Mining concepts of health responsibility using text mining and exploratory graph analysis

References

• Björklund A, Svensson T, Read S. Holistic and biomedical concepts of health: a study of health notions among Swedish occupational therapists and a suggestion for developing an instrument for comparative studies. Scand J Occup Ther. 2006;13:141–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batalden M, Batalden P, Margolis P, et al. Coproduction of healthcare service. BMJ Qual Safety. 2016;25:509–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson T, Björklund B. Health, the body and occupational therapy. Scand J Occup Ther. 2000;7:26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hughner RS, Kleine SS. Views of health in the lay sector: a compilation and review of how individuals think about health. Health (London). 2004;8:395–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton J. Lay experience of health and illness: past research and future agendas. Sociol Health Illn. 2003;25:23–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natapoff J. Children’s views of health: a developmental Study. Am J Public Health. 1978;68:995–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natapoff JN. A developmental analysis of children’s ideas of health. Health Educ Q. 1982;9:34–45.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt LR, Fröhling H. Lay conceptions of health and illness from a developmental perspective. Psychol Health. 2000;15:229–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly TT, McKellin W. Keeping healthy! Whose responsibility is it anyway? Vietnamese Canadian women and their healthcare providers' perspectives. Nurs Inq. 2007;14:2–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton J, Ahmad N, Peel E, et al. Contextualising accounts of illness: notions of responsibility and blame in white and South Asian respondents accounts of diabetes causation. Sociol Health Illn. 2007;29:891–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pill R, Nigel CHS. Choice or change: further evidence on ideas of illness and responsibility for health. Soc Sci Med. 1985;20:981–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pill R, Stott NCH. Concepts of illness causation and responsibility: some preliminary data from a sample of working class mothers. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16:43–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shye D, Javetz R, Shuval JT. Lay self-care in health: the views and perspectives of Israeli laypeople. Soc Sci Med. 1991;33:297–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp CL, Denton M. The allocation of responsibility for later life: Canadian reflections on the roles of individuals, government, employers and families. Aging Soc. 2003;23:737–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolanki O. Moral argumentation in talk about health and old age. Health (London). 2004;8:483–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolanki O. Discussing responsibility and ways of influencing health. IJAL. 2008;3:45–76.
   Google Scholar
• Gast HL. The Relationship Between Stages of Ego Development and Developmental Stages of Health Self Care Operations: Texas Woman’s University; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Kajanne A. Structure and content: The relationship between reflective judgment and laypeople’s viewpoints. J Adult Develop. 2003;10:173–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajanne A, Pirttila-Backman A-M. Laypeople’s viewpoints about the reasons for expert controversy regarding food additives. Public Underst Sci. 1999;8:303–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilley CS, Lawrence K, Bender A, et al. Maturity and adherence in adolescent and young adult heart recipients. Pediatr Transpl. 2006;10:323–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence K, Stilley CS, Olshansky E, et al. Further exploration: maturity and adherence in adolescent and young adult heart recipients. Prog Transpl. 2008;1:50–54.
   Google Scholar
• Kjellström S, Ross SN. Older persons reasoning about responsibility for health: variations and predictions. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2011;73:99–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson TL, Gabrielian S. Developing conceptions of authority and contract across the lifespan: two perspectives. Dev. Rev 2003;23:162–218.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan C. In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins JG, Greenwald R. Environmental attitudies conceptualized through developmental theory: a qualitative analysis. J. Social Issues. 1994;50:29–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kegan R. The evolving self: problem and process in human development. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Kegan R. In over Our Heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Loevinger J, Blasi A. Ego development: conceptions and theories. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1976. (Jossey-Bass behavioral science series,).
   Google Scholar
• Rybash JM, Roodin PA, Making decisions about health-care problems: a comparison of formal and postformal modes of competence. In: Commons ML, Sinnott JD, Richards FA, et al., editors. Adult development: comparisons and applications of developmental models. Vol. 1. New York: Praeger; 1989. p. 217–235.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson TL, Xie Y, Wilson M. Domain-general and domain-specific developmental assessments: do they measure the same thing? Cogn Devel. 2003;18:61–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjellström S. Ansvar, Hälsa Och Människa: En Studie Av Idéer Om Individens Ansvar För Sin Hälsa [Responsibility, health and the individual: a study of ideas on personal responsibility for health]. Linköping: Linköping University; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Silge J, Robinson D. Text mining with R: a tidy approach. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas J, McNaught J, Ananiadou S. Applications of text mining within systematic reviews. Res Syn Meth. 2011;2:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostoff RN, del Rio JA, Humenik JA, et al. Citation mining: Integrating text mining and bibliometrics for research user profiling. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 2001;52:1148–1156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ananiadou S, McNaught J. Text mining for biology and biomedicine. Boston and London: Artech House London; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen AM, Hersh WR. A survey of current work in biomedical text mining. Brief Bioinform. 2005;6:57–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W-T, Barbour R. Life priorities in the HIV-positive Asians: a text-mining analysis in young vs. old generation. AIDS Care 2017;29:507–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman R, Sanger J. The text mining handbook: advanced approaches in analyzing unstructured data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. New York: Springer; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Singh N, Hu C, Roehl WS. Text mining a decade of progress in hospitality human resource management research: identifying emerging thematic development. Int J Hosp Manage. 2007;26:131–147.
   Google Scholar
• Yu CH, Jannasch-Pennell A, DiGangi S. Compatibility between text mining and qualitative research in the perspectives of grounded theory, content analysis, and reliability. Qual Rep. 2011;16:730.
   Google Scholar
• Feinerer I, Hornik K. tm: Text Mining Package, 2014. URL http://CRAN R-project org/package=tm R package version 05-83[p 188]. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchet-Valat M. SnowballC: Snowball stemmers based on the C libstemmer UTF-8 library. R package version 05. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Team RC. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing, 2015; Vienna, Austria, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Golino HF, Demetriou A. estimating the dimensionality of intelligence like data using exploratory graph analysis. Intelligence. 2017;62:54–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golino HF. EGA package. 2016. URL https://github.com/hfgolino/EGA
   Google Scholar
• Epskamp S, Rhemtulla M, Borsboom D. Generalized network psychometrics: Combining network and latent variable models. arXiv preprint arXiv:160509288. 2016. doi: 10.1007/s11336-017-9557-x
   Google Scholar
• Pons P, Latapy M. Computing communities in large networks using random walks. JGAA. 2006;10:191–218.
   Google Scholar
• Golino HF, Epskamp S. Exploratory graph analysis: A new approach for estimating the number of dimensions in psychological research. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0174035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107:238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull. 1980;88:588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993. p. 136–162.
   Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdi H, Williams LJ. Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test. Encyclopedia of research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2010:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Satorra A, Bentler PM. A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika. 2001; 66: 507–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar