184
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Ethical Problems Created by the Cultural Differences Between Migrants and the Native Population of Receiving Cities

REFERENCES

  • Benhabib, J. (1996). On the political economy of immigration. European Economic Review, 40(9), 1737–1743. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(95)00122-0
  • Bentham, J. (1996). The collected works of Jeremy Bentham: An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. doi:10.1093/actrade/9780198205166.book.1
  • Bhabha, H. (2015). Foreword. In P. Werbner & T. Modood (Eds.), Debating cultural hybridity: Multicultural identities and the politics of anti-racism. London, UK: Zed Books.
  • Blake, M. (2014). The right to exclude. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 17(5), 521–537. doi:10.1080/13698230.2014.919056
  • Brandt, R. B. (1959). Ethical theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Carens, J. (1996). Realistic and idealistic approaches to the ethics of migration. International Migration Review, 30(1), 156–170. doi:10.1177/019791839603000113
  • Carmel, E. (2011). European Union migration governance: Utility, security, and integration. In E. Carmel, A. Cerami, & T. Papadopoulos (Eds.), Migration and welfare in the New Europe: Social protection and the challenges of integration (pp. 49–66). Portland, OR: Policy Press. doi:10.1332/policypress/9781847426444.003.0003
  • Chebel d’Appollonia, A. (2012). Frontiers of fear: Immigration and insecurity in the United States and Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. doi:10.7591/cornell/9780801450686.001.0001
  • Chebel d’Appollonia, A. (2015). Security, identity, adversity: The “French Touch” on the securitization of immigration. New York, NY: Council for European Studies at Columbia University. Retrieved from http://critcom.councilforeuropeanstudies.org/security-identity-adversity-the-french-touch-on-the-securitization-of-immigration
  • Chebel d’Appollonia, A. (2016). Response to reviews of “Frontiers of fear—Immigration and insecurity in the United States and Europe.” Journal of Ethics and Migration Studies, 42(4), 699–702. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2015.1123867
  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31522
  • Di Rosa, M., Melchiorre, M. G., Lucchetti, M., & Lamura, G. (2012). The impact of migrant work in the elder care sector: Recent trends and empirical evidence in Italy. European Journal of Social Work, 15(1), 9–27. doi:10.1080/13691457.2011.562034
  • Epstein, G. S. (2010). Informational cascades and the decision to migrate. In G. S. Epstein & I. N. Gang (Eds.), Migration and culture (Vol. 8, pp. 25–44). Bingley, UK: Emerald. doi:10.1108/S1574-8715(2010)0000008008
  • Epstein, G. S., & Gang, I. N. (Eds.) (2010). Migration and culture (Vol. 8). Bingley, UK: Emerald. doi:10.1108/S1574-8715(2010)8
  • Epstein, G. S., & Kahana, N. (2008). Child labor and temporary emigration. Economics Letters, 99(3), 545–548. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2007.09.047
  • Espejo, P. O. (2014). People, territory, and legitimacy in democratic states. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 466–478. doi:10.1111/ajps.12064
  • Facchini, G., & Testa, C. (2009). Who is against a common market? Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(5), 1068–1100. doi:10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.5.1068
  • Frederickson, H. G., Smith, K. B., Larimer, C. W., & Licari, M. J. (2016). The public administration theory primer. New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429494369
  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 23–48. doi:10.1257/jep.20.2.23
  • Hare, R. M. (1952). The language of morals. London, UK: Oxford. doi:10.1093/0198810776.001.0001
  • Herzfeld, M. (2014). Cultural intimacy: Social poetics in the nation-state. New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203826195
  • Higgins, P. (2013). Immigration justice. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press. doi:10.3366/edinburgh/9780748670260.001.0001
  • Katav-Herz, S. (2010). The implications of social norms on immigration policy. In G. S. Epstein & I. N. Gang (Eds.), Migration and culture (Vol. 8, pp. 677–689). Bingley, UK: Emerald. doi:10.1108/S1574-8715(2010)0000008033
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions: Structure (Vol. 2). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Martinelli, A. (2005). The European identity. In E. Ben-Rafael, S. N. Eisenstadt, & Y. Sternberg (Eds.), Comparing modernities: Essays in homage to Shmuel N. Eisenstadt (Vol. 1, pp. 581–604). Leiden, Netherlands, & Boston, MA: Brill.
  • Monro, D. H. (1967). Empiricism and ethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ortega, F. (2005). Immigration quotas and skill upgrading. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9–10), 1841–1863. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.012
  • Polachek, S. W., & Horvath, F. W. (1977). A life cycle approach to migration: Analysis of the perspicacious peregrinator. In R. Ehrenberg (Ed.), Research in labor economics (Vol. 1, pp. 103–149). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Sahin, M., Nijkamp, P., & Stough, R. (2011). Impact of urban conditions on firm performance of migrant entrepreneurs: A comparative Dutch–US study. Annals of Regional Science, 46(3), 661–689. doi:10.1007/s00168-009-0351-2
  • Shachar, A., & Hirschl, R. (2014). On citizenship, states, and markets. Journal of Political Philosophy, 22(2), 231–257. doi:10.1111/jopp.12034
  • Siniver, E. (2010). Culture, investment in language and earnings. In G. Epstein & I. Gang (Eds.), Migration and culture (Vol. 8, pp. 269–292). Bingley, UK: Emerald. doi:10.1108/S1574-8715(2010)0000008017
  • Smart, J. J. C., & Williams, B. (1973). Utilitarianism: For and against. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511840852
  • Smith, N. (2012, April 10). All ethical roads lead to open borders. Open Borders: The Case. Retrieved from https://openborders.info/blog/all-ethical-roads-lead-to-open-borders
  • Spates, J. L. (1976). Counterculture and dominant culture values: A cross-national analysis of the underground press and dominant culture magazines. American Sociological Review, 41(5), 868–883. doi:10.2307/2094732

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.