Expanding beyond individualism: Engaging critical perspectives on occupation

References

• Slater D. Geopolitics and the post-colonial: rethinking North-South relations. Malden (MA): Blackwell Publishing; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman D. Enacting the critical potential of occupational science: problematizing the ‘individualizing of occupation’. J Occup Sci. 2013;20:298–313.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Client-centred occupational therapy: the importance of critical perspectives. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22:237–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen J, Kanstrup AM, Josephsson S. The assumed relation between occupation and inequality in health. Scand J Occup Ther. 2016;23:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella EA. Knowledge paradigms in occupational science: Pluralistic perspectives. In: Whiteford G, Hocking C, editors. Occupational science: society, inclusion, participation. West Sussex (UK): Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. p. 69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie V, Cutchin M, Humphrey R. Occupation as transactional exprience: a critique of individualism in occupational science. J Occup Sci. 2006;13:83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito L, Perez FM. Neoliberalism and the commodification of mental health. Hum Soc. 2014;38:414–442.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey D. Neo-liberalism as creative destruction. Geografiska Annaler B. 2006;88:145–158.
   Google Scholar
• Ilcan S. Privatizing responsibility: public sector refor under neoliberal government. Foucault Stud. 2009;18:11–33.
   Google Scholar
• Brady M. Ethnographies of neoliberal governmentalities: from the neoliberal apparatus to neoliberalism and governmental assemblages. Foucault Stud. 2014;18:11–33.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl HM. Neo-liberalism meets the Nordic welfare state: gaps and silences. NORA. 2012;20:283–288.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey DA. Brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford (UK): Oxford Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Soss J, Fording RC, Schram SF. Discplining the poor: neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Polzer J, Power E, editors. Neoliberal governance and health: duties, risks, and vulnerabilities. Montreal (Canada): McGill-Queen’s University Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bourgeault IL. Sociological perspectives on health and health care. In: Bryant T, Raphael D, Rioux M, editors. Staying alive: critical perspectives on health, illness, and health care. Toronto (ON): Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc; 2010. p. 41–63.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson JM, Tang S, Blue C. Health care reform and the paradox of efficiency: ‘Writing in’ culture. Int J Health Serv. 2007;37:291–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laliberte RD. Governing through occupation: Shaping expectations and possibilities. In: Whiteford G, Hocking C, editors. Occupational science: society, inclusion, participation. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. p. 100–116.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlach AJ. Sharpening our critical edge: occupational therapy in the context of marginalized populations. Can J Occup Ther. 2015;82:245–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molineux M, Whiteford G. Occupational science: genesis, evolution and future contribution. In: Duncan E, editor. Foundations for Practice in Occupational Therapy. Churchill Livingstone (UK): Elsevier; 2011. p. 243–53.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW, Iwama M. Well-being and occupational rights: an imperative for critical occupational therapy. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19:385–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvaan R. The contextually situated nature of occupational choice: marginalized young adolescents’ experiences in South Africa. J Occup Sci. 2015;22:39–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malfitano APS, Lopes RE, Magalhães L, et al. Social occupational therapy: conversations about a Brazilian experience. Can J Occup Ther. 2014;81:298–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronenberg F, Pollard N. Political dimensions of occupation and the roles of occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther. 2006;60:617–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes S. Disability, work and welfare. Sociol Compass. 2012;6:472–484.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson JM, Rodney P, Reimer-Kirkham S, et al. Inequities in health and healthcare viewed through the ethical lens of critical social justice: contextual knowledge for the global priorities ahead. Adv Nurs Sci. 2009;32:282–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend EA, Stone SD, Angelucci T, et al. Linking occupation and place in community health. J Occup Sci. 2009;16:50–55.
   Google Scholar
• Galvaan R. Occupational choice: the significance of socio-economic and political factors. In: Whiteford G, Hocking C, editors. Occupational science: society, inclusion, participation. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. p. 152–62.
   Google Scholar
• Durocher E, Kinsella EA, McCorquodale L, et al. Ethical tensions related to systemic constraints: occupational alienation in occupational therapy practice. OTJR. 2016;36:216–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huot S, Laliberte Rudman D, Dodson B, et al. Expanding policy-based conceptualizations of ‘successful integration’: negotiating integration through occupation following international migration. J Occup Sci. 2013;20:6–22.
   Google Scholar
• Angell AM. Occupation-centered analysis of social difference: contributions to a socially responsive occupational science. J Occup Sci. 2012;21:104–116.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe JL, McLaren P, Steinberg SR. Critical pedagogy and qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The sage handbook of qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage Publications Inc; 2011. p. 163–177.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Sacred texts: a sceptical exploration of the assumptions underpinning theories of occupation. Can J Occup Ther. 2009;76:6–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach AJ, Browne AJ, Suto MJ. A critical reframing of play in relation to Indigenous children in Canada. J Occup Sci. 2014;21:243–258.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard N, Sakellariou DA. society founded on occupation. In: Pollard N, Sakellariou D, editors. Politics of occupation-centred practice: reflections on occupational engagement across cultures. West Sussex (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlach AJ. Early intervention for Indigenous families and children in British Columbia: a critical inquiry [doctor of philosophy]. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia; 2015. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2429/55065
   Google Scholar
• Thayer-Bacon BJ. Relational ‘(e)Pistemologies’. New York (NY): Peter Lang; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson S. Research Is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. Halifax (NS): Fernwood; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson JM. Toward a post-colonial feminist methodology in nursing research: exploring the convergence of post-colonial and black feminist scholarship. Nurs Res. 2002;9:7–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khan KB, McDonald H, Baumbusch JL, et al. Taking up postcolonial feminism in the field: working through a method. Womens Stud Int Forum. 2007;30:228–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JM. Lessons from a postcolonial-feminist perspective: suffering and a path to healing. Nurs Inq. 2004;11:238–246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson K. A recognition of being: reconstructing native womanhood. Toronto (ON): Sumach Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• LaRocque E. Reflections on cultural continuity: contuinuity through Aboriginal women's writings. In: Guthrie Valaskakis G, Dion Stout M, Guimond E, editors. Restoring the balance: first nations women, community, and culture. Winnipeg (MB): University of Manitoba Press; 2009. p. 149–174.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlach AJ, Browne AJ, Greenwood M. Engaging Indigenous families in a community-based early childhood program in British Columbia, Canada: a cultural safety perspective. Health Soc Care Community. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Teachman G. Interrogating inclusion: critical research with disabled youth who use augmentative and alternative communication [dissertation]. Toronto (ON): University of Toronto; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin MM. The dialogic imagination: four essays. Austin (TX): University of Texas Press; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards C, Imrie R. Disability and bodies as bearers of value. Sociology. 2003;37:239–256.
   Google Scholar
• Ravaud J, Stiker H. Inclusion/exclusion: An analysis of historical and cultural meanings. In: Albrecht G, Seelman K, Bury M, editors. Handbook of disability studies. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2001. p. 490–512.
   Google Scholar
• Graham LJ, Slee R. An illusory interiority: interrogating the discourse/s of inclusion. Educ Philos Theory. 2008;40:277–293.
   Google Scholar
• Njelesani J, Teachman G, Durocher E, et al. Thinking critically about client-centred practice and occupational possibilities across the life-span. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22:252–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for economic cooperation and development (OECD). Employment Outlook 2015. Paris (France): OECD Publishing; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Boland T. Seeking a role: discplining job seekers as actors in the labour market. Work Employ Soc. 2015;30:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman D. Risk, retirement and the ‘duty to age well’: shaping productive aging citizens in Canadian newsprint media. In: Polzer J, Power E, editors. Neoliberal governance and health: duties, risks and vulnerabilities. Toronto (CA): McGill-Queens University Press; 2016. p. 108–131.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich R, Callanan Y. Insights about studying discouraged workers. J Occup Sci. 2011;18:153–166.10.1080/14427591.2011.575756
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich R, McCarty C, Boyd B, et al. Empirical lessons about occupational categorization from case studies of unemployment. Can J Occup Ther. 2014;81:289–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich R, Laliberte Rudman D, Dickie VA. Resource seeking as occupation: a critical and empirical exploration. Am J Occup Ther. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Huot S. ‘Doing’ capital: examining the relationship between immigrants’ occupational engagement and symbolic capital. Migr Stud. 2017;5:29–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose N, O'Malley P, Valverde M. Govermentality. Annu Rev Law Social Sci. 2006;2:83–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky M. Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York (NY): Russell Sage Foundation; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman D, Aldrich R. ‘Activated, but stuck’: applying a critical occupational lens to examine the negotiation of long-term unemployment in contemporary socio-political contexts. Societies. 2016;6:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martson SA, Jones III JP, Woodward K. Human geography without scale. Trans Inst Br Geog. 2005;30:416–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhambra GK, de Sousa Santos B. Introduction: global challenges for sociology. Sociol. 2017;5:3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Galheigo SM. What needs to be done? Occupational therapy responsibilities and challenges regarding human rights. Aust Occup Ther J. 2011;58:60–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durocher E, Kinsella EA, Ells C, et al. Contradictions in client-centred discharge planning: through the lens of relational autonomy. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22:293–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Dyck I. Power and client-centred practice: an insider exploration of occupational therapists’ experiences. Can J Occup Ther. 2006;73:261–271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farias L, Laliberte Rudman D. A critical interpretive synthesis of the uptake of critical perspectives in occupational science. J Occup Sci. 2014;23:33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan S, Kinsella EA. Occupational identity: engaging socio-cultural perspectives. J Occup Sci. 2009;16:85–91.
   Google Scholar
• Ramugondo EL. Occupational terminology: occupational consciousness. J Occup Sci. 2015;22:488–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman D. Occupational terminology. J Occup Sci. 2010;17:55–59.
   Google Scholar
• Bailliard A. Justice, difference and the capability to function. J Occup Sci. 2016;23:3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailliard A, Aldrich R. Occupational justice in everyday occupational therapy practice. In: Pollard N, Sakellariou D, editors. Occupational therapies without borders: integrating justice with practice. Oxford (UK): Elsevier; 2016. p. 83–94.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Resisting theoretical imperialism in the disciplines of occupational science and occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther. 2011;74:27–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach AJ. A critical reflection on the concept of cultural safety. Can J Occup Ther. 2012;79:151–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzl JM, Hansen H. Structural competency: theorizing a new medical engagement with stigma and inequality. Soc Sci Med. 2014;103:126–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking C, Townsend EA. Driving social change: occupational therapists’ contributions to occupational justice. World Fed Occup Ther Bull. 2015;71:68–71.
   Google Scholar
• World Federation of Occupational Therapists. Position statement: human rights. 2006. Available from: http://www.wfot.org/aboutus/positionstatements.aspx
   Google Scholar