Students’ ways of understanding a proof

References

• Ahmadpour Mobarakeh, F., & Fadaee, M. R. (2016). The status of reasoning and proof in Iranian seventh-grade mathematics textbook. Presented in TSG 18, 13th International Congress on mathematics Education. Hamburg, Germany, 24-31 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Balacheff, N. (1988). Aspects of proof in pupils’ practice of school mathematics. In D. Pimm (Ed.), Mathematics, teachers and children (pp. 216–235). London, UK: Hodder and Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, W., & Kirsch, A. (1991). Preformal proof: Examples and reflections. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(2), 183–203.
   Google Scholar
• Collis, K. F. (1974). Cognitive Development and Mathematics Learning. Paper prepared for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Workshop, published at the Shell Mathematics Unit Centre for Science Education, Chelsea College, University of London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. W. (2006). Why do mathematicians re-prove theorems? Philosophia Mathematica, 14(3), 269–286.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, G., & Jahnke, H. N. (2002). Another approach to proof: Arguments from physics. ZDM, 34(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (1998). Students’ proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. In A. H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education. III (pp. 234–283). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society and Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Harel, G., & Tall, D. O. (1991). The general, the abstract, and the generic in advanced mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11(1), 38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 396–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herscovics, N., & Bergeron, J. C. (1988). An extended model of understanding. In M. J. Behr & C. B. Lacampagne, (Eds.), Proceedings of the tenth annual meeting of the North American chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 15–22). De Kalb, IL: Northern Illinois University.
   Google Scholar
• Herscovics, N., & Linchevski, L. (1994). A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 59–78.
   Google Scholar
• Knuth, E. (2002). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 379–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, G., & Harel, G. (1989). Proof frames of preservice elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 41–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (1989). Mathematical abstraction as the result of a delicate shift of attention. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(2), 2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J., & Pimm, D. (1984). Generic examples: Seeing the general in the particular. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 277–289.
   Google Scholar
• Mejía-Ramos, J. P., & Inglis, M. (2009). Argumentative and proving activities in mathematics education research. In F.-L. Lin, F.-J. Hsieh, G. Hanna, & M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI Study 19 Conference: Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education (Vol.2, pp. 88–93). Taipei, Taiwan: Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan Normal University.
   Google Scholar
• Mejia-Ramos, J. P., Fuller, E., Weber, K., Rhoads, K., & Samkoff, A. (2012). An assessment model for proof comprehension in undergraduate mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyazaki, M., Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2017). Students’ understanding of the structure of deductive proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(2), 223–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Pirie, S., & Kieren, T. (1989). A recursive theory of mathematical understanding. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(3), 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, D, & Knipping, C. (2010). Proof in mathematics education: research, learning and teaching. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Sémadéni, Z. (1984). Action proofs in primary mathematics teaching and in teacher training. For the Learning of Mathematics, 4(1), 32–34.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stylianides, A. J. (2007). The notion of proof in the context of elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Tall, D. (1995). Cognitive development, representations and proof. In L. Healy & C. Hoyles (Eds.), Justifying and proving in school mathematics. Proceedings of an International Conference (pp. 27–38). London: Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K., & Alcock, L. (2004). Semantic and syntactic proof productions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 209–234.
   Google Scholar