Nonprofit Organizations in Governance Arrangements: Adding Democratic Value to Community Reinvestment Act Agreements?

REFERENCES

• Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashton, P. (2008). Advantage or disadvantage? The changing institutional landscape of underserved mortgage markets. Urban Affairs Review, 43(3), 352–402. doi:10.1177/1078087407306326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avery, R., Bostic, R., & Canner, G. (2005). Assessing the CRA’s necessity and efficiency. Housing Policy Debate, 16(1), 143–172. doi:10.1080/10511482.2005.9521537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, M. (2005). Credit where it counts: The community reinvestment act and its critics. New York University Law Review, 80, 513–652. http://www.nyulawreview.org/sites/default/files/pdf/NYULawReview-80-2-Barr.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boris, E. (2000). Nonprofit organizations in a democracy—Roles and responsibilities. In E. Boris & C. E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict (pp. 1–35). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2004). All organizations are public: Comparing public and private organizations. Washington, DC: Beard Books.
   Google Scholar
• California Reinvestment Coalition (CRC). (2015). Community Reinvestment Act. Retrieved from http://calreinvest.org/crc-issues/community-reinvestment-act
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, T. (2007, March 27). Make mortgage lending more responsible. The Boston Globe, p. A11. http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2007/03/27/make_mortgage_lending_more_responsible
   Google Scholar
• Casey, C., Glasberg, D., & Beeman, A. (2011). Racial disparities in access to mortgage credit: Does governance matter? Social Science Quarterly, 92(3), 782–806. doi:10.1111/j.1540–6237.2011.00792.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. (2012, August). Piereson: Death to New Deal and Democrats is imminent. Nonprofit Quarterly. Retrieved from http://nonprofitquarterly.org/2012/08/01/piereson-death-to-new-deal-and-democrats-is-imminent
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. (2015, July). Does philanthropy work against collection action by the poor? Nonprofit Quarterly. Retrieved from http://nonprofitquarterly.org/2015/07/06/does-philanthropy-work-against-collective-action-by-the-poor
   Google Scholar
• Colm, G. (1960). In defense of the public interest. Social Research, 27(3), 295–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courchane, M., Surette, B., & Zorn, P. (2004). Subprime borrowers: Mortgage transition and outcomes. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 29(4), 365–392. Doi:10.1023/B:REAL.0000044019.57580.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Agostino, M., & Kloby, K. (2011). Building community capacity to engage government: Reflections of nonprofit leaders on post-Katrina New Orleans. Administration & Society, 43(7), 749–769. doi:10.1177/0095399711413733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFilippis, J., Fisher, R., & Shragge, E. (2010). The limits and potential of local organizing. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Housing, & Urban Development–Treasury Task Force. (2000). Final report and recommendations of the predatory lending HUD-Treasury joint task force. Washington, DC: Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved from http://archives.hud.gov/reports/treasrpt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Dreier, P. (2003). Protest, progress, and the politics of reinvestment. In G. Squires (Ed.), Organizing access to capital: Advocacy and democratization of financial institutions (pp. 188–220). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eikenberry, A., & Kluver, J. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil Society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140. doi:10.1111/j.1540–6210.2004.00355.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council. (2015). Community Reinvestment Act: Background and purpose. Retrieved from www.ffiec.gov/cra/history.htm
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, A. J. (1992). The ongoing experiment with “regulation from below”: Expanded reporting requirements for HMDA and CRA. Housing Policy Debate, 3(2), 601–636. doi:10.1080/10511482.1992.9521104
   Google Scholar
• Foley, M. W., & Edwards, B. (1996). The paradox of civil society. Journal of Democracy, 7(3), 38–52. doi:10.1353/jod.1996.0048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glickman, N., & Servon, L. (1998). More than bricks and sticks: Five components of community development corporation capacity. Housing Policy Debate, 9(3), 497–539. doi:10.1080/10511482.1998.9521306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hague, M. S. (2011). Non-governmental organizations. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of governance (pp. 330–431). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9299.1991.tb00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudon, P. A. (2011). A critique of public-private partnerships in Quebec: Democratic deficiencies and unethical procurement. Public Integrity, 13(3), 257–274. doi:10.2753/pin1099–9922130306
   Google Scholar
• Immergluck, D. (2004). Credit to the community: Community reinvestment and fair lending policy in the United States. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Immergluck, D. (2008). Out of the goodness of their hearts: Regulatory and regional impacts on bank investment and housing and community development in the United States. Journal of Urban Affairs, 30(1), 1–20. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9906.2007.00371.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint Center for Housing Studies. (2002). The 25th anniversary of the Community Reinvestment Act: Access to capital in an evolving financial services system. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies. Retrieved from http://www.jchs.harvard.edu/sites/jchs.harvard.edu/files/cra02-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kee, J. E., & Forrer, J. (2012). PPPs: E-SCADs or partners in service? Public Integrity, 14(2), 193–202. doi:10.2753/pin1099–9922140205
   Google Scholar
• Koliba, C., Meek, J., & Zia, A. (2011). Governance in public administration and public policy networks. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kouzmin, A., Johnston, J., & Thorne, K. (2011). Economic SCADs: The dark underbelly of neoliberalism. Public Integrity, 13(3), 221–238. doi:10.2753/pin1099–9922130303
   Google Scholar
• Long, J., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsico, R. (2005). Democratizing capital: The history, law and reform of the Community Reinvestment Act. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirabella, R. (2013). Toward a more perfect nonprofit. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 35(1), 81–105. doi:10.2753/atp1084–1806350106
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Charitable Statistics (NCCS). (2013). National taxonomy of exempt entities. Retrieved from http://nccs.urban.org/classification/NTEE.cfm
   Google Scholar
• National Community Reinvestment Coalition. (2005). CRA commitments. Retrieved from http://www.ncrc.org/component/k2/item/237-cra-commitments
   Google Scholar
• North Central Massachusetts CRA Coalition. (2015). CRA coalition brochure. Retrieved from http://www.homesncm.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/CRA-Coalition-Brochure-Annual-Meeting-092809-PDF-File1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Pershing, S. P., & Austin, E. (2015). Organization theory and governance for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pogge, J. (1992). Reinvestment in Chicago neighborhoods: A twenty-year struggle. In G. Squires (Ed.), Organizing access to capital: Advocacy and democratization of financial institutions (pp. 133–138). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Shuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rathgeb Smith, S. (2010). Nonprofits and public administration: Reconciling performance management and citizen engagement. American Review of Public Administration, 40(2), 129–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathgeb Smith, S. (2012). Nonprofit organizations and creating public value (Working paper commissioned for the Center for Integrative Leadership). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Retrieved from http://www.leadership.umn.edu/documents/Smith7.20.12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Renuart, E. (2004). An overview of the predatory lending process. Housing Policy Debate, 15(3), 467–502. doi:10.1080/10511482.2004.9521511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saegert, S. (2006). Building civic capacity in urban neighborhoods: An empirically grounded anatomy. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(3), 275–294. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9906.2006.00292.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (1993). The marketization of welfare: Changing nonprofit and for-profit roles in the American welfare state. Social Service Review, 67(1), 16–39. doi:10.1086/603963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, B. (2012). Constructing society’s aide. Administration & Society, 44(8), 936–961. doi:10.1177/0095399711429107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, B. (2013). The road to market. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 35(1), 28–45. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806350103
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. (1998). From confrontation to collaboration? Banks, community groups, and the implementation of community reinvestment agreements. Housing Policy Debate, 9(3), 631–662. doi:10.1080/10511482.1998.9521310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sites, W., Chaskin, R., & Parks, V. (2007). Reframing community practice for the 21st century: Multiple traditions, multiple challenges. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(5), 519–541. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00363.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). The democratic anchorage of governance networks. Scandinavian Political Studies, 283, 195–218. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9477.2005.00129.x
   Google Scholar
• Squires, G. D. (Ed.). (1992). From redlining to reinvestment: Community responses to urban disinvestment. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Squires, G. D. (Ed.). (2003). Organizing access to capital: Advocacy and democratization of financial institutions. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• St. Louis Equal Housing, & Community Reinvestment Alliance (SLEHCRA). (2015). Welcome to SLEHCRA. Retrieved from http://www.slehcra.org
   Google Scholar
• Stoecker, R. (1996, May/June). Empowering redevelopment: Toward a different CDC. Shelterforce, 87 Retrieved from http://www.nhi.org/online/issues/87/cdcmodel.html
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M., & Ostrower, F. (2007). Acting in the public interest? Another look at governance research in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(3), 416–438. doi:10.1177/0899764006296049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J., & Silver, J. (2003). The essential role of activism in community reinvestment. In G. Squires (Ed.), Organizing access to capital: Advocacy and democratization of financial institutions (pp. 169–187). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tocqueville, A., & Bender, T. (1981). Democracy in America. New York, NY: Modern Library.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Fotel, T. (2009). Democratic anchorage of infrastructural governance networks: The case of the Femern belt forum. Planning Theory, 8(3), 282–308. doi:10.1177/1473095209104827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar