References
- Alibali, M. W., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1993). Gesture-speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning: What the hands reveal about a child’s state of mind. Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 468–523. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1993.1012
- Alibali, M. W., & Hostetter, A. B. (2010). Mimicry and simulation in gesture comprehension (Commentary on P. Niedenthal, M. Maringer, M. Mermillod, & U. Hess, The Simulation of Smiles (SIMS) model: Embodied simulation and the meaning of facial expression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(6), 433–434. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10001445
- Alibali, M. W., & Kita, S. (2010). Gesture highlights perceptually present information for speakers. Gesture, 10(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.10.1.02ali
- Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners’ and teachers’ gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 247–286. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.611446
- Ärlebäck, J. B., Doerr, H. M., & O’Neil, A. H. (2013). A modeling perspective on interpreting rates of change in context. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15(4), 314–336. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2013.834405
- Bell, A., & Janvier, C. (1981). The interpretation of graphs representing situations. For the Learning of Mathematics, 2(1), 34–42. https://flm-journal.org/Articles/342368A19260FACE7BC364ED38AD7.pdf
- Bjuland, R., Cestari, M. L., & Borgersen, H. E. (2008). The interplay between gesture and discourse as mediating devices in collaborative mathematical reasoning: A multimodal approach. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(3), 271–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802216169
- Broaders, S. C., Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2007). Making children gesture brings out implicit knowledge and leads to learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 136(4), 539–550. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.539
- Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
- Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352–378. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/4149958
- Castillo-Garsow, C. (2012). Continuous quantitative reasoning. In R. Mayes & L. L. Hatfield (Eds.), Quantitative reasoning and mathematical modeling: A driver for STEM integrated education and teaching in context (Vol. 2, pp. 55–73). University of Wyoming College of Education.
- Castillo-Garsow, C., Johnson, H. L., & Moore, K. C. (2013). Chunky and smooth images of change. For the Learning of Mathematics, 33(3), 31–37. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43894859
- Chafe, W. L. (1979). The flow of thought and the flow of language. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 12: Discourse and syntax (pp. 159–181). Academic Press.
- Chafe, W. L. (1980). The development of consciousness in the production of a narrative. In W. L. Chafe (Ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production (pp. 9–50). Ablex.
- Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1986). The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge. Cognition, 23(1), 43–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(86)90053-3
- Cook, S. W., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2006). The role of gesture in learning: Do children use their hands to change their minds? Journal of Cognition and Development, 7(2), 211–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327647jcd0702_4
- Cook, S. W., & Tanenhaus, M. (2009). Embodied understanding: Speakers’ gestures affect listeners’ actions. Cognition, 113(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.006
- Edwards, L. D. (2009). Gestures and conceptual integration in mathematical talk. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9124-6
- Gerwing, J., & Bavelas, J. (2004). Linguistic influences on gesture’s form. Gesture, 4(2), 157–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.4.2.04ger
- Goldin-Meadow, S., Alibali, M. W., & Church, R. B. (1993). Transitions in concept acquisition: Using the hand to read the mind. Psychological Review, 100(2), 279–297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.279
- Goldin-Meadow, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2010). Action’s influence on thought: The case of gesture. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 5(6), 664–674. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610388764
- Goldin-Meadow, S., Cook, S. W., & Mitchell, Z. A. (2009). Gesturing gives children new ideas about math. Psychological Science, 20(3), 267–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02297.x
- Gray, E. M., & Tall, D. O. (2001). Relationships between embodied objects and symbolic procepts: An explanatory theory of success and failure in mathematics. In M. van den Heuvel-panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of 25th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 65–72). PME.
- Holler, J., & Stevens, R. (2007). The effect of common ground on how speakers use gesture and speech to represent size information. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X06296428
- Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 495–514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.3.495
- Johnson, H. (2012). Reasoning about variation in the intensity of change in covarying quantities involved in rate of change. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(3), 313–330. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.01.001.
- Jordan, B. & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 4(1), 39–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2.
- Kim, M., Roth, W. M., & Thom, J. (2011). Children’s gestures and the embodied knowledge of geometry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(1), 207–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9240-5
- Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. Basic Books.
- Marghetis, T., & Núñez, R. (2013). The motion behind the symbols: A vital role for dynamism in the conceptualization of limits and continuity in expert mathematics. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(2), 299–316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12013
- McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001
- Nemirovsky, R., Kelton, M. L., & Rhodehamel, B. (2013). Playing mathematical instruments: Emerging perceptuomotor integration with an interactive mathematics exhibit. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(2), 372–415. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.2.0372
- Piaget, J. (1977). The role of action in the development of thinking. In W. F. Overton & J. M. Gallagher (Eds.), Knowledge and development (pp. 17–42). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2547-5_2
- Radford, L. (2009). Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9127-3
- Radford, L. (2014). Towards an embodied, cultural, and material conception of mathematics cognition. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(3), 349–361. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0591-1
- Reynolds, F., & Reeve, R. (2002). Gesture in collaborative mathematics problem solving. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20(4), 447–460. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00091-3
- Tall, D. (2013). The Three Worlds of Mathematics. In How Humans Learn to Think Mathematically: Exploring the Three Worlds of Mathematics (Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, pp. 133–154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565202.011 doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565202
- Thompson, P. W. (2011). Quantitative reasoning and mathematical modeling. In L. L. Hatfield, S. Chamberlain, & S. Belbase (Eds.), New perspectives and directions for collaborative research in mathematics education, WISDOMe monographs (Vol. 1, pp. 33–57). University of Wyoming.
- Thompson, P. W., & Carlson, M. P. (2017). Variation, covariation and functions: Foundational ways of mathematical thinking. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. s421–456). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Walkington, C., Boncoddo, R., Williams, C., Nathan, M., Alibali, M., & Simon, E. (2014). Being mathematical relations: Dynamic gestures support mathematical reasoning. In W. Penuel, S. A. Jurow, K. O’Connor, et al. , (Eds.), Learning and becoming in practice: Proceedings of the eleventh international conference of the learning sciences (pp. 479–486). University of Colorado. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4080.0005
- Wilkerson-Jerde, M., & Wilensky, U. (2011). How do mathematicians learn math?: Resources and acts for constructing and understanding mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9306-5
- Yoon, C., Thomas, M. O. J., & Dreyfus, T. (2011). Gestures and insight in advanced mathematical thinking. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(7), 891–901. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2011.608861