Young children’s actions on length measurement tasks: strategies and cognitive attributes

References

• Barrett, J. E., Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2017). Children’s measurement: A longitudinal study of children’s knowledge and learning of length, area, and volume. In B. Herbel-Eisenmann (Ed.), Journal for research in mathematics education (Vol. 16). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Bartsch, K., & Wellman, H. M. (1988). Young children’s conception of distance. Developmental Psychology, 24(4), 532–541. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.24.4.532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. E., Braswell, J., Oranje, A., Sandene, B., Kaplan, B., & Yan, F. (2008). Does it matter if I take my mathematics test on computer? A second empirical study of mode effects in NAEP. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 6(9), 39. http://www.jtla.org
   Google Scholar
• Bragg, P., & Outhred, L. N. (2001). So that’s what a centimetre looks like: Students’ understandings of linear units. In M. Van den Heuvel-panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology in Mathematics Education (Vol.2, pp. 209–216). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bragg, P., & Outhred, L. N. (2004, 14–18 July). A measure of rulers - The importance of units in a measure. Paper presented at the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Bergen, Norway. www.emis.de/proceedings/PME28/RR/RR169_Bragg.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., Blondel, E., Simon, S., & Black, P. (1995). Progression in measuring. Research Papers in Education, 10(2), 143–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152950100202
   Google Scholar
• Cannon, P. L. (1992). Middle grade students’ representations of linear units. In W. Geeslin & K. Graham (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology in Mathematics Education (Vol.1, pp. 105–112). Durham, NH: Program Committee of the 16th PME Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Case, R., & Okamoto, Y. (1996). The role of central conceptual structures in the development of children’s thought. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61(1–2), 246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.1996.tb00536.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, K.-L., Males, L. M., Mosier, A., & Gonulates, F. (2011). Exploring US textbooks’ treatment of the estimation of linear measurements. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(5), 697–708. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/11858-011-0361-2
   Google Scholar
• Chernoff, J. J., Flanagan, K. D., McPhee, C., & Park, J. (2007). Preschool: First findings from the third follow-up of the early childhood longitudinal study, birth cohort (ECLS-B) (NCES 2008-025). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, B., Haymond, K., & Gersten, R. (2014). Mathematics screening measures for the primary grades. In R. J. Kettler, T. A. Glover, C. A. Albers, & K. A. Feeney-Kettler (Eds.), Universal screening in educational settings: Evidence-based decision making for schools. School psychology book series (pp. 199–221). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. M., Cheeseman, J., Gervasoni, A., Gronn, D., Horne, M., McDonough, A., … Rowley, G. (2002). Early Numeracy Research Project final report: Department of Education, Employment and Training, the Catholic Education Office (Melbourne), and the Association of Independent Schools Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H. (1999). Teaching length measurement: Research challenges. School Science and Mathematics, 99(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17440.x
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H. (Ed.). (2003). Learning and teaching measurement: 65th yearbook. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., & Bright, G. W. (2003). Learning and teaching measurement. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2004). Learning trajectories in mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_1
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., & Germeroth, C. (2016). Learning executive function and early mathematics: Directions of causal relations. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36(3), 79–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.12.009
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., & Liu, X. (2008). Development of a measure of early mathematics achievement using the Rasch model: The research-based early maths assessment. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 457–482. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701777272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Wolfe, C. B., & Day-Hess, C. A. (2008/2020). REMA—research-based early mathematics assessment. Kennedy Institute, University of Denver.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, C. J., & Barrett, J. E. (2010). Strategy use indicative of an understanding of units of length. Paper presented at the 34th Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics in Education, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Davydov, V. V., & Tsvetkovich, Z. H. (1991). The object sources of the concept of fractions. In V. V. Davydov (Ed.), Soviet studies in mathematics education, Psychological abilities of primary school children in learning mathematics (Vol. 6, pp. 86–147). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (J. Teller, Trans.)
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, E. S. (1993). Integrative strategy instruction: A potential model for teaching content area subjects to adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26(6), 358–383. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949302600602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, S., Siegler, R. S., & Van Voorhis, F. E. (2003a, April). Developmental changes in children’s understanding of measurement procedures and principles. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, S., Siegler, R. S., & Van Voorhis, F. E. (2003b). Society for Research in Child Development. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Fabricius, W. V., & Wellman, H. M. (1993). Two roads diverged: Young children’s ability to judge distances. Child Development, 64(2), 399–414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1131258
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gallego, F. A., Näslund-Hadley, E., & Alfonso, M. (2018). Tailoring instruction to improve mathematics skills in preschools [IDB Working Paper Series; 905]. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, A., Cooke, G., Leinwand, S., Noell, J., & Pollock, E. (2005). Reassessing U.S. International mathematics performance: New findings from the 2003 TIMSS and PISA. American Institutes for Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, H. P., & Baroody, A. J. (2003). Test of early mathematics ability (3rd ed.). Pro Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, H. P., Pappas, S., Lee, Y.-S., & Chiong, C. (2009). How did you get that answer? Computer assessments of young children’s mathematical minds in MCLASS math. In P. E. Noyce & D. T. Hickey (Eds.), New frontiers in formative assessment (pp. 49–67). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J. C. (1981). Cognitive development and learning linear measurement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/748928
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J. C. (1984). Why do some children have trouble learning measurement concepts? Arithmetic Teacher, 31(7), 19–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.31.7.0019
   Google Scholar
• Horne, M., & Rowley, G. (2001). Measuring growth in early numeracy: Creation of interval scales to monitor development. In M. Van den Heuvel-panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology in Mathematics Education (Vol.3, pp. 161–168). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kamii, C., & Clark, F. B. (1997). Measurement of length: The need for a better approach to teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 97(3), 116–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1997.tb17354.x
   Google Scholar
• Kent, P., Bakker, A., Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2011). Measurement in the workplace: The case of process improvement in manufacturing industry. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(5), 747–758. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/11858-011-0359-9
   Google Scholar
• Kilday, C. R., Kinzie, M. B., Mashburn, A. J., & Whittaker, J. V. (2012). Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of preschoolers’ math skills. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(2), 48–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Smith, J. P., III. (2011). What is different across an ocean? How Singapore and US elementary mathematics curricula introduce and develop length measurement. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(5), 681––696. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/sll858-0ll-0339-0
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R. (2003). Developing understanding of measurement. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 179–192). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Mariotti, M. A. (2002). Influencies of technologies advances in students’ math learning. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 757–786). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J., & Lazendic, G. (2018). Achievement in large-scale national numeracy assessment: An ecological study of motivation and student, home, and school predictors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(4), 465–482. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, K. F., & Baillargeon, R. (1990). Length and distance: Do preschoolers think that occlusion brings things together? Developmental Psychology, 26(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.26.1.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najarian, M., Snow, K., Lennon, J., & Kinsey, S. (2010). Early childhood longitudinal study, birth cohort (ECLS-B) preschool—kindergarten 2007 psychometric report (NCES 2010-009). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• NCTM. (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• NGA/CCSSO. (2010). Common core state standards. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. E. (1996). Children doing mathematics. Balckwell.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Assessment and Information Services. (2007) . Comparability of student scores obtained from paper and computer administrations. Oregon Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Petitto, A. L. (1990). Development of numberline and measurement concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 7(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0701_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., Inhelder, B., & Szeminska, A. (1948/1960). The child’s conception of geometry. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pomplun, M., Ritchie, T., & Custer, M. (2006). Factors in paper-and-pencil and computer reading score differences at the primary grades. Educational Assessment, 11(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea1102_3
   Google Scholar
• Salaschek, M., Zeuch, N., & Souvignier, E. (2014). Mathematics growth trajectories in first grade: Cumulative vs. compensatory patterns and the role of number sense. Learning and Individual Differences, 35(October), 103–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sarama, J., Clements, D. H., Barrett, J. E., Van Dine, D. W., & McDonel, J. S. (2011). Evaluation of a learning trajectory for length in the early years. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(5), 667–680. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0326-5
   Google Scholar
• Schiff, W. (1983). Conservation of length redux: A perceptual-linguistic phenomenon. Child Development, 54(6), 1497–1506. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1129812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrank, F. A., McGrew, K. S., Mather, N., & Woodcock, R. W. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Cognitive Abilities. Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. L., Wiser, M., Anderson, C. W., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Implications of research on children’s learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic-molecular theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 14(1&2), 1–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2006.9678570
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2007). Quantitative reasoning and the development of algebraic reasoning. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 95–132). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• So, W. (2013). Connecting mathematics in primary science inquiry projects. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 385–406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9342-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P. (1991). Operations that generate quantity. Learning and Individual Differences, 3(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(91)90004-K
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P., & Olive, J. (2010). Children’s fractional knowledge. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, M., & Clements, D. H. (2003). Linear and area measurement in prekindergarten to grade 2. In D. H. Clements (Ed.), Learning and teaching measurement: 65th yearbook (pp. 3–16). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Strickland, J., Woods, K., & Pavlovic, M. (2016). Assessing and understanding early numeracy for students with additional learning needs. Paper presented at the AARE Conference, Melbourne, Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Tal, E. (2013). Old and new problems in philosophy of measurement. Philosophy Compass, 8(1), 1159–1173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12089
   Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, C. (2002). Data analytic methods for latent partially ordered classification models. Applied Statistics, 51(3), 337–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9876.00272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, C. (2009). Diagnostic models as partially ordered sets. Measurement, 7(1), 49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, C., Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Izsák, A., Orrill, C. H., de la Torre, J., … Tatsuoka, K. K. (2016). Developing workable attributes for psychometric models based on the Q-Matrix. In A. Izsák, J. T. Remillard, & J. Templin (Eds.), Psychometric methods in mathematics education: Opportunities, challenges, and interdisciplinary collaborations (Monograph #15) (pp. 73–96). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, K. K. (1983). Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20(4), 345–354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1983.tb00212.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, K. K. (1990). Toward an integration of item-response theory and cognitive error diagnoses. In N. Frederiksen, R. L. Glaser, A. M. Lesgold, & M. G. Shafto (Eds.), Diagnostic monitoring of skill and knowledge acquisition (pp. 453-486). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, K. K. (2009). Cognitive assessment: An introduction to the rule space method. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tatsuoka, K. K., Tatsuoka, C., Kelly, A. E., & Dean, M. (2012). Cognitively diagnostic methodology: Rule space, Q-matrix theory and applications. In C. Secolsky & D. B. Denison (Eds.), Handbook of measurement, assessment, and evaluation in higher education (pp. 438–451). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, S., Rowe, K., Underwood, C., & Peck, R. (2005). Numeracy in the early years: Project good start. Retrieved from Australian Council for Educational Research website: www.acer.edu.au/documents/GOODSTART_FinalReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tymms, P. (2001). The development of a computer-adaptive assessment in the early years. Educational and Child Psychology, 18(3), 20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Heuvel-panhuizen, M., & Buys, K. (2005). Young children learn measurement and geometry: A learning-teaching trajectory with intermediate attainment targets for the lower grades in primary school. Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Vasilyeva, M., Ludlow, L. H., Casey, B. M., & Onge, C. S. (2009). Examination of the psychometric properties of the measurement skills assessment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(1), 106–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408318774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Way, W. D., Lin, C.-H., & Kong, J. (2008, March). Maintaining score equivalence as tests transition online: Issues, approaches and trends. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar