“Tia was the right one:” mathematical authority and trust among first graders

References

• Amit, M., & Fried, M. N. (2005). Authority and authority relations in mathematics education: A view from an 8th grade classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-3618-2
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. W., Holland, J. D., & Palincsar, A. S. (1997). Canonical and sociocultural approaches to research and reform in science education: The story of Juan and his group. The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1086/461871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, A., & Wagner, D. (2016). Language repertoires for mathematical and other discourses. In M. B. Wood, E. E. Turner, M. Civil, & J. A. Eli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. (pp. 1166–1172). Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37(3), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.2307/2093465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanton, M., Stephens, A., Knuth, E., Gardiner, A. M., Isler, I., & Kim, J. S. (2015). The development of children’s algebraic thinking: The impact of a comprehensive early algebra intervention in third grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 39–87. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.1.0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. J. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 171–200). Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Brizuela, B. M., Blanton, M., Sawrey, K., Newman-Owens, A., & Gardiner, A. M. (2015). Children’s use of variables and variable notation to represent their algebraic ideas. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2015.981939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic and algebra in elementary school. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Chizhik, A. W. (1999). Can students work together equitably? An analysis of task effects in collaborative group work. Social Psychology of Education, 3(1–2), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009611032434
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G. (1982). Expectations states and interracial interaction in school settings. Annual Review of Sociology, 8(1), 209–235. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.08.080182.001233
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (1995). Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Education Research Journal, 32(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032001099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (1st ed., pp. 15–22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77750-9_2
   Google Scholar
• Cornelius, L. L., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2004). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students’ relationships with each other and with concepts. Cognition & Instruction, 22(4), 467–498. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690Xci2204_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Real, J. (2020). Latinx hasn’t even caught on among Latinos. It never will. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/latinx-latinos-unpopular-gender-term/2020/12/18/bf177c5c-3b41-11eb-9276-ae0ca72729be_story.html
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition & Instruction, 10(2–3), 105–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. (2008a). A Bird’s eye view of the “Pieces” vs. “Coherence” controversy (From the “Pieces” side of the Fence). In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change (pp. 35–60). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. (2008b). A “theory bite” on the meaning of scientific inquiry: A companion to Kuhn and Pease. Cognition & Instruction, 26(4), 560–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802391760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, T. (2015). Delegating mathematical authority as a means to strive toward equity. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 8(1), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v8i1a242
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., Langer-Osuna, J. M., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2014). Toward a model of influence in persuasive discussions: Negotiating quality, authority, privilege, and access within a student-led argument. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.883979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2013). Power in numbers: Student participation in mathematical discussions in heterogeneous spaces. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 288–315. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii, T., & Stephens, M. (2008). Using number sentences to introduce the idea of variable. In C. E. Greenes & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Algebra and algebraic thinking in school mathematics: Seventieth yearbook (pp. 127–140). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). Grounded theory: The discovery of grounded theory. Sociology the Journal of the British Sociological Association, 12(1), 27–49.
   Google Scholar
• Gresalfi, M., & Cobb, P. (2006). Cultivating students’ discipline-specific dispositions as a critical goal for pedagogy and equity. Pedagogies, 1(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15544818ped0101_8
   Google Scholar
• Hamm, J. V., & Perry, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in first-grade classrooms: On whose authority? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1998). Positioning theory: Moral contexts of international action (1st ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Wagner, D. (2013). Mathematics teachers’ representations of authority. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(3), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9252-5
   Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Wagner, D., & Cortes, V. (2010). Lexical bundle analysis in mathematics classroom discourse: The significance of stance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9253-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermansen, T. K., Ronfard, S., Harris, P. L., Pons, F., & Zambrana, I. M. (2021). Young children update their trust in an informant’s claim when experience tells them otherwise. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 205, 105063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hume, D. (1748/1977). “On Miracles” in an enquiry concerning human understanding. Hackett Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ju, M. K., & Kwon, O. N. (2007). Ways of talking and ways of positioning: Students’ beliefs in an inquiry-oriented differential equations class. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(3), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. E. (2003). Theme issue: The role of design in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001003
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, M. A., & Harris, P. L. (2007). The basis of epistemic trust: Reliable testimony or reliable sources? Episteme, 4(3), 264–284. https://doi.org/10.3366/E1742360007000081
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–63. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312027001029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, J. D., & Harris, P. L. (2015). The roles of intuition and informants’ expertise in children’s epistemic trust. Child Development, 86(3), 919–926. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2011). How Brianna became bossy and Kofi came out smart: Understanding the trajectories of identity and engagement for two group leaders in a project-based mathematics classroom. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2011.595881
   Google Scholar
• Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2015). From getting “fired” to becoming a collaborator: A case of the coconstruction of identity and engagement in a project-based mathematics classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(1), 53–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.944643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2016). The social construction of authority among peers and its implications for collaborative mathematics problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2016.1148529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2018). Exploring the central role of student authority relations in collaborative mathematics. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 50(6), 1077–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0965-x
   Google Scholar
• Langer-Osuna, J. M., Gargroetzi, E., Munson, J., & Chavez, R. (2020). Exploring the role of off-task activity on students’ collaborative dynamics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 514–532. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, M., & Ruef, J. (2020). Student or teacher? A look at how students facilitate public sensemaking during collaborative groupwork. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v13i1a372
   Google Scholar
• MacGregor, M., & Stacey, K. (1997). Students’ understanding of algebraic notation: 11–15. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002970913563
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Council of Chief State School Officers. http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Southerland, S., Kittleson, J., Settlage, J., & Lanier, K. (2005). Individual and group meaning-making in an urban third grade classroom: Red fog, cold cans, and seeping vapor. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(9), 1032–1061. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, F. R., & Wilson, N. C. (2015). Playful talk: Negotiating opportunities to learn in collaborative groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(1), 5–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.839945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syed, M., & Nelson, S. C. (2015). Guidelines for establishing reliability when coding narrative data. Emerging Adulthood, 3(6), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815587648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, E., Dominguez, H., Maldonado, L., & Empson, S. (2013). English learners’ participation in mathematical discussion: Shifting positionings and dynamic identities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 199–234. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderbilt, K. E., Heyman, G. D., & Liu, D. (2014). In the absence of conflicting testimony young children trust inaccurate informants. Developmental Science, 17(3), 443–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, J. F. (2006). Transfer in pieces. Cognition & Instruction, 24(1), 1–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2401_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M. B. (2013). Mathematical micro-identities: Moment-to-moment positioning and learning in a fourth-grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(5), 775–808. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.5.0775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.27.4.0458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar