Applying the Multiview Analysis and Design Methodology in a Non Governmental Organisation in Bangladesh

REFERENCES

• Argyris, C. and D. A. Schon (1974). Theory in Practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco, CA, Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Avison, D. E. and A. T. Wood-Harper (1990). Multiview: an exploration in information systems development. Maidenhead, McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Avison, D. E. and A. T. Wood-Harper (1997). Multiview: an exploration in information systems development. London, Alfred Waller.
   Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R. and A. T. Wood-Harper (1998). “Diversity in Information Systems Action Research Methods.” European Journal of Information Systems 7: 90–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R. and T. Wood-Harper (1996). “A Critical Perspective on Action Research as a Method for Information Systems Research.” Journal of Information Technology 11: 235–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R. and T. Wood-Harper (1998). “Diversity in Information Systems Action Research Methods.” European Journal of Information Systems 7: 90–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S. (1996). “Learning with Information Systems: learning cycles in information systems development.” London, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. (1996). “Reflections on Learning in Information Systems Practice.” The Systemist 17(2): 54–63.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. (1998). “Self-Reflection and Vulnerability in Action Research: Bringing forth new worlds in our learning.” Systemic Practice and Action Research 11(2): 179–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S. (2000). “Logical Frameworks, Aristotle and Soft Systems: A note on the origins, values and uses of Logical Frameworks.” Public Administration and Development 20(1): 29–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S., G. Coleman, et al. (2000). “Information Systems Project in China: Action research and soft systems methodology.” Human Systems Management 19: 181–192.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. and P. Mayhew (1994). “Lessons in the Application of Systems Analysis in Developing Countries. A paper prepared for the Second European Conference on Information Systems, Nijenrode University, Nijenrode.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. and S. Morse (1997). Systems Thinking and Gauging Sustainable Development. Systems for Sustainability: people, organisations and environments. F. Stowall, R. Ison and R. Armson. London, Plenum Press: 407–412.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. and S. Morse (2003). “Learning from Experience in Sustainability”. The 2003 International Sustainable Development Research Conference, University of Nottingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. and A. T. Wood-Harper (1998). Rapid Information Systems Development: systems analysis and systems design in an imperfect world: Second Edition. London, McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. and A. T. Wood-Harper (2003). How to Set Up Information Systems: a non-specialists guide to the Multiview approach. London, Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Bottrall, A. (1982). “The Action Research Approach to Problem Solving, with illustrations from irrigation management,” Overseas Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1992). “Rural Appraisal: rapid, relaxed and participatory”. Brighton, Institute of Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1997). “Whose Reality Counts? Putting the first last”. London, Intermediate Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (2002). Participatory Workshops: A sourcebook of 21 sets of ideas and activities. London, Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Chcckland, P. and S. Holwell (1998). “Action Research: Its nature and validity.” Systemic Practice and Action Research 11(1): 9–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. and S. Holwell (1998). Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making sense of the field. Chichester, Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. B. (1981). Systems thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester, Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. B. and J. Scholes (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Chichester, Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, J. (1999). Fighting Failure. Synergy Matters: “Working with systems in the 21st Century. A. Castell, A. Gregory, G. Hindle, M. James and G. Ragsdell. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, J. and J. Hughes (1997). Modern Academic Myths. "Systems for Sustainability: People, organizations and environments”. A. Stowell, R. Ison and R. Armson. London, Plenum: 125–130.
   Google Scholar
• Galliers, R., S. Madon, et al. (1998). “Information Systems and Culture: applying 'stages of growth' concepts to development administration.” Information Technology for Development 8: 89–100.
   Google Scholar
• Gamila, S. (2003). “Cross-Cultural IS Adoption in Multinational Corporations.” Information Technology for Development 10(4): 249–263.
   Google Scholar
• Gasper, D. (1999). “Evaluating the “Logical Framework Approach": Towards learning - orientated development evaluation.” Public Administration and Development 20(1): 17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heron, J. (1996). Co-operative Inquiry: research into the human condition. London, Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, H. and R. Normann (2004). “When Research and Practice Collide: The role of action research when there is a conflict of interests with stakeholders.” Systemic Practice and Action Research 17(3): 207–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakabadse, A. and N. Kakabadse (2002). “Making 'modernising government initiatives' work: Culture change through Collaborative Inquiry (CI).” Public Administration and Development 22(4): 337–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok, K., M. Patel, et al. (2006). “Multi-Scale Narratives from an IA Perspective: Part I: European and Mediterranean Scenario Development.” Futures 38: 261–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning: experience as the source of learning and development. London, Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, K. (l993)._Rapid Appraisal Methods. Washington DC, World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1946). “Action Research and Minority Problems.” Journal of Social Issues 2(4): 34–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lousberg, M. and J. Soler (1998). “Action Research and the Evaluation of IT Projects.” Active learning 8: 36–40.
   Google Scholar
• McManus, J. and A. T. Wood-Harper (2003). Information Systems Project Management: Methods, tools and techniques. London, Financial Times Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, G., J. Gu, et al. (2000). “Dealing with Human Relations in Chinese Systems Behaviour.” Systemic Practice and Action Research 13(1): 71–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley, G. and J. Wilby (2000). “Systems Practice in China: New developments and cross cultural collaborations.” Systemic Practice and Action Research 13(1): 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinari, M. (2000). “Introducing Mini Solutions: Working towards sustainability”. Reading, Ab UNo.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, J. (1999). Reflection in Learning and Professional Development. London, Kogan Page Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, I. and J. Mingers (2000). The Use of Multimethodology in Practice - Results of a survey of practitioners. Warwick, University of Warwick.
   Google Scholar
• Paton, G. (2001). “A Systemic Action Learning Cycle as the Key Element of an Ongoing Spiral of Analyses.” Systemic Practice and Action Research 14(1): 95–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puri, K. and S. Sahay (2003). “Participation through Communicative Action: A case study of GIS for Addressing Land/Water Development in India.” Information Technology for Development 10(3): 179–200.
   Google Scholar
• Revans, R. W. (1980). Action Learning: New Techniques for Management. London, Blond and Briggs.
   Google Scholar
• Roman, R. and R. D. Colle (2003). “Content Creation for ICT Development Projects: Integrating normative approaches and community demand.” Information Technology for Development 10(2): 85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Stowell, F., D. West, et al. (1997). “Action Research as a Framework for IS Research”. Information Systems: an emerging discipline? J. Mingers and F. Stowell. Maidenhead, McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sugisaki, S. (2003). “IMF Lends Support to Bangladesh's Reforms Aimed at Boosting Growth, Improving Investment Climate.” IMF Survey 32(19): 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Szlezak, T. (1999). Reading Plato. London, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. (2000). IT Projects: sink or swim. The Computer Bulletin: 24–26.
   Google Scholar
• Vidgen, R., D. E. Avison, et al. (2002). Developing Web Information Systems. London, Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Wadsworth, Y. (1998). “What is Participatory Action Research?” Action Reserch International Paper 2(http:/www.scu.edu.au/school/gcm/ar/ari/p-ywadsworth98.html).
   Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (2001). Making a World of Difference: IT in a global context. Chichester, Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Woherem, E. (1993). Information Technology in Africa: challenges and opportunities. Nairobi, ACTS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood-Harper, A. T. (1990). “Comparison of Information Systems Approaches: an action- research, Multiview perspective.” Norwich, University of East Anglia.
   Google Scholar
• Wood-Harper, A. T., L. Antill, et al. (1985). Information Systems Definition: a Multiview Approach. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zaman, H. (1999). “Assessing the Impact of Micro-Credit on Poverty and Vulnerability in Bangladesh.” Working Papers. Washington, The World Bank Group: 50.
   Google Scholar