Awareness of driving disability in people with stroke tested in a simulator

References

• Mazer BL, Korner-Bitensky NA, Sofer S. Predicting ability to drive after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 743–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundqvist A, Gerdle B, Rönnberg J. Neuropsychological aspects of driving after stroke: In the simulator and on the road. Appl Cogn Psychol 2000; 14: 135–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundqvist A, Alinder J. Neuropsychological aspects of driving after brain lesion: Simulator study and on-road driving. Appl Neuropsychol 1997; 4: 220–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkilä V-M, Korpelainen J, Turkka J, Kallanranta T, Summala H. Clinical evaluation of the driving ability in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand 1999; 99: 349–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotrell V, Wild K. Longitudinal study of self-imposed driving restrictions and deficit awareness in patients with Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1999; 13: 151–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo M, McGehee DV, Dawson JD, Anderson SN. Simulated car crashes at intersections in drivers with Alzheimer Disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2001; 15: 10–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zomeren AH, Brouwer WH, Rothengatter JA, Snoek JW. Fitness to drive a car after recovery from severe head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 90–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marottoli R, Richardson E. Confidence, and self-rating of driving, ability among older drivers. Accid Anal Prev 1998; 30: 331–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schanke A-K, Sundet K. Comprehensive driving assessment: Neuropsychological testing and on-road evaluation of brain injured patients. Scand J Psych 2000; 41: 113–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tham K, Borell L. Motivation for training: A case study of four persons with unilateral neglect. Occup Ther Health Care 1996; 10: 65–79
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans L. Traffic safety. Science Service Society, Bloomfield Hills 2004
   Google Scholar
• Michon J. A critical view of driver behavioural models: What do we know, what should we do?. Plenum Press, New York 1985
   Google Scholar
• Patomella A, Caneman G, Kottorp A, Tham K. Identifying scale and person response validity of a new assessment of driving ability. Scand J Occup Ther 2004; 11: 70–7
   Google Scholar
• Patomella A, Kottorp A. An evaluation of driving ability in a simulator: A good predictor of driving ability after stroke? Proceedings of the Third International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driving Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lundqvist A, Alinder J. Driving after brain injury: Self-awareness and coping at the tactical level of control. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 1109–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano G, Schacter D. Awareness of deficits after brain injury. Oxford University Press, New York 1991
   Google Scholar
• Fisher AG. Uniting practice and theory in an occupational framework: 1998 Eleanor Clarke Slagle lecture. Am J Occup Ther 1998; 52: 509–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Model of human occupation: Theory and application3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2002
   Google Scholar
• Simmond M, Fleming J. Reliability of the self-awareness of deficits interview for adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2003; 17: 325–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgaro S, Prigatano G. Modification of the patient competency rating scale for use on an acute neurorehabilitation unit: the PCRS-NR. Brain Inj 2003; 17: 847–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherer M, Hart T, Nick T. Measurement of impaired self-awareness after traumatic brain injury: A comparison of the patient competency rating scale and the awareness questionnaire. Brain Inj 2003; 17: 25–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming J, Strong J, Ashton R. Self-awareness of deficits in adults with traumatic brain injury: How best to measure?. Brain Inj 1996; 10: 1–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tham K, Bernspång B, Fisher AG. Development of the assessment of awareness of disability. Scand J Occup Ther 1999; 6: 184–90
   Google Scholar
• Kottorp A. Assessment of awareness of disability: Development, administration and interpretation. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Occupational Therapy; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher AG. Assessment of motor and process skills, Vol. 1: development, standardization and administration manual7th ed. Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ekstam L, Uppgard B, Kottorp A, Tham K. The relationship between awareness of disability and occupational performance during the first year subsequent to stroke. Am J Occup Ther 2007; 61: 503–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tham K, Ginsburg E, Fisher AG, Tegner R. Training to improve awareness of disabilities in clients with unilateral neglect. Am J Occup Ther 2001; 55: 46–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patomella A-H, Tham K, Kottorp A. P-Drive: Assessment of driving performance after stroke. J Rehabil Med 2006; 38: 273–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouri FA, Lincoln NB. Validation of a cognitive assessment: Predicting driving performance after stroke. Clin Rehabil 1992; 6: 275–81
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg C, Caneman G, Samuelsson SM, Hakamies-Blomqvist L, Almkvist O. The assessment of fitness to drive after a stroke: The Nordic Stroke Driver Screening Assessment. Scand J Psychol 2003; 44: 23–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Winsteps–Rasch Model computer program. In: 3.63.0 ed. Chicago: winsteps.com; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Wright BD, Linacre JM. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1994; 8:3: 370
   Google Scholar
• Bond T, Fox C. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 2001
   Google Scholar
• Kottorp A, Bernspång B, Fisher AG. Validity of a performance assessment of activities of daily living for people with developmental disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res 2003; 47: 597–605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckase M. Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implications. J Educ Stat 1979; 4: 207–30
   Google Scholar
• Linacre J. Facets: Many-facet Rasch measurement programme. In: 3.61.0 ed. Chicago: MESA Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Fisk GD, Owsley C, Pulley LV. Driving after stroke: Driving exposure, advice, and evaluations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 1338–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson H, Lundberg C, Falkmer T, Johansson K. A Swedish survey of occupational therapists’ involvement and performance in driving assessments. Scand J Occup Ther 2007; 4: 215–20
   Google Scholar
• Hatakka M, Keskinen E, Gregersen NP, Glad A, Hernetkoski K. From control of the vehicle to personal self-control: Broadening the perspectives to driver education. Transport Research Part F 2002; 5: 201–15
   Google Scholar
• Svensson O. Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers?. Acta Psychol 1981; 47: 143–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Stroke Register in Sweden. Riks-Stroke Analyserande rapport Riks-Stroke (Analyserande rapport från Riksstroke för helåret 2005). För helåret 2005. Västerbottens Läns Landsting [online report] 2006 [cited 2007 June 25]. Available at: http://www.riks-stroke.org/content/analyser/Rapport05.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Foerch C, Misselwitz B, Sitzer M, Berger K, Steinmetz H, Neumann-Haefelin T. Difference in recognition of right and left hemispheric stroke. Lancet 2005; 366: 392–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakamies-Blomqvist L, Wahlström B. Why do older drivers give up driving?. Accid Anal Prev 1998; 30: 305–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar