Social Media as a Public Values Sphere

REFERENCES

• Ausserhofer, J., & Maireder, A. (2013). National politics on Twitter: Structures and topics of a networked public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 16(3), 291–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 65–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D., Ahmad, N., Lishner, D. A., & Tsang, J. (2002). Empathy and altruism. In K. W. Brown & M. R. Leahy (eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypo-egoic phenomena (pp. 161–174). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, J. C., & Morris, J. S. (2010). MyFaceTube politics: Social networking Web sites and political engagement of young adults. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 24–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Johnson, J. (2015). The political economy of public values: A case for the public sphere and progressive opportunity. American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 61–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Sarewitz, D. (2005). Public values and public failure in US science policy. Science and Public Policy, 32(2), 119–136.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. (2009). Rhetoric and the public sphere: Has deliberative democracy abandoned mass democracy? Political Theory, 37(3), 323–350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M. R., Gonçalves, B., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2011). Political polarization on Twitter. ICWSM, 133, 89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2013). Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 319–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, P., & West, K. (2009). What do public values mean for public action? Putting public values in their plural place. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(6), 602–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (1998). The new golden rule: Community and morality in a democratic society. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Facebook Company statistics – Statistic Brain. (2017). Statistic Brain Research Institute, publishing as Statistic Brain. Retrieved from https://www.statisticbrain.com/facebook-statistics/
   Google Scholar
• Fox, C. J., & Miller, H. T. (1995). Postmodern public administration: Towards discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Garza, A. (2014, October). A herstory of the #BlackLivesMatter movement. Feminist Wire. Retrieved from http://www.thefeministwire.com/2014/10/blacklivesmatter-2
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London, UK: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, N. (2012). The subtle nature of Facebook politics: Swedish social network site users and political participation. New Media & Society, 14(7), 1111–1127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (2008). Notes on post‐secular society. New Perspectives Quarterly, 25(4), 17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D., & Gibbs, J. (2013). Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1159–1168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, R., Rohm, A., & Crittenden, V. L. (2011). We’re all connected: The power of the social media ecosystem. Business Horizons, 54(3), 265–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and internet connectivity effects. Information, Community & Society, 8(2), 125–147.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P. N., & Parks, M. R. (2012). Social media and political change: Capacity, constraint, and consequence. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 359–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, L., & Mauney, S. (2014, April). “As much as I love you, I’ll never get you to understand”: Political discourse and “face” work on Facebook. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Symposium About Language and Society, Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, T. B. (2006). Public values, their nature, stability and change. The case of Denmark. Public Administration Quarterly, 30(3–4), 365–398.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values an inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, T. B., & Vrangbæk, K. (2011). Value dynamics: Towards a framework for analyzing public value changes. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(8), 486–496.
   Google Scholar
• Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kietzmann, J. H., Silvestre, B. S., McCarthy, I. P., & Pitt, L. F. (2012). Unpacking the social media phenomenon: Towards a research agenda. Journal of Public Affairs, 12(2), 109–119.
   Google Scholar
• Kushin, M. J., & Kitchener, K. (2009). Getting political on social network sites: Exploring online political discourse on Facebook. First Monday, 14(11). Retrieved from http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2645
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. K., Choi, J., Kim, C., & Kim, Y. (2014). Social media, network heterogeneity, and opinion polarization. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 702–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loader, B. D., Vromen, A., & Xenos, M. A. (2014). The networked young citizen: social media, political participation and civic engagement. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McKee, A. (2004). The public sphere: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mergel, I. (2013a). A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 327–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mergel, I. (2013b). Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the US federal government. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 123–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mergel, I., & Bretschneider, S. I. (2013). A three‐stage adoption process for social media use in government. Public Administration Review, 73(3), 390–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monshipouri, M. (2017). Human rights in the digital age: Opportunities and constraints. Public Integrity, 19(2), 123–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T. (2012). Putting the “public” back in public values research: Designing participation to identify and respond to values. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 699–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2016. (2016, May 26). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/#
   Google Scholar
• Ng, E. W., & Detenber, B. H. (2005). The impact of synchronicity and civility in online political discussions on perceptions and intentions to participate. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 10(3), JCMC1033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M., & Cohen, J. (1996). For love of country: Debating the limits of patriotism. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society, 6(2), 259–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., & Sciortino, G. (2015). American society: Toward a theory of societal community. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25(6), 689–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, L., Lin, H., & Leung, A. K. (2013). Cultural differences and switching of in-group sharing behavior between an American (Facebook) and a Chinese (Renren) social networking site. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(1), 106–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. M. (1982). Contractualism and utilitarianism. In A. Sen & B. Williams (eds.), Utilitarianism and beyond (pp. 103–129). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Semaan, B. C., Robertson, S. P., Douglas, S., & Maruyama, M. (2014). Social media supporting political deliberation across multiple public spheres: towards depolarization. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 1409–1421). Baltimore, MD: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs, 90(1), 28–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silk, J. B., & House, B. R. (2011). Evolutionary foundations of human prosocial sentiments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(s2), 10910–10917.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skinner, J. (2011). Social media and revolution: The Arab Spring and the Occupy movement as seen through three information studies paradigms. Working Papers on Information Systems, 11, 169.
   Google Scholar
• Social media causes some users to rethink their views on an issue. (2016, November 7). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/07/social-media-causes-some-users-to-rethink-their-views-on-an-issue/
   Google Scholar
• Somers, M. R. (1993). Citizenship and the place of the public sphere: Law, community, and political culture in the transition to democracy. American Sociological Review, 58(5), 587–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Social media and political communication: A social media analytics framework. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(4), 1277–1291.
   Google Scholar
• Twitter Company statistics – Statistic Brain. (2017). Statistic Brain Research Institute, publishing as Statistic Brain. Retrieved from https://www.statisticbrain.com/twitter-statistics/
   Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., Nabatchi, T., & De Graaf, G. (2013). From galaxies to universe: A cross-disciplinary review and analysis of public values publications from 1969 to 2012. American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 13–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenar, L. (2001). Contractualism and global economic justice. Metaphilosophy, 32(1–2), 79–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardi, S., & Boyd, D. (2010). Dynamic debates: An analysis of group polarization over time on twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 316–327.
   Google Scholar
• Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the Web. London, UK: A & C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Johnson, T. J., Seltzer, T., & Bichard, S. L. (2010). The revolution will be networked: The influence of social networking sites on political attitudes and behavior. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 75–92.
   Google Scholar