Critical dialogical approach: A methodological direction for occupation-based social transformative work

References

• Galheigo SM. Occupational therapy in the social field: concepts and critical considerations. In: Kronenberg F, Pollard N, Sakellariou D, editors. Occupational therapies without borders. Vol. 2. Edinburgh: Elsevier Science; 2011. p. 47–56.
   Google Scholar
• Galvaan R, Peters L. Open Education Resource: a strategy for occupation-based community development [Internet]; 2014. Accessed 18 April, 2018. Available from: https://vula.uct.ac.za/access/content/group/9c29ba04-b1ee-49b9-8c85-9a468b556ce2/OBCDF/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Kronenberg F, Pollard N, Sakellariou D. Occupational therapies without borders (volume 2): towards an ecology of occupation-based practices. Edinburgh: Elsevier Science; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Malfitano APS, Lopes RE, Magalhães L, et al. Social occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther. 2014;81:298–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard N, Sakellariou D, Kronenberg F. A political practice of occupational therapy. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Farias L, Laliberte Rudman D, Magalhães L. Illustrating the importance of critical epistemology to realize the promise of occupational justice. Occup Ther J Res. 2016;36:234–243.
   Google Scholar
• Frank G, Zemke R. Occupational therapy foundations for political engagement and social transformation. In: Pollard N, Sakellariou D, Kronenberg F, editors. A political practice of occupational therapy. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2008. p. 111–136.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez A, Puigvert L, Flecha R. Critical communicative methodology: informing real social transformation through research. ‎Qual Inq. 2011;17:235–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farias L. Advancing social transformation through occupation: a critical examination of epistemological foundations, discourses and contextual factors shaping research and practice [dissertation]. London: Western University at London; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman D. Situating occupation in social relations of power: occupational possibilities, ageism and the retirement ‘choice’. S Afr J Occup Ther. 2015;45:27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend E. Occupation: Potential for personal and social transformation. J Occup Sci. 1997;4:18–26.
   Google Scholar
• Watson R, Swartz L. Transformation through Occupation. London: Whurr Publishers Ltd; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Law M. Participation in the occupations of everyday life. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56:640–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer A. The philosophy of occupation therapy. Arch Occup Therapy. 1922;1(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock A. Reflections on doing, being and becoming. Can J Occup Ther. 1998;65:248–257.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard N, Sakellariou D. Politics of occupation-centred practice: reflections on occupational engagement across cultures. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Wilding C, Whiteford G. Occupation and occupational therapy: knowledge paradigms and everyday practice. Aust Occ Ther J. 2007;54:185–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bruggen H. Turning challenges into opportunities: how occupational therapy is contributing to social, health and educational reform. WFOT Bulletin. 2014;70:41–46.
   Google Scholar
• van Bruggen H. Mind the gap; addressing inequalities in health through occupation-based practices. In: Sakellariou D, Pollard N, editors. Occupational therapies without borders: integrating justice with practice. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier Science; 2016. p. 411–423.
   Google Scholar
• Rushford N, Thomas K. Disaster and development: an occupational perspective. London: Elsevier Science; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Barros D, Ghirardi MI, Lopes RE. Social occupational therapy: a social-historic perspective. In: Kronenberg F, Algado S, Pollard N, editors. Occupational therapies without borders: Learning from the spirit of survivor. London: Elsevier Science; 2005. p. 140–151.
   Google Scholar
• Sakellariou D, Pollard N. Occupational therapies without borders: integrating justice with practice. Edinburgh: Elsevier Science; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlach AJ. Sharpening our critical edge: occupational therapy in the context of marginalized populations. Can J Occup Ther. 2015;82:245–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteford GE, Townsend E. Participatory occupational justice framework (POJF 2010): enabling occupational participation and inclusion. In: Kronenberg F, Pollard N, Sakellariou D, editors. Occupational therapies without borders: towards an ecology of occupation- based practices 2. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2011. p. 65–84.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KR W. Reflections on.well-being and occupational on… well-being and occupational rights. Can J Occup Ther. 2008;75:61–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilcock A, Townsend E. Occupational terminology interactive dialogue. J Occup Sci. 2000;7:84–86.
   Google Scholar
• Galvaan R. Occupational choice: the significance of socio-economic and political factors. In: Whiteford GE, Hocking C, editors. Occupational science: society, inclusion, participation. West sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. p. 152–62.
   Google Scholar
• Fransen H, Pollard N, Kantartzis S, et al. Participatory citizenship: critical perspectives on client-centred occupational therapy. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22:260–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteford GE, Hocking C. Occupational science: society, inclusion and participation. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Magalhães L. What would Paulo Freire think of occupational science? In: Whiteford GE, Hocking C, editors. Occupational science: society, inclusion, participation. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. p. 8–19.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard N, Sakellariou D. The occupational therapist as a political being. Cad Ter Ocup UFSCar. 2014;22:1–10. Sao Carlos.
   Google Scholar
• Phelan SK. Constructions of disability: a call for critical reflexivity in occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther. 2011;78:164–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994. p. 105–17.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman D. Critical discourse analysis: adding a political dimension to inquiry. In: Cutchin MP, Dickie VA, editors. Transactional perspectives on occupation. New York, London: Springer; 2013. p. 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M. The will to knowledge - the history of sexuality (vol. 1). London: Penguin Books; 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M, Gordon C. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Cannella GS, Pérez MS, Pasque PA. Critical qualitative inquiry: foundations and futures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan P. Qualitative data analysis using a dialogical approach. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Poland B, Cavalcante F. Unmasking power relations: from interview research to dialogue for social change. Paper presented at: CQ Seminar Series; Centre for Critical Qualitative Health Research, University of Toronto; 2010 March 26; Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Freire P. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin M. The dialogic imagination: four essays. Holquist M, editor. Austin, London: University of Texas Press; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Shor I, Freire P. What is the “dialogical method” of teaching? J Educ. 1987;169:11–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe JL, McLaren P, Rethinking CT, qualitative R. In. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005. p. 303–42.
   Google Scholar
• Frank A. What is dialogical research, and why should we do it? Qual Health Res. 2005;15:964–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisto V. Bajtin y lo social: hacia la actividad dialógica heteroglósica [Bakhtin and the social: towards the heteroglyphic dialogical activity]. Athenea Digital. 2015;15(1):3–29
   Google Scholar
• Gibson BE. Rehabilitation: a post-critical approach. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Santos BdS, Nunes JA, Meneses MP. Opening up the canon of knowledge and recognition of difference. In: Santos BdS, editor. Another knowledge is possible: Beyond northern epistemologies. London, UK: Verso; 2007. p. xvix–lxii.
   Google Scholar
• Knight PT, Saunders MS. Understanding teachers’ professional cultures through interview: a constructivist approach. EvalResEduc. 1999;13:144–156.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley A. Interviewing women: a contradiction in terms. In: Roberts H, editor. Doing Feminist Research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1981. p. 30–61.
   Google Scholar
• Woods P. Inside schools: ethnography in education research. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan RC, Biklen SK. Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson Education; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Wengraf T. Qualitative research interviewing: biographic narrative and semistructured methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsella EA, Whiteford GE. Knowledge generation and utilisation in occupational therapy: towards epistemic reflexivity. Aust Occup Ther J. 2009;56:249–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagens V, Dobrow MJ, Chafe R. Interviewee transcript review: assessing the impact on qualitative research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin NK. The research act: a theoretical orientation to sociological methods. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Miller DL. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Practice. 2000;39:124–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2005. p. 191–216.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey L. Beyond member-checking: a dialogic approach to the research interview. Int J ResMethod Educ. 2015;38:23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Jones P, Bunce G, Evans J, et al. Walking interviews. J Res Practice. 2008;2:4.
   Google Scholar
• Karnieli-Miller O, Strier R, Pessach L. Power relations in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2009;19:279–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahnke LM, Asher A. The problem of data: data management and curation practices among university researchers. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lin L. Data management and security in qualitative research. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2009;28:127–132.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord. 2006;45:124–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman D, Dennhardt S, Fok D, et al. A vision for occupational science: reflecting on our disciplinary culture. J Occup Sci. 2008;15(3):136–46.
   Google Scholar