References
- Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. Handbook of labor economics (Vol 4, pp. 1043–1171). Amsterdam, Netherland: Elsevier.
- Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2016). The race between machine and man: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares and employment [Technical Report]. National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2017). Robots and jobs: Evidence from us labor markets. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2941263
- Alexopoulos, M., & Cohen, J. (2016). The medium is the measure: Technical change and employment, 1909–1949. Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(4), 792–810. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00588
- Arntz, M., Gregory, T., & Zierahn, U. (2017). Revisiting the risk of automation. Economics Letters, 159, 157–160. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2017.07.001
- Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279–1333. doi:10.1162/003355303322552801
- Bakhshi, H., Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. (2015). Creativity vs. robots: The creative economy and the future of employment. London, UK: Nesta.
- Bank, W. (2017). A fair adjustment: Efficiency and equity of public spending in Brazil. [Working Paper n°1]. Retrieved from: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/643471520429223428/Volume-1-Overview
- Bessen, J. (2018). AI and jobs: The role of demand. In Economics of artificial intelligence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Bessen, J. E. (2017). Automation and jobs: When technology boosts employment. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/soL3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2935003
- Bloomberg. (2018). Brazil truckers strike for fourth day. Bloomberg Business, Retrieved from: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-24/brazil-truckers-strike-for-fourth-day-despite-fuel-price-cut
- Bosch, M., Pagés, C., & Ripani, L. (2018). El futuro del trabajo en América Latina y el Caribe: Una gran oportunidad para la región? Retrieved from: https://publications.iadb.org/es/publicacion/show-simple-item-record-el-futuro-del-trabajo-en-america-latina-y-el-caribe-una-gran
- Bowles, J. (2014). The computerisation of european jobs. Brussels, Belgium: Bruegel.
- Brazilian Labor Ministry. (2018). Brazil's occupational classification system conversion query. Retrieved from: http://www.mtecbo.gov.br/cbosite/pages/tabua/ConsultasConversao.jsf
- Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
- Cavallini, M. (2018). Correios: Sindicatos anunciam greve: Parte das agências funcionou. Retrieved from: https://g1.globo.com/economia/noticia/correios-sindicatos-anunciam-greve-parte-das-agencias-esta-aberta.ghtml
- Chui, M., Manyika, J., & Miremadi, M. (2015). Four fundamentals of workplace automation. McKinsey Quarterly, 29(3), 1–9.
- David, H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29, 3–30.
- David, H., & Dorn, D. (2013). The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the us labor market. American Economic Review, 103, 1553–1597. doi:10.1257/aer.103.5.1553
- Dvorkin, M. (2016, January 4). Jobs involving routine tasks aren't growing [On the Economy Blog]. Retrieved from https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2016/january/jobs-involving-routine-tasks-arent-growing
- Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
- Furman, J. (2016). Is this time different? The opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence. AI now: The social and economic implications of artificial intelligence technologies in the near term. New York, NY: New York University.
- Furman, J. (2018). Should we be reassured if automation in the future looks like automation in the past? In Economics of artificial intelligence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Goos, M., Manning, A., & Salomons, A. (2014). Explaining job polarization: Outine-biased technological change and offshoring. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2509–2526. doi:10.1257/aer.104.8.2509
- Graetz, G., & Michaels, G. (2017). Is modern technology responsible for jobless recoveries? American Economic Review, 107(5), 168–173. doi:10.1257/aer.p20171100
- Hershbein, B., & Kahn, L. B. (2018). Do recessions accelerate routine-biased technological change? Evidence from vacancy postings. American Economic Review, 108(7), 1737–1772. doi:10.1257/aer.20161570
- Hyndman, R., & Khandakar, Y. (2008). Automatic time series forecasting: The forecast package for R. Journal of Statistical Software, 27(3), 1–22. doi:10.18637/jss.v027.i03
- ING-DiBa Bank. (2015). Die roboter kommen folgen der automatisierung für den deutschen arbeitsmarkt. Economic Research, 30, 1–7.
- International Labour Organization. (2018). ISCO-08 structure, index correspondence with ISCO-88. Retrieved from: http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/stat/isco/isco08/
- Li, Y., & Zhai, X. (2018). Review and prospect of modern education using big data. Procedia Computer Science, 129, 341–347. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.03.085
- Mann, K., & Püttmann, L. (2018). Benign effects of automation: New evidence from patent texts. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2959584
- O*NET OnLine. (2018). Browse by job zone. Retrieved from: https://www.onetonline.org/find/zone/All_Job_Zones.csv
- Pajarinen, M., & Rouvinen, P. (2014). Computerization threatens one third of Finnish employment. ETLA Brief, 22.
- Polat, R. K. (2012). Digital exclusion in Turkey: A policy perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 589–596. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.002
- Raj, M., & Seamans, R. (2018). AI, labor, productivity, and the need for Firm-level data. In Economics of artificial intelligence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Ramaswamy, K. (2018). Technological change, automation and employment: A short review of theory and evidence (No. 2018-002). Mumbai, India: Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research.
- Rasmussen, C. E. (2004). Gaussian processes in machine learning. Advanced lectures on machine learning (pp. 63–71). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
- Rotman, D. (2013). How technology is destroying jobs. Technology Review, 116, 28–35.
- Schein, E. H. (1990). Career anchors: Discovering your real values. San Diego, CA: Pfeiffer & Company.
- Schulz, E., Speekenbrink, M., & Krause, A. (2018). A tutorial on Gaussian process regression: Modelling, exploring and exploiting functions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 85, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2018.03.001
- Schwab, K. (2018). The global competitiveness report 2018, World Economic Forum.
- Serrano-Santoyo, A., & Rojas-Mendizabal, V. (2017). Exploring a complexity framework for digital inclusion interventions. Procedia Computer Science, 121, 212–217. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.029
- Susskind, D. (2017). A model of technological unemployment [Discussion Paper, N° 819]. University of Oxford, Department of Economics. Retrieved from: https://www.economics.ox.ac.uk/materials/papers/15126/819-susskind-a-model-of-technological-unemployment-july-2017.pdf
- The Observatory of Economic Complexity. (2017). Economic complexity index rankings. Retrieved from: https://atlas.media.mit.edu/en/rankings/country/eci/
- Trevisan, L. N., Veloso, E. F. R., Silva, R. C., & Dutra, J. S. (2016). Ancoras de carreira e tecnologia na percepção sobre estresse no ambiente de trabalho. Revista Organizações em Contexto, 12(24), 65–89. doi:10.15603/1982-8756/roc.v12n24p65-89
- U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018). Standard of occupational classification. Retrieved from: https://www.bls.gov/soc/ISCO_SOC_Crosswalk.xls
- Veloso, E. F. R., Trevisan, L. N., da Silva, R. C., & Dutra, J. S. (2018). The use of traditional and nontraditional career theories to understand the youngs relationship with new technologies. Revista de Gestão, 25(4), 340–357. doi:10.1108/REGE-12-2017-0008