The Untold Stories: Women on the Front-Lines of Environmental Regulation

References

• Acker, J. (1992). From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions. Contemporary Sociology, 21, 565–569. https://doi.org/10.2307/2075528
   Google Scholar
• Arora-Jonnson, S. (2009). Discordant connections: Discourses on gender and grassroots activism in two forest communities in India and Sweden. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 35(1), 213–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora-Jonsson, S. (2014). Forty years of gender research and environmental policy: Where do we stand? Women's Studies International Forum, 47(Part B), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora-Jonsson, S., & Agren, M. (2019). Bringing diversity to nature: Politicizing gender, race, and class in environmental organizations. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 2(4), 874–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619866381
   Google Scholar
• Bakan, D. (1966). The Duality of Human Existence. Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Bardach, E., & Kagan, R. (2002/1982). Going by the book: The problem of regulatory unreasonableness. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J., Walker, J., & Grabosky, P. (1987). An enforcement taxonomy of regulatory agencies. Law & Policy, 9(3), 323–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1987.tb00414.x
   Google Scholar
• Central Intelligence Agency. (2020). World factbook: Denmark. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/da.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J. J. (2018). Framing the debate: How interest groups influence draft rules at the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Environmental Policy and Governance, 28(3), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among the five approaches. Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, D., & Jones, M. (2018). Narratives as tools for policy change. Policy & Politics, 46(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15230061022899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, K., Twenge, J. M., Clark, M. A., Shaikh, S. K., Beiler-May, A., & Carter, N. T. (2016). Attitudes toward women’s work and family roles in the United States, 1976–2013. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315590774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Equal Pay for Equal Work Task Force. (2020). Equal pay MT. Montana.Gov. https://equalpay.mt.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. (1984). The tyranny of structurelessnes. In untying the knot: Feminisim, anarchims, and organization. Dark Star/Rebel Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practice. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. (2003). Framing of environmental disputes. In R. Lewicki, B. Gray, & M. Elliot (Eds.), Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts (pp. 34–50). Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. (1984). Environment and enforcement: Regulation and the social definition of pollution. Claredon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilton, R. M., & O’Leary, R. (2018). Leading in place: Leadership through a different lens. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, B. M. (1997). Compliance: Regulation and environment. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., Shanahan, E. A., & McBeth, M. K. (Eds). (2014). The science of stories: Applications of the narrative policy framework in public policy analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kamieniecki, S. (2006). Corporate America and environmental policy: How often does business get its way? Stanford Law and Politics.
   Google Scholar
• Keiser, L., Wilkins, V., Meier, K., & Holland, C. (2002). Lipstick and logarithms: Gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 96(3), 553–563. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402000321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R. (2005). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R., Gray, B., & Elliott, M. (2003). Making sense of environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases. Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Mastracci, S., & Bowman, L. (2015). Public agencies, gendered organizations: The future of gender studies in public management. Public Management Review, 17(6), 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.867067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P., & Winter, S. (2000). Reconsidering styles of regulatory enforcement: Patterns in Danish agro-environmental inspection. Law & Policy, 22(2), 143–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9930.00089
   Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, C. (1999). General guidelines for conducting interviews. Free Management Library. https://managementhelp.org/businessresearch/interviews.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark. (2020a). The Danish Environmental Protection Agency. https://eng.mst.dk/
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark. (2020b). Organisation. Danish Environmental Protection Agency. https://eng.mst.dk/about-us/organisation/.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark. (2020). Gender Equality. https://um.dk/en/gender-equality/
   Google Scholar
• Elmagrhi, M. H., Ntim, C., Elamer, A., & Zhang, Q. (2019). A study of environmental policies and regulations, governance: structures, and environmental performance: The role of female directors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montana Department of Environmental Quality. (2020a). Organizational structure. https://deq.mt.gov/DEQAdmin/about/orgchart.
   Google Scholar
• Montana Department of Environmental Quality. (2020b). Department of Environmental Quality Directory. https://directory.mt.gov/govt/state-dir/agency/deq.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, V. L. (2006). Are street level bureaucrats compelled or enticed to cope? Public Administration, 84(4), 861–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00616.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, V. L. (2015). Personal attributes and institutions: Gender and the behavior of public employees. Why gender matters to not only gendered policy areas. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1005–1029. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C. (2010). Knowledge into action: Framing the debates over climate change and poverty. In Paul D’Angelo & Jim A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 43–83). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pautz, M. (2009). Trust between regulators and the regulated: A case study of environmental inspectors and facility personnel in Virginia. Politics & Policy, 37(5), 1047–1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2009.00210.x
   Google Scholar
• Pautz, M. C., & Rinfret, S. R. (2013). The lilliputians of environmental regulation: The perspective of state regulators. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pautz, M. C., & Wamsley, C. S. (2012). Pursuing trust in environmental regulatory interactions: The significance of inspectors’ interactions with the regulated community. Political Science Faculty Publications, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Pautz, M., & Rinfret, S. (2016). State environmental regulators: Perspectives about trust with their regulatory counterparts. Journal of Public Affairs, 16(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M. (2005). How management matters: Street-level bureaucrats and welfare reform. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rinfret, S. R. (2011). Behind the shadows: Interest groups and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Human Dimensions of Wildlife. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 16(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2011.536910
   Google Scholar
• Rinfret, S., & Pautz, M. (2019). Environmental policy in action. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, D. (1977). Federal equal employment opportunity: Politics and public personnel administration. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Selden, S. C. (1997). The promise of representative bureaucracy: Diversity and responsiveness in a government agency. ME Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2014). Getting to the helm: Women in leadership in federal regulation. Public Organization Review, 14(4), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0240-0
   Google Scholar
• Sneed, B. (2007). Glass walls in state bureaucracies: Examining the difference departmental function can make. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 880–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00775.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, C. (2000). Bureau men, settlement women: Constructing public administration in the progressive era. University of Kansas Press.
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. (2020). Montana facts. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/MT.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar