Patron’s largess and regional borrowing under authoritarian rule

References

• Anderson, J. E. 2018. “Economic Reforms and Their Impacts on Informal Payments for Government Services in Transition Countries.” International Public Management Journal 22(1):163.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, E. 2012. “Electoral Manipulation and the Development of Russia’s Political System.” East European Politics 28(2):105–18. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2012.669734.
   Google Scholar
• Baimenov, A. and S. Liebert. 2019. “Governance in the Post‐Soviet Era: Challenges and Opportunities.” Public Administration Review 79(2):281–5. doi: 10.1111/puar.13014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaguer-Coll, M. T., D. Prior, and E. Tortosa-Ausina. 2016. “On the Determinants of Local Government Debt: Does One Size Fit All?.” International Public Management Journal 19(4):513–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskaran, T., A. Brender, S. Blesse and Y. Reingewertz. 2016. “Revenue Decentralization, Central Oversight and the Political Budget Cycle: Evidence from Israel.” European Journal of Political Economy 42(1):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bastida, F., A. Beyaert, and B. Benito. 2013. “Electoral Cycles And Local Government Debt Management..” Local Government Studies 39(1):107–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baturo, A., and R. Elgie. 2019. The Politics of Presidential Term Limits. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., M. Carammia, D. A. Epp, B. Noble, B. Rey and T. M. Yildirim. 2017. “Budgetary Change in Authoritarian and Democratic Regimes.” Journal of European Public Policy 24(6):792–808. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1296482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearfield, D. A. 2009. “What is Patronage? A Critical Reexamination.” Public Administration Review 69(1):64–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01941.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, A. L. and H. J. M. Smith. 2017. “The Impact of Parties and Elections on Municipal Debt Policy in Mexico.” Governance 30(4):621–39. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2019.1645129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenschot, W. and E. Aspinall. 2020. “How Clientelism Varies: Comparing Patronage Democracies.” Democratization 27(1):1–19. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2019.1645129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Biezen, I. and P. Kopecky. 2007. “The State and the Parties.” Party Politics 13(2):235–54. doi: 10.1177/1354068807073875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondel, J. 2002. “Party Government, Patronage, and Party Decline in Western Europe.” Pp. 233–56 in Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges, edited by R. Gunther, J.R. Montero, and J. J. Linz. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blunt, P., M. Turner, and H. Lindroth. 2012. “Patronage, Service Delivery, and Social Justice in Indonesia.” International Journal of Public Administration 35(3):214–20. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2011.641050.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, N., T. Frye, G. Garifullina, and O. J. Reuter. 2014. “The Political Economy of Russian Gubernatorial Election and Appointment.” Europe-Asia Studies 66(8):1213–33. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2014.941695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno De Mesquita, B. and A. Smith. 2010. “Leader Survival, Revolutions, and the Nature of Government Finance.” American Journal of Political Science 54(4):936–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00463.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhardt, F. 2021. “Institutionalising Authoritarian Presidencies: Polymorphous Power and Russia’s Presidential Administration.” Europe-Asia Studies 73(3):472–504. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2020.1749566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A. 2006. “State Versus Society? Local Government and the Reconstruction of the Russian State.” Local Government Studies 32(5):659–76. doi: 10.1080/03003930600896277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheibub, J. A., and A. Medina. 2019. “The Politics of Presidential Term Limits in Latin America.” Pp. 517–34 in The Politics of Presidential Term Limits, edited by A. Baturo and R. Elgie. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., and M. I. Neshkova. 2020. “The Effect of Fiscal Transparency on Corruption: A Panel Cross‐Country Analysis.” Public Administration 98(1):226–43. doi: 10.1111/padm.12620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, R. M., L. Freinkman, and I. Goldberg. 2005. “Fiscal Federalism in Rentier Regions: Evidence from Russia.” Journal of Comparative Economics 33(4):814–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2005.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, R. M., A. Olofsgård, and T. M. Yousef. 2009. “The Logic of Authoritarian Bargains.” Economics & Politics 21(1):93–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0343.2008.00337.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiGiuseppe, M. and P. E. Shea. 2016. “Borrowed Time: Sovereign Finance, Regime Type, and Leader Survival.” Economics & Politics 28(3):342–67. doi: 10.1111/ecpo.12081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowley, K. M. 2006. “Local Government Transparency in East Central Europe.” Local Government Studies 32(5):563–83. doi: 10.1080/03003930600896152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennser-Jedenastik, L. 2014. “The Politics of Patronage and Coalition: How Parties Allocate Managerial Positions in State-Owned Enterprises.” Political Studies 62(2):398–417. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ermasova, N., and J. Mikesell. 2016. “Fiscal Disparity and Equalisation in the Russian Federation.” Post-Communist Economies 28(1):1–15. doi: 10.1080/14631377.2015.1084726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eroshkina, L. A. 2019. Interview with the Director of the Department of Interbudgetary Relations Larisa Eroshkina to TASS Agency Interview by TASS. https://www.minfin.ru/ru/press-center/?id_4=36494-intervyu_direktora_departamenta_mezhbyudzhetnykh_otnoshenii_larisy_yeroshkinoi_agentstvu_tass.
   Google Scholar
• Flikke, G. 2018. “The Sword of Damocles.” Problems of Post-Communism 65(6):434–46. doi: 10.1080/10758216.2017.1291308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flinders, M. and F. Matthews. 2010. “Think Again: Patronage, Governance and the Smarter State.” Policy & Politics 38(4):639–56. doi: 10.1332/030557310X539315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gel’man, V. 2008. “Party Politics in Russia: From Competition to Hierarchy.” Europe-Asia Studies 60(6):913–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gel’man, V. 2015. Authoritarian Russia: Analyzing Post-Soviet Regime Changes. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V., K. Gushchina and P. Kononenko. 2016. “Russia’s Local Government in the Process of Authoritarian Regime Transformation: Incentives for the Survival of Local Democracy.” Local Government Studies 42(4):507–26. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2016.1154848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jancsics, D. and I. Jávor. 2012. “Corrupt Governmental Networks.” International Public Management Journal 15(1):62–99. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2012.684019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarocińska, E. 2010. “Intergovernmental Grants in Russia.” Economics of Transition 18(2):405–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0351.2009.00377.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. L. and A. Yushkov. 2022. “On the Determinants of Regional Government Debt in Russia.” Eurasian Geography and Economics February:1–39. doi: 10.1080/15387216.2022.2042350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopecky, P. 2006. “Political Parties and the State in Post-Communist Europe: The Nature of Symbiosis.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 22(3):251–73. doi: 10.1080/13523270600855654.
   Google Scholar
• Kopecky, P. 2013. Political Parties and the State in Post-Communist Europe. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kopecky, P., J.-H M. Sahling, F. Panizza, G. Scherlis, C. Schuster and M. Spirova. 2016. “Party Patronage in Contemporary Democracies: Results from an Expert Survey in 22 Countries from Five Regions.” European Journal of Political Research 55(2):416–31. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopecky, P. and G. Scherlis. 2008. “Party Patronage in Contemporary Europe.” European Review 16(3):355–71. doi: 10.1017/S1062798708000306.
   Google Scholar
• Kopecky, P. and M. Spirova. 2011. “Jobs for the Boys’? Patterns of Party Patronage in Post-Communist Europe.” West European Politics 34(5):897–921. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2011.591072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriner, D. L. and A. Reeves. 2015. “Presidential Particularism and Divide-the-Dollar Politics.” American Political Science Review 109(1):155–71. doi: 10.1017/S0003055414000598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D. 2011. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. Whitefish, MT: Literary Licensing.
   Google Scholar
• Laverty, N. 2015. “The ‘Party of Power’ as a Type.” East European Politics 31(1):71–87. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2014.983088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S. and L. A. Way. 2002. “The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 13(2):51–65. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S. and L. A. Way. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, I., E. Nazrullaeva and A. Yakovlev. 2016. “Substituting Distribution for Growth: The Political Logic of Intergovernmental Transfers in the Russian Federation.” Economics & Politics 28(1):23–54. doi: 10.1111/ecpo.12070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martell, C. R. and G. M. Guess. 2006. “Development of Local Government Debt Financing Markets: Application of a Market-Based Framework.” Public Budgeting & Finance 26(1):88–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5850.2006.00840.x.
   Google Scholar
• Martell, C. R., T. T. Moldogaziev and S. Espinosa. 2021. Information Resolution and Subnational Capital Markets. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, F. 2020. “Parliamentary Scrutiny of Executive Patronage: The Relationship between Institutional Norms, Reputation and Accountability.” Public Administration 98(3):625–42. doi: 10.1111/padm.12637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milanovic, B., C. Hoff and S. Horowitz. 2010. “Turnover in Power as a Restraint on Investing in Influence: Evidence from the Postcommunist Transition.” Economics & Politics 22(3):329–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0343.2010.00365.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moldogaziev, T. T., S. Espinosa and C. R. Martell. 2018. “Fiscal Governance, Information Capacity, and Subnational Capital Finance.” Public Finance Review 46(6):974–1001. doi: 10.1177/1091142117711018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montes, G. C. and P. H. Luna. 2021. “Fiscal Transparency, Legal System and Perception of the Control on Corruption: Empirical Evidence from Panel Data.” Empirical Economics 60(4):2005–37. doi: 10.1007/s00181-020-01849-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, W. C. 2006. “Party Patronage and Party Colonization of the State.” Pp. 189–95 in Handbook of Party Politics, edited by R. S. Katz and W. Crotty. New York, NY: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Naseemullah, A. and P. Chhibber. 2018. “Patronage, Sub-Contracted Governance, and the Limits of Electoral Coordination.” Comparative Politics 51(1):81–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oversloot, H. and R. Verheul. 2006. “Managing Democracy: Political Parties and the State in Russia.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 22(3):383–405. doi: 10.1080/13523270600855795.
   Google Scholar
• Panizza, F., B. G. Peters and C. R. Ramos Larraburu. 2019. “Roles, Trust and Skills: A Typology of Patronage Appointments.” Public Administration 97(1):147–61. doi: 10.1111/padm.12560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penpecioğlu, M. and T. Taşan-Kok. 2016. “Alienated and Politicized? Young Planners’ Confrontation with Entrepreneurial and Authoritarian State Intervention in Urban Development in Turkey.” European Planning Studies 24(6):1037–55. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1135233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. 2008. “The Organizational Strategies of Political Parties: An Integrative Typology.” Politics & Policy (Southeastern Political Review) 27(4):635–54.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. 2021. “Studying Public Administration in Authoritarian Regimes.” Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 43(1):1–5. doi: 10.1080/23276665.2020.1870241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrov, N., M. Lipman, and H. E. Hale. 2014. “Three Dilemmas of Hybrid Regime Governance: Russia from Putin to Putin.” Post-Soviet Affairs 30(1):1–26. doi: 10.1080/1060586X.2013.825140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petry, J. 2020. “Financialization with Chinese Characteristics? Exchanges, Control and Capital Markets in Authoritarian Capitalism.” Economy and Society 49(2):213–38. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2020.1718913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popov, V. 2004. “Fiscal Federalism in Russia: Rules versus Electoral Politics.” Comparative Economic Studies 46(4):515–41. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100049.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, P. and J. Blöndal. 2012. “Democracies and Deficits: Prospects for Fiscal Responsibility in Democratic Nations.” Governance 25(1):11–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01554.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prado-Lorenzo, J.-M., I.-M. García-Sánchez and B. Cuadrado-Ballesteros. 2014. “Do Electoral Risks Moderate the Effect of Partisan and Electoral Cycles on Debt-Financed Local Spending?” Local Government Studies 40(5):745–65. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2013.799065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter, O. J. 2010. “The Politics of Dominant Party Formation: United Russia and Russia’s Governors.” Europe-Asia Studies 62(2):293–327. doi: 10.1080/09668130903506847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter, O. J. 2013. “Regional Patrons and Hegemonic Party Electoral Performance in Russia.” Post-Soviet Affairs 29(2):101–35. doi: 10.1080/1060586X.2013.780410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sáez, L. 2016. “The Political Budget Cycle and Subnational Debt Expenditures in Federations: Panel Data Evidence from India.” Governance 29(1):47–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallai, D. and G. Schnyder. 2021. “What Is ‘Authoritarian’ about Authoritarian Capitalism? The Dual Erosion of the Private–Public Divide in State-Dominated Business Systems.” Business & Society 60(6):1312–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samaratunge, R., Q. Alam and J. Teicher. 2008. “Public Sector Reforms and Accountability: The Case of South and Southeast Asia.” Public Management Review 10(1):101–26. doi: 10.1080/14719030701763237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster, C. 2016. “What Causes Patronage Reform? It Depends on the Type of Civil Service Reform.” Public Administration 94(4):1094–104. doi: 10.1111/padm.12280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharafutdinova, G. and R. Turovsky. 2017. “The Politics of Federal Transfers in Putin’s Russia: Regional Competition, Lobbying, and Federal Priorities.” Post-Soviet Affairs 33(2):161–75. doi: 10.1080/1060586X.2016.1163826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, C. K. 2012. “Beyond Gaps and Imbalances: Restructuring the Debate on Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations.” Public Administration 90(1):99–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01947.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shevtsova, L. 2004. “The Limits of Bureaucratic Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 15(3):67–77. doi: 10.1353/jod.2004.0055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, R. 2014. “The Putin Factor: Personalism, Protest, and Regime Stability in Russia.” Politics & Policy 42(4):567–92.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, A. 2019. “Effects of Presidential Term Limits.” Pp. 585–606 in The Politics of Presidential Term Limits, edited by A. Baturo and R. Elgie. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teague, E. 2014. “The Return of Regional Elections in Russia.” Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia 3(1):37–57. doi: 10.1353/reg.2014.0009.
   Google Scholar
• van Thiel, S. 2012. “Party Patronage in The Netherlands: Sharing Appointments to Maintain Consensus.” Pp. 250–71 in Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies, edited by P. Kopecký, P. Mair, and M. Spirova. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turovsky, R. and Y. Gaivoronsky. 2017. “Russia’s Regions as Winners and Losers: Political Motives and Outcomes in the Distribution of Federal Government Transfers.” European Politics and Society 18(4):529–51. doi: 10.1080/23745118.2017.1286312.
   Google Scholar
• Vartapetov, K. 2010. “Russia’s Federal Fiscal Grants: Regional Equalisation and Growth.” Post-Communist Economies 22(4):471–81. doi: 10.1080/14631377.2010.518452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volintiru, C. 2015. “The Exploitative Function of Party Patronage: Does It Serve the Party’s Interest?” East European Politics 31(1):39–55. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2014.999855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, D. 2012. “Re-Conceptualising Russian Party Politics.” East European Politics 28(3):210–24. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2012.688815.
   Google Scholar
• White, S. 2007. “Russia’s Client Party System.” Pp. 21–52 in Party Politics in New Democracies, edited by P. Webb and S. White. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. 1964. The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston, MA: Little & Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. 1986. Budgeting: A Comparative Theory of the Budgeting Process. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. 2001. Budgeting and Governing. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wintrobe, R. 2018. “An Economic Theory of a Hybrid (Competitive Authoritarian or Illiberal) Regime.” Public Choice 177(3):217–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., and R. M. Walker. 2020. “Public Management in China: Reform, Innovation and Governance.” International Public Management Journal 23(3):v–ix. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2020.1784646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, X. 2014. “Mandate Versus Championship: Vertical Government Intervention and Diffusion of Innovation in Public Services in Authoritarian China.” Public Management Review 16(1):117–39. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.798028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zygar, M.. 2016. All the Kremlin’s Men: Inside the Court of Vladimir Putin. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar