The unsustainability of occupational based model diagrams

References

• Godin B. Models of innovation: the history of an idea. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch M. Pictures of nothing? Visual construals in social theory. Sociol Theory. 1991;9:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Latour B, Woolgar S. Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon PD. The work-play model: a basis for occupational therapy programming in psychiatry. Am J Occup Ther. 1970;24:215–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King LJ. Toward a science of adaptive responses: Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture. Am J Occup Ther. 1978;32:429–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountford W. Modern concepts of occupational therapy. Int J Nurs Stud. 1969;6:205–216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• School of Allied Medical Professions. Occupational therapy curriculum guides developed through a task analysis procedure: development of occupational therapy job descriptions and curricula through task analysis. Columbus (OH): Ohio State University; 1972.
   Google Scholar
• American Occupational Therapy Association. Uniform terminology for occupational therapy–second edition. Am J Occup Ther. 1989;43:808–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borst MJ, Nelson DL. Use of uniform terminology by occupational therapists. Am J Occup Ther. 1993;47:611–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid H, Hocking C, Smythe L. The making of occupation-based models and diagrams: history and semiotic analysis. Can J Occup Ther. Forthcoming [cited 2018]; 1–14
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen CH, Baum CM, Bass JD. Occupational therapy: performance, participation, and well-being. 4th ed. Philadelphia: SLACK; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Reed KL, Sanderson SN. Concepts of occupational therapy. 2nd ed. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Haglund L, Ekbladh E, Thorell L, et al. Practice Models in Swedish Psychiatric occupational therapy practice models in Swedish psychiatric occupational therapy. Scand J Occup Ther. 2000;7:107–113.
   Google Scholar
• Vermaak ME, Nel M. From paper to practice – academics and practitioners working together in enhancing the use of occupational therapy conceptual models. South African J Occup Ther. 2016;46:35–40.
   Google Scholar
• Joosten AV. Contemporary occupational therapy: our occupational therapy models are essential to occupation centred practice. Aust Occup Ther J. 2015;62:219–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boniface G, Fedden T, Hurst H, et al. Using theory to underpin an integrated occupational therapy service through the Canadian Model of Occupational. Br J Occup Ther. 2008;71:531–539.
   Google Scholar
• Ashby S, Chandler B. An exploratory study of the occupation-focused models included in occupational therapy professional education programmes. Br J Occup Ther. 2010;73:616–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong SR, Fisher G. Comparing and using occupation-focused models. Occup Ther Heal Care. 2015;29:297–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. An overview of research on the Model of Human Occupation. Can J Occup Ther. 1984;51:59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking C. Objects in the environment: a critique of the model of human occupation dimensions. Scand J Occup Ther. 1994;1:77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Pan A-W, Fan C-W, Chung L, et al. Examining the validity of the Model of Human Occupation Screening Tool: using classical test theory and item response theory. Br J Occup Ther. 2011;74:34–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J. Achieving best practice: a review of evidence linked to occupation-focused practice models. Occup Ther Heal Care. 2010;24:206–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gold M. Metatheory and field theory in social psychology: relevance or elegance? J Soc Issues. 1992;48:67–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert JK, Boulter C, Rutherford M. Models in explanations, Part 1: horses for courses? Int J Sci Educ. 1998;20:83–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekkers R. Applied systems theory [Internet]. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 1–257.
   Google Scholar
• Egan M, Delaat MD. Considering spirituality in occupational therapy practice. Can J Occup Ther. 1994;61:95–101.
   Google Scholar
• Polatajko HJ, Davis J, Stewart D, et al. Specifying the domain of concern: occupation as core. In: Townsend E, Polatajko H, editors. Enabling Occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, & justice through occupation. Ottawa (ON): CAOT Publications; 2007. p. 13–36.
   Google Scholar
• Joubert R. Exploring the history of occupational therapy’s development in South Africa to reveal the flaws in our knowledge base. South African J Occup Ther. 2010;40:21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsella EA, Whiteford GE. Knowledge generation and utilisation in occupational therapy: towards epistemic reflexivity. Aust Occup Ther J. 2009;56:249–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters CO. Powerful occupational therapists: a community of professionals, 1950-1980. Occup Ther Ment Heal. 2011;27:199–410.
   Google Scholar
• Smith V. Energizing everyday practices through the indigenous spirituality of haka. J Occup Sci. 2017;24:9–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill HN. Māori and the natural environment from an occupational justice perspective. J Occup Sci. 2017;24:19–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baillie CP, Johnson AM, Drane S, et al. For the community, by the community: working with youth to understand the physical activity-environment relationship in First Nations communities. Youth Engagem Heal Promot. 2016;1:1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Tinsley HEA. The congruence myth: an analysis of the efficacy of the person–environment fit model. J Vocat Behav. 2000;56:147–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad KZ. Person-environment fit: a critical review of the previous studies and a proposal for future research. Int J Psychol Stud. 2010;2:71–78.
   Google Scholar
• Folina J. Pictures, proofs, and “mathematical practice”: reply to James Robert Brown. Br J Philos Sci. 1999;50:425–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickie V, Cutchin MP, Humphry R. Occupation as transactional experience: a critique of individualism in occupational science. J Occup Sci. 2006;13:83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin MP, Dickie V, Humphry R. Transaction versus interpretation, or transaction and interpretation? A response to Michael Barber. J Occup Sci. 2006;13:97–99.
   Google Scholar
• Humphry R, Wakeford L. Educational implications of taking a transactional perspective of occupation in practice. In: Cutchin M, Dickie V, editors. Transactional perspective on occupation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 2013. p. 215–228.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen C. Classification and study in occupation a review and discussion of taxonomies. J Occup Sci. 1994;1:3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen CH, Backman C, Little BR, et al. Occupations and well-being: a study of personal projects. Am J Occup Ther. 1999;53:91–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn W, Brown C, McGuigan A. The ecology of human performance: a framework for considering the effect of context. Am J Occup Ther. 1994;48:595–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum CM, Christiansen CH, Bass JD. The Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance (PEOP) model. In: Christiansen CH, Baum CM, Bass JD, editors. Occupational therapy: performance, participation and well-being. 4th ed. Thorofare (NJ): SLACK; 2015. p. 47–55.
   Google Scholar
• Sebeok TA. Signs: an introduction to semiotics. 2nd ed. Toronto (ON): University of Toronto Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler D. Semiotics: the basics. 3rd ed. London, England: Routledge; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Chin C. Models as interpreters (with a case study from pain science). Stud Hist Philos Sci Part A. 2011;42:303–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knuuttila T. Modelling and representing: an artefactual approach to model-based representation. Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2011;42:262–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neisser U. Cognitive pscyhology. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Butts DS, Nelson DL. Agreement between occupational therapy practice framework classifications and occupational therapists’ classifications. Am J Occup Ther. 2007;61:512–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diasio K. Occupational therapy in mental health. Occup Ther Ment Heal. 1980;1:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Lee SW, Kielhofner G, Morley M, et al. Impact of using the Model of Human Occupation: a survey of occupational therapy mental health practitioners’ perceptions. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19:450–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerxa EJ. Oversimplification: the hobgoblin of theory and practice in occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther. 1998;55:5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg R. Can you visualize theory? On the use of visual thinking in theory pictures, theorizing diagrams, and visual sketches. Sociol Rev. 2016;34:250–275.
   Google Scholar
• Jones M, Hocking C, McPherson K. Communities with participation-enabling skills: a study of children with traumatic brain injury and their shared occupations. J Occup Sci. 2017;24:88–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransen H, Pollard N, Kantartzis S, et al. Participatory citizenship: critical perspectives on client-centred occupational therapy. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22:260–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright-St Clair VA, Nayar S. Older Asian immigrants’ participation as cultural enfranchisement. J Occup Sci. 2017;24:64–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Sacred texts: a sceptical exploration of the assumptions underpinning theories of occupation. Can J Occup Ther. 2009;76:6–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Dimensions of meaning in the occupations of daily life. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71:296–305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weinblatt N, Avrech-Bar M. Postmodernism and its application to the field of occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther. 2001;68:164–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humberstone IL. Direction of fit. Mind. 1992;101:59–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidegger M, Hofstadter translated by A. Poetry, language, thought. New York: Harper Collins; 1971.
   Google Scholar