1532673X01293001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, Michael W., Jörn Ege, and Rahel Schomaker. 2019. “The Challenge of Administrative Internationalization: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead.” International Journal of Public Administration 42(11):904–17. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2018.1522642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beagles, Jonathan E., Sabina Schnell, and Catherine Gerard. 2019. “Overcoming Parochialism in American Public Administration.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 2(4):255–66. doi: 10.1093/ppmgov/gvz009.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, F. S., and W. D. Berry. 2018. “Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research.” Pp. 263–308 in Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Christopher M. Weible and Paul A. Sabatier. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bertucci, Guido, and Adriana Alberti. 2005. “The United Nations Programme in Public Administration: Reinventing Itself to Help Reinvent Public Administration.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 71(2):337–53. doi: 10.1177/0020852305053891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatti, Yosef, Asmus L. Olsen, and Lene Holm Pedersen. 2011. “Administrative Professionals and the Diffusion of Innovations: The Case of Citizen Service Centres.” Public Administration 89(2):577–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01882.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesenbender, Sophie, and Jale Tosun. 2014. “Domestic Politics and the Diffusion of International Policy Innovations: How Does Accommodation Happen?” Global Environmental Change 29:424–33. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boix, Carles, Michael Miller, and Sebastian Rosato. 2013. “A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes 1800–2007.” Comparative Political Studies 46(12):1523–54. doi: 10.1177/0010414012463905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carothers, Christopher. 2021. “The Autocrat’s Corruption Dilemma.” Government and Opposition 23:1–17. doi: 10.1017/gov.2021.23.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, Christopher. 2022. “Taking Authoritarian anti-Corruption Reform Seriously.” Perspectives on Politics 20(1):69–17. 10.1017/S1537592720001371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Yifan, Stuart Bretschneider, Justin M. Stritch, Nicole Darnall, and Lily Hsueh. 2021. “E-Procurement System Adoption in Local Governments: The Role of Procurement Complexity and Organizational Structure.” Public Management Review:1–23. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2021.1874497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, Anthony B. L. 2005. “The Politics of Administrative Reforms in Asia: Paradigms and Legacies, Paths and Diversities.” Governance 18(2):257–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00275.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Beomgeun, and M. Jae Moon. 2019. “The Determinants of Citizens’ Preference of Policy Instruments for Environmental Policy: Do Social Trust, Government Capacity, and State-Society Relations Matter?” International Review of Public Administration 24(3):205–24. doi: 10.1080/12294659.2019.1643101.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Taehyon, and Susan Meyers Chandler. 2020. “Knowledge Vacuum: An Organizational Learning Dynamic of How e-Government Innovations Fail.” Government Information Quarterly 37(1):101416–1. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.101416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, Sharon S. 2008. “The Evolution and Continuing Challenges for E-Governance.” Public Administration Review 68(S1):S86–S102. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00981.x.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, Hanna, Victor Bekkers, and Lars Tummers. 2016. “Innovation in the Public Sector : A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda.” Public Administration 94(1):146–66. doi: 10.1111/padm.12209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, Hanna, Lars Tummers, and Victor Bekkers. 2018. “The Diffusion and Adoption of Public Sector Innovations : A Meta-Synthesis of the Literature.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 1(3):159–76. . doi: 10.1093/ppmgov/gvy001.
   Google Scholar
• Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif, and David B. Audretsch. 2017. “Conditions for Innovation in Public Sector Organizations.” Research Policy 46(9):1681–91. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domínguez, Luis Rodríguez, Isabel Maria García Sá Nchez, and Isabel Gallego Álvarez. 2011. “Determining Factors of E-Government Development: A Worldwide National Approach.” International Public Management Journal 14(2):218–48. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2011.597152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, Patrick, Helen Margetts, Simon Bastow, and Jane Tinkler. 2006. “New Public Management is Dead — Long Live Digital-Era Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(3):467–94. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mui057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbahnasawy, Nasr G. 2014. “E-Government, Internet Adoption, and Corruption: An Empirical Investigation.” World Development 57:114–26. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francesco, Fabrizio De. 2012. “Diffusion of Regulatory Impact Analysis among OECD and EU Member States.” Comparative Political Studies 45(10):1277–305. doi: 10.1177/0010414011434297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füglister, Katharina. 2012. “Where Does Learning Take Place? The Role of Intergovernmental Cooperation in Policy Diffusion.” European Journal of Political Research 51(3):316–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02000.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2016. “Four Ways We Can Improve Policy Diffusion Research.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 16(1):8–21. doi: 10.1177/1532440015608761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldring, Edward, and Sheena Chestnut Greitens. 2020. “Rethinking Democratic Diffusion: Bringing Regime Type Back In.” Comparative Political Studies 53(2):319–53. doi: 10.1177/0010414019852701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, Erin R., Charles R. Shipan, and Craig Volden. 2013. “Review Article: The Diffusion of Policy Diffusion Research in Political Science.” British Journal of Political Science 43(3):673–701. doi: 10.1017/S0007123412000415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhill, Brian. 2015. Transmitting Rights: International Organizations and the Diffusion of Human Rights Practices. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhill, Brian. 2020. “How Can International Organizations Shape Public Opinion?: Analysis of a Pair of Survey-Based Experiments.” The Review of International Organizations 15(1):165–88. doi: 10.1007/s11558-018-9325-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan G., and Mary K. Feeney. 2017. “Developing and Testing an Integrative Framework for Open Government Adoption in Local Governments.” Public Administration Review 77(4):579–90. doi: 10.1111/puar.12689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingrams, Alex, Aroon Manoharan, Lisa Schmidthuber, and Marc Holzer. 2020. “Stages and Determinants of E-Government Development: A Twelve-Year Longitudinal Study of Global Cities.” International Public Management Journal 23(6):731–69. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2018.1467987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingrams, Alex, Suzanne Piotrowski, and Daniel Berliner. 2020. “Learning from Our Mistakes: Public Management Reform and the Hope of Open Government.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 3(4):257–72. doi: 10.1093/ppmgov/gvaa001.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Junyan, Tianguang Meng, and Qing Zhang. 2019. “From Internet to Social Safety Net: The Policy Consequences of Online Participation in China.” Governance 32(3):531–46. doi: 10.1111/gove.12391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalish, Yuval. 2020. “Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models for the Co-Evolution of Networks and Behavior: An Introduction and Tutorial.” Organizational Research Methods 23(3):511–34. doi: 10.1177/1094428118825300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Chon Kyun. 2007. “A Cross-National Analysis of Global e-Government.” Public Organization Review 7(4):317–29. doi: 10.1007/s11115-007-0040-5.
   Google Scholar
• Kneuer, Marianne, and Sebastian Harnisch. 2016. “Diffusion of E-Government and e-Participation in Democracies and Autocracies.” Global Policy 7(4):548–56. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppell, Jonathan G. S. 2010. “Administration without Borders.” Public Administration Review 70(SUPPL. 1):S46–S55. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02245.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kornreich, Yoel. 2019. “Authoritarian Responsiveness: Online Consultation with ‘Issue Publics’ in China.” Governance 32(3):547–64. doi: 10.1111/gove.12393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lah, T. J., and James L. Perry. 2008. “The Diffusion of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 in OECD Countries.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 28(3):282–99. doi: 10.1177/0734371X08319950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Chang Kil., and David Strang. 2006. “The International Diffusion of Public-Sector Downsizing: Network Emulation and Theory-Driven Learning.” International Organization 60(04):883–909. doi: 10.1017/S0020818306060292.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Chung Pin, Kaiju Chang, and Frances Stokes Berry. 2011. “Testing the Development and Diffusion of E-Government and E-Democracy: A Global Perspective.” Public Administration Review 71(3):444–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02228.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Don S., and Soonae Park. 2020. “Ministerial Leadership and Endorsement of Bureaucrats: Experimental Evidence from Presidential Governments.” Public Administration Review 80(3):426–41. doi: 10.1111/puar.13153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Meng-Hao, and Mary K. Feeney. 2014. “Adoption of Electronic Technologies in Local U.S. Governments: Distinguishing between E-Services and Communication Technologies.” The American Review of Public Administration 44(1):75–91. doi: 10.1177/0275074012460910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maerz, Seraphine F. 2016. “The Electronic Face of Authoritarianism: E-Government as a Tool for Gaining Legitimacy in Competitive and Non-Competitive Regimes.” Government Information Quarterly 33(4):727–35. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggetti, Martino, and Fabrizio Gilardi. 2016. “Problems (and Solutions) in the Measurement of Policy Diffusion Mechanisms.” Journal of Public Policy 36(1):87–107. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X1400035X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margetts, Helen. 2009. “The Internet and Public Policy.” Policy & Internet 1(1):1–21. doi: 10.2202/1944-2866.1029.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, Michael, and Phillipa Norman. 2009. “Policy Entrepreneurship and Policy Change.” Policy Studies Journal 37(4):649–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00329.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, Michael, and Sandra Vergari. 1998. “Policy Networks and Innovation Diffusion : The Case of State Education Reforms.” The Journal of Politics 60(1):126–48. doi: 10.2307/2648004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, M. Jae. 2002. “The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality?” Public Administration Review 62(4):424–33. doi: 10.1111/0033-3352.00196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, M. Jae. 2020. “Shifting from Old Open Government to New Open Government: Four Critical Dimensions and Case Illustrations.” Public Performance and Management Review 43(3):535–59. doi: 10.1080/15309576.2019.1691024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, M. Jae, and P. deLeon. 2001. “Municipal Reinvention: Managerial Values and Diffusion among Municipalities.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11(3):327–52. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, M. Jae, Jooho Lee, and Chul-Young Roh. 2014. “The Evolution of Internal IT Applications and E-Government Studies in Public Administration: Research Themes and Methods.” Administration & Society 46(1):3–36. doi: 10.1177/0095399712459723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, M. Jae, and Donald F. Norris. 2005. “Does Manageiral Orientation Matter?: the Adoption of Reinvetnting Government and e-Government at the Municipal Level.” Information Systems Journal 15(1):43–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00185.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, Laurence J. 2015. “Networks and Networking: The Public Administrative Agendas.” Public Administration Review 75(3):361–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, Leslie A. 2012. Frontiers of Governance: The OECD and Global Public Management Reform. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pal, Leslie A. 2019. “Standard Setting and International Peer Review: The OECD as a Transnational Policy Actor.” Pp. 491–508 in The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration, edited by Diane Stone and Moloney Kim. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pal, Leslie A., and Jennifer Spence. 2020. “Event-Focused Network Analysis: A Case Study of anti-Corruption Networks.” Policy and Society 39(1):91–112. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1716559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, Leslie A., and Derek Ireland. 2009. “The Public Sector Reform Movement : Mapping the Global Policy Network the Public Sector Reform Movement.” International Journal of Public Administration 32(8):621–57. doi: 10.1080/01900690903000187.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Chul Hyun, and Koomin Kim. 2020. “E-Government as an anti-Corruption Tool: Panel Data Analysis across Countries.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 86(4):691–707. doi: 10.1177/0020852318822055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, James L. 2016. “Building Global Public Administration Knowledge.” Public Administration Review 76(4):533–4. doi: 10.1111/puar.12588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlin-Andersson, Kerstin. 2001. “National, International and Transnational Constructions of New Public Management.” Pp. 43–72 in New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practice, edited by Tom Christensen and Per Laegreid. Ashgate, UK: Aldershot.
   Google Scholar
• Schlaufer, Caroline. 2021. “Why Do Nondemocratic Regimes Promote E-Participation? The Case of Moscow’s Active Citizen Online Voting Platform.” Governance 34(3):821–36. doi: 10.1111/gove.12531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnell, Sabina, and Suyeon Jo. 2019. “Which Countries Have More Open Governments? Assessing Structural Determinants of Openness.” The American Review of Public Administration 49(8):944–56. doi: 10.1177/0275074019854445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim, Dong Chul, and Tae Ho Eom. 2008. “E-Government and anti-Corruption: Empirical Analysis of International Data.” International Journal of Public Administration 31(3):298–316. doi: 10.1080/01900690701590553.
   Google Scholar
• Shipan, Charles R., and Craig Volden. 2012. “Policy Diffusion: Seven Lessons for Scholars and Practitioners.” Public Administration Review 72(6):788–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02610.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, Tom A. B., Gerhard G. van de Bunt, and Christian E. G. Steglich. 2010. “Introduction to Stochastic Actor-Based Models for Network Dynamics.” Social Networks 32(1):44–60. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier, Sebastian. 2015. “Political Determinants of E-Government Performance Revisited: Comparing Democracies and Autocracies.” Government Information Quarterly 32(3):270–8. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier, Sebastian. 2017. “Internet Diffusion and Regime Type: Temporal Patterns in Technology Adoption.” Telecommunications Policy 41(1):25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2016.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, Diane. 2004. “Transfer Agents and Global Networks in the ‘Transnationalization ’ of Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 11(3):545–66. doi: 10.1080/13501760410001694291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, Diane. 2012. “Transfer and Translation of Policy.” Policy Studies 33(6):483–99. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2012.695933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, Diane, and Stella Ladi. 2015. “Global Public Policy and Transnational Administration.” Public Administration 93(4):839–55. doi: 10.1111/padm.12207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teodoro, Manuel P. 2009. “Bureaucratic Job Mobility and the Diffusion of Innovations.” American Journal of Political Science 53(1):175–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00364.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, Jale, and Aurel Croissant. 2016. “Policy Diffusion: A Regime-Sensitive Conceptual Framework.” Global Policy 7(4):534–40. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• True, Jacqui, and Michael Mintrom. 2001. “Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming.” International Studies Quarterly 45(1):27–57. doi: 10.1111/0020-8833.00181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. 2008. Global E-Government Survey 2008: From e-Government to Connected Governance. New York: UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, Rick, and Doris Masal. 2015. “PUBLIC LEADERSHIP: A Review of the Literature and Framework for Future Research.” Public Management Review 17(8):1165–89. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2014.895031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Shu, and Mary K. Feeney. 2016. “Determinants of Information and Communication Technology Adoption in Municipalities.” The American Review of Public Administration 46(3):292–313. doi: 10.1177/0275074014553462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, Eric W., Charles C. Hinnant, and M. Jae Moon. 2004. “Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(3):371–91. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mui021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, Eric W., M. Jae Moon, and Wilson Wong. 2006. “What Drives Global E-Government? An Exploratory Assessment of Existing e-Government Performance Measures.” Pp. 275–94 In Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management, edited by George Boyne, Kenneth J. Meier, Laurence J. O’Toole Jr., and Richard M. Walker. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weyland, Kurt. 2017. “Autocratic Diffusion and Cooperation: The Impact of Interests vs. Ideology.” Democratization 24(7):1235–52. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2017.1307823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Paul. 2002. “The Competent Boundary Spanner.” Public Administration 80(1):103–24. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirtz, Bernd W., and Peter Daiser. 2018. “A Meta-Analysis of Empirical e-Government Research and Its Future Research Implications.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 84(1):144–63. doi: 10.1177/0020852315599047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, Hongtao, Frances Stokes Berry, and Wenna Chen. 2018. “Management Innovation and Policy Diffusion through Leadership Transfer Networks: An Agent Network Diffusion Model.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28(4):457–74. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muy031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, Hongtao, and Wenna Chen. 2019. “Portable Innovation, Policy Wormholes, and Innovation Diffusion.” Public Administration Review 79(5):737–48. doi: 10.1111/puar.13090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Matthew M. 2020. “Implementation of Digital-Era Governance: The Case of Open Data in U.S. Cities.” Public Administration Review 80(2):305–15. doi: 10.1111/puar.13156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Fengxiu, and Mary K. Feeney. 2020. “Engaging through Technology: The Role of Administrative Culture and Mandates.” Public Management Review 22(10):1423–42. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1630475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Hui, Xiaolin Xu, and Jianying Xiao. 2014. “Diffusion of E-Government: A Literature Review and Directions for Future Directions.” Government Information Quarterly 31(4):631–6. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar