Board Characteristics, Compliance, and Firm Performance: Empirical Findings from Colombia

References

• Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: a conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48, 58–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilera, R. V., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2009). Codes of good governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 376–387. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00737.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbar, S., Poletti-Hughes, J., El-Faitouri, R., & Shah, S. (2016). More on the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance in the UK: evidence from the application of generalized method of moments estimation. Research in International Business and Finance, 38, 417–429. doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R., & Reeb, D. (2004). Board composition: balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 209–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASX Corporate Governance Council. (2014). Corporate governance principles and recommendations (3a ed). Recuperado de http://www.asx.com.au/documents/asx-compliance/cgc-principles-and-recommendations-3rd-edn.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Baysinger, B. D., & Butler, H. N. (1985). Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1(1), 101–124. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036883
   Google Scholar
• Baysinger, B., & Hoskisson, R. E. (1990). The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: Effects on corporate strategy. Academy of Management Review, 15, 72–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. D. (2000). Fraudulent financial reporting: consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 14(4), 441–454. doi:10.2308/acch.2000.14.4.441
   Google Scholar
• Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2009). What matters in corporate governance? Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 783–827. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, N. (2001). Time-series cross-section data: What have we learned in the past few years. American Political Science Review, 4, 271–295.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, N., & Katz, J. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belkhir, M. (2009). Board of director’s size and performance in the banking industry. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 5(2), 201–221. doi:10.1108/17439130910947903
   Google Scholar
• Bennedsen, M., Kongsted, H. C., & Nielsen, K. M. (2008). The causal effect of board size in the performance of small and medium-sized firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(6), 1098–1109. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (1999). The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance. The Business Lawyer, 54, 921–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, A. L., Field, L. C., Karpoff, J. M., & Raheja, C. G. (2007). The determinants of corporate board size and composition: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(1), 66–101. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, W. G. (1994). Inside the boardroom: Governance by directors and trustees. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bozec, R., Dia, M., & Bozec, Y. (2010). Governance-performance relationship: a re-examination using technical efficiency measures. British Journal of Management, 21(3), 684–700. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00624.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, N. (2006). Boards of directors and firm performance: Is there an expectations gap? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(6), 577–593. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00534.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L. D., & Caylor, M. L. (2006). Corporate governance and firm valuation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(4), 409–434. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.05.005
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. (2001). The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 639–660. doi:10.2307/3069408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, L., Lowry, M., & Mkrtchyan, A. (2013). Are busy boards detrimental. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(1), 63–82. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, S. (2008). Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 157–176. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chepkosgei, P. (2013). The influence of board of directors composition on financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation). University of Nairobi. Recuperado de http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11295/59267/Chepkosgei_%20The%20influence%20of%20board%20of%20directors%20composition%20?sequence=3
   Google Scholar
• Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., & Naveen, L. (2008). Boards: does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 329–356. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, J. W., McWilliams, V. B., & Sen, N. (2001). An examination of the relationship of governance mechanisms to performance. Journal of Management, 27(1), 23–50. doi:10.1177/014920630102700102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conyon, M., & Mallin, C. (1997). A review of compliance with Cadbury. Journal of General Management, 22(3), 24–37. doi:10.1177/030630709702200303
   Google Scholar
• Conyon, M. J., & Peck, S. I. (1998). Board size and corporate performance: Evidence from European countries. The European Journal of Finance, 4(3), 291–304. doi:10.1080/135184798337317
   Google Scholar
• Core, J. E., Guay, W. R., & Rusticus, T. O. (2006). Does weak governance cause weak stock returns? an examination of firm operating performance and analysts’ expectations. The Journal of Finance, 61(2), 655–687. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00851.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cravens, K. S., & Wallace, W. A. (2001). A framework for determining the influence of the corporate board of directors in accounting studies. Corporate Governance, 9(1), 2–24. doi:10.1111/1467-8683.00222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674–686. doi:10.2307/256988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and inference in econometrics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dechow, P. M., Richard, G., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: an analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 1–36. doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00489.x
   Google Scholar
• Demb, A., & Neubauer, F. F. (1992). The corporate board: confronting the paradoxes. Long Range Planning, 25(3), 9–20. doi:10.1016/0024-6301(92)90364-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, D. W. (1996). Financial intermediation as delegated monitoring: a simple example. Economic Quarterly, 82(3), 51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, T., Sundgren, S., & Wells, M. T. (1998). Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 48(1), 35–54. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00003-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307. doi:10.1086/260866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Sepa- ration of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–326. doi:10.1086/467037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiegener, M. K. (2005). Determinants of board participation in the strategic decisions of small corporations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 627–650. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00101.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaitán, R. S. (2009). Gobierno corporativo en Colombia. Tendencias actuales. AD-minister, 15, 137–153.
   Google Scholar
• Garay, U., González, G., González, M., & Hernández, Y. (2006). Índice de buen gobierno corporativo y desempeño financiero en la Bolsa de Valores de Caracas. Estudio IESA, 24, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107–155. doi:10.1162/00335530360535162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodstein, J., Gautam, K., & Boeker, W. (1994). The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 15(3), 241–250. doi:10.1002/smj.4250150305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, P. P., Kennedy, D. B., & Weaver, S. C. (2009). Corporate governance and firm value: evidence from Canadian capital markets. Corporate Ownership and Control Journal, 6(3), 293–307.
   Google Scholar
• Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1988a). The determinants of board composition. RAND Journal of Economics, 19(4), 589–606. doi:10.2307/2555459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1998b). Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. The American Economic Review, 88, 96–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously- determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Economic Policy Review, 9, 7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28, 383–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235–256. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. Stata Journal, 7(3), 281–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, B. (1999). Managerial incentive problems: a dynamic perspective. Review of Economic Studies, 66(1), 169–182. doi:10.1111/1467-937X.00083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghiemstra, R., & van Manen, J. (2004). Non-executive directors in the Netherlands: another expectations gap? Accounting and Business Research, 34(1), 25–42. doi:10.1080/00014788.2004.9729949
   Google Scholar
• Huse, M. (2005). Accountability and creating accountability: A framework for exploring behavioral perspectives of corporate governance. British Journal of Management, 16(s1), S65–S79. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00448.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huther, J. (1997). An empirical test of the effect of board size on firm efficiency. Economics Letters, 54(3), 259–264. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(97)00035-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackling, B., & Johl, S. (2009). Board structure and firm performance: evidence from India's top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 492–509. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00760.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76, 323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. (2013). Board composition beyond independence social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39(1), 232–262. doi:10.1177/0149206312463938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, W. Q., & Zeithaml, C. P. (1992). Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 766–794. doi:10.2307/256315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitagawa, C. H., & Ribeiro, M. D S. (2009). Governança corporativa na América Latina: a relevância dos princípios da OCDE na integridade dos conselhos e autonomia dos conselheiros. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 20(51), 61–76. doi:10.1590/S1519-70772009000300005
   Google Scholar
• Klein, P., Shapiro, D., & Young, J. (2005). Corporate governance, family ownership and firm value: the Canadian evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(6), 769–784. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00469.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerniadi, H., Krishnamurti, C., & Tourani-Rad, A. (2014). Corporate governance and the variability of stock returns. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 10(4), 494–510. doi:10.1108/IJMF-08-2012-0090
   Google Scholar
• Langevoort, D. C. (2003). Managing the expectation gap in investor protection: the SEC and post-Enron reform agenda. Villanova Law Review, 48, 1139–1165.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., Yeh, Y. C., & Yang, F. (2014). Supervisory quality of board and firm performance: A perspective of board meeting attendance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(3–4), 264–279. doi:10.1080/14783363.2012.756751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linck, J. S., Netter, J. M., & Yang, T. (2008). The determinants of board structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 308–328. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorsch, J. W. (1989). Pawns or potentates: the reality of America’s corporate boards, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Love, I. (2011). Corporate governance and performance around the world: what we know and what we don’t. World. Bank Research Observer, 26(1), 42–70. doi:10.1093/wbro/lkp030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, M. L. (1971). Directors: Myth and reality. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacCormac, M. (1985). The functions of the board of directors: a reassessment. IBAR, 7, 90–97.
   Google Scholar
• Mak, Y. T., & Kusnadi, Y. (2005). Size really matters: further evidence on the negative relationship between board size & firm value. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13(3), 301–318. doi:10.1016/j.pacfin.2004.09.002
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, M. L., Westphal, J. D., & Graebner, M. E. (2008). What do they know? the effects of outside director acquisition experience on firm acquisition performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(11), 1155–1177. doi:10.1002/smj.704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, T. (2012). Investability: corporate governance and firm value. Research in International Business and Finance, 26(1), 120–136. doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2011.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, R., Vithessonthi, C., & Mansi, M. (2015). Busy CEOs and the performance of family firms. Research in International Business and Finance, 33, 144–166. doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2014.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peasnell, K., Pope, P., & Young, S. (1998). A new model board. Accountancy International, 122, 91–115.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1992). Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 29(4), 411–438. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00672.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugliese, A., Bezemer, P. J., Zattoni, A., Huse, M., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Boards of directors' contribution to strategy: a literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 292–306. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00740.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, C. (1994). Non-executive directors and the expectations gap. Accountancy, 114(1213), 74–75.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, K., Locke, S., & Scrimgeour, F. (2010). The efficacy of principle‐based corporate governance practices and firm financial performance: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 6(3), 190–219. doi:10.1108/17439131011056224
   Google Scholar
• Renders, A., Gaeremynck, A., & Sercu, P. (2010). Corporate-governance ratings and company performance: a cross-European study. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), 87–106. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00791.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodman, D. (2009). How to do Xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9, 86–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarpal, S., & Singh, F. (2013). Board size and corporate performance: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Business Ethics in Developing Economies, 2, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Shukeri, S. N., Shin, O. W., & Shaari, M. S. (2012). Does board of director’s characteristics affect firm performance? Evidence from Malaysian public listed companies. International Business Research, 5, 120–127.
   Google Scholar
• Stiles, P., & Taylor, B. (2001). Boards at work: how directors view their roles and responsibilities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Titman, S., & Trueman, B. (1986). Information quality and the valuation of new issues. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8(2), 159–172. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(86)90016-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricker, B. (2012). Corporate governance: principles, policies and practices (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uadiale, O. M. (2010). The impact of board structure on corporate financial performance in Nigeria. International Journal of Business & Management, 5, 155–166.
   Google Scholar
• Upadhyay, A. D., Bhargava, R., & Faircloth, S. D. (2014). Board structure and role of monitoring committees. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1486–1492. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 113–142. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00018-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Berghe, L. A., & Levrau, A. (2004). Evaluating Boards of Directors: what constitutes a good corporate board? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 461–478. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00387.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Heuvel, J., Van Gils, A., & Voordeckers, W. (2006). board roles in small and medium sized family businesses. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(5), 467–483. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00519.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir, C., & Laing, D. (2000). The performance-governance relationship: the effects of Cadbury compliance on UK quoted companies. Journal of Management and Governance, 4(4), 265–281.
   Google Scholar
• Weir, C., Laing, D., & McKnight, P. J. (2002). Internal and external governance mechanisms: their impact on the performance of large UK public companies. Journal Business Finance and Accounting, 29, 579–611.
   Google Scholar
• Weisbach, M. S. (1988). Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 431–460. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(88)90053-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whisler, T. L. (1984). The rules of the game: inside the corporate boardroom. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section Panel Data, Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, J., & Fukumoto, Y. (2013). A new finding for corporate board size effects: evidence from Japan. The Singapore Economic Review, 58, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yawson, A. (2006). Evaluating the characteristics of corporate boards associated with layoff decisions. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(2), 75–85. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00488.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185–211. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S., & Pearce, J. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291–334. doi:10.1177/014920638901500208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar