Collaboration for R&D Projects between the Industry and External Agents: Evidence from Manufacturing Companies in Peru

References

• Abramo, G., D’angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2011). University-industry research collaboration: A model to assess university capability. Higher Education, 62(2), 163–181. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9372-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J. D. (1990). Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(4), 673–702. doi:10.1086/261702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arundel, A., & Geuna, A. (2004). Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(6), 559–580. doi:10.1080/1043859092000234311
   Google Scholar
• Bayona, C., García-Marco, T., & Huerta, E. (2001). Firms’ motivations for cooperative R&D: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Research Policy, 30(8), 1289–1307. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00151-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, W., & Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms - evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33(2), 209–223. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2003.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekkers, R., Maria, I., & Freitas, B. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37(10), 1837–1853. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bönte, W., & Keilbach, M. (2005). Concubinage or marriage? Informal and formal cooperations for innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23(3-4), 279–302. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogers, M., Zobel, A.-K., Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., … Ter Wal, A. L. J. (2017). The open innovation research landscape: Established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 8–40. doi:10.1080/13662716.2016.1240068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botella, C., & Suárez, I. (2012). Innovación para el desarrollo en América Latina: una aproximación desde la cooperación internacional. Serie Avances de Investigación (Vol. 78). Madrid, Spain: Fundación Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Branscomb, L. M., Kodama, F., & Florida, R. (1999). Industrializing knowledge: University–industry linkages in Japan and the United States. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. doi:10.1086/ahr/87.4.1050
   Google Scholar
• Brem, A. (2011). Editorial: Special issue on open innovation and the integration of suppliers — part two. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15(1), v–vii. doi:10.1142/S1363919611003234
   Google Scholar
• Brunnel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858–868. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnside, B., & Witkin, L. (2008). Forging successful university-industry collaborations. Research Technology Management, 51(2), 26–30. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/213802791?accountid=28391 doi:10.1080/08956308.2008.11657492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert, J., & Patel, P. (2003). University-industry research collaborations in the UK: Bibliometric trends. Science and Public Policy, 30(2), 85–96. doi:10.3152/147154303781780597
   Google Scholar
• Cantwell, J. (1994). Transnational corporations and innovative activities. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2002). R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing. The American Economic Review, 92(4), 1169–1184. doi:10.1257/00028280260344704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J. P. (1993). Cooperative R&D with product market competition. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 11(4), 553–571. doi:10.1016/0167-7187(93)90025-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, C., Raynor, M., & McDonald, R. (2015). What is disruptive innovation?. Harvard Business Review, 93(12), 44–53. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2015/12/what-is-disruptive-innovation
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coccia, M., & Wang, L. (2016). Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(8), 2057–2061. doi:10.1073/pnas.1510820113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal1, 99(397), 569–596. doi:10.2307/2233763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1–23. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combs, K. L. (1992). Cost sharing vs. multiple research project in cooperative R&D. Economics Letters, 39, 353–357. doi:10.1016/0165-1765(92)90273-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comité Intersectorial para la Innovación. (2011). Programa Nacional de Innovación, 87. México City, México: Secretaria de Economía.
   Google Scholar
• CONCYTEC. (2006). Plan Nacional Estratégico de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación PNCTI 2006–2021. Retrieved from http://www.peru.gob.pe/docs/PLANES/14184/PLAN_14184_Plan_Nacional_Estratégico_de_Ciencia_,Tecnología_e_Innovación_para_la_Competitividad_y_el_Desarrollo_Humano_PNCTI_2006-2021_2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• D’Este, P. D., & Patel, P. (2007). University – industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295–1313. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danneels, E. (2006). Dialogue on the effects of disruptive technology on firms and industries. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 2–4. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00174.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., Kalvet, T., & Chesbrough, H. (2008). Policies for open innovation: Theory, framework and cases. (Research p). Helsinki: Vision Era-Net.
   Google Scholar
• Peruano, D. E. (2015, March 13). Normas legales (pp. 54844–54846). Lima, Peru. Retrieved from http://www.leyes.congreso.gob.pe/Documentos/Leyes/30309.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Durisin, B., & Todorova, G. (2012). A study of the performativity of the‚ ambidextrous organizations theory: Neither lost in nor lost before translation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(S1), 53–75. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00981.x
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation approaches – their emergence and characteristics. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations (pp. 1–35). London, UK: Pinter/Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2000). Tech transfer, incubators probed at Triple Helix III. Research Technology Management, 43(6), 4–5. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/213806468?accountid=28391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evangelista, R., Perani, G., Rapiti, F., & Archibugi, D. (1997). Nature and impact of innovation in manufacturing industry: Some evidence from the Italian innovation survey. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 521–536. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00028-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W., & Senker, J. (1994). Making sense of diversity: Public-private sector research linkage in three technologies. Research Policy, 23(6), 673–695. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)90017-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaig, G., & Stadler, M. (1998). On the dynamics of product and process innovations. Jahrbücher Für Nationalökonomie Und Statistik, 217, 401–417. doi:10.1515/jbnst-1998-0402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forum Economic Word. (2014). The Global Competitiveness Report 2014–2015. Switzerland. Retrieved from: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2014-15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A. G., Cortimiglia, M. N., Ribeiro, J. L. D., & Oliveira, L. S. D. (2016). The effect of innovation activities on innovation outputs in the Brazilian industry: Market-orientation vs. technology-acquisition strategies. Research Policy, 45(3), 577–592. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C., (1988). Japan: A new national innovation system? In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.) Technical change and economic theory. London, UK: Pinter Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, I. M. B., Marques, R. A., & Silva, E. M. D P. (2013). University–industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in new industrialized countries. Research Policy, 42(2), 443–453. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., & Lukas, R. (2001). Who cooperate on R&D? Research Policy, 30(2), 297–312. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00115-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gassmann, O., Sandmeier, P., & Wecht, C. H. (2006). Extreme customer innovation in the front-end: Learning from a new software paradigm. International Journal of Technology Management, 33(1), 46–66. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2006.008191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, J. C., & Chen, K. H. (2009). Modeling macro - R&D production frontier performance: An application to Chinese province – level R&D. Scientometrics, 82(1), 165–173. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0030-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guellec, D., & Pottelsberghe, Van, B. (2003). The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 12(3), 225–244. doi:10.1787/670385851815
   Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371–385. doi:10.1002/smj.4250140505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2000). Research partnerships. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 567–586. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00090-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2001). Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: Evidence from the advanced technology program. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1/2), 87–98. doi:10.1023/A:1007888312792
   Google Scholar
• Ham, R. M., & Mowery, D. C. (1998). Improving the effectiveness of public–private R&D collaboration: Case studies at a US weapons laboratory. Research Policy, 26(6), 661–675. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00041-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, R. (2006). The innovator’s dilemma as a problem of organizational competence. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 5–11. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00175.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heslop, L. A., McGregor, E., & Griffith, M. (2001). Development of a technology readiness assessment measure: The cloverleaf model of technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(4), 369. doi:10.1023/A:1011139021356
   Google Scholar
• Hladik, K. (1988). R&D and international joint ventures. In F.J. Contractor, & P. Lorange (Eds.). Cooperative strategies in international business (pp. 187–203). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hottenrott, H., & Lopes-Bento, C. (2016). R&D partnerships and innovation performance: Can there be too much of a good thing? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(6), 773–794. doi:10.1111/jpim.12311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, A., & Kitson, M. (2012). Pathways to impact and the strategic role of universities: New evidence on the breadth and depth of university knowledge exchange in the UK and the factors constraining its development. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(3), 723. doi:10.1093/cje/bes017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM (2012). Manual CRISP-DM de IBM SPSS Modeler. Nueva York: Autor. Retrieved from: ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/documentation/modeler/15.0/es/CRISP-DM.pdf
   Google Scholar
• INEI. (2015). Encuesta nacional de innovación en la industria manufacturera. Lima, Peru: Dirección Nacional de Censos y Encuestas.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, M., & Scott, J. T. (1982). Scale economics in research and development: The schumpeterian hypothesis. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 30(3), 239–249. doi:10.2307/2098217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koschatzky, K., Kulicke, M., & Zenker, A. (2001). Innovation networks: Concepts and challenges in the European perspective. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Landry, R., & Amara, N. (2012). Elucidation and enhancement of knowledge and technology transfer business models. The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 42(1), 94–116. doi:10.1108/03055721211207789
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2004). Searching high and low: What types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy, 33(8), 1201–1215. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyden, D. P., & Link, A. (1999). Federal laboratories as research partners. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17(4), 575–592. doi:10.1016/S0167-7187(97)00050-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H.-E., & McDonough, I. I. I. E. F. (2014). Cognitive frames, learning mechanisms, and innovation ambidexterity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 3(S1), 170–188. doi:10.1111/jpim.12199
   Google Scholar
• Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2005). Universities as partners in U.S. research joint ventures. Research Policy, 34(3), 385–393. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, J., & Taylor, P. (2002). R&D and technology purchase through license agreements: Complementary strategies and complementary assets. R and D Management, 28(4), 263–278. doi:10.1111/1467-9310.00103
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A. (2007). National innovation systems-analytical concept and development tool. Industry & Innovation, 14(1), 95–119. doi:10.1080/13662710601130863
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. (1991). Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy, 20(1), 1–12. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(91)90080-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. (1995). Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(1), 55–65. doi:10.2307/2109992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Ciencia Tecnología E Innovación Productiva (2012). Plan Nacional De Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Lineamientos estratégicos 2012–2015. Argentina Innovadora 2020. Retrieved from: http://www.mincyt.gob.ar/adjuntos/archivos/000/022/0000022576.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Economía. (2015). Plan Nacional De Innovación 2014–2018, 16. Retrieved from: http://www.economia.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Plan-Nacional-de-Innovación1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministerio de la Produccion. (2015). Innovate: Caja de herramientas para la innovación. Lima, Peru: Ministerio de la Produccion. Retrieved from: http://www.innovateperu.pe/media/innovateperu/libro-digitse.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: Why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32(8), 1481–1499. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00159-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortara, L. (2010). Getting help with open innovation. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, A., & Marjit, S. (2004). R&D organization and technology transfer. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 243–258. doi:10.1023/B:GRUP.0000031079.32373.a4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls-Nixon, C. L., & Woo, C. Y. (2003). Technology sourcing and output of established firms in a regime of encompassing technological change. Strategic Management Journal, 24(7), 651–666. doi:10.1002/smj.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., Von Krogh, G., & Voelpel, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances. Organization Studies, 27(8), 1179–1208. doi:10.1177/0170840606066312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13(6), 343–373. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. (1991). What makes basic research economically useful? Research Policy, 20(2), 109–119. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(91)90074-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2008). Engaging the scholar: Three types of academic consulting and their impact on universities and industry. Research Policy, 37(10), 1884–1891. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plunket, A., Voisin, C., & Bellon, B. (2001). The dynamics of industrial collaboration. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos-Vielba, I., Fernández Esquinas, M., & Espinosa de los Monteros, E. (2010). Measuring university–industry collaboration in a regional innovation system. Scientometrics, 84(3), 649–667. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0113-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237–262. doi:10.5367/ihe.2013.0165
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, P. L., & Langlois, R. N. (1995). Innovation, networks, and vertical integration. Research Policy, 24(4), 543–562. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(94)00786-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sábato, J., & Botana, N. (1968). La ciencia y la tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América Latina. Revista de La Integración, 3, 15–36. Retrieved from: http://tecale.org/documCurso/POCI_Sabato-Botana_Unidad_3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Saetre, A. S., Wiggins, J., Atkinson, O. T., & Atkinson, B. K. E. (2009). University spin-offs as technology transfer: A comparative study among Norway, the United States, and Sweden. Comparative Technology Transfer and Society, 7(2), 115–145. doi:10.1353/ctt.0.0036
   Google Scholar
• Sagasti, F. (2011). En busca del tiempo perdido: ciencia, tecnología e innovación en el Perú. In Nacional Internacional FORO (p. 25). Lima, Peru. Retrieved from: http://www.franciscosagasti.com/descargas/publicaciones_02/en-busca-tiempo-perdido.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schartinger, D., Schibany, A., & Gassler, H. (2001). Interactive relations between universities and firms: Empirical evidence for Austria. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 255–268. doi:10.1023/A:1011110207885
   Google Scholar
• Segarra-Blasco, A., & Arauzo-Carod, J. M. (2008). Sources of innovation and industry-university interaction: Evidence from Spanish firms. Research Policy, 37(8), 1283–1295. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stal, E., & Fujino, A. (2005). Aprimorando as relações universidade-empresa-governo no Brasil: A lei de inovação e a gestão da propriedade intelectual. In Asociación Latino-Iberoamericana De Gestión Tecnológica (pp. 1–14). Salvador, Brasil: Asociación Latino-Iberoamericana de Gestión Tecnológica.
   Google Scholar
• Stuckey, J. (1983). Vertical integration and joint venture in the aluminum industry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suzumura, K. (1992). Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. The American Economic Review, 82, 1307–1320. doi:10.1007/s00712-009-0071-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947–967. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00172-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, E. (2018). From closed to open innovation in emerging economies: Evidence from the chemical industry in Brazil. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(3), 26–37. doi:10.22215/timreview/1144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang, E. W. K. (1998). Motives for strategic alliances: A resource-based perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–221. doi:10.1016/S0956-5221(97)00036-5
   Google Scholar
• Van deVen, A., Polley, D., Garud, R., & Venkataraman, S. (1999). The innovation journey. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhaverbeke, W., Van de Vrande, V., & Cloodt, M. (2008). Connecting absorptive capacity and open innovation. Retrieved from: SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1091265.
   Google Scholar
• Wirsich, A., Kock, A., Strumann, C., & Schultz, C. (2016). Effects of university–industry collaboration on technological newness of firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(6), 708–725. doi:10.1111/jpim.12342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, L., Darby, M., & Torero, M. (2002). Labor mobility from academe to commerce. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(3), 629–660. doi:10.1086/339613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar