463
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Rule bending on the frontlines of public service delivery: How and why caseworkers favor the strong

Pages 453-466 | Received 03 Jun 2022, Accepted 14 Oct 2022, Published online: 03 Nov 2022

References

  • Ambrose, M. L., R. Taylor, and R. L. Hess. Jr. 2015. “Can I Help You? Employee Prosocial Rule Breaking as a Response to Organizational Mistreatment of Customers.” in Mistreatment in Organizations. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Bansak, K., J. Hainmueller, and D. Hangartner. 2016. “How Economic, Humanitarian, and Religious Concerns Shape European Attitudes toward Asylum Seekers.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 354(6309):217–22. doi: 10.1126/science.aag2147.
  • Baviskar, S. 2019. “Who Creams? Explaining the Classroom Cream-Skimming Behavior of School Teachers from a Street-Level Bureaucracy Perspective.” International Public Management Journal 22(3):524–59. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2018.1478918.
  • Borry, E. L. 2017. “Ethical Climate and Rule Bending: How Organizational Norms Contribute to Unintended Rule Consequences.” Public Administration 95(1):78–96. doi: 10.1111/padm.12304.
  • Bozeman, B., J. Youtie, and J. Jung. 2021. “Death by a Thousand 10-Minute Tasks: Workarounds and Noncompliance in University Research Administration.” Administration & Society 53(4):527–68. doi: 10.1177/0095399720947994.
  • Bryan, C. J., E. Tipton, and D. S. Yeager. 2021. “Behavioural Science is Unlikely to Change the World without a Heterogeneity Revolution.” Nature Human Behaviour 5(8):980–9. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01143-3.
  • Burn, I., P. Button, and D. Neumark. 2017. Age Discrimination and Hiring of Older Workers. FRBSF Economic Letter, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
  • Clarke, J., J. Newman, N. Smith, E. Vidler, and L. Westmarland. 2007. Creating Citizen-Consumers: Changing Publics and Changing Public Welfares. London: Sage Publications.
  • DeHart-Davis, L. 2007. “The Unbureaucratic Personality.” Public Administration Review 67(5):892–903.
  • Einstein, K. L., and D. M. Glick. 2017. “Does Race Affect Access to Government Welfares? An Experiment Exploring Street‐Level Bureaucrats and Access to Public Housing.” American Journal of Political Science 61(1):100–16. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12252.
  • Epp, C. R., S. Maynard-Moody, and D. P. Haider-Markel. 2014. Pulled over: How Police Stops Define Race and Citizenship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Eurostat. 2022. Employment and Unemployment – Database. Retrieved March 5, 2022 (https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/lfs/data/database)
  • Fleming, C. J. 2020. “Prosocial Rule Breaking at the Street Level: The Roles of Leaders, Peers, and Bureaucracy.” Public Management Review 22(8):1191–216. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1619817.
  • Goodsell, C. T. (Ed.). 1981. The Public Encounter: Where State and Citizen Meet. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Grant, A. M. 2007. “Relational Job Design and the Motivation to Make a Prosocial Difference.” Academy of Management Review 32(2):393–417. doi: 10.5465/amr.2007.24351328.
  • Guul, T. S., M. J. Pedersen, and N. B. G. Petersen. 2021. “Creaming among Caseworkers: Effects of Client Competence and Client Motivation on Caseworkers’ Willingness to Help.” Public Administration Review 81(1):12–22. doi: 10.1111/puar.13297.
  • Hainmueller, J., D. Hangartner, and T. Yamamoto. 2015. “Validating Vignette and Conjoint Survey Experiments against Real-World Behavior.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112(8):2395–400. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416587112.
  • Hainmueller, J., D. J. Hopkins, and T. Yamamoto. 2014. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments.” Political Analysis 22(1):1–30. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpt024.
  • Harrits, G. S., and M. Ø. Møller. 2014. “Prevention at the Front Line: How Home Nurses, Pedagogues, and Teachers Transform Public Worry into Decisions on Special Efforts.” Public Management Review 16(4):447–80. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.841980.
  • Hasenfeld, Y. 2010. “The Attributes of Human Welfare Organizations.” Human Welfares as Complex Organizations 2:9–32.
  • Horiuchi, Y., Z. Markovich, and T. Yamamoto. 2022. “Does Conjoint Analysis Mitigate Social Desirability Bias?” Political Analysis 30(4):535–49. doi: 10.1017/pan.2021.30.
  • Jensen, C., and M. B. Petersen. 2017. “The Deservingness Heuristic and the Politics of Health Care.” American Journal of Political Science 61(1):68–83. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12251.
  • Jilke, S., and L. Tummers. 2018. “Which Clients Are Deserving of Help? A Theoretical Model and Experimental Test.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28(2):226–38. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muy002.
  • Kaptein, M., and M. Van Helvoort. 2019. “A Model of Neutralization Techniques.” Deviant Behavior 40(10):1260–85. doi: 10.1080/01639625.2018.1491696.
  • Keiser, L. R., P. R. Mueser, and S. W. Choi. 2004. “Race, Bureaucratic Discretion, and the Implementation of Welfare Reform.” American Journal of Political Science 48(2):314–27. doi: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00072.x.
  • Križ, K., and M. Skivenes. 2014. “Street-Level Policy Aims of Child Welfare Workers in England, Norway and the United States: An Exploratory Study.” Children and Youth Services Review 40:71–8. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.02.014.
  • Law on Active Social Policy. n.d. Retrieved March 5, 2022 (https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2019/981)
  • Lipsky, M. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Lu, X., H. Xu, and W. Wang. 2021. “Clients’ Help Deservingness, Crowd Situational Stress and Discretionary Decision-Making: An Experimental Study of Regulatory Street-Level Bureaucrats in China.” International Public Management Journal 24(2):287–312. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2019.1661892.
  • Machin, S., and A. Manning. 1999. “The Causes and Consequences of Longterm Unemployment in Europe.” Handbook of Labor Economics 3:3085–139.
  • Maruna, S., and H. Copes. 2005. “What Have We Learned from Five Decades of Neutralization Research?” Crime and Justice 32:221–320. doi: 10.1086/655355.
  • Maynard-Moody, S. W., and M. C. Musheno. 2003. Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Welfare. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Mik-Meyer, N. 2017. The Power of Citizens and Professionals in Welfare Encounters: The Influence of Bureaucracy, Market and Psychology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Milner, A., A. Page, and A. D. LaMontagne. 2013. “Long-Term Unemployment and Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” PLoS One 8(1):e51333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051333.
  • Monties, V., and S. Gagnon. 2022. “Responding to Reforms: Resilience through Rule-Bending and Workarounds in the Police Force.” Public Management Review 1–20. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2022.2070242.
  • Morrison, E. W. 2006. “Doing the Job Well: An Investigation of Pro-Social Rule Breaking.” Journal of Management 32(1):5–28. doi: 10.1177/0149206305277790.
  • Oberfield, Z. W. 2010. “Rule following and Discretion at Government’s Frontlines: Continuity and Change during Organization Socialization.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20(4):735–55. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mup025.
  • OECD. 2022. “OECD Employment and Labour Market Statistics.” OECD Employment and Labour Market Statistics. Retrieved March 6, 2022 (https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/employment/data/oecd-employment-and-labour-market-statistics_lfs-data-en)
  • Olsen, J. P. 2006. “Maybe It is Time to Rediscover Bureaucracy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(1):1–24. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mui027.
  • Pedersen, K., and L. Johannsen. 2018. “New Public Governance in the Baltic States: Flexible Administration and Rule Bending.” Public Performance & Management Review 41(3):648–67. doi: 10.1080/15309576.2018.1465828.
  • Pedersen, M. J., J. M. Stritch, and F. Thuesen. 2018. “Punishment on the Frontlines of Public Welfare Delivery: Client Ethnicity and Caseworker Sanctioning Decisions in a Scandinavian Welfare State.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28(3):339–54. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muy018.
  • Perry, J. L., and W. Vandenabeele. 2015. “Public Service Motivation Research: Achievements, Challenges, and Future Directions.” Public Administration Review 75(5):692–9. doi: 10.1111/puar.12430.
  • Petersen, M. B., R. Slothuus, R. Stubager, and L. Togeby. 2011. “Deservingness versus Values in Public Opinion on Welfare: The Automaticity of the Deservingness Heuristic.” European Journal of Political Research 50(1):24–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01923.x.
  • Piatak, J., Z. Mohr, and J. McDonald. 2020. “Rule Formalization, Gender, and Gender Congruence: Examining Prosocial Rule Breaking for Internal and External Stakeholders.” International Public Management Journal 25(4):1–19. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2020.1790445.
  • Pykett, J., M. Saward, and A. Schaefer. 2010. “Framing the Good Citizen.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 12(4):523–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2010.00424.x.
  • Schram, S. F., J. Soss, R. C. Fording, and L. Houser. 2009. “Deciding to Discipline: Race, Choice, and Punishment at the Frontlines of Welfare Reform.” American Sociological Review 74(3):398–422. doi: 10.1177/000312240907400304.
  • Soss, J., R. C. Fording, and S. F. Schram. 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Statistics Denmark. 2022. Sammenlign din indkomst [Compare your income]. Retrieved March 6, 2022 (https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/nyheder-analyser-publ/Publikationer/indkomst)
  • Stigaard, M. V., M. F. Sørensen, S. C. Winter, N. Friisberg, A. C. Henriksen, and F. Søren. 2006. “Kommunernes Beskaeftigelsesindsats.” København: Socialforskningsinstituttet 6:28.
  • Tummers, L. 2012. “Policy Alienation of Public Professionals: The Construct and Its Measurement.” Public Administration Review 72(4):516–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02550.x.
  • Tummers, L., V. Bekkers, E. Vink, and M. Musheno. 2015. “Coping during Public Service Delivery: A Conceptualization and Systematic Review of the Literature.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(4):1099–126. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muu056.
  • van Oorschot, W. V. 2000. “Who Should Get What, and Why? On Deservingness Criteria and the Conditionality of Solidarity among the Public.” Policy & Politics 28(1):33–48. doi: 10.1332/0305573002500811.
  • Weißmüller, K. S., L. De Waele, and A. van Witteloostuijn. 2022. “Public Service Motivation and Prosocial Rule-Breaking: An International Vignettes Study in Belgium, Germany, and The Netherlands.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 42(2):258–86. doi: 10.1177/0734371X20973441.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.