Programme characteristics and everyday occupations in day centres and clubhouses in Sweden

References

• Anthony WA. Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1993;16:11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Onken SJ, Craig CM, Ridgway P, et al. An analysis of the definitions and elements of recovery: a review of the literature. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2007;31:9–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjörnstrand C, Bejerholm U, Eklund M. Participation in day centres for people with psychiatric disabilities: characteristics of occupations. Scand J Occup Ther. 2011;18:243–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raeburn T, Halcomb E, Walter G, et al. An overview of the clubhouse model of psychiatric rehabilitation. Australas Psychiatry 2013;21:376–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beard JH, Malamud TJ, Rossman E. Psychiatric rehabilitation and long-term rehospitalization rates: the findings of two research studies. Schizophr Bull. 1978;4:622–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Parliament Commitee on Psychiatric Care. Välfärd och valfrihet: service, stöd och vård för psykiskt störda: delbetänkande SOU 1992:46. [Welfare and choice: service, support and care for the mentally ill: interim report 1992:46]. Stockholm: Allmänna förlaget; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• National Board of Health and Welfare. Öppna jämförelse. Stöd till personer med funktionsnedsättning. [Open comparisons. Supports för people with disabilities]. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Becker DR, Drake RE. Individual placement and support: a community mental health center approach to vocational rehabilitation. Community Ment Health J. 1994;30:193–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund M, Tjornstrand C. Psychiatric rehabilitation in community-based day centres: motivation and satisfaction. Scand J Occup Ther. 2013;20:438–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macias C, Barreira P, Alden M, et al. The ICCD benchmarks for clubhouses: a practical approach to quality improvement in psychiatric rehabilitation. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52:207–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markström U, Karlsson M. Towards hybridization: the roles of Swedish non-profit organizations within mental health. VOLUNTAS Int J Voluntary and Nonprofit Org. 2013;24:917–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• http://www.sverigesfontanhus.se/wordpress/, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy CD, Garvin C, Macfarlane P, et al. An analysis of groups in consumer-centered programs. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2006;9:219.
   Google Scholar
• Norman C. The Fountain House movement: an alternative rehabilitation model for people with mental health problems, members’ descriptions of what works. Scand J Caring Sci. 2006;20:184–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiff JW, Coleman H, Miner D. Voluntary participation in rehabilitation: lessons learned from a clubhouse environment. Can J Community Ment Health 2008;27:65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner GA. Model of human occupation: theory and application. 4th ed. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being & justice through occupation. Ottawa: CAOT ACE; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock AA, Hocking C. An occupational perspective of health. 3rd ed. Thorofare (NJ): Slack; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bejerholm U, Eklund M. Occupational engagement in persons with schizophrenia: relationships to self-related variables, psychopathology, and quality of life. Am J Occup Ther. 2007;61:21–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly M, Lamont S, Brunero S. An occupational perspective of the recovery journey in mental health. Br J Occup Ther. 2010;73:129–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund M, Leufstadius C. Relationships between occupational factors and health and well-being in individuals with persistent mental illness living in the community. Can J Occup Ther. 2007;74:303–313.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eklund M, Bäckström M, Eakman A. Psychometric properties and factor structure of the 13-item satisfaction with daily occupations scale when used with people with mental health problems. Health Qual Life Outc. 2014;12:308–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebeiro Gruhl KL. Reflections on … the recovery paradigm: should occupational therapists be interested? Can J Occup Ther. 2005;72:96–102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iancu SC, Zweekhorst MBM, Veltman DJ, et al. Mental health recovery on care farms and day centres: a qualitative comparative study of users’ perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:573–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argentzell E, Leufstadius C, Eklund M. Factors influencing subjective perceptions of everyday occupations: comparing day centre attendees with non-attendees. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19:68–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Masso J, Avi-Itzhak T, Obler DR. The clubhouse model: an outcome study on attendance, work attainment and status, and hospitalization recidivism. Work 2001;17:23–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warner R, Huxley P, Berg T. An evaluation of the impact of clubhouse membership on quality of life and treatment utilization. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1999;45:310–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowbray CT, Holter MC, Mowbray OP, et al. Consumer-run drop-in centers and clubhouses: comparisons of services and resources in a statewide sample. Psychol Serv. 2005;2:54–64.
   Google Scholar
• Macias C, Rodican CH, Hargreaves WA, et al. Supported employment outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of ACT and clubhouse models. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57:1406–1415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonebaum AD, Boyd JK, Dudek KJ. A comparison of competitive employment outcomes for the clubhouse and PACT models. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57:1416–1420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund M, Gunnarsson AB, Sandlund M, et al. Effectiveness of an intervention to improve day centre services for people with psychiatric disabilities. Aust Occup Ther J. 2014;61:268–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund M, Markstrom U. Outcomes of a freedom of choice reform in community mental health day center services. Adm Policy Ment Health 2015;6:664–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson I, Argentzell E, Sandlund M, et al. Measuring perceived meaningfulness in day centres for persons with mental illness. Scand J Occup Ther. 2011;18:312–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjörnstrand C, Bejerholm U, Eklund M. Psychometric testing of a self-report measure of engagement in productive occupations. Can J Occup Ther. 2013;80:101–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund M, Gunnarsson BA. Content validity, clinical utility, sensitivity to change and discriminant ability of the Swedish Satisfaction with Daily Occupations (SDO) instrument: a screening tool for people with mental disorders. Br J Occup Ther. 2008;71:487–495.
   Google Scholar
• Eklund M, Sandlund M. The life situation of people with persistent mental illness visiting day centers: a comparative study. Community Ment Health J. 2012;48:592–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatnaland T, Vatnaland J, Friis S, et al. Are GAF scores reliable in routine clinical use? Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007;115:326–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Startup M, Jackson MC, Bendix S. The concurrent validity of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Br J Clin Psychol. 2002;41:417–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund M, Hansson L, Ahlqvist C. The importance of work as compared to other forms of daily occupations for wellbeing and functioning among persons with long-term mental illness. Community Ment Health J. 2004;40:465–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coniglio FD, Hancock N, Ellis L. Peer support within clubhouse: a grounded theory study. Community Ment Health J. 2012;48:153–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjornstrand C, Bejerholm U, Eklund M. Participation in day centres for people with psychiatric disabilities – a focus on occupational engagement. Br J Occup Ther. 2013;73:144–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doroud N, Fossey E, Fortune T. Recovery as an occupational journey: a scoping review exploring the links between occupational engagement and recovery for people with enduring mental health issues. Aus Occup Ther J. 2015;62:378–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony WA, Ellison ML, Rogers ES, et al. Implementing and evaluating goal setting in a statewide psychiatric rehabilitation program. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2014;57:228–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Κopelowicz A, Liberman R. Integrating treatment with rehabilitation for persons with major mental disorders. Psych Serv. 2003;54:1491–1498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecomte T, Wallace CJ, Perreault M, et al. Consumers’ goals in psychiatric rehabilitation and their concordance with existing services. Psychiatr Serv. 2005;56:209–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pernice-Duca F, Onaga E. Examining the contribution of social network support to the recovery process among clubhouse members. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2009;12:1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Barry AE. How attrition Impacts the internal and external validity of longitudinal research. J Sch Health 2005;75:267–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowbray CT, Woodward AT, Holter MC, et al. Characteristics of users of consumer-run drop-in centers versus clubhouses. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2009;36:361–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar