Thin vs. Thick Morality Ethics and Gender in International Development Programs

References

• Adams, G. B., & Balfour, D. L. (2013). The prospects for reconciling sector-specific ethics in a context of blurred boundaries, ubiquitous networks and hypermodernity. In H. G. Frederickson & R. K. Ghere (Eds.), Ethics and Public Management (pp. 243–264). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Afshar, H. (2000). Gendering the millennium: Globalising women. Developmemt in Practice, 10(3/4), 527–534.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aune, J. B. (2000). “Logical framework approach and PRA: Mutually exclusive or complementary tools for project planning?” Development in Practice, 10(5), 687–690.
   Google Scholar
• Badin, S., & Goetz, A. M. (1997). Who needs [sex] when you can have [gender]? Feminist Review, 56, 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1994). Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience. World Development, 22(9), 1253–1268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts: Putting the first last. Warwickshire, UK: Practical Action.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, S. (2009). For a humanism amid hypermodernity: From a society of knowledge to a critical knowledge of society. Axiomathes, 19(4), 389–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleaver, F. (2002). Paradoxes of participation: Questioning participatory approaches to development. In M. Edwards & A. Fowler (Eds.), The Earthscan reader on NGO management (pp. 225–240). London, UK: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, R. (2003). The logical framework: An easy escape, a straitjacket, or a useful planning tool? Development in Practice, 13(1), 57–70.
   Google Scholar
• Dearden, P., & Kowalski, B. (2003). Programme and Project Cycle Management (PPCM): Lessons from South and North. Development in Practice, 13(5), 501–514.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, P., Monkman, K., & Miles, R. (2003). Social policy from the bottom up: Abandoning FGC in Sub-Saharan Africa. Development in Practice, 13(5), 445–458.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, S. (2003). Paradoxes of institutionalization: The depoliticisation of Bangladeshi NGOs. Development in Practice, 13(1), 5–26.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, A. (1996). Demonstrating NGO performance: Problems and possibilities. Development in Practice, 6(1), 58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G. (2009). Searching for virtue in the public life: Revisiting the vulgar ethics thesis. Public Integrity, 12(3), 239–246.
   Google Scholar
• Ghere, R. K. (2012). NGO leadership and human rights. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C. (1987). Moral orientation and moral development. In E. F. Kittay & D. T. Meyers (Eds.), Women and Moral Theory (pp. 19–33). Totowa, NJ: Rowan & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1998). The inclusion of the Other: Studies in political theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karlan, D., & Appel, J. (2011). More than good intentions: How a new economics is helping to solve global poverty. New York, NY: Dutton.
   Google Scholar
• Korten, D. C. (1980). Community organization and rural development: A learning process approach. Public Administration Review, 40, 480–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremer, M. (1993). The O-ring theory of economic development. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 551–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, F., & Sitaram S. (2002). Microfinance and women’s empowerment: A lesson from India. Development in Practice, 12(5), 575–588.
   Google Scholar
• Lekskes, J. (1998). Gender-awareness and policies: Theory and practice among small NGOs. Development in Practice, 8, 478–482.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mainzer, L. C. (1991). Vulgar ethics for public administration. Administration & Society, 23(1), 3–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makhoul, J., & Harrison L. (2002). Development perspectives: Views from rural Lebanon. Development in Practice, 12(5), 613–624.
   Google Scholar
• Mallick, R. (2002). Implementing and evaluating microcredit in Bangladesh. Development in Practice, 12(2), 153–163.
   Google Scholar
• Margalit, A. (2002). The ethics of memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayoux, L. (1998). Women’s empowerment and micro-finance programmes: Strategies for increasing impact. Development in Practice, 8(2), 235–241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchell, S. (1996). Gender and development: A SAFE recipe. Development in Practice, 6, 140–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mkenda-Mugittu, V. F. (2003). Measuring the invisibles: Gender mainstreaming and monitoring experience from a dairy development project in Tanzania. Development in Practice, 13, 459–473.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, C. O. (1993). Gender planning and development: Theory, practice, and training. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Padaki, V. (2000). Coming to grips with organisational values. Development in Practice, 10, 420–435.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. (2013). Public service morals and ethics: Thin/thick dilemmas in routine and critical situations. In H. G. Frederickson & R. K. Ghere (Eds.), Ethics and public management (pp. 42–58). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Schwickert, E. M., & Miller, S. C. (2005). Gender, morality, and the ethics of responsibility: Complementing teleological and deontological ethics. Hypatia, 20, 164–187.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smillie, I., & Hailey J. (2002). Managing for change: Leadership, strategy, and management in Asian NGOs. London, UK: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Song, S. (2005). Majority norms, multiculturalism, and gender equality. American Political Science Review, 99, 473–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C.R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• University of Wolverhampton. (n.d.). A guide for developing a logical framework. Walsall, UK: Centre for International Development and Training.
   Google Scholar
• Uphoff, N. (2002). Robert Chambers, Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50(3), 759–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willetts, J., & Crawford, P. (2007). The most significant lessons about the most significant change technique. Development in Practice, 19(6), 367–379.
   Google Scholar