Language and Mathematics - Key Factors influencing the Comprehension Process in reality-based Tasks

References

• Abedi, J. (2006). Language issues in item development. In S. M. Downing & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 377–398). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Abedi, J., & Lord, C. (2001). The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 14(3), 219–234. doi:10.1207/S15324818AME1403_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artelt, C. (1999). Lernstrategien und Lernerfolg: Eine handlungsnahe Studie. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 31(2), 86–96. doi:10.1026//0049-8637.31.2.86
   Google Scholar
• Artelt, C., Beinicke, A., Schlagmüller, M., & Schneider, W. (2009). Diagnose von Strategiewissen beim Textverstehen. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 41(2), 96–103. doi:10.1026/0049-8637.41.2.96
   Google Scholar
• Blomhøj, M., & Jensen, T. H. (2007). Whats all the fuss about competencies? In Eds. W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss, New ICMI study series: Vol. 10. modelling and applications in mathematics education (pp. 45–56). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-29822-1_3
   Google Scholar
• Blomhøj, M., & Jensen, T. H. (2003). Developing mathematical modelling competence: Conceptual clarification and educational planning. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 22(3), 123–139. doi:10.1093/teamat/22.3.123
   Google Scholar
• Blum, W., & Leiss, D. (2007). How do students and teachers deal with modelling problems? In C. Haines (Ed.), Mathematical modelling (ICTMA 12). Education, engineering and economics: Proceedings from the twelfth international conference on the teaching of mathematical modelling and applications (pp. 222–231). Chichester: Horwood.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, W., Galbraith, P. L., Henn, W., & Niss, M. (2007). New ICMI study series: Vol. 10. Modelling and Applications in Mathematics Education. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-29822-1
   Google Scholar
• Borromeo Ferri, R. (2006). Theoretical and empirical differentiations of phases in the modelling process. ZDM Mathematics Education, 38(2), 86–95. doi:10.1007/BF02655883
   Google Scholar
• Borromeo Ferri, R. (2011). Wege zur Innenwelt des mathematischen Modellierens: Kognitive Analysen zu Modellierungsprozessen im Mathematikunterricht. Wiesbaden: Vieweg + Teubner.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, M. A. (2010). The think-aloud controversy in second language research. Second language acquisition research. Monographs on research methodology. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caccamise, D., Synder, L., & Kintsch, E. (2008). Constructivist theory and the situation model. Relevance to future assessment of reading comprehension. In C. C. Block & S. R. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction. Research-based best practices (second ed., pp. 80–100). New York, London: The Guildford press.
   Google Scholar
• Caccamise, D., & Snyder, L. (2005). Theory and pedagogical practices of text comprehension. Top Lang Disorders, 23(1), 5–20. doi:10.1097/00011363-200501000-00003
   Google Scholar
• Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Rupley, W. H. (2012). Reading-enhanced word problem solving: A theoretical model. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(1), 91–114. doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0068-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christmann, U., & Groeben, N. (2006). Psychologie des Lesens. In B. Franzmann (Ed.), Handbuch Lesen (pp. 145–223). Baltmannsweiler, Germany: Schneider-Verlag Hohengehren.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, P. (1983). Types of errors made by papua new guinean students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14, 355–367. doi:10.1007/BF00368234
   Google Scholar
• Clements, M. A. (1980). Analyzing children’s errors on written mathematical tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11(1), 1–21. doi:10.1007/BF00369157
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statstical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2.th ed.). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Daroczy, G., Wolska, M., Meurers, W. D., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2015). Word problems: A review of linguistic and numerical factors contributing to their difficulty. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depaepa, F., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Teachers approaches towards word problem solving: Elaborating or restricting the problem context. Teaching and Teachers Education, 26(2), 152–160. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 3–58. doi:10.1177/1529100612453266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellerton, N. F., & Clarkson, P. C. (1996). Laguage factors in mathematics teaching and learning. In Eds. A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde, Kluwer international handbooks of education: Vol. 4. International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 987–1033). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1465-0_27
   Google Scholar
• Flaherty, E. (1975). The thinking aloud technique and problem solving ability. Journal of Educational Research, 68(6), 223–225. doi:10.1080/00220671.1975.10884753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, P., & Stillman, G. (2006). A framework for identifying student blockages during transitions in the modelling process. ZDM Mathematics Education, 38(2), 143–162. doi:10.1007/BF02655886
   Google Scholar
• Gogolin, I., Lange, I., Michel, U., & Reich, H. H. (2013). Herausforderung Bildungssprache: Und wie man sie meistert. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, A. (2009). Leseflüssigkeit. Dimensionen und Bedingungen bei leseschwachen Hauptschülern. In A. Bertschi-Kaufmann (Ed.), Lesesozialisation und Medien. Literalität. Bildungsaufgabe und Forschungsfeld (pp. 151–164). Weinheim, München: Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Louwerse, M. M., McNamara, D. S., Olney, A., Cai, Z., & Mitchell, H. H. (2007). Inference generation and cohesion in the construction of situation models: Some connections with computational linguistics. In F. Schmalhofer & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes (pp. 289–310). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Grothjahn, R. (2010). The C-Test: Contributions from current research. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang GmbH Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Haag, N., Heppt, B., Stanat, P., Kuhl, P., & Pant, H. A. (2013). Second language learners’ performance in mathematics: Disentangling the effects of academic language features. Learning and Instruction, 28, 24–34. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagena, M., Leiss, D., & Schwippert, K. (2017). Using reading strategy training to foster students’ mathematical modelling competencies: Results of a quasi-experimental control trial. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 4057–4085. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00803a
   Google Scholar
• Heine, L., & Schramm, K. (2007). Lautes Denken in der Fremdsprachenforschung: Eine Handreichung für die empirische Praxis. In H. J. Vollmer & W. Zydatiss (Eds.), Synergieeffekte in der Fremdsprachenforschung. Empirische Zugänge, Probleme, Ergebnisse (pp. 167–206). Frankfurt am Main, New York: Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstetter, C. H. (2003). Contextual and mathematics accommodation test effects for english-language learners. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(2), 159–188. doi:10.1207/S15324818AME1602_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julie, C. (2007). Learners context preferences and mathematical literacy. In Ed. C. Haines, Mathematical modelling (ICTMA 12). Education, engineering and economics: Proceedings from the twelfth international conference on the teaching of mathematical modelling and applications (pp. 195–202). Chichester, UK: Horwood. doi:10.1533/9780857099419.4.195
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, G., & Maaß, K. (2007). Modelling in lower secondary mathematics classroom: Problems and opportunities.In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss Eds., New icmi study series: Vol. 10. Modelling and applications in mathematics education (pp. 99–108). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-29822-1_8
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, G., & Sriraman, B. (2006). A global survey of international perspectives on modelling in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 38(3), 302–310. doi:10.1007/BF02652813
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & Greeno, J. G. (1985). Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. Psychological Review, 92(1), 109–129. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.92.1.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., de Jong, J., Lafontaine, D., McQueen, J., Mendelovits, J., & Monseur, C. (2002). Reading for change: Performance and engagement across countries: Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/9789264099289-en
   Google Scholar
• Leiss, D., & Müller, M. (2008). Offene Aufgaben - auch ein offenes Problem der Bewertung. Praxis Schule 5-10, 19(5), 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Leiss, D., Schukajlow, S., Blum, W., Messner, R., & Pekrun, R. (2010). The role of the situation model in mathematical modelling—task analyses, student competencies, and teacher interventions. Journal Für Mathematik-Didaktik, 31, 1. doi:10.1007/s13138-010-0006-y
   Google Scholar
• Lienert, G. A., & Raatz, U. (1994). Testaufbau und Testanalyse (5th ed.). Weinheim: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Maaß, K. (2010). Classification scheme for modelling tasks. Journal Für Mathematik-Didaktik, 31(2), 285–311. doi:10.1007/s13138-010-0010-2
   Google Scholar
• Martiniello, M. (2008). Language and the performance of English-language learners in math word problems. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 333–368. doi:10.0.69.99/haer.78.2.70783570r1111t32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matos, J. F., & Carreira, S. (1995). Cognitive processes and representations involved in applied problem solving. In C. W. Sloyer, W. Blum, & I. D. Huntley (Eds.), Advances and perspectives in teaching of mathematical modelling and applications (ICTMA-6) (pp. 71–80). Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Hegarty, M. (1996). The process of understanding mathematical problems. In R. J. Sternberg & T. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), Studies in mathematical thinking and learning series. The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 29–53). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2003). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken (8th ed.). Basel, Belgium: Beltz.  doi:10.1007/978-3-531-92052-8_42
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2017). Self-explanation and reading strategy training (SERT) improves low-knowledge students’ science course performance. Discourse Processes, 54(7), 479–492. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3801_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, T. P., Miller, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1991). Mental models and reading comprehension. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 490–511). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Education Psychology, 94, 249–259. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.94.2.249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, C., Craig, T., Schütte, M., & Wagner, D. (2014). Language and communication in mathematics education: An overview of research in the field. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(6), 843–853. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0624-9
   Google Scholar
• NewNewman, K. (1977). An analysis of sixth-grade pupils’ errors on written mathematical tasks. In M. A. Clements & J. Foyster (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australia (pp. 239–258). Melbourne: Swinburne Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niss, M., Blum, W., & Galbraith, P. (2007). Introduction. In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), New ICMI study series: Vol. 10. Modelling and applications in mathematics education (pp. 3–32). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Noack, C. (2006). Die Silbe als Zugriffseinheit beim Leseprozess. In U. Bredel & H. Günther (Eds.), Linguistische Arbeiten: Vol. 509. Orthographietheorie und Rechtschreibunterricht (pp. 181–196). Tübingen: M. Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, L. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Learning to learn: Students engagement, strategies and practices Programme for International Student Assessment. doi: 10.1787/9789264083943-en
   Google Scholar
• Palm, T. (2009). Theory of authentic task situations. In L. Verschaffel, B. Greer, W. van Dooren, & S. Mukhopadhyay (Eds.), Words and worlds. Modelling verbal descriptions of situations (pp. 3–20). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Plath, J., & Leiss, D. (2018). The impact of linguistic complexity on the solution of mathematical modelling tasks. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50(1,2), 159–171. doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0897-x
   Google Scholar
• Prediger, S., Renk, N., Büchter, A., Gürsoy, E., & Benholz, C. (2013). Family background or language disadvantages? Factors for underachievement in high stakes tests. In A. M. Lindmeier & A. Heinze (Ed.), Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Paper presented at the Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Kiel, Germany) (Vol. 4, p. 4.49-4.56).
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale: NJ Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Reusser, K. (1988). Problem solving beyond the logic of things: Contextual effects on understanding and solving word problems. Instructional Science, 17(4), 309–338. doi:10.1007/BF00056219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reusser, K. (1989). Vom Text zur Situation zur Gleichung – Kognitive Simulation von Sprachverständnis und Mathematisierung beim Lösen von Textaufgaben. (Habilitationsschrift). Bern: Universität Bern.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, H. (1966). The major aspects of reading. In H. A. Robinson (Ed.), Reading: Seventy-five years of progress (pp. 22–32). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Schlagmüller, M., & Ennemoser, M. (2007). LGVT 6-12. Lesegeschwindigkeits- und -verständnistest für die Klassen 6-12. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Schukajlow, S., Kaiser, G., & Stillman, G. (2018). Empirical research on teaching and learning of mathematical modelling: A survey on the current state-of-the-art. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50(1,2), 5–18. doi:10.1007/s11858-018-0933-5
   Google Scholar
• Schukajlow, S., & Leiss, D. (2011). Selbstberichtete Strategienutzung und mathematische Modellierungskompetenz. Journal Für Mathematikdidaktik, 32(1), 53–77. doi:10.1007/s13138-010-0023-x
   Google Scholar
• Shaftel, J., Belton-Kocher, E., Glasnapp, D., & Poggio, J. (2006). The impact of language characteristics in mathematics test items on the performance of english language learners and students with disabilities. Educational Assessment, 11(2), 105–126. doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1102_2
   Google Scholar
• Stillman, G., Brown, J., & Galbraith, P. (2010). Identifying challanges within transition phases of mathematical modelling activities at year 9. In R. A. Lesh (Ed.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies. ICTMA 13 (pp. 385–398). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0561-1_33
   Google Scholar
• van der Schoot, M., Bakker Arkema, A. H., Horsley, T. M., & van Lieshout, E. C. D. M. (2009). The consistency effect depends on markedness in less successful but not successful problem solvers: An eye movement study in primary school children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 58–66. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & de Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Contexts of learning. Lisse [Netherlands]. Exton, PA: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vilenius-Tuohimaa, P. M., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2008). The association between mathematical word problems and reading comprehension. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 409–426. doi:10.1080/01443410701708228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vukovic, R. K., & Lesaux, N. K. (2013). The language of mathematics: Investigating the ways language counts for children’s mathematical development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(2), 227–244. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315–327). New York, NY: Macmillan; Collier Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wijaya, A., van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Doorman, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks: An analysis of students’ errors. Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3), 555–584.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. K., & Leon, S. (2009). An investigation of the language demands in content assessments for english language learners. Educational Assessment, 14(3–4), 139–159. doi:10.1080/10627190903425883
   Google Scholar