Skill clusters of ability to manage everyday technology among people with and without cognitive impairment, dementia and acquired brain injury

References

• Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, et al. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychol Aging. 2006;21:333–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emiliani PL. Assistive Technology (AT) versus Mainstream echnomlogy (MST): the research perspective. Technol Disabil. 2006;18:19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: a qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:578–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slegers K. The effects of computer training and internet usage on the use of everyday technology by older adults: a randomized controlled study. Educ Gerontol. 2007;33:91–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn N. Apart from technology: Understanding people's non-use of information and communication technologies in everyday life. Technol Soc. 2003;25:99–116.
   Google Scholar
• Munoz-Neira C, Lopez OL, Riveros R, et al. The technology: activities of daily living questionnaire: a version with a technology-related subscale. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2012;33:361–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygård L, Starkhammar S. The use of everyday technology by people with dementia living alone: mapping out the difficulties. Aging Ment Health. 2007;11:144–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinowsky C, Almkvist O, Kottorp A, et al. Ability to manage everyday technology: a comparison of persons with dementia or mild cognitive impairment and older adults without cognitive impairment. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5:462–469.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kassberg AC, Malinowsky C, Jacobsson L, et al. Ability to manage everyday technology after acquired brain injury. Brain Inj. 2013;27:1583–1588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson Lund M, Nygård L, Kottorp A. Perceived difficulty in the use of everyday technology: relationships with everyday functioning in people with acquired brain injury with a special focus on returning to work. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:1618–1625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygård L, Pantzar M, Uppgard B, et al. Detection of activity limitations in older adults with MCI or Alzheimer's disease through evaluation of perceived difficulty in use of everyday technology: a replication study. Aging Ment Health. 2012;16:361–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygård L, Kottorp A. Engagement in IADLs, social activities and use of everyday technology in older adults with and without cognitive impairment. Br J Occup ther. 2014;77:565–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryd C, Nygård L, Malinowsky C, et al. Associations between performance of activities of daily living and everyday technology use among older adults with mild stage Alzheimer's disease or mild cognitive impairment. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22:33–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedman A, Nygård L, Malinowsky C, et al. Changing everyday activities and technology use in mild cognitive impairment. Br J Occup Ther. 2016;79:111–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Occupational Therapy Association. Occupational therapy practice framework: domain and process (3rd Edition). Am J Occup Ther. 2014;68:S1–S48.
   Google Scholar
• Kottorp A, Nygård L, Hedman A, et al. Access and use of everyday technology among older people: an occupational justice issue - but for whom? J Occup Sci. 2016;23:382–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinowsky C, Almkvist O, Nygård L, et al. Individual variability and environmental characteristics influence older adults' abilities to manage everyday technology. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;24:484–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinowsky C, Nygård L, Kottorp A. Psychometric evaluation of a new assessment of the ability to manage technology in everyday life. Scand J Occup Ther. 2011;18:26–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygård L. Användarmanual För META (Users' Manual to the META). Stockholm (Sweden): Division of Occupational Therapy, Karolinska Institutet; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• SPSS. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (Software Program). 22.0 ed. Chicago (IL): SPSS Inc; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wojtasik V, Olivier C, Lekeu F, et al. A grid for a precise analysis of daily activities. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010;20:120–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patomella AH, Kottorp A, Malinowsky C, et al. Factors that impact the level of the level of difficulty of everyday technology in a sample of older adults with and without cognitive impairment. Technol Disabil. 2011;23:243–250.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg L. Navigating through technological landscapes. Views of people with dementia or MCI and their significant others [Doctoral thesis]. Stockholm: Sweden: Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Occupational Therapy. Karolinska Institutet; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Langdon P, Lewis T, Clarkson J. The effects of prior experience on the use of consumer products. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2007;6:179–191.
   Google Scholar
• Lindqvist E, Larsson TJ, Borell L. Experienced usability of assistive technology for cognitive support with respect to user goals. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;36:135–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg L, Nygård L. Learning and using technology in intertwined processes: a study of people with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease. Dementia (London). 2014;13:662–677.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Thong YUL, Xu X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 2012;36:157–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwens SF, van Heugten CM, Aalten P, et al. Relationship between measures of dementia severity and observation of daily life functioning as measured with the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS). Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008;25:81–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassberg AC, Prellwitz M, Malinowsky C, et al. Interventions aimed at improving the ability to use everyday technology in work after brain injury. Scand J Occup Ther. 2016;23:147–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marom B, Jarus T, Josman N. The relationship between the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) and the Large Allen Cognitive Level (LACL) Test in clients with stroke. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2009;24:33–50.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher AG, Griswold LA, Munkholm M, et al. Evaluating domains of everyday functioning in people with developmental disabilities. Scand J Occup Ther. 2016;24:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar