Teachers’ knowledge of different forms of complex numbers through quantitative reasoning

References

• Anevska, K., Gogovska, V., & Malcheski, R. (2015). The role of complex numbers in interdisciplinary integration in mathematics teaching. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2573–2577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.553
   Google Scholar
• Argün, Z., Arıkan, A., Bulut, S., & Halıcıoğlu, S. (2014). Temel matematik kavramların künyesi [List of basic mathematical concepts].
   Google Scholar
• Atmaca, U. İ., Uygun, N. G., Çağlar, M. F., & Çünür, I. (2014, August 28–30). Haberleşme mühendisliği için mobil öğrenme uygulaması [Mobile learning app for communication engineering] [Paper presentation]. VII. URSI-Türkiye Bilimsel Kongresi.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belin, M., & Karagöz Akar, G. (2017). Prospective mathematics teachers’ making sense of the decimal representation of real numbers as rational number sequences through quantitative reasoning. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences, 6, 38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Belin, M., & Karagöz Akar, G. (2020a). The effect of quantitative reasoning on prospective mathematics teachers’ proof comprehension: The case of real numbers. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 57, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belin, M., & Karagöz Akar, G. (2020b). Exploring real numbers as rational number sequences with prospective mathematics teachers. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 9(1), 63–87. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTE.2020.9999
   Google Scholar
• Benítez, J., Giménez, M. H., Hueso, J. L., Martínez, E., & Riera, J. (2013). Design and use of a learning object for finding complex polynomial roots. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(3), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2012.729678
   Google Scholar
• Caglayan, G. (2016). Mathematics teachers’ visualization of complex number multiplication and the roots of unity in a dynamic geometry environment. Computers in the Schools, 33(3), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2016.1218217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352–378. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çelik, A., & Özdemir, M. F. (2011). Ortaöğretimde kompleks sayılarla ilgili kavram yanılgılarının belirlenmesi ve çözüm önerileri [Determining the concept errors with regard to complex numbers in secondary education]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (29), 203–229.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, J. (2000). Analysis of clinical interviews: Foundations and model viability. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 547–589). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P. (2000). The importance of a situated view of learning to the design of research and instruction. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 45–82). Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Jackson, K., & Dunlap, C. (2017). Conducting design studies to investigate and support mathematics students’ and teachers’ learning. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 208–233). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1993). Chapter 3: Theoretical orientation. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph, 6, 21–122. https://doi.org/10.2307/749930
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics (CCSSM). National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved September 6, 2023, from https://learning.ccsso.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/ADA-Compliant-Math-Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. (2012). The mathematical education of teachers II. American Mathematical Society and Mathematical Association of America. Retrieved September 6, 2023, from https://www.cbmsweb.org/
   Google Scholar
• Conner, E., Rasmussen, C., Zandieh, M., & Smith, M. (2007, February 22–25). Student understanding of complex numbers [paper presentation]. The 10th special interest group of the mathematical association of america on research in undergraduate mathematics education,
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, T. G., & Chelst, K. R. (2019). Finding meaning in the quadratic formula. The Mathematics Teacher, 112(4), 258–261. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.112.4.0258
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, T., Özgün-Koca, S. A., & Chelst, K. (2021). Visualizing complex roots of a quadratic equation. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12, 114(3), 238–243. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTLT.2020.0028
   Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fehr, R. (1996). More emphasis on complex numbers? — The i’s have It! [Paper presentation]. Twenty-ninth annual meeting – Florida section Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E., Jehiam, R., & Cohen, D. (1995). The concept of irrational numbers in high-school students and prospective teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273899
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, W. (1977). Functions of several variables. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, K. (2016). Plotting points: Implications of “over and up” on students’ covariational reasoning. In M. B. Wood, E. E. Turner, M. Civil, & J. A. Eli, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Tucson, AZ (pp. 573–580). The University of Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Gaona, J., López, S. S., & Montoya-Delgadillo, E. (2022). Prospective mathematics teachers learning complex numbers using technology. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2133021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harel, G. (2008). A DNR perspective on mathematics curriculum and instruction. Part II: With reference to teacher’s knowledge base. International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(5), 893–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0146-4
   Google Scholar
• Harel, G. (2013). DNR-based curricula: The case of complex numbers. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 3(2), 2–61. https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.201302.03
   Google Scholar
• Hedden, C. B., & Langbauer, D. (2003). Balancing problem-solving skills with symbolic manipulation skills. In H. L. Schoen, I. City, & R. I. Charles (Eds.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving, grades, 6-12 (pp. 155–159). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgen, J., Pepper, D., Sturman, L., & Ruddock, G. (2010). Is the UK an outlier? An international comparison of upper secondary mathematics education. The Nuffield Foundation. https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/Country_profiles_outlier_NuffieldFoundation18_04_11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Baccalaureate Organization. (2019). Mathematics: Analysis and approaches Guide. Retrieved September 6, 2023 from https://www.ibo.org/programmes/diploma-programme/curriculum/mathematics/
   Google Scholar
• Ipek, A. S. (2013). Karmaşık sayılar: gerçek ve sanalın birlikteliği [Complex numbers: the union of the real and the imaginary]. In İ. Ö. Zembat, M. F. Özmantar, E. Bingölbali, H. Şandır, & A. Delice (Eds.), Tanımları ve tarihsel gelişimleriyle matematiksel kavramlar (pp. 127–1337). Pegem Akademi.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. L., Tzur, R., Gardner, A., Hodkowski, N. M., Lewis, A., & McClintock, E. (2022). A new angle: A teacher’s transformation of mathematics teaching practice and engagement in quantitative reasoning. Research in Mathematics Education, 24(1), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2021.1988688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagöz Akar, G. (2016). Nicel muhakeme ve nicel muhakeme yoluyla kesirler üzerinden gerçek sayıların inşaası [Quantitative reasoning and the construction of real numbers over fractions through quantitative reasoning]. In E. Bingölbali, S. Arslan, & İ. Ö. Zembat (Eds.), Matematik eğitimi teorileri (pp. 117–133). Pegem Akademi.
   Google Scholar
• Karagöz Akar, G., Belin, M., Arabacı, N., Imamoglu, Y., & Akoğlu, K. (2023). Different meanings of pure imaginary numbers. In M. Shelley, O. T. Ozturk, & M. L. Ciddi (Eds.), Proceedings of ICEMST 2023–International conference on education in mathematics, science and technology, Cappadocia, Turkiye (pp. 259–277). ICEMST.
   Google Scholar
• Karagöz Akar, G., Sarac, M., & Belin, M. (2023). Exploring prospective teachers’ development of the Cartesian form of complex numbers. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 12(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTE.2022.0034
   Google Scholar
• Karagöz Akar, G., Zembat, İ. Ö., Arslan, S., & Belin, M. (2022). Revisiting geometric transformations through quantitative reasoning. In Karagöz Akar, G., S. Zembat & Thompson, P. W. (Ed.), Quantitative reasoning in mathematics and science education (pp. 199–219). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14553-7_8
   Google Scholar
• Karakok, G., Soto-Johnson, H., & Dyben, S. A. (2015). Secondary teachers’ conception of various forms of complex numbers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(4), 327–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9288-1
   Google Scholar
• Karam, R. (2020). Why are complex numbers needed in quantum mechanics? Some answers for the introductory level. American Journal of Physics, 88(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0000258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontorovich, I. (2018). Undergraduate’s images of the root concept in R and in C. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 49, 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Kontorovich, I., Zazkis, R., & Mason, J. (2021). The metaphor of transition for introducing learners to new sets of numbers. In Y. H. Leong, B. Kaur, B. H. Choy, J. B. W. Yeo, & S. L. Chin (Eds.), Excellence in mathematics education: foundations and pathways (Proceedings of the 43rd annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia), Singapore (pp. 259–264). MERGA.
   Google Scholar
• Melliger, C. (2007). How to graphically interpret the complex roots of a quadratic Equation. University of Nebraska–lincoln MAT exam expository papers 35. Retrieved September 6, 2023, from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mathmidexppap/35
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education. (2019). Özel yetenekliler için matematik dersi öğretim programı (Ortaöğretim 9.-12. Sınıflar) [Mathematics curriculum for gifted students (Secondary education 9th-12th grades)]. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
   Google Scholar
• Montiel, M., Wilhelmi, M. R., Vidakovic, D., & Elstak, I. (2009). Using the onto-semiotic approach to identify and analyze mathematical meaning when transiting between different coordinate systems in a multivariate context. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9184-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K. C. (2016). Graphing as figurative and operative thought. In C. Csikos, A. Rausch, & J. Szitanyi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th conference of the international groups for the psychology of mathematics education, Szeged, Hungary (Vol. 3, pp. 323–330). PME.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. C., Carlson, M. P., & Oehrtman, M. (2009, February 26-March 1). The role of quantitative reasoning in solving applied precalculus problems [paper presentation]. The 12th special interest group of the mathematical association of america on research in undergraduate mathematics education. Marriott Raleigh City Center -
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. C., Paoletti, T., & Musgrave, S. (2013). Covariational reasoning and invariance among coordinate systems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. C., Paoletti, T., Stevens, I. E., & Hobson, N. L. F. (2016). Graphing habits: “I just don’t like that”. In T. Fukawa-Connelly, N. Infante, M. Wawro, & S. Brown (Eds.), Proceedings of the nineteenth annual conference on research in undergraduate mathematics education, Pittsburgh, PA (pp. 16–30). West Virginia University.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. C., Stevens, I. E., Paoletti, T., Hobson, N. L. F., & Liang, B. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ figurative and operative graphing actions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 56, 100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K. C., & Thompson, P. W. (2015). Shape thinking and students’ graphing activity. In T. Fukawa-Connelly, N. Infante, K. Keene, & M. Zandieh (Eds.), Proceedings of the eighteenth annual conference on research in undergraduate mathematics education, Pittsburgh, PA (pp. 782–789). West Virginia University.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, N. T. (2018). Making imaginary roots real. The Mathematics Teacher, 112(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.112.1.0028
   Google Scholar
• Nahin, P. J. (2010). An imaginary tale: The story of √-1. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Nemirovsky, R., Rasmussen, C., Sweeney, G., & Wawro, M. (2012). When the classroom floor becomes the complex plane: Addition and multiplication as ways of bodily navigation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 287–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.611445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordlander, M. C., & Nordlander, E. (2012). On the concept image of complex numbers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(5), 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2011.633629
   Google Scholar
• Oehrtman, M. C., Carlson, M. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2008). Foundational reasoning abilities that promote coherence in students’ function understanding. In M. P. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the connection: Research and practice in undergraduate mathematics (pp. 27–42). Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Özhan, O. (2022). Complex numbers. In Basic transforms for electrical engineering (pp. 3–54). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98846-3_1
   Google Scholar
• Panaoura, A., Elia, I., Gagatsis, A., & Giatilis, G. P. (2006). Geometric and algebraic approaches in the concept of complex numbers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(6), 681–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390600712281
   Google Scholar
• Paoletti, T., Lee, H. Y., & Hardison, H. (2018). Static and emergent thinking in spatial and quantitative coordinate systems. In T. E. Hodges, G. J. Roy, & A. M. Tyminski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the ınternational group for the psychology of mathematics education, Greenville, SC (pp. 1315–1322). University of South Carolina & Clemson University.
   Google Scholar
• Paoletti, T., & Moore, K. C. (2017). The parametric nature of two students’ covariational reasoning. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Saldanha, L., & Thompson, P. W. (1998) Re-thinking covariation from a quantitative perspective: Simultaneous continuous variation. In S. Berenson & K. Dawkins (Eds.). Proceedings of the annual meeting of the ınternational group for the psychology of mathematics education — North America (Vol. 1, pp. 298–304). North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• Saraç, M., & Karagöz Akar, G. (2017). A prospective secondary mathematics teacher’s development of the meaning of complex numbers through quantitative reasoning. In E. Galindo & J. Newton, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Indianapolis, IN (pp. 267–271). Hoosier Association of Mathematics Teacher Educator.
   Google Scholar
• Sayre, E., & Wittman, M. (2007, February 22–25). Intermediate mechanics students’ coordinate system choice [paper presentation]. The 10th special interest group of the mathematical association of america on research in undergraduate mathematics education,
   Google Scholar
• Seloane, P. M., Ramaila, S., & Ndlovu, M. (2023). Developing undergraduate engineering mathematics students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge of complex numbers using GeoGebra. Pythagoras, 44(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v44i1.763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302715
   Google Scholar
• Soto-Johnson, H., & Troup, J. (2014). Reasoning on the complex plane via inscriptions and gesture. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 36, 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, I. E. (2019). The role of multiplicative objects in a formula. In A. Weinberg, D. MooreRusso, H. Soto, & M. Wawro (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-second annual conference on research in undergraduate mathematics education, Oklahoma City, OK (pp. 273–281). RUME.
   Google Scholar
• Tasova, H. I., & Moore, K. C. (2020). Framework for representing a multiplicative object in the context of graphing. In A. I. Sacristán, J. C. Cortés-Zavala, & P. M. Ruiz-Arias (Eds.), Mathematics Education Across Cultures: Proceedings of the 42nd meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Mexico: Cinvestav (pp. 236–245). PME–NA.
   Google Scholar
• Tatar, E., Okur, M., & Tuna, A. (2008). Ortaöğretim matematiğinde öğrenme güçlüklerinin saptanmasına yönelik bir çalışma [A study to determine learning difficulties in secondary mathematics education]. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 16(2), 507–516.
   Google Scholar
• Tekin, D. (2019). A model for developing the multiplication of complex numbers (publication No. 597960) [ Master’s thesis Boğaziçi University], Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W. (1990). A theoretical model of quantity-based reasoning in arithmetic and algebra. Center for Research in Mathematics & Science Education: San Diego State University.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W. (1994). Students, functions, and the undergraduate curriculum. In E. Dubinsky, A. H. Schoenfeld, & J. J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education, 1 (issues in mathematics education Vol. 4, pp. 21–44). American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W. (2011). Quantitative reasoning and mathematical modeling. New Perspectives and Directions for Collaborative Research in Mathematics Education, WISDOMe Monographs, 1, 33–57.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W. (2022). Quantitative reasoning as an educational lens. In Karagöz Akar, G., S. Zembat & P. W. Thompson (Eds.), Quantitative reasoning in mathematics and science education (pp. 1–16). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14553-7_1
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W., & Carlson, M. P. (2017). Variation, covariation, and functions: Foundational ways of thinking mathematically. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 421–456). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W., Hatfield, N. J., Yoon, H., Joshua, S., & Byerley, C. (2017). Covariational reasoning among US and South Korean secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turanlı, N., Keçeli, V., & Naime, K. (2007). Ortaöğretim ikinci sınıf öğrencilerinin karmaşık sayılara yönelik tutumları ve karmaşık sayılar konusundaki kavram yanılgıları [Secondary school second grade students’ attitudes towards complex numbers and misconceptions about complex numbers]. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(2), 135–149.
   Google Scholar
• Usiskin, Z., Peressini, A. L., Marchisotto, E. A., & Stanley, D. (2003). Mathematics for high school teachers: An advanced perspective. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• von Glasersfeld, E. (1987). The construction of knowledge: Contributions to conceptual semantics (no. 3). Intersystems Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, E., Trigueros, M., & Ursini, S. (2016). Research on the learning and teaching of algebra. In Á. Gutiérrez, G. Leder, & P. Boero (Eds.), The second handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 73–108). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1007/9789463005616_004
   Google Scholar