Translating the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure to Danish, addressing face and content validity

References

• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, et al. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 5th ed. Ottawa, Ont.: CAOT Publications ACE; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Carswell A, McColl M, Baptiste S, et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a research and clinical literature review. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71:210–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enemark Larsen A, Carlsson G. Utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as an admission and outcome measure in interdisciplinary community-based geriatric rehabilitation. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19:204–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris JE, Eng JJ. Goal priorities identified through client-centred measurement in individuals with chronic stroke. Physiother Can. 2004;56:171–176.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wressle E, Eeg-Olofsson A-M, Marcusson J, et al. Improved client participation in the rehabilitation process using a client-centred goal formulation structure. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34:5–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørkedal STB, Torsting AMB, Møller T. Rewarding yet demanding: client perspectives on enabling occupations during early stages of recovery from schizophrenia. Scand J Occup Ther. 2016;23:97–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson L, Mitchell G, Fleming J, et al. Clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Br J Occup Ther. 2012;75:337–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard LF, Knis-Matthews L. Are we really client-centered? Using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure to see how the client's goals connect with the goals of the occupational therapist. Occup Ther Ment Health. 2010;26:51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Cup EHC, Scholte op Reimer WJM, Thijssen MCE, et al. Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17:402–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjeken I, Dagfinrud H, Uhlig T, et al. Reliability of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:1503–1509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuntland H, Aaslund M, Langeland E, et al. Psychometric properties of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in home-dwelling older adults. Jmdh. 2016;9:411–423.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, et al. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 4th ed. København, Denmark: Ergoterapeutforeningen (Danish Association of Occupational Therapists); 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Dekkers M, Nielsen TL. Occupational performance, pain, and global quality of life in women with upper extremity fractures. Scand J Occup Ther. 2011;18:198–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oestergaard LG, Maribo T, Bünger CE, et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure's semi-structured interview: its applicability to lumbar spinal fusion patients. A prospective randomized clinical study. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:115–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckenna SP, Wilburn J, Thorsen H, et al. Adapting Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures for Use in New Languages and Cultures. In Christensen KB, Kreiner S, Mesbah M. Rasch Models in Health. 1st ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2013. doi:10.1002/9781118574454.
   Google Scholar
• Peña E. Lost in translation: methodological considerations in cross-cultural research. Child Dev. 2007;78:1255–1264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, et al. Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Regnault A, Herdman M. Using quantitative methods within the Universalist model framework to explore the cross-cultural equivalence of patient-reported outcome instruments. Qual Life Res. 2015;24:115–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker DL, Melnikow J, Ying M, et al. Translation of Health Surveys Using Mixed Methods. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010;42:430–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna S. Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving beyond misplaced common sense to hard science. BMC Med. 2011;9:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink L, Terwee C, Patrick D, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:539–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen T, Lambert H, Faber J. Reliability of the Danish version of the McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment for observation-based measures during meals. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19:488–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helle T, Iwarsson S, Brandt A. Validation of housing standards addressing accessibility: exploration of an activity-based approach. J Appl Gerontol. 2014;33:848–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman M, Fox Rushby J, Badia X. A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: the universalist approach. Qual Life Res. 1998;7:323–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend E, Polatajko H, editors. Enabling occupation II – Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being & justice through occupation. Ontario: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• General Assembly of the World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Coll Dent. 2014;81:14–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polit DF, Bech CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29:489–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neergaard MA, Olesen F, Andersen RS, et al. Qualitative description - the poor cousin of health research? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. BocaRaton, London, New York, Washington, DC: Chapman &Hall/CRC; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Bech CT, Owen CV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30:459–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM SPSS Statistics 23 core system user’s guide; 2014. http://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/documentation/statistics/23.0/en/client/Manuals/IBM_SPSS_Statistics_Brief_Guide.pdf cited June 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24:105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, etet al. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 5h edition ed. København, Denmark: Ergoterapeutforeningen (Danish Association of Occupational Therapists); 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kruk J. Good scientific practice and ethical principles in scientific research and higher education. Cent Eur J Sport Sci Med. 2013;1:25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Den Nationale Videnskabsetiske Komité. [The National Committee of Ethics in Science]. Act on Research Ethics Review of Health Research Projects 2013; 10.09.
   Google Scholar
• The Danish Data Protection Agency. Guidelines about Notification etc. of a Biomedical Research Project to the Committee System on Biomedical Research Ethics, No 9154; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht LH, Casteleijn JMF, Uys K. Could health care workers determine the occupational performance priorities of people with disability living in a developing community? S Afr J Occup Ther. 2008;38:8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Parker DM, Sykes CH. A systematic review of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a clinical practice perspective. Br J Occup Ther. 2006;69:150–160.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards M, Baptiste S, Stratford PW. Recovery after hip fracture: what can we learn from the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure? Am J Occup Ther. 2007;61:335–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens A, Beurskens A, Köke A, et al. The use of patient-specific measurement instruments in the process of goal-setting: a systematic review of available instruments and their feasibility. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27:1005–1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl-Jacobsen L, Hansen DG, Waehrens EE, et al. Performance of activities of daily living among hospitalized cancer patients. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22:137–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjeken I, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Kvien TK. Norwegian version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in patients with hand osteoarthritis: validity, responsiveness, and feasibility. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:709–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wressle E, Marcusson J, Henriksson C. Clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure-Swedish version. Can J Occup Ther. 2002;69:40–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polatajko H, Davis J, Hobson SJG, et al. Meeting the responsibility that comes with the privilege: introducing a taxonomic code for understanding occupation. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71:261–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher AG, Jones KB. Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. Vol. 1: Development, Standardization, and Administration Manual. Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Client-centred occupational therapy: the importance of critical perspectives. Scand J Occup Ther 2015; 2:237–243.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher A. Occupation-centred, occupation-based, occupation-focused: same, same or different?. Scand J Occup Ther. 2013;20:162–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Self-care, productivity, and leisure, or dimensions of occupational experience? Rethinking occupational categories. Can J Occup Ther. 2009;76:107–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattingly C. What is clinical reasoning? Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:979–986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquhoun H, Letts L, Law M, et al. Feasibility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for routine use. Br J Occup Ther. 2010;73:48–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan EAS, Murray J. The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquhoun H, Letts L, Law M, et al. Routine administration of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: effect on functional outcome. Aust Occup Ther J. 2010;57:111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquhoun H, Letts L, Law M, et al. Administration of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: effect on practice. Can J Occup Ther. 2012;79:120–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roch SG, Woehr DJ, Mishra V, et al. Rater training revisited: an updated meta-analytic review of frame-of-reference training. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2012;85:370–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen T, Madsen EE, Sørensen A. The effect of rater training on scoring performance and scale-specific expertise amongst occupational therapists participating in a multicentre study: A single-group pre–post-test study. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:1216–1226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pannucci CJ, Wilkins EG. Identifying and Avoiding Bias in Research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:619–625. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de24bc.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckstead JW. Content validity is naught. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46:1274–1283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23:334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar