1,675
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Value Contextuality in Public Service Delivery. An Analysis of Street-Level Craftsmanship and Public–Private Partnerships

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Andersen, L. B., Beck Jørgensen, T., Kjeldsen, A. M., Pedersen, L. H., & Vrangbaek, K. (2012). Public value dimensions: Developing and testing a multi-dimensional classification. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(11), 715–728. doi:10.1080/01900692.2012.670843
  • Beck Jørgensen, T., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354–381. doi:10.1177/0095399707300703
  • Bevir, M. (2010). Democratic governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Bovaird, T. (2004). Public-private partnerships: From contested concepts to prevalent practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70(2), 199–215. doi:10.1177/0020852304044250
  • Bovens, M. A. P., ‘t Hart, P., & van Twist, M. J. W. (2007/2012). Openbaar Bestuur– Beleid, organisatie en politiek [Public governance. policy, organization and politics] (7th and 8th ed.). Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Bovens, M. A. P., Schillemans, T., & ‘t Hart, P. (2008). Does public accountability work? An assessment tool. Public Administration, 86(1), 225–242. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00716.x
  • Box, R. C. (1999). Running government like a business: Implications for public administration theory and practice. The American Review of Public Administration, 29(1), 19–43. doi:10.1177/02750749922064256
  • De Graaf, G. (2015). The bright future of value pluralism in public administration. Administration & Society, 47(9), 1094–1102. doi:10.1177/0095399715598346
  • De Graaf, G., Huberts, L., & Smulders, R. (2016). Coping with public value conflicts. Administration & Society, 48(9), 1101–1127. doi:10.1177/0095399714532273
  • Dutch Ministry of Finances. (2016/2017). Voortgansrapportage DBFM(O) 2016/2017. Retrieved from https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/binaries/rijksoverheid/documenten/kamerstukken/2016/10/03/bijlage-voortgangsrapportage-dbfm-o-2016-2017/Voortgangsrapportage+DBFM%28O%29+2016-2017_1.pdf
  • Elliott, O. V., & Salamon, L. M. (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Evans, M. (2012). Beyond the integrity paradox–towards ‘good enough’ governance? Policy Studies, 33(1), 97–113. doi:10.1080/01442872.2011.637324
  • Fijnaut, C., & Huberts, L. (Eds.). (2002). Corruption, integrity and law enforcement. The Hague, the Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
  • Frederickson, H. G., Smith, K. B., Larimer, C. W., & Licari, M. J. (2012). The public administration theory primer (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. doi:10.1086/228311
  • Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance, 17(4), 525–548. doi:10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x
  • Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B., & Nasiritousi, N. (2009). Quality of government: What you get. Annual Review of Political Science, 12(1), 135–161. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-100608-104510
  • Huberts, L. (1998). What can be done against public corruption and fraud: Expert views on strategies to protect public integrity. Crime, Law and Social Change, 29(2/3), 209–224.
  • Huberts, L. (2007). Pathology of the state: Diagnosing in terms of corruption or integrity. In D. Argyriades, O. P. Dwivedi, & J. G. Jabbra (Eds.), Public administration in transition. A fifty year trajectory worldwide. Essays in honor of Gerald E. Caiden (pp. 202–217). London, England & Portland, OR: Vallentine Mitchell.
  • Huberts, L. (2014). The integrity of governance: What is it, what we know, what is done and where to go. Houndsmill, England: MacMillan.
  • Huberts, L., Maesschalck, J., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (Eds.). (2008). Ethics and integrity of governance: Perspectives across frontiers. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
  • Jaspers, S., & Steen, T. (2019). Realizing public values: Enhancement or obstruction? Exploring value tensions and coping strategies in the co-production of social care. Public Management Review, 21(4), 606–627. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1508608
  • Jensen, U. T., Andersen, L. B., & Jacobsen, C. B. (2019). Only when we agree! How value congruence moderates the impact of goal-oriented leadership on public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 79(1), 12–24. doi:10.1111/puar.13008
  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2006). Measuring Corruption: Myths and Realities. Retrieved from Washington: http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/anticorrupt/corecourse2007/Myths.pdf.
  • Kunneman, H., P. (Ed.). (2012). Good work: The ethics of craftsmanship. Amsterdam: Humanistics University Press.
  • Lawton, A., Huberts, L., & van Der Wal, Z. (2016). Towards a global ethics: Wishful thinking or a strategic necessity?. In A. Lawton, Z. van Der Wal, & L. Huberts (Eds.), Ethics in public policy and management: A global research companion (pp. 327–343). London, England and New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Oldenhof, L., Postma, J., & Putters, K. (2014). On justification work: How compromising enables public managers to deal with conflicting values. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 52–63. doi:10.1111/puar.12153
  • Paanakker, H. (forthcoming). Street level craftsmanship in times of austerity and reform: Assessing value convergence between policy makers, managers and street level professionals in the Dutch prison sector. Under revision.
  • Paanakker, H. (2020). Professionalism and public craftsmanship at street level. In H. Paanakker, A. Masters, & L. Huberts (Eds.), Quality of governance: Values and violations. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Paanakker, H. (2019). Values of public craftsmanship: The mismatch between street-level ideals and institutional facilitation in the prison sector. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(8), 884–896. doi:10.1177/0275074019859944.
  • Paanakker, H., Masters, A. & Huberts, L. (Eds.) (2020). Quality of governance: Values and violations. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-21522-4.
  • Perry, J. L. (2000). Bringing society in: Toward a theory of public-service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 471–488. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024277
  • Perry, J. L., de Graaf, G., van der Wal, Z., & van Montfort, C. (2014). Returning to our roots: “Good government” evolves to “good governance.” Public Administration Review, 74(1), 27–28. doi:10.1111/puar.12164
  • Polanyi, M. (2009). The tacit dimension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725. doi:10.1002/smj.249
  • Reynaers, A. M., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2015). Trasnsparency in public-private partnerships: Not so bad after all? Public Administration, 93(3), 609–626. doi:10.1111/padm.12142
  • Reynaers, A.-M. (2014a). It takes two to tangle: Public-private partnerships and their impact on public values (Doctoral dissertation). Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Reynaers, A.-M. (2014b). Public values in public–private partnerships. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 41–50. doi:10.1111/puar.12137
  • Reynaers, A.-M., & Paanakker, H. (2016). To privatize or not? Addressing public values in a semiprivatized prison system. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(1), 6–14. doi:10.1080/01900692.2015.1028637
  • Reynaers, A.-M., & Parrado, S. (2017). Responsive regulation in public‐private partnerships: Between deterrence and persuasion. Regulation & Governance, 11(3), 269–281. doi:10.1111/rego.12121
  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham; Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (2016). Recovering the craft of public administration. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 638–647. doi:10.1111/puar.12504
  • Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165–190. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x
  • Rutgers, M. R. (2015). As good as it gets? On the meaning of public value in the study of policy and management. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 29–45. doi:10.1177/0275074014525833
  • Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
  • Steenhuisen, B. (2009). Competing public values: Coping strategies in heavily regulated utility industries (Doctoral dissertation). Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands: Next Generation Infrastructures Foundation.
  • ‘t Hart, P. (2014). Ambtelijk vakmanschap 3.0. Zoektocht naar het handwerk van de overheidsmanager. [Craftsmanship among public administrators. Quest to the handwork of the public manager.]. Retrieved from https://www.nsob.nl/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/NSOB-Ambetlijk-vakmanschap.pdf.
  • Van der Wal, Z. (2008). Value solidity: Differences, similarities and conflicts between the organizational values of government and business (Doctoral dissertation). Vrije Universiteit, Enschede, Netherlands: Ipskamp Drukkers B.V.
  • Van der Wal, Z., & Yang, L. (2015). Confucius meets Weber or “Managerialism takes all”? Comparing civil servant values in China and the Netherlands. International Public Management Journal, 18(3), 411–436. doi:10.1080/10967494.2015.1030486
  • Van der Wal, Z., Nabatchi, T., & De Graaf, G. (2015). From galaxies to universe: A cross-disciplinary review and analysis of public values publications from 1969 to 2012. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 13–28. doi:10.1177/0275074013488822
  • Wang, X., & Wang, Z. (2019). Beyond efficiency or justice: The structure and measurement of public servants’ public values preferences. Administration & Society, 1–29. doi:10.1177/0095399719843658
  • West, K., & Davis, P. (2011). What is the public value of government action? Towards a (new) pragmatic approach to values questions in public endeavours. Public Administration, 89(2), 226–241. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01847.x
  • Witesman, E. M., & Walters, L. C. (2014). Public service values: A new approach to the study of motivation in the public sphere. Public Administration, 92(2), 375–405. doi:10.1111/padm.12000
  • Woods, N. (2000). The challenge of good governance for the IMF and the World Bank themselves. World Development, 28(5), 823–841. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00156-4
  • Yang, L. (2016). Worlds apart? Worlds aligned? The perceptions and prioritizations of civil servant values among civil servants from China and The Netherlands. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(1), 74–86. doi:10.1080/01900692.2015.1053614
  • Zheng, J., Roehrich, J. K., & Lewis, M. A. (2008). The dynamics of contractual and relational governance: Evidence from long-term public–private procurement arrangements. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14(1), 43–54. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2008.01.004