242
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

A Comparative Analysis of E-Government in Jamaica and Singapore: An Exploratory Study of Supply-Side Factors

& ORCID Icon

References

  • Aggarwal, A. K., & Makkonen, P. (2008). Critical success factors (CSF) for successful globalized learning. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 6(1), 92–109. doi:10.1504/IJIL.2009.021687
  • Aguilar, F. J. (1967). Scanning the business environment. Stuttgart, Germany: Macmillan .
  • Ali, M., Weerakkody, V., & El-Haddadeh, R. (2009). The impact of national culture on e-government implementation: A comparison case study. 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2009, 6th-9th August 2009, San Francisco, California, 2, 1140–1152.
  • Alkhaleefah, M., Alkhawaldeh, M., Venkatraman, S., & Alazab, M. (2010). Towards understanding and improving e-government strategies in Jordan. International Conference on E-Commerce, e-Business and e-Service, May 7–9, 2010, Guangzhou, China, 1871–1877.
  • Almarabeh, T., & Abu Ali, A. (2010). A general framework for e-government: Definition maturity challenges, opportunities, and success. European Journal of Scientific Research, 39, 29–42.
  • Alshehri, M., & Drew, S. (2010). Implementation of e-government: advantages and challenges. In International Association for Scientific Knowledge (IASK).
  • Alshehri, M., & Drew, S. J. (2011). E-government principles: Implementation, advantages and challenges. International Journal of Electronic Business, 9(3), 255–270. doi:10.1504/IJEB.2011.042545
  • Alshehri, M., & Drew, S. (2012). A comprehensive analysis of e-government services adoption in Saudi Arabia: Obstacles and challenges. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 3(2). doi:10.14569/IJACSA.2012.030201
  • M. A. AlSuwaidi and A. V. Rajan, E-government failure and Success Factors Rank Model an extension of Heeks Factor Model,2013 International Conference on Current Trends in Information Technology (CTIT), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2013, pp. 161–165. doi: 10.1109/CTIT.2013.6749495.
  • Andrade, A. D. (2009). Interpretive research aiming at theory building: Adopting and adapting the case study design. The qualitative report, 14(1), 42.
  • As-Saber, S. N., Srivastava, A., & Hossain, K. (2006). Information technology law and e-government: A developing country perspective. Journal of Administration & Governance, 1(1), 84–101.
  • Barceviˇcius, E., & Cibait ̇e, G., Gineikyt e, V., Klimaviˇci Ut ̇e, L., Matuleviˇc, L. , Misuraca, Vanini, G., & Cooper, I. (2019). Exploring digital government transformation in the EU: Analysis of the state of the art and review of literature. JRC Science for Policy Report. 10.2760/17207
  • Basit, T. N. (2010). Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Educational Research, 45(2), 143–154. doi:10.1080/0013188032000133548
  • Bekkering, E., & Shim, J. P. (2006). I2i trust in videoconferencing. Communications of the ACM, 49(7), 103–107. doi:10.1145/1139922.1139925
  • Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (2002). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. In M. Myers & D. Avison (Eds.), Qualitative research in information systems (pp. 78–99). London, United Kingdom: Sage.
  • Beynon-Davies, P. (2005). Constructing electronic government: The case of the UK inland revenue. International Journal of Information Management, 25(1), 3–20. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2004.08.002
  • Bissessar, A. M. (2010). The challenges of e-governance in a small, developing society: The case of trinidad and Tobago. In C. Reddick (Ed.), Comparative e-government. Integrated series in information systems (Vol. 25, pp. 313–329). New York, USA: Springer.
  • Boeije, H. R. (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxfam Publishing.
  • Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 123–132. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.10.001
  • Brooks, J., McCluskey, S., Turley, E., & King, N. (2015). The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(2), 202–222. doi:10.1080/14780887.2014.955224
  • Broome, P. A. (2015). Before e-governance and e-government, back to basics! The case of the caribbean. SAGE Open, 5(3), 215824401560310. doi:10.1177/2158244015603106
  • Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
  • Burnard, P., Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Analysing and presenting qualitative data. British Dental Journal Nature Publishing Group, 204(8), 429–432. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.292
  • Chan, C. M. L., Hackney, R., Pan, S. L., & Chou, T. C. (2011). Managing e-government system implementation: A resource enactment perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(5), 529–541. doi:10.1057/ejis.2011.19
  • Chen Y N, Chen H M, Huang W and Ching R KH. (2006). E-Government Strategies in Developed and Developing Countries. Journal of Global Information Management, 14(1), 23–46. doi:10.4018/jgim.2006010102
  • Chen, Y. C., & Dimitrova, D. V. (2006). Electronic government and online engagement: Citizen interaction with government via web portals. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2(1), 54–76. doi:10.4018/jegr.2006010104
  • Cohen, S., & Eimicke, W. (2003). The future of e-government: A project of potential trends and issues. 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2003, Jan. 6th to 9th, 2003, Hawaii United States of America.
  • Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2013). Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate & postgraduate students (4th ed.). London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Coughlan, M., Cronin, P., & Ryan, F. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: Quantitative research. The British Journal of Nursing, 16(11), 658–663. doi:10.12968/bjon.2007.16.11.23681
  • Craglia, M., Kanellopoulos, I., & Smits, P. (2007). Metadata: Where we are now, and where we should be going. 10th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science, 8–11 May 2007, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Crane Williams, R., & Marius, M. (2016). Regional approaches to e-government initiatives in the Caribbean. ECLAC – Studies and Perspectives Series – the Caribbean, 47, 59. United Nations.
  • Cristofoli, D., Trivellato, B., & Verzillo, S. (2019). Network management as a contingent activity. A configurational analysis of managerial behaviors in different network settings. Public Management Review, 21(12), 1775–1800. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1577905
  • Davies, R. (2015). eGovernment: Using technology to improve public services and democratic participation. Belgium: EPRS: European Parliamentary Research Service. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1336023/egovernment/1942897/.
  • Deakin, H., & Wakefield, K. (2014). Skype interviewing: Reflections of two PhD researchers. Qualitative Research, 14(5), 603–616. doi:10.1177/1468794113488126
  • Dijk, J. V., Ebbers, W., & Wijngaert, L. (2015). E-government. In The international encyclopedia of digital communication and society (pp. 1–10). New Jersey, United States of America: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs109
  • Draca, M., Martin, R., & Sanchis-Guarner, R. (2018). The evolving role of ICT in the economy. 8. London, United Kingdom: LSE Consulting. https://www.lse.ac.uk/business/consulting/assets/documents/the-evolving-role-of-ict-in-the-economy.pdf.
  • Durrant, F. (2006). The world wide web enhancing e-government in the Caribbean: An assessment of government portals or gateway websites. IFLA Journal, 32(3), 240–250. doi:10.1177/0340035206070579
  • Dworkin, S. L. (2012). Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. In Archives of sexual behavior (pp. 1319–1320). Springer New York LLC. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6
  • Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Lowe, A. (2002). Management research: An introduction ((2nd ed) ed.). California, United States of America: Sage Publishing.
  • Ebrahim Z and Irani Z. (2005). E-government adoption: architecture and barriers. Business Process Management Journal, 11(5), 589–611. 10.1108/14637150510619902
  • e-Government Leadership Center. (2020). Innovate and transform digital thought leadership through e-Government education. https://www.iss.nus.edu.sg/centres-of-excellence/e-government-leadership-centre
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case studies. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. doi:10.2307/258557
  • Farquhar, J. D. (2012). Case study research methods for business. California, United States of America: Sage Publishing.
  • Fath-Allah, A., Cheikhi, L., Al-Qutaish, R. E., & Idri, A. (2014). E-government portals best practices: A comprehensive survey. Electronic Government, 11(1–2), 101–132. doi:10.1504/EG.2014.063316
  • Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(6), 717–732. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x
  • Furuholt, B., & Wahid, F. (2008). E-government challenges and the role of political leadership in Indonesia: The case of sragen. 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 7-17 Jan 2008 Hawaii, United States of America (pp. 411–411). IEEE. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2008.357.
  • Ganesan, V., Lam, Y., & Lin, D. Y. (2019). How Singapore is harnessing design to transform government services. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-and-social-sector/our-insights/how-singapore-is-harnessing-design-to-transform-government-services
  • Gauld, R., Goldfinch, S., & Horsburgh, S. (2010). Do they want it? Do they use it? The “demand-side” of e-government in Australia and New Zealand. Government Information Quarterly, 27(2), 177–186. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.002
  • Gilbert, D., Balestrini, P., & Littleboy, D. (2004). Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(4), 286–301. doi:10.1108/09513550410539794
  • GovTech Singapore. (2016). eGov masterplans. https://www.tech.gov.sg/media/corporate-publications/egov-masterplans
  • Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and managing eGovernment. California, United States of America: Sage Publishing.
  • Heeks, R., & Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 243–265. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.005
  • Hibbert, K. (2017). Jamaica to be first total e-governance country in region. Jamaica Observer. http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/jamaica-to-be-first-total-e-governance-country-in-region_101479?profile=1373
  • Hio, L. (2016). Enhanced SingPass: What you need to know and do, Singapore news & top stories. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/enhanced-singpass-what-you-need-to-know-and-do
  • HistorySG. (1995, May 5). “Public Service for the 21st Century” (PS21) is launched - Singapore History. https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/history/events/d1c30f1c-074b-4507-b819-69cccbe8f713
  • Hoepfl, M. C. (1997). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Journal of Technology Education, 9(1), 47–63. doi:10.21061/jte.v9i1.a.4
  • Hofstede, G. (1991). Empirical models of cultural differences. In N. Bleichrodt & P. J. D. Drenth (Eds.), Contemporary issues in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 4–20). Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.
  • Hossan, C. G., & Habib, M. (2006). Success and Failure Factors for e-Government projects implementation in developing countries: A study on the perception of government officials of Bangladesh. 2nd European Conference on Mobile Government, 27-28, April 2008, (pp. 136–151). Marburg, Germany.
  • Howes, S., & Kidney Bishop, T. (2018). The hidden obstacles to government digital transformation, pp. 1–109. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/Digital_Transformation_final_WEB.pdf
  • Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
  • Ifinedo, P. (2012). Drivers of e-government maturity in two developing regions: Focus on Latin America and sub-saharan Africa. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 9(1), 1807–1775. doi:10.4301/S1807-17752012000100001
  • International Telecommunications Union. (2008). Electronic government for developing countries. www.itu.int/ITU-D/cyb/app/e-gov.html
  • Jamaica Cabinet Office. (2003). Public sector modernisation vision and strategy 2002-2012. Kingston, Jamaica: Ministry paper No.56. https://cabinet.gov.jm/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/govatyourservice.pdf
  • Jamaica Gleaner. (2019). Supreme Court rules NIDS unconstitutional, declares law null and void. http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/news/20190412/supreme-court-rules-nids-unconstitutional-declares-law-null-and-void
  • Jamaica Information Service. (2009, December 3). Public sector reform in Jamaica. Jamaica Information Service Website. https://jis.gov.jm/public-sector-reform-in-jamaica/
  • Jamaica Information Service. (2017, June 11). Jamaica looking to establish region’s first e-government system. Jamaica Information Service Website. https://jis.gov.jm/jamaica-looking-establish-regions-first-e-government-system-pm/
  • Joseph, R. C., & Jeffers, P. I. (2009). E-government in the Caribbean nations. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 12(1), 52–70. doi:10.1080/1097198X.2009.10856485
  • Joshi, J., Ghafoor, A., Aref, W. G., & Spafford, E. H. (2001). Digital government security infrastructure design challenges. Computer, 34(2), 66–72. doi:10.1109/2.901169
  • King, N., Brooks, J., & Tabari, S. (2017). Template analysis in business and management research. In Qualitative methodologies in organization studies. Methods and Possibilities. (Vol. 2 pp. 179–206). London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65442-3_8
  • Kumar, R., & Best, M. L. (2006). Impact and sustainability of e-government services in developing countries: Lessons learned from Tamil Nadu, India. The Information Society, 22(1), 1–12. doi:10.1080/01972240500388149
  • Lambrinoudakis, C., Gritzalis, S., Dridi, F., & Pernul, G. (2003). Security requirements for e-government services: A methodological approach for developing a common PKI-based security policy. Computer Communications, 26(16), 1873–1883. doi:10.1016/S0140-3664(03)00082-3
  • Lee S M, Tan X and Trimi S. (2005). Current practices of leading e-government countries. Commun. ACM, 48(10), 99–104. 10.1145/1089107.1089112
  • Linton, L. (2013). E-government initiative moving ahead. https://jis.gov.jm/e-Government-initiative-moving-ahead/
  • Linton, L. (2019). Legislation to establish ICT authority tabled. Jamaica Information Service. https://jis.gov.jm/legislation-to-establish-ict-authority-tabled/
  • Longhurst, R. (2009). Interviews: In-depth, semi-structured. In R. Kitchin, N. Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 580–584). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978/008044910/4.00458/2.
  • Macintosh, A., Robson, E., Smith, E., & Whyte, A. (2003). Electronic democracy and young people. Social Science Computer Review, 21(1), 43–54. doi:10.1177/0894439302238970
  • Madanayake, O. C., University of Wollongong. (2014). Managerial roles in top management support for information technology and systems projects. University of Wollongong Research Online. School of Mechanical, Materials and Mechatronic Engineering. Doctor of Philosophy thesis. https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/4238
  • Martin, N., & Gregor, S. (2006). ICT governance: Frameworks for managing Australian e-government. Journal of E-Government, 2(3), 19–49. doi:10.1300/J399v02n03_03
  • Martin, N., & Gregor, S. (2006). Ict governance: frameworks for managing australian e-government. Journal of e-government, 2(3), 19–49. https://doi.org/10.1300/J399v02n03_03
  • McCutcheon, D. M., & Meredith, J. R. (1993). Building operations management theory through case and field research. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 441–454. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00023-0
  • Meijer, A. (2015). E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies. Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 198–206. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001
  • Mergel, I. A., Schweik, C. M., & Fountain, J. E. (2011). The Transformational Effect of Web 2.0 Technologies on Government. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1412796
  • Mofleh, S., Wanous, M., & Strachan, P. (2017). Developing countries and ICT initiatives: Lessons learnt from Jordan’s experience. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 34(1), 1–17. doi:10.1002/j.1681-4835.2008.tb00236.x
  • Murthy, D. (2008). Digital ethnography. Sociology, 42(5), 837–855. doi:10.1177/0038038508094565
  • Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in is research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17(1), 2–26. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001
  • Ndou, V. (. (2004). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. EJISDC, 18(1), 1–24. doi:10.1002/j.1681-4835.2004.tb00117.x
  • Nehls, K., Smith, B. D., & Schneider, H. A. (2014). Video-conferencing interviews in qualitative research. In S. Hai-Jew (Ed.), Enhancing qualitative and mixed methods research with technology (pp. 140–157). Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global.
  • Nguyen, T., Cao Thanh, N., & Thi Le Thanh, T. (2015). The interconnection between interpretivist paradigm and qualitative methods in education. American Journal of Educational Science, 1(2). http://www.aiscience.org/journal/ajeshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
  • Oates, B. J. (2006). Researching information systems. California, United States of America: Sage Publishing.
  • OECD. (2019). OECD Digital Economy Papers. 280. Paris: OECD Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1787/bcb82cff/en.
  • OPM Communications. (2019). Government moves to modernize Jamaica, office of the prime minister communications. https://opm.gov.jm/news/government-moves-to-modernize-jamaica/
  • Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1–28. doi:10.1287/isre.2.1.1
  • Paton, D., & Smith, M. J. (2021). The Jamaica reader: History, culture, politics. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods : Integrating theory and practice. California, United States of America: Sage Publishing.
  • The PS21 Office in Singapore - Centre for Public Impact (CPI). (2018). Centre for public impact website. https://www.centreforpublicimpact.org/case-study/ps21-office-singapore/
  • Rakhmanov, E. (2009). The barriers affecting e-government development in Uzbekistan. 4th International Conference on Computer Sciences and Convergence Information Technology. 24-26, Nov. 2009. Seoul, Korea, 1474–1480.
  • Ram, R. (2018, July 4). ‘Jamaica minister relieved of energy portfolio amid corruption scandal’. THE WEST INDIAN ONLINE. https://www.thewestindianonline.com/jamaica-minister-relieved-of-energy-portfolio-amid-corruption-scandal/
  • Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Williams, M. D. (2013). Analysing challenges, barriers and CSF of eGov adoption. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 7(2), 177–198. doi:10.1108/17506161311325350
  • Ronaghan, S. A., United Nations Division for Public Economics and Public Administration (UN-DPEPA) & American Society for Public Administration. (2002). Benchmarking e-government : A global perspective. New York, United States: United Nations Digital Library. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3868821.
  • SAAA Singapore. (2016). Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore (IDA). http://www.saaa.org.sg/infocomm-development-authority-of-singapore-ida/
  • Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., & Flak, L. S. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government information quarterly, 25(3), 400–428. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X0700055X
  • Sarantis, D., Charalabidis, Y., & Askounis, D. (2011). A goal-driven management framework for electronic government transformation projects implementation. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 117–128. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2009.10.006
  • Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students. In 4th edition, Qualitative market research: An international journal. Pearson Education Limited: England. doi:10.1108/qmr.2000.3.4.215.2
  • Schuppan, T. (2009). E-government in developing countries: Experiences from sub-saharan Africa. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 118–127. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2008.01.006
  • Schwester, R. (2009). Examining the barriers to e-government adoption. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 7(1), 113–122.
  • Sealy, W. U. (2013). Empowering development through E-governance: Creating smart communities in small Island states. International Information & Library Review, 35(2–4), 335–358. doi:10.1080/10572317.2003.10762609
  • Seifert, J. W., Mcloughlin, G. J., & Ave, I. (2007). State e-government strategies: Identifying best practices and applications. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
  • Sharma, S. K. (2015). Adoption of e-government services: The role of service quality dimensions and demographic variables. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 9(2), 207–222. doi:10.1108/TG-10-2014-0046
  • Siew, L. S., & Leng, L. Y. (2003). E-government in action. Journal of Political Marketing, 2(3–4), 18–30. doi:10.1300/J199v02n03_02
  • Smart Nation Singapore. (2018). Digital government blueprint. https://www.tech.gov.sg/digital-government-blueprint/
  • Statista. (2020, February 3). Internet penetration in Jamaica. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1055489/internet-penetration-jamaica/
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. California, United States of America: Sage Publishing.
  • Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., Noci, G., Janssen, M., Lindgren, H. L., Scholl, H. J. (2020). Barriers and drivers of digital transformation in public organizations: Results from a survey in the Netherlands. In G. V. Pereira & A. Zuiderwijk (Eds.), Electronic government. EGOV 2020. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 122219, pp. 42–56). Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_4
  • Taylor-Powell, E., & Renner, M. (2003). Analyzing qualitative data, program development & evaluation G3658-12. doi:10.4324/9780203807170
  • Teo, J. National University of Singapore (NUS). (2011). Singapore eGov programme. Singapore: Singapore eGovernment Leadership Centre.
  • Transparency International - Jamaica. (2019). Corruption perception index 2019. Online. https://www.transparency.org/country/JAM
  • Ubaldi, B. C. (2011). E-Government development in the Caribbean. In Electronic Government: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 853–860). Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-947-2.ch068
  • United Nations. (2013). Compendium of innovative e-government practices vol. IV. In Compendium of Innovative E-government Practices. doi:10.18356/45a05124-en
  • United Nations. (2014). United Nations E-Government Survey 2014: E-Government for the Future We Want. doi:10.1978/92/1/123198-4
  • United Nations. (2016). E-Government Survey 2016: E-Government in Support of Sustainable Development. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UN-DPADM/UNPAN038853.pdf
  • United Nations. (2020). E-Government survey 2020: Digital government in the decade of action for sustainable development. United Nations: Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
  • United Nations: DESA. (2020). COVID-19: Embracing digital government during the pandemic and beyond. Policy Brief No.61. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/publication/un-desa-policy-brief-61-covid-19-embracing-digital-government-during-the-pandemic-and-beyond/
  • UNPAN. (2004). UN global e-government readiness report 2004: From e-government to e-inclusion. Dpadm Desa, 106(6), 1–253.
  • Waller, L., & Genius, A. (2015). Barriers to transforming government in Jamaica: Challenges to implementing initiatives to enhance the efficiency, effectiveness and service delivery of government through ICTs (e-government). Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 9(4), 480–497. doi:10.1108/TG-12-2014-0067
  • Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in is research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74–81. doi:10.1057/ejis.1995.9
  • Wang, H., & Hou, J. (2010). The external and internal barriers to e-government implementation. International Conference on Management and Service Science, 24-26 Aug. 2010. Wuhan, China. (pp. 1–4). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ICMSS.2010.5576651.
  • Wang, W., Liu, Y., Liang, Y., & He, K. (2017). The influential factors of organization adoption of e-government cloud. 2017 International Conference on Financial Management, Education and Social Science (FMESS 2017), 29-30, July 2017. Qingdao, China. (pp. 283–288).
  • Wang, H., & Rubin, B. L. (2004). Embedding e-finance in e-government: A new e-government framework. Electronic Government, 1(4), 362–373. doi:10.1504/EG.2004.005912
  • Weerakkody, V., & Choudrie, J. (2005). Exploring e-government in the UK: Challenges, issues and complexities. Journal of Information Science and Technology, 2(2), 25–45.
  • West, D. M. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00343.x
  • World Bank. (2015). e-Government. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/digitaldevelopment/brief/e-government
  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
  • Yong, Y. I. (1999). Introducing IDA - overview of roles & strategies, infocomm media development authority. https://www.imda.gov.sg/news-and-events/Media-Room/archived/ida/Speeches/1999/20061221171626

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.