Advanced search
Publication Cover
Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy Volume 8, 2001 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
2,399
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Measuring Kitchen Performance: What Assessment Should we Choose?

Naomi Josman, Smadar Birnboim From the Department of Occupational Therapy, Uniersity of Haifa and the Technion, Haifa, Israel
Pages 193-202 | Published online: 12 Jul 2009

  • Katz N, editor. Cognition and occupation in rehabilitation: Cognitive models for intervention in occupational therapy. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association, 1998.
  • Katz N. Cognitive rehabilitation: Models for intervention and research on cognition in occupational therapy. Occup Ther Int 1994; 1: 49-63.
  • Neistadt ME. A critical analysis of occupational therapy approaches for perceptual deficits in adults with brain injury. Am J Occup Ther 1989; 44: 299-304.
  • Toglia JP. Approaches to cognitive assessment of the brain-injured adult: Traditional methods and dynamic investigation. Occup Ther Pract 1989; 1: 36-57.
  • Averbuch S, Katz N. Cognitive rehabilitation a retraining model for clients following brain injuries. In: Katz N, ed. Cognition and occupation in rehabilitation: Cognitive models for intervention in occupational therapy. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association, 1998; 99-123.
  • Giles MG. A neurofunctional approach to rehabilitation following severe brain injury. In: Katz N, ed. Cognition and occupation in rehabilitation: Cognitive models for intervention in occupational therapy. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association, 1998: 125-147.
  • Duchek JM, Abreu BC. Meeting the challenges of cognitive disabilities. In: Christiansen CH, Baum CM, eds. Enabling function and well-being. Thorofare, NJ: Slack, 1997; 288-311.
  • Dittmar SS, Gresham GE. Functional assessment and outcome measures for the rehabilitation health professional. Gaithersburg An Aspen, 1997.
  • Katz N, Hartman-Maier A. Metacognition: The relationships of awareness and executive functions to occupational performance. In: Katz N, ed. Cognition and occupation in rehabilitation: Cognitive models for intervention in occupational therapy. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association, 1998; 323-342.
  • Glosser G, Goodglass H. Disorders of executive control functions among aphasie and other braindamaged patients. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1990; 12: 485-501.
  • Zoltan B. Vision, perception, and cognition, 3rd edn. Thorofare, NJ: Slack, 1996.
  • Tranel D, Anderson SW, Benson A. Development of the concept of 'executive function' and its relations to the frontal lobes. In: Boiler F, Grafman J, eds. Handbook of neuropsychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994; 125-148.
  • Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment, 3rd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
  • Duran L, Fisher AG. Evaluation and intervention with executive function impairment. In: Unsworth C, ed. Cognitive and perceptual dysfunction: A clinical reasoning approach to evaluation and intervention. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company, 1999; 209-254.
  • Schwarte MF, Mayer NH, Fitepatrick-DeSalme EJ, Montgomery MW. Cognitive theory and the study of everyday action disorders after brain damage. J Head Trauma Rehab 1993; 8: 59-72.
  • Gillette N. The issue is--Research directions for occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther 1991; 45: 563-565.
  • Gillette N. The Foundation-Partners in promoting measurement AOTF and AOTA. Am J Occup Ther 1991; 47: 367.
  • Asher IE. Occupational therapy assessment tools: An annotated index, 2nd edn. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association, 1996.
  • Hinojosa J, Kramer P. Evaluation obtaining and interpreting data. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association, 1998.
  • Law M, Letts L. A critical review of scales of activities of daily living. Am J Occup Ther 1989; 43: 522-528.
  • Law M. Evaluating activities of daily living: Directions for the future. Am J Occup Ther 1993; 47: 233-237.
  • Ottenbacher KJ, Christiansen C. Occupational performance assessment In: Christiansen CH, Baum CM, eds. Enabling function and well-being. Thorofare, NJ: Slack, 1997; 104-135.
  • Baum C, Edwards DF. Cognitive performance in senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type: The kitchen task assessment Am J Occup Ther 1993; 5: 18-25.
  • Fisher AG. Assessment of motor and process skills, 2nd ed. Fort Collins: Three Star Press, 1997.
  • Jongbloed L, Brighton C, Stacey S. Factors associated with independent meal preparation, self-care and mobility in CVA patients. Can J Occup Ther 1988; 5: 259-263.
  • Neistadt ME. The Rabideau kitchen evaluation-revised: An assessment of meal preparation skill. Occup Ther J Res 1992; 12: 242-253.
  • Gitlin LN. Measuring performance in instrumental activities of daily living. In: Law M, Baum C, Dunn W, eds. Measuring occupational performance: Supporting best practice in occupational therapy. Thorofare, NJ: Slack, 2001; 161-182.
  • Fisher AG. The assessment of IADL motor skills: An application of many-facet Rasch analysis. Am J Occup Ther 1993; 47: 319-329.
  • Dillar M, Andonian L, Flores O, Lou L, MacRae A, Shakir M. Culturally competent occupational therapy in a diversely populated mental health setting. Am J Occup Ther 1992; 46: 723.
  • Fair A, Barnitt R. Making cup of tea as part of a culturally sensitive services. Br J Occup Ther 1999; 62: 199-205.
  • Magalhaes LC, Fisher AG, Beraspang B, Linacre JM. Cross-cultural assessment of functional ability. Occup Ther J Res 1996; 16: 45-63.
  • Dombrowski LB. Functional needs assessment program for chronic psychiatric patients. Tucson: Therapy Skill Builders, 1990.
  • Porter J, Watson G, Capra S. Food skills assessment tools for people with mental illness. Aust Occup Ther J 1998; 45: 65-71.
  • Cronbach LJ. Essentials of psychological testing 3rd ed. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.
  • Duncan M. Interpretation and application. In: Hinojosa J, Kramer P, eds. Evaluation obtaining and interpreting data. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association, 1998; 145-164.
  • Crist P. Standardized assessments: Psychometric, measurement and testing procedures. In: Hinojosa J, Kramer P, eds. Evaluation obtaining and interpreting data. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association, 1998; 77-106.
  • Neistadt ME. Occupational therapy for adults with perceptual deficits. Am J Occup Ther 1988; 43: 448455.
  • Fisher AG, Liu Y, Velozo CA, Pan AW. Cross-cultural assessment of process skills. Am J Occup Ther 1992; 46: 876-885.
  • Magalhaes LC, Fisher AG, Beraspang B, Linacre JM. Cross-cultural assessment of functional ability. Occup Ther J Res 1996; 16: 45-63.
  • Neistadt ME. A meal preparation treatment protocol for adults with brain injury. Am J Occup Ther 1993; 48: 431-438.
  • Singer RN, Cauraugh JH. The generalizability effect of learning strategies for categories of psychomotor skills. Quest 1985; 37: 103-119.
  • Dickerson A, Fisher AG. Age differences in functional performance. Br J Occup Ther 1993; 57: 686-692.
  • Doble S. Test-retest and inter-rater reliability of a process skill assessment. Occup Ther J Res 1991; 11: 8-23.
  • Lunz ME, Stahl JA. Judge consistency and severity across grading periods. Eval Health Prof 1990; 13: 425-444.
  • Bruninks RH, Woodcock RW, Weatherman RF, Hill BK. Development and standardization of the scales of independent behavior. Alien, TX: DLM Resources, 1985.
  • Doble SE, Fisher AG, Fisk JD, MacPherson KM. Validation of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) with elderly adults with dementia. Final Report to the Alzheimer's Association. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Dalhousie University, 1992.
  • Stein F, Cutler SK, ed. Clinical research in occupational therapy. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, 2000.
  • Gitlin LN. Measuring performance in instrumental activities of daily living. In: Law M, Baum C, Dunn W, eds. Measuring occupational performance. Supporting best practice in occupational therapy. Thorofare, NJ: Slack, 2001; 161-182.
  • Fisher AG, Short-DeGraff M. Nationality speakingimproving functional assessment in occupational therapy: Recommendations and philosophy for change. Am J Occup Ther 1993; 47: 199-200.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.