Using Participatory Action Research as a Liberatory Tool in Nonprofit Organizations

References

• Anderson, G. (2017). Participatory action research (PAR) as democratic disruption: New public management and educational research in schools and universities. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(5), 432–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2017.1303211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta, S., & Goltz, H. H. (2014). Transforming practices: A primer on action research. Health Promotion Practice, 15(4), 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839914527591
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alvord, L. A., & Van Pelt, E. C. (1999). The scalpel and the silver bear. Bantam.
   Google Scholar
• Atack, I. (1999). Four criteria of development NGO legitimacy. World Development, 27(5), 855–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00033-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bautista, M. A., Bertrand, M., Morrell, E., Scorza, D. A., & Matthews, C. (2013). Participatory action research and city youth: Methodological insights from the Council of Youth Research. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 115(10), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311501005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckett, L., Glass, R. D., & Moreno, A. P. (2012). A pedagogy of community building: Re-imagining parent involvement and community organizing in popular education efforts. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 6(1), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, E. (2022). Peer research: co-producing research within the context of voluntary and community action. In Diarmuid McDonnell and Alasdair C. Rutherford (Eds.), Researching voluntary action (pp. 46–58). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, T., & Booth, W. (1999). Parents together: Action research and advocacy support for parents with learning difficulties. Health & Social Care in the Community, 7(6), 464–474. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2524.1999.00214.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostock, J., & Freeman, J. (2003). ‘No limits’: Doing participatory action research with young people in Northumberland. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 13(6), 464–474. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, N. M., & Bright, D. S. (2007). Appreciative inquiry as a mode of action research for community psychology. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(8), 1019–1036. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L. D., & Tandon, R. (1983). Ideology and political economy in inquiry: Action research and participatory research. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 19(3), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638301900306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brydon-Miller, M. (2008). Ethics and action research: Deepening our commitment to principles of social justice and redefining systems of democratic practice. In Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (Vol. 2, pp. 199–210). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, B., Harris, M., & Young, P. (2005). Building the capacity of the voluntary nonprofit sector: Challenges of theory and practice. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(9–10), 869–885. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-200067377
   Google Scholar
• Carey-Smith, M. T., Nelson, K. J., & May, L. J. (2007). Improving information security management in nonprofit organisations with action research. Retrieved November 1, 2020, from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/14346/
   Google Scholar
• Cassell, C., & Johnson, P. (2006). Action research: Explaining the diversity. Human Relations, 59(6), 783–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726706067080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts. Intermediate Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D., & Torbert, W. R. (2003). Transforming inquiry and action: Interweaving 27 flavors of action research. Action Research, 1(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503030012002
   Google Scholar
• Feeney, S. (2000). Symposium: authority, legitimacy, voice, and the scholar-practice question. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764000291001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1979). The history of sexuality (part 1). Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, C. A., & Carter, H. C. (2001). Participatory education for sustainable agriculture: Everyone a teacher, everyone a learner. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 18(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v18n01_06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed (revised). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Frumkin, P. (2009). On being nonprofit: A conceptual and policy primer. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J. (1982). Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian valley. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J., & Cornwall, A. (2008). Power and knowledge. In Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 172–189). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gellermann, W., Frankel, M. S., & Ladenson, R. F. (1990). Values and ethics in organization and human systems development: Responding to dilemmas in professional life. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Giachello, A. L., Arrom, J. O., Davis, M., Sayad, J. V., Ramirez, D., Nandi, C., & Ramos, C. (2003). Reducing diabetes health disparities through community-based participatory action research: The Chicago Southeast Diabetes Community Action Coalition. Public Health Reports, 118(4), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3549(04)50255-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. J. (2012). Who counts reality and why it counts: searching for a community-based approach to quantitative inquiry. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 27(2), 137–149.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 191–216). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, B. (2011). Climate airwaves: Community radio, action research and advocacy for climate justice in Ghana. International Journal of Communication, 5, 2035–2058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidayat, D., & Stoecker, R. (2018). Community-based organizations and environmentalism: How much impact can small, community-based organizations working on environmental issues have? Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 8(4), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-018-0520-7
   Google Scholar
• Hilsen, A. I. (2006). And they shall be known by their deeds: Ethics and politics in action research. Action Research, 4(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750306060539
   Google Scholar
• Horton, M., & Freire, P. (1990). We make the road by walking: Conversations on education and social change. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, M., & Zhu, J. (2021). Fostering civil society through community empowerment: An extended case of the Sichuan Earthquake in China. Administration & Society, 53(1), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720910508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel, B. A., Schurman, S. J., & Hugentobler, M. K. (1992). Conducting action research: relationships between organization members and researchers. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 28(1), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886392281008
   Google Scholar
• Kaslon, L., Lodl, K., & Greve, V. (2005). Online leader training for 4-H volunteers: A case study of action research. Journal of Extension, 43(2), Article 7. https://www.joe.org/joe/2005april/a4.php
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S. (2008). Critical theory and participatory action research. In H. Bradbury & P. Reason (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 121–138). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, T., Selim, P. A. M., & Kralik, D. (2002). Enhancing lives through the development of a community‐based participatory action research programme. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 11(1), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2002.00563.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykes, M. B. (2013). Participatory and action research as a transformative praxis: Responding to humanitarian crises from the margins. The American Psychologist, 68(8), 774–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykes, M. B., & Mallona, A. (2008). Towards transformational liberation: Participatory and action research and praxis. In H. Bradbury & P. Reason (Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 106–120). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Magendzo, S. (1990). Popular education in nongovernmental organizations: education for social mobilization? Harvard Educational Review, 60(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.60.1.j618176u87205x88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, J., & Marshall, P. (2001). The dual imperatives of action research. Information Technology & People, 14(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840110384771
   Google Scholar
• Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (Eds.). (2011). Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Moxley, D. P. (2003). Factors influencing the successful use of vision-based strategy planning by nonprofit human service organizations. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 7(1), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-07-01-2004-B006
   Google Scholar
• National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regula tions-and-policy/belmont-report.
   Google Scholar
• Nel, H., & Pretorius, E. (2012). Applying appreciative inquiry in building capacity in a nongovernmental organization for youths: An example from Soweto, Gauteng, South Africa. Social Development Issues, 34(1), 37–55.
   Google Scholar
• Nusem, E., Wrigley, C., & Matthews, J. (2017). Developing design capability in nonprofit organizations. Design Issues, 33(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyden, P., & Wiewel, W. (1992). Collaborative research: Harnessing the tensions between researcher and practitioner. The American Sociologist, 23(4), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691930
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30–61). Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Ozanne, J. L., & Anderson, L. (2010). Community action research. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 29(1), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.29.1.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozanne, J. L., & Saatcioglu, B. (2008). Participatory action research. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1086/586911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkes, M., & Panelli, R. (2001). Integrating catchment ecosystems and community health: the value of participatory action research. Ecosystem Health, 7(2), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-0992.2001.007002085.x
   Google Scholar
• Puma, J., Bennett, L., Cutforth, N., Tombari, C., & Stein, P. (2009). A case study of a community-based participatory evaluation research (CBPER) project: Reflections on promising practices and shortcomings. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 15(2), 34–47.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P. E. (1994). Participation in human inquiry. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P.E., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, G., & Dick, B. (2003). Emancipatory design choices for action research practitioners. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 13(6), 486–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, L., Wallerstein, N., Lucero, J., Fredine, H. J., Keefe, J., & O’Connell, J. (2006). Woman to woman: Coming together for positive change—using empowerment and popular education to prevent HIV in women. AIDS Education and Prevention, 18(5), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2006.18.5.390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, J., Mutschler, C., McShane, K., & Habal-Brosek, C. (2017). Qualitative participatory evaluation of a psychosocial rehabilitation program for individuals with severe mental illness. International Journal of Mental Health, 46(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2017.1278964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxton, G. D. (2005). The participatory revolution in nonprofit management. The Public Manager, 34, 34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, M. M. (2015). Building fundraising momentum: Message, relationship, and alliance essentials. Retrieved November 1, 2020, from http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/rethinkit_proceedings/2
   Google Scholar
• Stoecker, R. (2012). CBR and the two forms of social change. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 27, 83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Stoecker, R. (2013). Research methods for community change: A project-based approach. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stoecker, R., Reece, K., & Konkle, T. (2018). From relationships to impact in community-university partnerships. In M. Seal (Ed.), Participatory pedagogic impact research: Co-production with community partners in action (pp. 214–227). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stoecker, R., & Brydon-Miller, M. (2013). Action research. In A. A. Trainor & E. Graue (Eds.), Reviewing qualitative research in the social sciences (pp. 21–37). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strickland, R. A., & Vaughan, S. K. (2008). The hierarchy of ethical values in nonprofit organizations: A framework for an ethical, self-actualized organizational culture. Public Integrity, 10(3), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922100303
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. R., Braveman, B., & Hammel, J. (2004). Developing and evaluating community-based services through participatory action research: Two case examples. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.58.1.73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thayer, C. E. (2006). Participatory evaluation in nonprofit organizations: Rhetoric or reality? The George Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations, 4(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675100400101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, N., Polascek, M., & Maltrud, K. (2002). Participatory evaluation model for coalitions: The development of systems indicators. Health Promotion Practice, 3(3), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/152483990200300306
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. C. (1999). Photovoice: A participatory action research strategy applied to women’s health. Journal of Women’s Health, 8(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.1999.8.185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan, J. (2005). Popular education for the environment: Building interest in the educational dimension of social action. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0814062600001002
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, G. R., & Prosser, S. (2002). Action research: politics, ethics and participation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40(5), 587–593. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02416.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar